Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books

Hamimah HAMIMAH, (Universitas Negeri Padang)
Syamsu ARLIS, (Universitas Negeri Padang)
Arwin ARWIN, (Universitas Negeri Padang)
Chandra CHANDRA, (Universitas Negeri Padang)
Yesi ANITA, (Universitas Negeri Padang)
Ary Kiswanto KENEDI, (Universitas Samudra)
Annisa KHARISMA (Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
1 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 78 - 86 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895 İndeks Tarihi: 09-04-2020

Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books

Öz:
The low literacy of students in Indonesia was the center of attention for all observers ofpresent-day education that have an effect on the alpha generation as their successors. Overcoming theseproblems, it was necessary to innovate and develop social science story digital books for the alphageneration in industrial revolution 4.0 era that needs to be realized in the real life of students as thepurpose of this study. Development research was carried out with the development model of Borg & Gall,namely: research and information collecting, planning, develop a preliminary form of product, preliminaryfield testing, main product revision, main field testing, operational product revision, operational fieldtesting, final product revision, and dissemination and implementation. The results showed that thedevelop social science story digital books with the design of the Adobe Photoshop CS6 for an alphageneration was feasible and effective to use.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Acar, Ö. (2018). Investigation of the science achievement models for low and high achieving schools and gender differences in Turkey. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21517
  • Acikalin, M., & Kilic, H. (2017). The Role of Turkish National Holidays in Promoting Character and Citizenship Education. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1622
  • Amry, A. (2018). The Effect of Twitter Activities in a Blended Learning Classroom Guided by Activity Theory on Students ’ Achievement and Attitudes. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(2), 143–157.
  • Archer, L., Dawson, E., Seakins, A., DeWitt, J., Godec, S., & Whitby, C. (2016). “I’m Being a Man Here”: Urban Boys’ Performances of Masculinity and Engagement With Science During a Science Museum Visit. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(3), 438–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1187147
  • Augusto, T., Gomes, C., Fernanda, C., Bezerra, D. M., Oste, G., & Cremonezi, G. (2018). Study on The Alpha Generation And The Reflections of Its Behavior in the Organizational Environment. Quest Journals Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 6(1), 9–19.
  • Bächtold, M., & Munier, V. (2018). Teaching energy in high school by making use of history and philosophy of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (May 2017), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21522
  • Bacia, E., & Ittel, A. (2017). Education to Thrive in a Heterogeneous and Democratic Society--A Task for Citizenship and Character Education? Results of Case Studies in Three Berlin Schools. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1596
  • Baumfalk, B., Bhattacharya, D., Vo, T., Forbes, C., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. (2018). Impact of model-based science curriculum and instruction on elementary students ’ explanations for the hydrosphere. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21514
  • Beker, K., Broek, P. Van Den, & Jolles, D. (2018). processes and knowledge representations. Reading and Writing, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9879-9
  • Bellocchi, A. (2018). Early career science teacher experiences of social bonds and emotion management. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21520
  • Blanton, W. E., Wood, K. D., & Taylor, D. B. (2007). Rethinking Middle School Reading Instruction : A Basic Literacy Activity. Reading Psychology, 28(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710601115489
  • Budde, J., & Weuster, N. (2017). Class Council between Democracy Learning and Character Education. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1593
  • Chin, D. B., Blair, K. P., Wolf, R. C., Conlin, L. D., Cutumisu, M., Pfaffman, J., & Schwartz, D. L. (2019). Educating and Measuring Choice : A Test of the Transfer of Design Thinking in Problem Solving and Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1570933
  • Cole, M., & Packer, M. (2016). Design-Based Intervention Research as the Science of the Doubly Artificial. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 503–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1187148
  • Craig, T. T., & Marshall, J. (2019). Effect of project-based learning on high school Students’ state-mandated, standardized math and science exam performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (January 2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21582
  • D’Agostino, J. V., Rodgers, E., & Mauck, S. (2017). Addressing Inadequacies of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.181
  • Dreher, K. L. (2016). New media in black women’s autobiography: intrepid embodiment and narrative innovation. Prose Studies, 38(2), 197–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01440357.2016.1189241
  • Farsides, T., Sparks, P., Jessop, D., Farsides, T., Sparks, P., & Jessop, D. (2017). Self-reported reasons for moral decisions. Thinking & Reasoning. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1366946
  • Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction.
  • Gholami, J., & Qurbanzada, I. (2016). Key stakeholders’ attitudes towards teacher education programs in TEFL: A case study of Farhangian University in Iran. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2016-0011
  • Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Southerland, S. A., Saka, Y., & Ke, F. (2018). Examining features of how professional development and enactment of educative curricula influences elementary science teacher learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21480
  • Gürçay, B., & Baron, J. (2016). Challenges for the sequential two-system model of moral judgement. Thinking & Reasoning ISSN:, 6783(August). https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2016.1216011
  • Gutiérrez, K. D., & Jurow, A. S. (2016). Social design experiments: toward equity by design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(4), 565–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1204548
  • Hawley, P. H., & Sinatra, G. M. (2018). Declawing the dinosaurs in the science classroom : Reducing Christian teachers ’ anxiety and increasing their efficacy for teaching evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21479
  • Hemmerechts, K., Kavadias, D., & Spruyt, B. (2017). Segregation and socialization: academic segregation and citizenship attitudes of adolescents in comparative perspective? Journal of Social Science Education, 16(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i2-1611
  • Horn, M. S. (2018). Tangible ınteraction and cultural forms: supporting learning in ınformal environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 27(4), 632–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1468259
  • Jaber, L. Z., & Hammer, D. (2015). Engaging in Science : A Feeling for the Discipline. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 0(0), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1088441
  • Kim, D. (2018). A study on the ınfluence of korean mıddle school students ’ relatıonshıp through scıence class applyıng stad cooperatıve learnıng. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 291–309.
  • Kisby, B. (2017). Politics is ethics done in public”: exploring linkages and disjunctions between citizenship education and character education in England. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1582
  • Kolbe, K. D. (2015). Knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding waste management in a grammar and a comprehensive school in england - results from a school questionnaire. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2015-0005
  • Krist, C., Schwarz, C. V, & Reiser, B. J. (2018). Identifying essential epistemic heuristics for guiding mechanistic reasoning in science learning ıdentifying essential epistemic heuristics for guiding mechanistic reasoning in science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1510404
  • Levine, S. (2018). Using everyday language to support students in constructing thematic ınterpretations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1485023
  • Lund, E. S., Braten, I., & Brandmo, C. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of textual and individual factors on source-content integration when reading about a socio-scientific issue. Read Writ, (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9868-z
  • Marco-Bujosa, L. M., McNeill, K. L., & Friedman, A. A. (2019). Becoming an urban science teacher: How beginning teachers negotiate contradictory school contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (May). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21583
  • McCrindle, M. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global generations. In McCrindle Research Pty Ltd. Retrieved from http://mccrindle.com.au/resources/The-ABC-of-XYZ_Chapter-1.pdf
  • Mckenney, S. (2017). How can the learning sciences (better) impact policy and practice? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 0(0), 0–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1404404
  • Nagy, Á., & Kölcsey, A. (2017). Generation Alpha: Marketing or Science. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 7(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2017-0007
  • Neill, D. K. O. (2016). Understanding design research–practice partnerships in context and time: why learning sciences scholars should learn from cultural- historical activity theory approaches to DBR. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8406(August). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2016.1226835
  • Neoh, J. Y. (2017). Neoliberal education ? comparing character and citizenship education in Singapore and civics and citizenship education in Australia. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 28–38. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1575
  • Nixon, R. S., Smith, L. K., & Sudweeks, R. R. (2018). Elementary teachers ’ science subject matter knowledge across the teacher career cycle. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21524
  • Park, S. Y. (2017). Clarifying the characteristics and exploring the collaboration of citizenship and character education in South Korea. Journal of Social Science Education, 16(3), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.2390/jsse-v16-i3-1600
  • Pradhan, J. K., & Singh, S. (2016). Learning to learn from the Other: subaltern life narrative, everyday classroom and critical pedagogy. Prose Studies, 38(3), 261–270. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2017.1290601
  • Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Rienties, B. (2017). Turning groups ınside out : A social network perspective. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1398652
  • Rodgers, E., Agostino, J. V. D., Harmey, S. J., Kelly, R. H., & Brownfield, K. (2016). Examining the Nature of Scaffolding in an Early Literacy Intervention. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(3), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.142
  • Rouse, H. L., & Fantuzzo, J. (2006). Validity of the dynamic ındicators for basic early literacy skills as an ındicator of early literacy for urban kindergarten children. School Psychology Review, 35, 341–355.
  • Ruiz-Gallardo, J.-R., & Reavey, D. (2018). Learning science concepts by teaching peers in a cooperative environment : a longitudinal study of preservice teachers. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1– 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1506988
  • Russ, R. S., & Berland, L. K. (2018). Invented science : a framework for discussing a persistent problem of practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2018.1517354
  • Ryoo, K., & Bedell, K. (2018). Supporting linguistically diverse students ’ science learning with dynamic visualizations through discourse-rich practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, (April 2017), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21519
  • Sanchez-Martin, J., Cañada-Cañada, F., & Dávila-Acedo, M. A. (2018). Emotional responses to innovative Science teaching methods: Acquiring emotional data in a General Science teacher education class. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 346. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.408
  • Sawyer, R. K. (2017). Teaching and learning how to create in schools of art and design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8406(October). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381963
  • Schüller, E. M., Birnbaum, L., & Kröner, S. (2016). What makes elementary school students read in their leisure time ? development of a comprehensive questionnaire. Reading Research Quarterly, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.164
  • Smirnov, N., Easterday, M. W., Gerber, E. M., & Gerber, E. M. (2017). Infrastructuring distributed studio networks : a case study and design principles. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1409119
  • Sosa, T., Hall, A. H., Goldman, S. R., & Lee, C. D. (2016). Developing symbolic ınterpretation through literary argumentation. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(1), 93–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2015.1124040
  • Svedholm-häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2017). Actively open-minded thinking : development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
  • Thadani, V., Roth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Seyarto, M. C., Thompson, J. L., Froidevaux, N. M., … Seyarto, M. C. (2017). What Can a cognitive coding framework reveal about professional development’s effects on classroom teaching and learning? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1396220
  • Tootell, H., Freeman, M., & Freeman, A. (2014). Generation alpha at the intersection of technology, play and motivation. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 82– 90. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.19
  • Turner, J. C., Christensen, A., Kackar-cam, H. Z., Sara, M., Trucano, M., Turner, J. C., … Christensen, A. (2017). The development of professional learning communities and their teacher leaders : an activity systems analysis. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 00(00), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1381962
  • Victoria Turk. (2017). Understanding generation generation alpha. In Wired Consulting. Retrieved from https://cnda.condenast.co.uk/wired/UnderstandingGenerationAlpha.pdf
  • Vosniadou, S., & Skopeliti, I. (2018). Evaluating the effects of analogy enriched text on the learning of science : The importance of learning indexes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21523
  • Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectıveness of multıple ıntellıgences based ıntellıgences and scıence process skılls of junıor hıgh. Journal of Technology and Science Education 9(2), 122–135.
APA HAMIMAH H, ARLIS S, ARWIN A, CHANDRA C, ANITA Y, KENEDI A, KHARISMA A (2020). Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. , 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
Chicago HAMIMAH Hamimah,ARLIS Syamsu,ARWIN Arwin,CHANDRA Chandra,ANITA Yesi,KENEDI Ary Kiswanto,KHARISMA Annisa Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. (2020): 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
MLA HAMIMAH Hamimah,ARLIS Syamsu,ARWIN Arwin,CHANDRA Chandra,ANITA Yesi,KENEDI Ary Kiswanto,KHARISMA Annisa Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. , 2020, ss.78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
AMA HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. . 2020; 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
Vancouver HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. . 2020; 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
IEEE HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A "Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books." , ss.78 - 86, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
ISNAD HAMIMAH, Hamimah vd. "Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books". (2020), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
APA HAMIMAH H, ARLIS S, ARWIN A, CHANDRA C, ANITA Y, KENEDI A, KHARISMA A (2020). Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19(1), 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
Chicago HAMIMAH Hamimah,ARLIS Syamsu,ARWIN Arwin,CHANDRA Chandra,ANITA Yesi,KENEDI Ary Kiswanto,KHARISMA Annisa Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19, no.1 (2020): 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
MLA HAMIMAH Hamimah,ARLIS Syamsu,ARWIN Arwin,CHANDRA Chandra,ANITA Yesi,KENEDI Ary Kiswanto,KHARISMA Annisa Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.19, no.1, 2020, ss.78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
AMA HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(1): 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
Vancouver HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(1): 78 - 86. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
IEEE HAMIMAH H,ARLIS S,ARWIN A,CHANDRA C,ANITA Y,KENEDI A,KHARISMA A "Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19, ss.78 - 86, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
ISNAD HAMIMAH, Hamimah vd. "Thinking the most convenient analysis of alpha generation by using social science story digital books". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19/1 (2020), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.654895
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:10

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları