Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 31 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 195 - 201 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/agri.2019.25901 İndeks Tarihi: 02-04-2020

Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain

Öz:
Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Brief Pain InventoryShort Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain.Methods: An analytical design was used. A total of 192 patients were included in the study. A demographic questionnaire andthe Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form were used to collect data. Content validity was assessed by experts and construct validitywas tested using exploratory factor analysis. Reliability analyses estimated the internal consistency and test-retest reliability.Cronbach’s alpha and the item-total correlations were calculated for the subscales to examine internal consistency.Results: Exploratory factor analysis yielded 2 factors: pain severity and pain interference, which accounted for 68.81% of thetotal variance. The coefficient alpha of both subscales demonstrated good internal consistency. The item-total correlations ofthe scale ranged between 0.56 and 0.87. The test-retest reliability was r=0.774 for pain severity and r=0.808 for pain interference (p=0.001).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form is a valid and reliable instrument to assess chronic nonmalignant pain.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi Onkoloji

Kronik nonmaling ağrısı olan hastalarda Brief Ağrı Envanteri Kısa Formu'nun Türkçe formunun geçerliği ve güvenirliği

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, kronik nonmaling ağrısı olan hastalarda Brief Ağrı Envanteri Kısa Formu’nun Türkçe versiyonunun geçerliğini ve güvenirliğini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Analitik çalışma deseni kullanıldı. Çalışmaya 192 hasta dahil edildi. Veri toplamada sosyodemografik soru formu ve Brief Ağrı Envanteri Kısa Formu kullanıldı. Envanterin geçerliğini değerlendirmek için içerik ve yapı geçerliği kullanılmıştır. Içerik geçerliği uzman görüşü ile değerlendirildi. Yapı geçerliği için açımlayıcı faktör analizi kullanılmıştır. Güvenirlik analizi için iç tutarlılık ve test tekrar test güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. İç tutarlılık için alt boyutların Cronbach alfa ve maddetoplam korelasyonları hesaplandı. Bulgular: Açımlayıcı faktör analizi 2 faktör göstermiştir, ağrı şiddeti ve ağrı girişimi. İki faktör toplam varyansin %68.81’ini açıklamıştır. Her iki alt boyutun alfa katsaysı iyi iç tutarlılık göstermiştir. Ölçeğin madde toplam korelasyonları 0.56 ile 0.87 arasındadır. Test–retest güvenirliği ağrı şiddeti için r=0.774 ve ağrı girişimi için r=0.808’dir (p=0.001). Sonuç: Brief Ağrı Envanteri Kısa Formu’nun Türkçe versiyonu, kronik nonmaling ağrıyı değerlendirmek için güvenilir ve geçerli bir araçtır.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Anestezi Onkoloji
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Davis DB. Caring for people in pain. Florence, KY: Routledge; 2000. p. 159–78.
  • 2. Elliott TE, Renier CM, Palcher JA. Chronic pain, depression, and quality of life: correlations and predictive value of the SF-36. Pain Med 2003;4:331–9.
  • 3. Lapane KL, Quilliam BJ, Benson C, Chow W, Kim MS. Impact of Noncancer Pain on Health-Related Quality of Life. Pain Pract 2015;15(4):333–42.
  • 4. Polomano RC, Dunwoody CJ, Krenzischek DA, Rathmell JP. Perspective on pain management in the 21st century. J Perianesth Nurs 2008;23(1 Suppl):4–14.
  • 5. Comley AL, De Meyer E. Assessing patient satisfaction with pain management through a continuous quality improvement effort. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001;21(1):27–40.
  • 6. McCaffery M, Ferrell BR, Pasero C. Nurses’ personal opinions about patients’ pain and their effect on recorded assessments and titration of opioid doses. Pain Manag Nurs 2000;1(3):79–87.
  • 7. Gordon DB, Pellino TA, Miaskowski C, Mc Neill JA, Paice JA, Laferriere D, et al. A 10-year review of quality improvement monitoring in pain management: Recommendations for standardized outcome measures. Pain Manag Nurs 2002;3:116–30.
  • 8. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: Global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994;23(2):129–38.
  • 9. Saxena A, Mendoza T, Cleeland CS. The Assessment of cancer pain in North India: The validation of the Hindi Brief Pain Inventory-BPI-H. J Pain Symptom Manage 1999;17:27–41.
  • 10. Mystakidou K, Mendoza T, Tsilika E, Befon S, Parpa E, Bellos G, et al. Greek Brief Pain Inventory: Validation and utility in cancer pain. Oncology 2001;60(1):35–42.
  • 11. Yun YH, Mendoza TR, Heo DS, Yoo T, Heo BY, Park HA, et al. Development of a cancer pain assessment tool in Korea: a validation study of a Korean version of the brief pain inventory. Oncology 2004;66(6):439–44.
  • 12. Aisyaturridha A, Naing L, Nizar AJ. Validation of the Malay Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire to measure cancer pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2006;31(1):13–21.
  • 13. Dicle A, Karayurt Ö, Dirimese E. Validation of the Turkish Version of the Brief Pain Inventory in surgery patients. Pain Manag Nurs 2009;10(2):107–13.
  • 14. Ferreira KA, Teixeira MJ, Mendonza TR, Cleeland CS. Validation of brief pain inventory to Brazilian patients with pain. Support Care Cancer 2011;19(4):505–11.
  • 15. Ballout S, Noureddine S, Huijer HA, Kanazi G. Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic Brief Pain Inventory in a sample of Lebanese cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 2011;42(1):147–54.
  • 16. De Andres J, Cruces Prado LM, Canos Verdecho MA, Penide Villanueva L, Hoyos DVM, Herdman M, et al. Validation of the Short Form of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI-SF) in Spanish Patients with Non-Cancer-Related Pain. Pain Pract 2015;15(7):643–53.
  • 17. Upadhyay C, Cameron K, Murphy L, Battistella M. Measuring pain in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a review of pain assessment tools. Clin Kidney J 2014;7(4):367–72.
  • 18. Niklasson B, Georgsson Ohman S, Segerdahl M, Blanck A. Risk factors for persistent pain and its influence on maternal wellbeing after cesarean section. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94(6):622–8.
  • 19. Erdoğan S. Ölçümlerde Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik. Ankara, 2014;56-189.
  • 20. Lobiondo-Wood G, Haber J. Reliability and validity. In: G. Lobiondo-Wood, Haber J, editors. Nursing research methods, critical appraisal, and utilization. 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 2002. p. 311–46.
  • 21. Cleeland CS. The Brief Pain Inventory User Guide 2009. Available at: https://www.mdanderson.org/documents/ Departments-and-Divisions/Symptom-Research/BPI_ UserGuide.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2011.
  • 22. Akgül A. Tıbbi araştırmalarda istatistiksel analiz teknikleri SPSS uygulamaları. 3rd ed. Ankara: Emek Ofset; 2005. p. 440–6.
  • 23. Tezbaşaran AA. Likert tipi ölçek geliştirme kılavuzu. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği; 1997.
  • 24. Erefe I. Veri Toplama Araçlarının Niteliği. In: Erefe I, editor. Hemsirelikte Arastirma. Istanbul: Odak Ofset; 2002. p.169– 88.
  • 25. George D, Mallery P. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
  • 26. Farketich S. Focus on psychometrics: aspects of item analysis. Res Nurs Health 1991;14(2):165–8.
  • 27. Büyüköztürk Ş. Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi; 2009.
  • 28. Karasar N. Bilimsel Arastırma Yontemi. 7th ed. Ankara: 3A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd; 1995;147–53.
  • 29. Çakmur H. Araştırmalarda Ölçme Güvenilirlik-Geçerlilik. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin 2012;11:339–44.
  • 30. American Thoracic Society, Quality of Life Resource. Available at: http://qol.thoracic.org/sections/measurementproperties/reliability.html. Accessed March 27, 2015.
APA YILDIRIM Y, PARLAR KILIÇ S, eyigor s, EYIGOR C, Yıldırım Y, KARAMAN E, OYUR ÇELİK G, UYAR M (2019). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. , 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
Chicago YILDIRIM Yasemin,PARLAR KILIÇ Serap,eyigor sibel,EYIGOR CAN,Yıldırım Yusuf,KARAMAN Emine,OYUR ÇELİK GÜLAY,UYAR Meltem Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. (2019): 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
MLA YILDIRIM Yasemin,PARLAR KILIÇ Serap,eyigor sibel,EYIGOR CAN,Yıldırım Yusuf,KARAMAN Emine,OYUR ÇELİK GÜLAY,UYAR Meltem Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. , 2019, ss.195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
AMA YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. . 2019; 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
Vancouver YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. . 2019; 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
IEEE YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M "Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain." , ss.195 - 201, 2019. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
ISNAD YILDIRIM, Yasemin vd. "Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain". (2019), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2019.25901
APA YILDIRIM Y, PARLAR KILIÇ S, eyigor s, EYIGOR C, Yıldırım Y, KARAMAN E, OYUR ÇELİK G, UYAR M (2019). Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Ağrı, 31(4), 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
Chicago YILDIRIM Yasemin,PARLAR KILIÇ Serap,eyigor sibel,EYIGOR CAN,Yıldırım Yusuf,KARAMAN Emine,OYUR ÇELİK GÜLAY,UYAR Meltem Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Ağrı 31, no.4 (2019): 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
MLA YILDIRIM Yasemin,PARLAR KILIÇ Serap,eyigor sibel,EYIGOR CAN,Yıldırım Yusuf,KARAMAN Emine,OYUR ÇELİK GÜLAY,UYAR Meltem Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Ağrı, vol.31, no.4, 2019, ss.195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
AMA YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Ağrı. 2019; 31(4): 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
Vancouver YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain. Ağrı. 2019; 31(4): 195 - 201. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
IEEE YILDIRIM Y,PARLAR KILIÇ S,eyigor s,EYIGOR C,Yıldırım Y,KARAMAN E,OYUR ÇELİK G,UYAR M "Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain." Ağrı, 31, ss.195 - 201, 2019. 10.14744/agri.2019.25901
ISNAD YILDIRIM, Yasemin vd. "Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form for patients with chronic nonmalignant pain". Ağrı 31/4 (2019), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2019.25901