Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 33 Sayfa Aralığı: 80 - 95 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17829/turcom.472157 İndeks Tarihi: 15-05-2020
Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract
Öz: If social cybernetics is clarified as an ‘emergent property’ for the multifaceted established of interiorassociations in the midst of technology, policy and management foundations of wide-ranging resolutioncomputing, we should ask are there any implementation of its definition in the sociology of technology?Therefore, this paper introduces multidimensional perspectives of techno-social interactions to diagrama theoretical concept of digital divide (DD) and elucidate its limitation stages within the relative literature.What the current reality is that we cannot escape from a global prison even if we do know we are in one,in this sense, this paper is interested in arguing how the definition of DD leads technocratic reasoning inwhich societies of globalised control cannot be separated from speculation, accumulation and circulationof technological commodities that actually lead an unspecific but an extension of social contract inany developed or developing nations throughout technological education. Political philosophy is theninseparable from ethnics of social cybernetics because the relative issue is rather assemblage of abstracttechnological control.
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Küreselleşmiş Kontrol Toplumlarında Dijital Bölünmeyi Düşünmek: Sosyal Sözleşmenin Yayılımı
Öz: -
Anahtar Kelime: Konular:
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Akdeniz, Y. and Altıparmak, K.(2015). Legal notice of 20.01.2015, original sent in Turkish via Notary Public, at http://cyber-rights.org.tr/docs/Twitter_ihtar_ENG.pdf
- Brosnan, M.J. (1998). Technophobia: The Psychological Impact of Information Technology, Paperback
- Bunge, M. (1977). Towards a technoethics. Monist, 60(1), 96-107.
- Castells, M. (2004). The network society: A cross-cultural perspective, Edward Elgar Pub. Central Intelligent Agency. (2016). “The world factbook publication”, at https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html?sid=uUuVqK
- Chapman, A. (2015). You can’t escape from a prison if you don’t know you’re in one: what is blocking your freedom? Kindle Edition Chomsky, N. (1992). Deterring democracy, Paperback
- Dawkins, R. (2011). “Evolution and related topics”, Honest Ab, September 26, http://honest-ab.blogspot. al/2011/09/almost-everything-evolves.html
- Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control, JSTOR, 59, 3-7.
- Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1972). Capitalism and schizophrenia, University of Minnesota Press.
- Downey, J.P and Smith, L.A. (2011). The role of computer attitudes in enhancing computer competence in training, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 23(3).81-100
- Duque, B. Ricordo. (2007). History of information technology: introduction & conclusion, in W. Shrum, K. Benson, W. Bijker & K. Brunnstein (eds), Past, Present and Future of Research in the Information Society. New York: Springer.
- Eliasson, J. (2012). “Dubai 2012 – Global Governance Outlook”,http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PYWkxr78S5s, the times are 20:00 and 37:00.
- Agamben G. (2003). The state of exception. University of Chicago Press
- Glendinning, C. (1990), “Notes towards a neo-luddite manifesto,” Untre Reader 38(1), 82–88. at http://www. jesusradicals.com/wpcontent/uploads/luddite-manifesto.pdf.
- Hargittai, E. (2006). Hurdles to information seeking: Explaining spelling and typographical mistakes in users’ online search behavior, Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 7(1), p.52-67.
- Hornik, S. Johnson, R.D. and Wu, Y. (2007). When technology does not support learning: conflicts between epistemological beliefs and technology support in virtual learning environments, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (JOEUC), 19(2), p.23-46
- Hoyt, J. K. (1896) The cyclopedia of practical quotations. Funk and Wagnalls Co.
- Hicks, R. D. (1925) Diogenes Laertius. lives of eminent philosophers 2. London: William Heinemann.
- Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future, Paperback
- Internet World Stats (2018). “Internet World users by language top 10 languages”, at http://www.internetworldstats. com/stats7.htm
- Kranzberg, M. ( 1986). Technology and History: “Kranzberg’s Laws.” Technology and Culture, 27 ( 3),p.544– 560.
- Kvasny, L. and Keil, M. (2006). The challenges of redressing digital divide: A tale of two U.S. cities, Information Systems Journal, 16, 23-53.
- Kvasny, L. (2006). The cultural (Re)production of digital inequality, Information, Communication and Society, 9(2), 160-181.
- Le Bon, G. (1896). The crowd: A study of the popular mind, Tombstone Press.
- Lucas-Conwell, F. (2006). “Technology evangelists: A leadership survey”. Growth Resources, at https://www.gri. co/pub/res/pdf/TechEvangelist.pdf
- Luppicini, R. (2010). Technoethics and the evolving knowledge society. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
- Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion. London: Penguin Group.
- Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
- Salomon, GI. (1993). On the nature of pedagogic computer tools: the case of the Writing Partner in Lajoie S P and Derry S J (eds) Computers as Cognitive Tools Lawrence Ehbaum Association, New Jersey.
- Selwyn, N. (2004). “Reconsidering political and popular understanding of digital divide”, New Media and Society, 6(3), 341-62.
- Snowden, E. (2015). Edward Snowden, at https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Edward_Snowden
- Stepan, A. C. (2001). Arguing comparative politics, Oxford University Press.
- Perlmutter, T. (1988).“Comparing fordist cities: The logic of urban crisis and union response in Turin, 1950-1975, and Detroit, 1915-1945.Working Paper Series: 31”, New York University.
- Popper, K. (1966). The open society and its enemies complete: Volumes 1 and 2.
- Sicko, D. and Brewster, B. (2010). Techno rebels: The renegades of electronic funk (Painted Turtle) 2nd Edition, Paperback
- Steyaert, J. and Gould, N. (2009). Social work and the changing face of digital divide, British Journal of Social Work, 39(4), 740-753.
- Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up Digital: The rise of the net generation, New York: Mc-Graw-Hill.
- UNESCO, (2005), Institute for statistics measuring linguistic diversity on the internet: 2005, UNESCO World
- Report. Paris: UNESCO, athttp://www.uis.unesco.org/template/pdf/cscl/MeasuringLinguisticDiversity_ En.pdf.
- Watson, B.J. (1930). Behaviorism, University of Chicago Press,
- Wiener, N. (1964). God and Golem, Inc.: A Comment on Certain Points Where Cybernetics Impinges on Religion. M.I.T. Press, Cambridge.
- Wilson, J. E. (2006). The Information Revolution and Developing Countries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Winner, L. (1986). Do artifacts have politics? in L. Winner, The whale and the reactor: A search for limits in the age of high-technology. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.
| APA | Tolu H (2019). Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. , 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| Chicago | Tolu Hüseyin Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. (2019): 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| MLA | Tolu Hüseyin Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. , 2019, ss.80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| AMA | Tolu H Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. . 2019; 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| Vancouver | Tolu H Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. . 2019; 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| IEEE | Tolu H "Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract." , ss.80 - 95, 2019. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| ISNAD | Tolu, Hüseyin. "Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract". (2019), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| APA | Tolu H (2019). Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), 0(33), 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| Chicago | Tolu Hüseyin Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online) 0, no.33 (2019): 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| MLA | Tolu Hüseyin Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), vol.0, no.33, 2019, ss.80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| AMA | Tolu H Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online). 2019; 0(33): 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| Vancouver | Tolu H Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online). 2019; 0(33): 80 - 95. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| IEEE | Tolu H "Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract." Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online), 0, ss.80 - 95, 2019. 10.17829/turcom.472157 |
| ISNAD | Tolu, Hüseyin. "Consideration of Digital Divide in Societies of Globalised Control: Extension of Social Contract". Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Online) 33 (2019), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.17829/turcom.472157 |
