The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus

AYGÜN, MURAT

doi:10.3906/fiz-1906-8

The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus

Murat AYGÜN (Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi)

Turkish Journal of Physics

1 0

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 44 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 39 - 48 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/fiz-1906-8 İndeks Tarihi: 04-05-2020

The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus

Öz:

In the present study, I investigate the effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton haloprojectile. For this purpose, I evaluate two different fusion reactions, 8 B + 28 Si and 8 B +58 Ni, in the availableliterature. I apply two different nuclear potentials as a function of temperature. I calculate both fusion cross-sectionsand nuclear potentials for both reactions and I then compare the theoretical results with the experimental data. Thiscomparison provides an opportunity for a test of different temperature-dependent potentials in explaining the fusioncross-sections with the 8 B halo nucleus.

Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Fizik, Uygulamalı Fizik, Katı Hal Fizik, Atomik ve Moleküler Kimya Fizik, Akışkanlar ve Plazma Fizik, Nükleer Fizik, Matematik Fizik, Partiküller ve Alanlar

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık

[1] Rashdan M, Faessler A, Ismail M, Ohtsuka N. The temperature dependence of the Hi optical potential. Nuclear Physics A 1987; 468: 168-176. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(87)90322-8
[2] Guo-Qiang L, Gong-Ou X. Optical potential and the fusion barrier of two hot nuclei. Physical Review C 1990; 41: 169. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.41.169
[3] Amador-Valenzuela P, Aguilera EF, Martinez-Quiroz E, Lizcano D, Belyaeva TL et al. Mapping σp into σfus for the 8 B + 58 Ni system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2014; 492: 012003. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/492/1/012003
[4] Pakou A, Stiliaris E, Pierroutsakou D, Alamanos N, Boiano A et al. Fusion cross sections of 8 B+ 28 Si at near-barrier energies. Physical Review C 2013; 87: 014619. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.87.014619
[5] Aguilera EF, Amador-Valenzuela P, Martinez-Quiroz E, Fernández-Arnáiz J, Kolata JJ et al. Above-barrier fusion enhancement of proton-halo systems. Physical Review C 2016; 93: 034613. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.93.034613
[6] Aguilera EF, Amador-Valenzuela P, Martinez-Quiroz E, Lizcano D, Rosales P et al. Near-barrier fusion of the 8 B +58 Ni proton-halo system. Physical Review Letters 2011; 107: 092701. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.092701
[7] Gómez-Camacho A, Aguilera EF, Lubian J, Gomes PRS. Simultaneous χ2 -analysis of near-barrier fusion and elastic scattering for the proton-halo system 8 B +58 Ni using dynamical Woods–Saxon polarization potentials. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 2013; 40: 035103. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/40/3/035103
[8] Tomasi E, Chen XS, Leray S, Ngô C, Barranco M et al. Calculation of interaction potentials between two heavy ions at finite temperature. Nuclear Physics A 1982; 389: 69-79. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(82)90291-3
[9] Bansal M, Chopra S, Gupta RK, Kumar R, Sharma MK. Dynamical cluster-decay model using various formulations of a proximity potential for compact non-coplanar nuclei: Application to the 64 Ni +100 Mo reaction. Physical Review C 2012; 86: 034604. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034604
[10] Salehi M, Ghodsi ON. The influence of the dependence of surface energy coefficient to temperature in the proximity model. Chinese Physics Letters 2013; 30: 042502. doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/30/4/042502
[11] Sauer G, Chandra H, Mosel U. Thermal properties of nuclei. Nuclear Physics A 1976; 264: 221-243. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90429-2
[12] Shlomo S, Natowitz JB. Temperature and mass dependence of level density parameter. Physical Review C 1991; 44: 2878. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.44.2878
[13] Gharaei R, Zanganeh V. Temperature-dependent potential in cluster-decay process. Nuclear Physics A 2016; 952: 28-40. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.04.001
[14] Satchler GR. Direct Nuclear Reactions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1983.
[15] Thompson IJ. Coupled reaction channels calculations in nuclear physics. Computer Physics Reports 1988; 7: 167- 212. doi: 10.1016/0167-7977(88)90005-6
[16] http://www.fresco.org.uk/.
[17] Ngo C, Tamain B, Galin J, Beiner M, Lombard RJ. Calculation of interaction barriers using the energy density formalism. Nuclear Physics A 1975; 240: 353-364. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90335-8
[18] Ngo C, Beiner M, Tamain B, Lombard RJ, Mas D et al. Properties of heavy ion interaction potentials calculated in the energy density formalism. Nuclear Physics A 1975; 252: 237-252. doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(75)90614-4
[19] Blocki J, Randrup J, Świątecki WJ, Tsang CF. Proximity forces. Annals of Physics 1977; 105: 427-462. doi: 10.1016/0003-4916(77)90249-4
[20] Zanganeh V, Gharaei R, Izadpanah AM. Comparative study for different nuclear proximity potentials applied to quasi-elastic scattering and fusion reactions. Nuclear Physics A 2019; 992: 121637. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121637
[21] Gharaei R, Zanganeh V, Wang N. Systematic study of proximity potentials for heavy-ion fusion cross sections. Nuclear Physics A 2018; 979: 237-250. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2018.09.032
[22] Dutt I, Puri RK. Systematic study of the fusion barriers using different proximity-type potentials for N=Z colliding nuclei: new extensions. Physical Review C 2010; 81: 044615. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.81.044615
[23] Aygun M, Aygun Z. A comprehensive analysis of 9 Li +70 Zn fusion cross section by using proximity potentials, temperature dependent density distributions and nuclear potentials. Revista Mexicana de Física 2019; 65: 573-582. doi: 10.31349/RevMexFis.65.573
[24] Aygun M. Effects of proximity potentials on the cross-sections of 6,8 He +65 Cu halo fusion reactions. Ukrainian Journal of Physics 2019; 64: 5. doi: 10.15407/ujpe64.5.363
[25] Myers WD, Swiatecki WJ. Nuclear masses and deformations. Nuclear Physics 1966; 81: 1-60. doi: 10.1016/0029- 5582(66)90639-0

APA	AYGÜN M (2020). The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. , 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
Chicago	AYGÜN MURAT The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. (2020): 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
MLA	AYGÜN MURAT The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. , 2020, ss.39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
AMA	AYGÜN M The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. . 2020; 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
Vancouver	AYGÜN M The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. . 2020; 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
IEEE	AYGÜN M "The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus." , ss.39 - 48, 2020. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
ISNAD	AYGÜN, MURAT. "The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus". (2020), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3906/fiz-1906-8

APA	AYGÜN M (2020). The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. Turkish Journal of Physics, 44(1), 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
Chicago	AYGÜN MURAT The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. Turkish Journal of Physics 44, no.1 (2020): 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
MLA	AYGÜN MURAT The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. Turkish Journal of Physics, vol.44, no.1, 2020, ss.39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
AMA	AYGÜN M The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. Turkish Journal of Physics. 2020; 44(1): 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
Vancouver	AYGÜN M The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus. Turkish Journal of Physics. 2020; 44(1): 39 - 48. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
IEEE	AYGÜN M "The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus." Turkish Journal of Physics, 44, ss.39 - 48, 2020. 10.3906/fiz-1906-8
ISNAD	AYGÜN, MURAT. "The effect of temperature on fusion cross-sections of the 8 B proton halo nucleus". Turkish Journal of Physics 44/1 (2020), 39-48. https://doi.org/10.3906/fiz-1906-8