Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar

Dilek OĞUZ (Kırıkkale Üniversitesi)
Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri
5 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 261 - 293 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.5152/trs.2019.1447 İndeks Tarihi: 04-05-2020

Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar

Öz:
-
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Radyoloji, Nükleer Tıp, Tıbbi Görüntüleme
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • [1]. Barth BA, Burdick SJ. Anatomy, Histology, Embryology, and Developmental Anomalies of the Pancreas. In: Sleisenger and Fordrant's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 9. Edition. Feldman M, Friedman LS, Brandt LJ, Eds. Phledelphia 2010, Saunders, Ch 55,pp. 909,19. [CrossRef]
  • [2]. Todokoro H, Takase M, Nobukawa B. Development and Congenital Anomalies of the Pancreas. Anatomy Research International. Anatomy Research International 2011; 351217.
  • [3]. Cano DA, Hebrok M, Zenker M. Pancreatic Development and Disease. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 745-62. [CrossRef]
  • [4]. Etienne D, John A, Menias CO, Ward R, Tubbs RS, Loukas M, et al. Annular pancreas: A review of its molecular embriyology, genetic basis and clinical considerations. Ann Anatomy 2012; 194: 422-8. [CrossRef]
  • [5]. Alexander LF. Congenital Pancreatic Anomalies, Variants and Conditions. Radiol Clin N Am 2012; 50: 487-98. [CrossRef]
  • [6]. Topazian M. Pancreas Divisum and Other Pancreatobiliary Anomalies. In: ERCP. Baron T, Kozarek R, Carr-Locke DL Eds.Saunders, Phyledelphia 2008; Ch 42: 446-58. [CrossRef]
  • [7]. Ioannis Dimitriou J, Katsouraki A, Nikolaidou E, Noussios G. The Main Anatomical Variations of the Pancreatic Duct System: Review of the Literature and Its Importance in Surgical Practice. J Clin Med Res 2018; 10: 370-5. [CrossRef]
  • [8]. Kamisawa T, Takuma K et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of pancreatobiliary maljunction. World J Gastrointestinal Endosc 2011; 3: 1-5. [CrossRef]
  • [9] Oguz D, Şahin B. Safra yollarının kistik hastalıkları. ERCP Editörler: Erkan Parlak, Burhan Şahin. 1. Baskı, 2012; Bölüm (36):294-313.
  • [10]. Van Geenen EJ, van der Peet DL, Bhagirath P, Mulder CJ, Bruno MJ. Etiology and diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 7: 495-502. [CrossRef]
  • [11]. Van Erpecum KJ. Compliacations of bile duct stones: acute cholangitisand pancreatitis. Best Practice&Research Clinical Gastroenterology 2006; 20: 1139-52. [CrossRef]
  • [12]. Vinay Chandrasekhara, MD, Krishnavel V. Prepared by: asge standards of practice committee. The role of endoscopy in benign pancreatic disease. GIE 2015; 82: 203-14. [CrossRef]
  • [13]. Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M. Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 1037-45. [CrossRef]
  • [14]. Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1414-22. [CrossRef]
  • [15]. Pfau PR, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Desilets DJ, Kaul V, Kethu SR, et al. Sphincter of Oddi manometry. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 1175-80. [CrossRef]
  • [16]. Braganza JM, Lee SH, McCloy RF, McMahon MJ. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet 2011; 377: 1184-97. [CrossRef]
  • [17]. Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A, Curioni S, Lomazzi A, Dinelli M, et al. Complications of diagnostic therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 417-20. [CrossRef]
  • [18]. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, et al. Risk factors for post ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-47. [CrossRef]
  • [19]. Sarner M, Cotton PB. Classification of chronic pancreatitis. Gut 1984; 25: 756-9. [CrossRef]
  • [20]. Axon AT, Classen M, Cotton PB, Cremer M, Freeny PC, Lees WR. Pancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: international definitions. Gut 1984; 25: 110712. [CrossRef]
  • [21]. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL, Barnett J, Freeman M, Geenen J, et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-47. [CrossRef]
  • [22]. Tamura R, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S. Chronic pancreatitis: MRCP versus ERCP for quantitative caliber measurement and qualitative evalution. Radiology 2006; 238: 920-7. [CrossRef]
  • [23]. Löhr JM, Dominguez-Munoz E, Rosendahl J, Besselink M, Mayerle J, Lerch MM, et al. United European Gastroenterology evidence based guidelines for the diagnosis and therapy of chronic pancreatitis (HaPanEU). United European Gastroenterol J 2017; 5: 153-99. [CrossRef]
  • [24]. Madhani K, Farrell JJ. Management of Autoimmune Pancreatitis Gastrointest Endoscopy. Clin N Am 2018; 28: 493-519. [CrossRef]
  • [25]. Raina A, Yadav D, Krasinskas AM, McGrath KM, Khalid A, Sanders M, et al. Evaluation and management of autoimmune pancreatitis: experience at a large US center. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2295-306. [CrossRef]
  • [26]. Takuma K, Kamisawa T, Tabata T, Inaba Y, Egawa N, Igarashi Y. Utility of pancreatography for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 2332-7. [CrossRef]
  • [27]. Nishino T, Oyama H, Toki F, Shiratori K. Differentiation between autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma based on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography findings. Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 988-96. [CrossRef]
  • [28]. Oguz D. Otoimmun pankreatitte ERCP bulguları. ERCP Editörler: Erkan Parlak, Burhan Şahin. 1. Baskı 2012; Bölüm (46): 379-86.
  • [29]. Maire F, Couvelard A, Hammel P, Ponsot P, Palazzo L, Aubert A, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: the preoperative value of cytologic and histopathologic diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58: 701-6. [CrossRef]
  • [30]. Prepared by: Asge Standards Of Practice Committee. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of patients with solid pancreatic neoplasia. GIE 2016; 83: 17-28.
  • [31]. Isenberg G, Gouma DJ, Pisters PW. The on-going debate about perioperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 310-5.
  • [32]. De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL, Cramer H, Chappo J, McHenry L Jr, et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1). Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 552-61. [CrossRef]
  • [33]. Layfield LJ, Ehya H, Filie AC, Hruban RH, Jhala N, Joseph L, et al. Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 2014; 42: 351-62. [CrossRef]
  • [34]. Prepared by: Asge Standards Of Practice Committee. The role of endoscopy in ampullary and duodenal adenomas. GIE 2015; 82: 775-81.
  • [35]. Tringali A, Lemmers A, Meves V, Terheggen G, Pohl J, Manfredi G, et al. Intraductal biliopancreatic imaging: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technology review. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 739-53. [CrossRef]
  • [36]. Arnelo U, Siiki A, Swahn F, Segersvärd R, Enochsson L, del Chiaro M, et al. Single-operator pancreatoscopy is helpful in the evaluation of suspected intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN). Pancreatology 2014; 14: 510-4. [CrossRef]
  • [37]. Miura T, Igarashi Y, Okano N, Miki K, Okubo Y, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas by means of peroral pancreatoscopy using a small-diameter videoscope and narrowband imaging. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 119-23. [CrossRef]
  • [38]. Yasuda K, Sakata M, Ueda M, Uno K, Nakajima M. The use of pancreatoscopy in the diagnosis of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor lesions of the pancreas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3: 53-7. [CrossRef]
  • [39]. Hara T, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, Tsuyuguchi T, Kondo F, Kato K, et al. Diagnosis and patient management of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas by using peroral pancreatoscopy and intraductal ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 34-43. [CrossRef]
  • [40]. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post- ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-8. [CrossRef]
  • [41]. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 143-9.e9. [CrossRef]
  • [42]. Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S, Testoni PA. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-4. [CrossRef]
  • [43]. Vinay Chandrasekhara V, Khashab MA. Prepared by: asge standards of practice committee. Adverse events associated with ERCP. GIE 2017; 85: 32-47. [CrossRef]
  • [44]. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 80-8. [CrossRef]
  • [45]. Rustagi T, Jamidar PA. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyrelated adverse events: general overview. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2015; 25: 97-106. [CrossRef]
  • [46]. Silviera ML, Seamon MJ, Porshinsky B, Prosciak MP, Doraiswamy VA, Wang CF, et al. Complications related to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a comprehensive clinical review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2009; 18: 73-82.
  • [47]. Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 2012; 13: 18-25.
  • [48]. Michailidis L, Aslam B, Grigorian A, Mardini H. The efficacy of endoscopic therapy for pancreas divisum: a meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol 2017; 30: 550-8. [CrossRef]
  • [49]. Petersen BT. Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, part 2: Evidence-based review of the presentations, with "objective" pancreatic findings (types I and II) and of presumptive type III. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 670-87. [CrossRef]
  • [50]. Morgan D. Endoscopic stent therapy in advanced chronic pancreatitis: relationships between ductal changes, clinical response, and stent patency. Am J Gastroenterol 2003; 98: 821-6. [CrossRef]
  • [51]. Seza K, Yamaguchi T, Ishihara T, Tadenema H, Tawada K, Saisho H, et al. A long-term controlled trial of endoscopic pancreatic stenting for treatment of main pancreatic duct stricture in chronic pancreatitis. Hepatogastroenterology 2011; 58: 2128-31.
  • [52]. Delhaye M, Arvanitakis M, Verset G, Cremer M, Devière J. Long-term clinical outcome after endos copic pancreatic ductal drainage for patients with painful chronic pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004; 2: 1096-106. [CrossRef]
  • [53]. Bracher GA, Manocha AP, DeBanto JR, Gates LK Jr, Slivka A, Whitcomb DC, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic duct stenting to treat pancreatic ascites. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 710-5. [CrossRef]
  • [54]. Bashir S. Endosonography today: An overview. J Dig Endosc 2016; 7: 98-103. [CrossRef]
  • [55]. Pungpapong S, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, Noh KW, Raimondo M. Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography for the Diagnosis of Chronic Pancreatitis A Prospective Comparison Study. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 88-93. [CrossRef]
  • [56]. De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23: 367-74. [CrossRef]
  • [57]. Vila JJ, Vicuna M, Irisarri R, de la Higuera BG, Ruiz-Clavijo D, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez C, et al. Diagnostic yield and reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 375-81. [CrossRef]
  • [58]. Wilcox CM, Seay T, Kim H, Varadarajulu S. Prospective endoscopic ultrasound- based approach to the evaluation of idiopathic pancreatitis: causes, response to therapy, and long-term outcome. Am J Gastroenterol 2016; 111: 1339-48. [CrossRef]
  • [59]. Thevenot A, Bournet B, Otal P, Canevet G, Moreau J, Buscail L. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci 2013; 58: 2361-8. [CrossRef]
  • [60]. Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M, Romagnuolo J, Wiersema M, Brugge W, et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1251-61. [CrossRef]
  • [61]. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 2017; 67: 7-30. [CrossRef]
  • [62]. Lai R, Stanley MW, Bardales R, Linzie B, Mallery S. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002;34:715-20., Lai R, Stanley MW, Bardales R, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic duct aspiration: diagnostic yield and safety. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 715-20. [CrossRef]
  • [63]. Anderson MA, Carpenter S, Thompson NW, Nostrant TT, Elta GH, Scheiman JM. Endoscopic ultrasound is highly accurate and directs management in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 22717. [CrossRef]
  • [64]. The European Study Group on Cystic Tumours of the Pancreas. European evidence-based guidelines on pancreatic cystic neoplasms. Gut 2018; 67: 789-804. [CrossRef]
  • [65]. Hruban RH, Kloeppel G, Bofetta P. Tumours of the pancreas; in Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH (eds): WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System (ed 4). Lyon, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010, pp 280-330.
  • [66]. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cysts. Am J Gastroenterol advance online publication, 27 February 2018; doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.14. [CrossRef]
  • [67]. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee, Muthusamy VR, Chandrasekhara V, Acosta RD, Bruining DH, Chathadi KV, Eloubeidi MA, et al. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic pancreatic neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 84: 1-9. [CrossRef]
  • [68]. Levy P, Rebours V. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cystic Lesions of the Pancreas Visc Med 2018; 34: 192-6. [CrossRef]
  • [69]. Khashab MA, Kim K, Lennon AM, Shin EJ, Tignor AS, Amateau SK, et al. Should we do EUS/FNA on patients with pancreatic cysts? Th e incremental diagnostic yield of EUS over/MRI for prediction of cystic neoplasms. Pancreas 2013; 42: 717-21. [CrossRef]
  • [70]. Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand B, Boustière C, Giovannini M, Pujol B, et al. Learning, techniques and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guideline. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 190-205. [CrossRef]
  • [71]. Iglesias-Garcia J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Endoscopic ultrasound image enhancement elastography. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2012; 22: 33348. [CrossRef]
  • [72]. Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20: 260-74. [CrossRef]
  • [73]. Kitano M, Yamashita Y. New Imaging Techniquesfor Endoscopic Ultrasonography Contrast-Enhanced Endoscopic Ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endoscopy Clin N Am 2017; 27: 569-83. [CrossRef]
APA OĞUZ D (2019). Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. , 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
Chicago OĞUZ Dilek Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. (2019): 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
MLA OĞUZ Dilek Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. , 2019, ss.261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
AMA OĞUZ D Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. . 2019; 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
Vancouver OĞUZ D Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. . 2019; 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
IEEE OĞUZ D "Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar." , ss.261 - 293, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
ISNAD OĞUZ, Dilek. "Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar". (2019), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.1447
APA OĞUZ D (2019). Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7(2), 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
Chicago OĞUZ Dilek Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7, no.2 (2019): 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
MLA OĞUZ Dilek Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, vol.7, no.2, 2019, ss.261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
AMA OĞUZ D Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(2): 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
Vancouver OĞUZ D Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar. Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri. 2019; 7(2): 261 - 293. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
IEEE OĞUZ D "Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar." Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri, 7, ss.261 - 293, 2019. 10.5152/trs.2019.1447
ISNAD OĞUZ, Dilek. "Pankreas: Tanı ve Tedavide Endoskopik Yaklaşımlar". Türk Radyoloji Seminerleri 7/2 (2019), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.5152/trs.2019.1447
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
03-04-2024 17:23

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları