The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities

Nejla ATABEY, (Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi)
Ayten ARSLAN (Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
3 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 491 - 514 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681 İndeks Tarihi: 10-04-2020

The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities

Öz:
In this study, the effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model onthe argumentation qualities of pre-service teachers was investigated. The study group consisted of 40primary school pre-service teachers studying at Muş Alparslan University. Exploratory sequentialresearch design was used in this study. In the quantitative dimension of the study, quasi-experimentaldesign with pre-test-post-test control group was carried out. In this context, a control and 2 experimentalgroups were formed. Jigsaw and learning together methods were implemented with the experimentalgroups and activities suitable for group works were carried out with the control group. In the qualitativedimension, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the pre-service teachers. At the end of thestudy, the argumentation qualities of the pre-service teachers were evaluated with descriptive analysisand semi-structured interviews were evaluated with content analysis. Findings revealed that cooperativelearning methods, especially jigsaw method, positively affect the pre-service teachers' arguments,
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (1992). İşbirlikli öğrenme kuram araştırma uygulama. Malatya: Uğurel Press.
  • Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2007). Aktif öğrenme. İzmir: Biliş Yayınevi.
  • Aksoy, G. (2011). Öğrencilerin Fen ve Teknoloji dersindeki deneyleri anlamalarına okuma-yazma-uygulama ve birlikte öğrenme yöntemlerinin etkileri, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum.
  • Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67–90.
  • Arslan, A., & Zengin, R. , (2016). Birlikte Öğrenme Yönteminin Fen Öğretimi Laboratuar Uygulamalari Dersinde Öğrenci Tutumlarına Etkisi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(19), 81-94.
  • Bayrakçeken, S., Doymuş, K., & Doğan, A. (2013). İşbirlikli öğrenme modeli ve uygulanması. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Bearison, D. J., Magzomes, S., & Filardo, E. K. (1986). Socio-cognitive conflict and cognitive growth in youngchildren. Merrill-Polmer Quarterly, 32(1), 51-72.
  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students’ questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908.
  • Çelik, A. (2010). Bilimsel tartışma (argümantasyon) esaslı öğretim yaklaşımının lise öğrencilerinin kavramsal anlamaları, kimya dersine karşı tutumları, tartışma isteklilikleri ve kalitesi üzerine etkisinin incelenmesi, Unpublished master thesis, Gazi University, Ankara.
  • Çelik, A. Y., & Kılıç, Z. (2017). Lise öğrencilerinin bireysel ve grup argümanlarının kalitesinin karşılaştırılması. Kastamonu Education Journal, 25(5), 1865-1880.
  • Davidson, N., & O'Leary, P. W. (1990). How cooperative learning can enhance mastery teaching. Educational Leadership, 47(5), 30-34.
  • Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009) High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445.
  • Delice, A. (2014). Karma yöntem desen seçimi. Y. Dede ve S. B. Demir (Ed.), Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi içinde (s. 61-116). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık
  • Demir, A., & Sezek, F. (2015). 5. sınıf elektrik ünitesinin öğretilmesinde, işbirlikli-birlikte öğrenme ve yarı aktif öğrenme yöntemlerinin öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkileri. Uludağ Faculty of Education Journal, 28(2), 223-243.
  • Demircioğlu, T., & Uçar, S. (2014). Akkuyu nükleer santrali konusunda üretilen yazılı argümanların incelenmesi. Elementary Education, 13(4), 1373-1386.
  • Demirel, R. (2015). Kuvvet ve hareket konularında bireysel ve grupla argümantasyonun öğrencilerin akademik başarılarına etkisi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(3), 916-94.8
  • Doğan, A., Uçar, S., & Şimşek, .Ü (2015). Jigsaw tekniğinin 6. sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersi “Yer Kabuğu Nelerden Oluşur?” ünitesinin öğretiminde öğrenci başarısına etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12(32), 416-432.
  • Dolan, T. J., Nichols, B. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Using Socio-scientific Issues in primary Classes. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21, 1-12.
  • dos Santos, W. L. P. (2014).Debate on global warming as a socio-scientific issue: science teaching towards political literacy. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(3), 663-674.
  • Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.
  • Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). Tapping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
  • Ekborg, M. (2008). Opinion building on a socio-scientific issue: the case of genetically modified plants. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 60-65.
  • Evagorou, M., Jime´nez-Aleixandre, M., & Osborne, J. (2012). ‘Should we kill the grey squirrels?’A study exploring students’ justifications and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 401–428.
  • Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237.
  • Hedeen, T. (2003). The reverse jigsaw: A process of cooperative learning and discussion. Teaching Sociology, 31(3), 325-332
  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success stroy. Social independence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Karnes, M. & Collins, D. (1997). Using cooperative learning strategies to improve literacy skills in social studies. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(1), 37-51.
  • Kızıltepe, Z. (2015). İçerik analizi. F. N. Seggie, & Y. Bayyurt (Ed. ), Nitel araştırma yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımları içinde (s.253-266). Ankara: Anı yayıncılık.
  • Kiemer, K., Gröschner, A., Pehmer, A. K., & Seidel, T. (2015). Effects of a classroom discourse intervention on teachers' practice and students' motivation to learn mathematics and science. Learning and Instruction, 35, 94-103.
  • Koç Damgacı, F., &Karataş, H. (2015). İşbirlikli öğrenme yöntem ve tekniklerinin eğitimde kullanımına ilişkin deneysel çalışmalar ve sonuçları. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1)9, 304-314.
  • Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V., & Ulvık, M. (2006). Science students’ critical examination of scientific information related to SSI. Science Education, 90, 632-655.
  • Kutluca, A. Y. (2016). Fen Bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel argümantasyon kaliteleri ile bilimin doğası anlayışları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu.
  • Kutluca, A., & Aydın, A. (2017). Fen Bilimleri öğretmen adaylarının sosyobilimsel argümantasyon kalitelerinin incelenmesi: Konu bağlamının etkisi. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 458-480.
  • Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D.S. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: analyses of pre-service teachers’ moral reasoning on socio-scientific ıssues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953.
  • Lin, S., & Mintzes, J. J. (2010). Leaming argumentation skills through instruction in socio-scientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8, 993-1017.
  • McNeill , K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191
  • McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
  • Namdar, B. & Shen, J. (2016) Intersection of argumentation and the use of multiple representations in the context of socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 38(7), 1100-1132.
  • Osbome J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
  • Özturk, S. ,& Leblebicioğlu, G. (2012). Sosyo-bilimsel bir konu olan hidroelektriksantraller (HES) hakkında karar verilirken kullanılan irdeleme şekillerinin incelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(2), 1-33.
  • Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students’ argumentation in decision-making on a socioscientific issue:Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 745–754.
  • Polyiem, T., Nuangchalenn, P., & Wongchantra, P. (2011). Learning achievement,science process skills and moral reasoning of ninth grade students learned by 7e leaming cycle and socio-scientific issuebased learning. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(10), 257-564.
  • Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship: Teaching socio-scientific issııe. Maidenlıead: Open University Press.
  • Rebello, C. M., & Barrow, L. H. (2013). Exploring the effects of scaffolding on collegestudents’ solutions and argumentation quality on conceptual physics problems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico.
  • Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socio-scientific issues. A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
  • Sadler, T. D. ,& Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informalreasoning regarding socio-scientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education, 89(1), 71–93.
  • Sadler, T. D. ,& Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
  • Sampson, V. D. (2007). Theeffects of collabortaion on argumentationoutcomes, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona StateUniversity, America.
  • Sampson, V. D. (2007). The effects of collabortaion on argumentation outcomes, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University, America.
  • Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2001). Gelişimöğrenme ve öğretim: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
  • Senemoğlu, N. (2004). Kuramdan uygulamaya gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim. Ankara: Gazi Kitapevi
  • Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50(2), 241- 271.
  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning. USA
  • Soysal, Y. (2012). Sosyobilimsel argümantasyon kalitesine alan bilgisi düzeyinin etkisi: Genetiği değiştirilmiş organizmalar, Unpublished master thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu.
  • Şimşek, Ü. (2007). Çözeltiler ve kimyasal denge konularında uygulanan jigsaw ve birlikte öğrenme tekniklerinin öğrencilerin maddenin tanecikli yapıda öğrenmeleri ve akademik başarıları üzerine etkisi, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum
  • Tan, Ş., Kayabaşı, Y., & Erdoğan, A. (2002). Öğretimi planlama ve değerlendirme. (3.Baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Tekbiyik, A. (2015). The use of jigsaw collaborative learning method in teaching socio-scientific issues: The case of nuclear energy. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(2), 237–253.
  • Topcu, M. S. (2008). Preservice science teachers' informal reasoning regarding socio-scientificissues and the factors influencing their informal reasoning,Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Orta Doğu Teknik Universitesi, Ankara.
  • Topçu, M. S., & Atabey, N. (2013). Exploring 7th grade students’ quality of written argumentation: The impact of competing theories and predict-observe-explain strategies.European Science Education Research Association, Nicosia- Cybrus.van Eemeren, F. H.,& Grootendorst, R. (1996). A systematic theory of argumantation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Topçu, M. S. & Atabey, N. (2017). Sosyobilimsel konu içerikli alan gezilerinin ilköğretim öğrencilerinin argümantasyon nitelikleri üzerine etkisi. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 68-84.
  • Yapıcıoğlu, A. E., & Aycan, Ş. (2018). Pre-service science teachers’ decisions and types of informal reasoning about the socio-scientific issue of nuclear power plants. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research, 13(1), 31-53.
  • Yenilmez, K., & Dereli, A. (2009). İlköğretim okullarında matematiğe karşı olumsuz önyargı oluşturan etkenler. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(1), 1 25-33.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013) Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  • Yılmaz, H., & Sünbül, A. M. (2007). Öğretimde planlama ve değerlendirme. Konya: Çizgi Yayınevi.
  • Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students' ınformal reasoning on a socio-scientific ıssue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1163–1187.
  • Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journalof Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35–62.
APA ATABEY N, ARSLAN A (2020). The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. , 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Chicago ATABEY Nejla,ARSLAN Ayten The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. (2020): 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
MLA ATABEY Nejla,ARSLAN Ayten The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. , 2020, ss.491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
AMA ATABEY N,ARSLAN A The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. . 2020; 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Vancouver ATABEY N,ARSLAN A The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. . 2020; 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
IEEE ATABEY N,ARSLAN A "The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities." , ss.491 - 514, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
ISNAD ATABEY, Nejla - ARSLAN, Ayten. "The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities". (2020), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
APA ATABEY N, ARSLAN A (2020). The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19(2), 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Chicago ATABEY Nejla,ARSLAN Ayten The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19, no.2 (2020): 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
MLA ATABEY Nejla,ARSLAN Ayten The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.19, no.2, 2020, ss.491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
AMA ATABEY N,ARSLAN A The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(2): 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Vancouver ATABEY N,ARSLAN A The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(2): 491 - 514. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
IEEE ATABEY N,ARSLAN A "The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19, ss.491 - 514, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
ISNAD ATABEY, Nejla - ARSLAN, Ayten. "The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers’ argumentation qualities". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19/2 (2020), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 13:58

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları