Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 117 - 123 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 13-05-2020

Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region

Öz:
Municipal solid waste (MSW) is increasing in parallel with population surplus. Removal of thiswaste is essential due to not only bad smell and image pollution but also the formation ofdangerous methane gas during the disposal. Methane can be used as an energy source because ofits calorific value. Waste management strategies aiming at converting domestic wastes from athreat in terms of environment, human health, and transforming wastes into an input for theeconomy need to be widespread in Çukurova Region. In this study, the potential of MSW inÇukurova region is presented according to the base year of 2014 data using the projection ofpopulation who are supposed to live in this region. For this evaluation, LandGEM modeling toolis used, and the projected gas generation is provided. Since there is a disposal facility establishedin Adana, the parameters used for modelling are different for Adana and Mersin. A bioreactorwas established in Adana Metropolitan Municipality Integrated Solid Waste Disposal Facilitythus wet inventory landfill type is chosen when modeling the landfill gas (LFG) generation. Onthe contrary, inventory conventional landfill type is chosen for Mersin. Results have shown thatthe electricity generation of Çukurova region could reach approximately 55 MW maximumcapacity in case of using suitable disposal plants.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Maity, S.K. Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part I. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015. 43, p.1427– 1445.
  • 2. Deloitte: Biyokütlenin altın çağı Available from https://www2.deloitte.com/tr/tr/pages/energy-andresources/articles/golden-age-of-biomassarticle.html [Cited 14 May 2018]
  • 3. Cesaro A., and Belgiorno V. Combine Biogas and Bioethanol Production: Opportunities and Challenges for Industrial Application, Energies 2015. 8, p. 8121-8144.
  • 4. Kilic M., and Harmancı O.A., Numerical Investigation of heat transfer by using nanofluids and impinging jet technique, 2nd International Science and Engineering Congress (IMSEC2017) 25-27 October 2017 Adana, Turkey.
  • 5. Kilic M., and Baskaya Ş., Improvement of heat transfer from high heat flux surfaces by using vortex promoters with different geometries and impinging jets, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 2017. 32(3), p. 693-707.
  • 6. Kilic M., A New Cooling Technique for Military Systems; Transpiration cooling, The Journal of Defense Sciences, 2016. 15(1), p. 201-229.
  • 7. Yılmaz İ.H., Abdulvahitoğlu A., and Kılıç M., Evaluation of energy potential for municipal solid waste in Turkey, 5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management. 21–24 June, Athens, Greece, 2017.
  • 8. Saka, K., Yılmaz, İ. H., Agricultural Biomass Potential in Turkey. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 2017. 3(2), p. 79-81.
  • 9. Yılmaz, İ. H, and Saka, K., Exploitable Biomass Status and Potential of the Southeastern Anatolia Region, Turkey. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 2018. 13(1), p. 46–52.
  • 10. Available from http://www.dektmk.org.tr/pdf/enerji_kongresi_10/ nergiz_akpinar3.pdf [Cited 30 August 2017]
  • 11. İsmail Özbay, Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices for an Industrialized City Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2015. 24(2) p. 637-644
  • 12. Yılmaz A., and Bozkurt Y., Türkiye’de Kentsel Kat Atık Yönetimi Uygulamaları ve Kütahya Katı Atık Birliği (KÜKAB) Örneği Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2010. 15(1) p.11-28
  • 13. Evsel atıkların ekonomiye kazandırılması: TR62 (Adana, Mersin) Bölgesi. Available from http://www.cka.org.tr/dosyalar/kati_atik_raporu.pdf [Cited 14 May 2018]
  • 14. Çakır, A. K., and Gunerhan, H.. İzmir Harmandalı Deponisindeki Metan Gazı Potansiyelinin Belirlenmesi, Bertaraf ve Değerlendirme Seçeneklerinin Araştırılması, Mühendis ve Makina Dergisi, 2012. 53(631), p. 24-34.
  • 15. Kankılıç, T., and Topal, H., Belediye Atıklarında Düzenli Depolama Sahalarında Biyogaz ve Enerji Üretimi, Mühendis ve Makina, 2015, 56(669), p. 58- 69.
  • 16. Kurt G., and Koçer N., Malatya ilinin biyokütle potansiyeli ve enerji üretimi Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2010. 26(3) p.240-247.
  • 17. Metin E., Eröztürk A., and Neyim C., Solid waste management practices and review of recovery and recycling operations in Turkey. Waste Management, 2003. 23, p. 425–432
  • 18. Turan N. G. , Çoruh Semra, Akdemir A., and Ergun O. N., Municipal solid waste management strategies in Turkey. Waste Management, 2009. 29, p.465–469
  • 19. Tınmaz, E., and Demir, I., Research on solid waste management system: to improve existing situation in Corlu Town of Turkey. Waste Management, 2006. 26(3), p. 307-314.
  • 20. Nas, S. S., and Bayram, A., Municipal solid waste characteristics and management in Gümüşhane, Turkey. Waste management, 2008. 28(12), p. 2435- 2442.
  • 21. Ağdağ, O. N., Comparison of old and new municipal solid waste management systems in Denizli, Turkey. Waste Management, 2009. 29(1), p. 456-464.
  • 22. Kanat, G., Municipal solid-waste management in Istanbul. Waste Management, 2010. 30(8-9), p. 1737- 1745.
  • 23. Yay, A. S. E., Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) for municipal solid waste management: a case study of Sakarya. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015. 94, p. 284-293.
  • 24. http://www.yildiz.edu.tr/~kvarinca/Dosyalar/Yayinlar/ yayin001.pdf [cited 14May 2018]
  • 25. Turkish Statistical Institute. Available from http://www.turkstat.gov.tr [Cited 14 May 2018]
  • 26. U.S. Environmetal Protection Agency. Available from http://www.epa.gov [Cited 14 May 2018]
  • 27. Sarptaş H., Assesment of Landfill Gas (LFG) Energy Potential Based on Estimates of LFG Models. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 2016. 18 (3) p. 491-501.
APA ABDULVAHITOGLU A, Yılmaz İ (2018). Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. , 117 - 123.
Chicago ABDULVAHITOGLU ASLI,Yılmaz İbrahim Halil Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. (2018): 117 - 123.
MLA ABDULVAHITOGLU ASLI,Yılmaz İbrahim Halil Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. , 2018, ss.117 - 123.
AMA ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. . 2018; 117 - 123.
Vancouver ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. . 2018; 117 - 123.
IEEE ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ "Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region." , ss.117 - 123, 2018.
ISNAD ABDULVAHITOGLU, ASLI - Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil. "Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region". (2018), 117-123.
APA ABDULVAHITOGLU A, Yılmaz İ (2018). Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 2(2), 117 - 123.
Chicago ABDULVAHITOGLU ASLI,Yılmaz İbrahim Halil Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 2, no.2 (2018): 117 - 123.
MLA ABDULVAHITOGLU ASLI,Yılmaz İbrahim Halil Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, vol.2, no.2, 2018, ss.117 - 123.
AMA ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal. 2018; 2(2): 117 - 123.
Vancouver ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region. International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal. 2018; 2(2): 117 - 123.
IEEE ABDULVAHITOGLU A,Yılmaz İ "Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region." International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal, 2, ss.117 - 123, 2018.
ISNAD ABDULVAHITOGLU, ASLI - Yılmaz, İbrahim Halil. "Projected potential of Landfill gas in Çukurova region". International Advanced Researches and Engineering Journal 2/2 (2018), 117-123.