Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri

Hatice ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY, (Başkent Üniversitesi)
Mirace Yasemin KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi)
Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri
11 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 111 - 128 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5152/trs.2019.793 İndeks Tarihi: 04-05-2020

Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. Sandrasegaran K, Lin C, Akisik FM, Tann M. State-ofthe-art pancreatic MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 42-53. [CrossRef]
  • [2]. Patel BN Routine MR Imaging for Pancreas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26: 315-22.
  • [3]. Tirkes T, Menias CO, Sandrasegaran K. MR imaging techniques for pancreas. Radiol Clin North Am 2012; 50: 379-93. [CrossRef]
  • [4]. Coppens E, Metens T, Winant C, Matos C. Pineapple juice labeled with gadolinium: a convenient oral contrast for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 2122-9. [CrossRef]
  • [5]. Barth MM, Smith MP, Pedrosa I, Lenkinski RE, Rofsky NM. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges. Radiographics 2007; 27: 1445-62. [CrossRef]
  • [6]. Erturk SM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Herrmann KA, Marti-Bonmati L, Ros PR. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen. Radiographics 2009; 29(6):1547-63. [CrossRef]
  • [7]. Merkle EM, Dale BM. Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1524-32. [CrossRef]
  • [8]. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics 2008; 28: 1983-98. [CrossRef]
  • [9]. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2007; 15: 277-90. [CrossRef]
  • [10]. de Bazelaire CM, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, Alsop DC. MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 2004; 230: 652-9. [CrossRef]
  • [11]. Glockner JF, Hu HH, Stanley DW, Angelos L, King K. Parallel MR imaging: a user's guide. Radiographics 2005; 25: 1279-97. [CrossRef]
  • [12]. Deshmane A, Gulani V, Griswold MA, Seiberlich N. Parallel MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 55-72. [CrossRef]
  • [13]. Elster AD. How much contrast is enough? Dependence of enhancement on field strength and MR pulse sequence. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 276-80. [CrossRef]
  • [14]. Isoda H, Kataoka M, Maetani Y, Kido A, Umeoka S, Tamai K, et al. MRCP imaging at 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T: preliminary experience in healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1000-6. [CrossRef]
  • [15]. Kim SY, Byun JH, Lee SS, Park SH, Jang YJ, Lee MG. Biliary tract depiction in living potential liver donors: intraindividual comparison of MR cholangiography at 3.0 and 1.5 T. Radiology 2010; 254: 469-78. [CrossRef]
  • [16]. Onishi H, Kim T, Hori M, Murakami T, Tatsumi M, Nakaya Y, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography at 3.0 T: intraindividual comparative study with MR cholangiopancreatography at 1.5 T for clinical patients. Invest Radiol 2009; 44: 559-65. [CrossRef]
  • [17]. Edelman RR, Salanitri G, Brand R, Dunkle E, Ragin A, Li W, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the pancreas at 3.0 tesla: qualitative and quantitative comparison with 1.5 tesla. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 175-80. [CrossRef]
  • [18]. Weigel M, Hennig J. Contrast behavior and relaxation effects of conventional and hyperecho-turbo spin echo sequences at 1.5 and 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2006; 55: 826-35. [CrossRef]
  • [19]. Martín J, Sentis M, Puig J, Rué M, Falcó J, Donoso L, et al. Comparison of inphase and opposed-phase GRE and conventional SE MR pulse sequences in T1-weighted imaging of liver lesions. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 20: 890-7. [CrossRef]
  • [20]. Grimm A, Meyer H, Nickel MD, Nittka M, Raithel E, Chaudry O, et al. Evaluation of 2-point, 3-point, and 6- point Dixon magnetic resonance imaging with flexible echo timing for muscle fat quantification. Eur J Radiol 2018; 103: 57-64. [CrossRef]
  • [21]. Reeder SB, Wen Z, Yu H, Pineda AR, Gold GE, Markl M, Multicoil Dixon chemical species separation with an iterative least squares estimation method. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 35-45. [CrossRef]
  • [22]. Patel BN, Gupta RT, Zani S, Jeffrey RB, Paulson EK, Nelson RC. How the radiologist can add value in the evaluation of the pre- and postsurgical pancreas. Abdom Imaging 2015; 40: 2932-44. [CrossRef]
  • [23]. Raman SP, Hruban RH, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Fishman EK. Pancreatic imaging mimics: part 2, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and their mimics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012; 199: 309-18. [CrossRef]
  • [24]. Lee SS, Byun JH, Hong HS, Park SH, Won HJ, Shin YM, et al. Image quality and focal lesion detection on T2-weighted MR imaging of the liver: comparison of two high-resolution free breathing imaging techniques with two breath-hold imaging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 323-30. [CrossRef]
  • [25]. Nanko S, Oshima H, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, Hara M, Shibamoto Y. Usefulness of the application of the BLADE technique to reduce motion artifacts on navigation-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 30: 321-6. [CrossRef]
  • [26]. Hirokawa Y, Isoda H, Maetani YS, Arizono S, Shimada K, Togashi K. Evaluation of motion correctioneffect andimagequality with the periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction (PROPELLER) (BLADE) and parallel imaging acquisition technique in the upper abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 957-62. [CrossRef]
  • [27]. Siddiqui N, Vendrami CL, Chatterjee A, Miller FH. Advanced MR Imaging Techniques for Pancreas Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26: 323-44. [CrossRef]
  • [28]. Ichikawa T, Erturk SM, Motosugi U, Sou H, Iino H, Araki T, et al. High-b value diffusion-weighted MRI for detecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma: preliminary results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 409-14. [CrossRef]
  • [29]. Fukukura Y, Shindo T, Hakamada H, Takumi K, Umanodan T, Nakajo M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: optimizing b-value for visualization of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Eur Radiol 2016; 26: 3419-27. [CrossRef]
  • [30]. Qayyum A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics 2009; 29: 1797-810. [CrossRef]
  • [31]. Koh DM, Takahara T, Imai Y, Collins DJ. Practical aspects of assessing tumors using clinical diffusion weighted imaging in the body. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007; 6: 211-24. [CrossRef]
  • [32]. Patterson DM, Padhani AR, Collins DJ. Technology insight: water diffusion MRI-a potential new biomarker of response to cancer therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2008; 5: 220-33. [CrossRef]
  • [33]. Barral M, Taouli B, Guiu B, Koh DM, Luciani A, Manfredi R, et al (2015) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the pancreas: current status and recommendations. Radiology; 274: 45-63. [CrossRef]
  • [34]. Wallner BK, Schumacher KA, Weidenmaier W, Friedrich JM. Dilated biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography with a T2-weighted contrast-enhanced fast sequence. Radiology 1991; 181: 805-8. [CrossRef]
  • [35]. Aytekin Oto. Abdomen MRG sekanslarının fizik prensipleri ve klinik uygulamaları. İçinde :Gövde Manyetik Rezonans. TMRD 2005. s.1-3.
  • [36]. Patel BN. Routine MR Imaging for Pancreas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2018; 26: 315-22. [CrossRef]
  • [37]. Selçuk D AB. Safra kanalları, safra kesesi ve pankreasın MR görüntülenmesi İçinde: Olgun DÇ. Tüm Vücut MRG İstanbul: İstanbul medikal yayıncılık.
  • [38]. Nam JG, Lee JM, Kang HJ, Lee SM, Kim E , Peeters JM, et al. GRASE Revisited: breath-hold three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3T. Eur Radiol 2018; 28: 3721-8. [CrossRef]
  • [39]. Ayşe Erden. MRKP. İçinde :Gövde Manyetik Rezonans. TMRD. 2005. s.29-38.
  • [40]. Tez: Erdem U. Koledokolitiazis tanısında Manyetik Rezonans Kolanjiopankreatografi ve Manyetik Rezonans True-FISP sekansının karşılaştırılması. T.C. Sağlık Bilimleri Üniverstesi, Hamidiye Şişli Etfal Sağlık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi. 2019.
  • [41]. Ünal E, Akata D, Karcaaltincaba M. Liver function assessment by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2016; 37: 549-60. [CrossRef]
  • [42]. A. Cieszanowski, A. Stadnik, A. Lezak. Detection of active bile leak with Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison of 20-25 min delayed and 60-180 min delayed images. Eur J Radiol 2013; 82: 2176-82. [CrossRef]
  • [43]. Stelter L, Freyhardt P , Grieser C, Walter T, Geisel D, Baur A, et al. An increased flip angle in late phase Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI shows improved performance in bile duct visualization compared to T2w-MRCP. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 1723-7. [CrossRef]
  • [44]. Palmucci P, Roccasalva F, Piccoli M, Fuccio Sanzà G, Foti PV, Ragozzino A et al. Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Practical Tips and Clinical Indications for Biliary Disease Management. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 1-11. [CrossRef]
  • [45]. M. Kantarcı, B. Pirimoglu, N. Karabulut N, Bayraktutan U, Ogul H, Ozturk G, et al. Non-invasive detection of biliary leaks using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR cholangiography: comparison with T2-weighted MR cholangiography. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 2713-22. [CrossRef]
  • [46]. Anupindi SA, Victoria T. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2008; 16: 453-66. [CrossRef]
APA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H, KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M (2019). Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. , 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
Chicago ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY Hatice,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ Mirace Yasemin Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. (2019): 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
MLA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY Hatice,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ Mirace Yasemin Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. , 2019, ss.111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
AMA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. . 2019; 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
Vancouver ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. . 2019; 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
IEEE ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M "Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri." , ss.111 - 128, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
ISNAD ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY, Hatice - KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ, Mirace Yasemin. "Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri". (2019), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.793
APA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H, KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M (2019). Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7(2), 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
Chicago ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY Hatice,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ Mirace Yasemin Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7, no.2 (2019): 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
MLA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY Hatice,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ Mirace Yasemin Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, vol.7, no.2, 2019, ss.111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
AMA ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(2): 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
Vancouver ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(2): 111 - 128. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
IEEE ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY H,KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ M "Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri." Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7, ss.111 - 128, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.793
ISNAD ÖZTÜRKMEN AKAY, Hatice - KARDENİZ BİLGİLİ, Mirace Yasemin. "Pankreas MR Görüntüleme Çekim Protokolleri". Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7/2 (2019), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.793
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:29

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları