Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties

Şaziye SEÇKİN YILMAZ, (Üsküdar Üniversitesi)
Berrin BAYDIK (Ankara Üniversitesi)
İlköğretim Online (elektronik)
1 1
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 782 - 802 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604 İndeks Tarihi: 11-04-2020

Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties

Öz:
The aim of this study was to examine the language skills of students with and without readingdifficulties (RD) comparatively. For this purpose, a comparative descriptive research methodology wasutilised with a participant group comprised of 52 elementary school 3rd grade students with and withoutRD. The results of this study revealed that students with difficulties in reading fluency were lesssuccessful in phonological processing than their peers with no difficulty in reading fluency. Also, studentswho had difficulties in reading comprehension were less successful than their peers with no difficultiesin oral language assessments. In summary, it was recognised that students who experienced difficultiesin reading also possessed difficulties in language skills. As a result, the assessment of both reading skillsand language skills is critical for the identification of RD as well as for conducting appropriateintervention programs to address these difficulties.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abolafya, P. B. (2008). Rapid automatized naming in relation to some other reading components and reading skills of second graders. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
  • Acarlar, F., Ege, P. ve Turan, F. (2002). Türk çocuklarında üst dil becerilerinin gelişimi ve okuma ile ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17(50), 63–73.
  • Adlof, S. M., & Catts, H. W. (2015). Morphosyntax in poor comprehenders. Reading& Writing, 28, 1051–1070.
  • Akoğlu, G. ve Acarlar, F. (2014). Türkçe anlamsız sözcük tekrarı listesinin 3-9 yaş grubu çocuklarda kullanımının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(173), 13-24.
  • Aksoy-Tercan, E., Kesikçi-Ergin, H. ve Amado, S. (2012). Okuma güçlüğü yaşayan çocuklarda çalışma belleğinin fonolojik depo açısından incelenmesi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 27(69), 65-75.
  • Bakır, F. H. (2007). Development of the Turkish rapid automatized naming tests (Unpublished master’s thesis). Boğaziçi University, İstanbul.
  • Basaraba, D., Yovanoff, P., Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2013). Examining the structure of reading comprehension: Do literal, inferential, and evaluative comprehension truly exist? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(6), 1-31.
  • Baydık, B. (2011). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma stratejilerini kullanımı ve öğretmenlerinin okuduğunu anlama öğretim uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 301-319.
  • Baydık, B. ve Seçkin, Ş. (2012, June). An examination of reading skills of students with reading difficulties in informative and narrative texts. International Conference for Academic Diciplines, Florence-Italy.
  • Bowers, P. N., Kirby, J. R., & Deacon, S. H. (2010). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy skills: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 80, 144–179.
  • Bowey, J. A., McGuigan, M., & Ruschena, A. (2005). On the association between serial naming speed for letters and digits and word-reading skill: Towards a developmental account. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 400–422.
  • Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Profiles of children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal Of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 683-696.
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2000). Phonological skills and comprehension failure: A test of the phonological deficit hypothesis. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 13, 31-56.
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31-42.
  • Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Elbro, C. (2003). The ability to learn new word meanings from context by school-age children with and without language comprehension difficulties. Journal of Child Language, 30(3), 681-694.
  • Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: Is there any evidence for a special relationship? Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 679-694.
  • Caravolas, M., Lervåg, A., Mousikou, P., Efrim, C., Litavsky, M., Onochie-Quintanilla, E.,Salas, N., Schöffelová, M., Defior, S., Mikulajová, M., Seidlová-Málková, G., & Hulme, C. (2012). Common patterns of prediction of literacy development in different alphabetic orthographies. Psychological Science, 23(6) 678–686.
  • Caravolas, M., Volin, J., & Hulme, C. (2005). Phoneme awareness is a key component of alphabetic literacy skills in consistent and inconsistent orthographies: Evidence from Czech and English children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92, 107–139.
  • Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. (2003). Language basis of reading disabilities and implications for early identification and remediation. Reading Psychology, 24, 223-246.
  • Catts, H. W., & Kamhi, A. G. (2005). Causes of Reading Disabilities. In H. W. Catts & A. G. Kamhi (Eds.). Language and reading disabilities (2nd ed.)(pp. 94-126). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Catts, H. W., Adlof, S. M., & Weismer, S. E. (2006). Language deficits in poor comprehenders: A case for the simple view of reading. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 278-293.
  • Ceylan, M., & Baydık, B. (2018). Reading skills of students who are poor readers in different text genres. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 13(2), 178-191.
  • Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Deacon, S. H., & Kirby, J. R. (2004). Morphological awareness: Just “more phonological”? The roles of morphological and phonological awareness in reading development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 223–238.
  • Demirtaş, Ç. P. (2017). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerde okuma, sesbilgisel farkındalık, hızlı isimlendirme ve çalışma belleği becerilerinin incelenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Ankara.
  • Duff, F. J., Reen, G., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2015). Do infant vocabulary skills predict school-age language and literacy outcomes? .Journal of Child Psychology, 56(8), 848-856.
  • Elwér, Å., Keenan, J. M., Olson, R. K., Byrne, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2013). Longitudinal stability and predictors of poor oral comprehenders and poor decoders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(3), 497–516.
  • Erdoğan, Ö. (2009). İlköğretim birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin fonolojik farkındalık becerileri ile okuma ve yazma becerileri arasındaki ilişki (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University, Ankara.
  • Ergül, C. (2012). Okumada güçlük yaşayan öğrencilerin okuma performanslarının öğrenme güçlüğü riski açısından değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 12(3), 2033-2057.
  • Ergül, C. ve Demir, E. (2016). Hızlı İsimlendirme Testi. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
  • Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, S. (2009). Preschool cognitive and language skills predicting kindergarten and Grade 1 reading and spelling: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Research inReading, 32(3),275–292.
  • Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of EducationalPsychology, 100(3), 566–580.
  • Georgiou, G., Parrila, R. Manolitsis, G., & Kirby, J. (2011). Examining the importance of assessing rapid automatized naming (RAN) speed for the identification of children with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities, 9, 5-26.
  • Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., Cui, Y., & Papadopoulos, T.C. (2013). Why is rapid automatized naming related to reading? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 218-225.
  • Gillam, S. L., & Gillam, R. B. (2016). Narrative discourse intervention for school-aged children with language impairment: Supporting knowledge in language and literacy. Topics In Language Disorders, 36(1), 20-34.
  • Göktaş, Ö. ve Gürbüztürk, O. (2012). Okuduğunu anlama becerisinin ilköğretim ikinci kademe matematik dersindeki akademik başarıya etkisi. Uluslararası Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 53-66.
  • Güven (2014). İki dil testinin (TEDİL ve TODİL) tipik ve atipik dil gelişimi gösteren çocuklarda ayırt ediciliğinin incelenmesi (Unpublished master’s thesis). Anadolu University, Eskişehir.
  • Høıen-Tengesdal, I., & Tønnessen, F. (2011). The relationship between phonological skills and word decoding. Scandinavian Journal Of Psychology, 52(1), 93-103.
  • Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25, 4-32.
  • Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2009). Developmental disorders of language learning and cognition. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Justice, L., Mashburn, A., & Petscher, Y. (2013). Very early language skills of fifth-grade poor comprehenders. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(2), 172-185.
  • Karasar, N. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi (20. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
  • Karasu, H. P., Girgin, Ü. ve Uzuner, Y. (2013). Formel olmayan okuma envanteri. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Katzir, T., Kim, Y., Wolf, M., O'Brien, B., Kennedy, B., Lovett, M.,& Morris, R. (2006). Reading fluency: The whole is more than the parts. Annals of Dyslexia, 56(1), 51–83.
  • Kim, Y.S., Wagner, R.K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 338–362.
  • Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.
  • Lai, S.A., Benjamin, R.G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Kuhn, M.R. (2014). The longitudinal relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension skills in second grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 30, 116-138.
  • Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2006). Development of reading and spelling. Finnish from preschool to Grade 1 and Grade 2. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(1), 3–30.
  • McArthur, G., & Castles, A. (2013). Phonological processing deficits in specific reading disability and specific language impairment: Same or different? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(3), 280-302.
  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2007). Ders kitapları ile eğitim araçlarının incelenmesi ve değerlendirilmesine ilişkin yönerge. Erişim adresi: http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/html/2597_0.html
  • Nation, K. J., Cocksey, J., Taylor, J. S. H., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2010). A longitudinal investigation of early reading and language skills in children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 51(9), 1031–1039.
  • Nation, K., & Angell, P. (2006). Learning to read and learning to comprehend. London Review of Education, 4(1), 77-87.
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory & Language, 39, 85-101.
  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2000). Factors influencing syntactic awareness skills in normal readers and poor comprehenders. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 229–241.
  • Nation, K., Clarke, P., Marshall, C. M., & Durand, M. (2004). Hidden language impairments in children: Parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairments? Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 199–211.
  • Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(1), 1-17.
  • Nithart, C., Demont, E., Metz-Lutz, M., Majerus, S., Poncelet, M., & Leybaert, J. (2011). Early contribution of phonological awareness and later influence of phonological memory throughout reading acquisition. Journal of Research In Reading, 34(3), 346-363.
  • Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociationof word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and CognitiveProcesses, 18, 443–468.
  • Öney, B., & Durgunoğlu, A. (1997). Beginning to read in Turkish: A phonologically transparent orthography. Applied Psycholinguistics,18, 1-15.
  • Papadimitriou, A. M., & Vlachos. M. (2014). Which specific skills developing during preschool years predict the reading performance in the first and second grade of primary school? Early Child Development and Care, 184(11), 1706-1722.
  • Puolakanaho, A., Ahonen, T., Aro, M., Eklund, K., Leppänen, P.H. T., Poikkeus, A. M., Tolvanen, A., Torppa, M., & Lyytinen, H. (2008). Developmental links of very early phonological and language skills to second grade reading outcomes: Strong to accuracy but only minor to fluency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(4), 353-370.
  • Rasinski, T. V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning. Kim, Y.S., Wagner, R.K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 338–362.
  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235-257.
  • Rispens, J., & Baker, A. (2012). Nonword repetition: The relative contributions of phonological short-term memory and phonological representations in children with language and reading impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55(3), 683-694.
  • Seçkin-Yılmaz, Ş. ve Baydık, B. (2017). Okuma performası düşük olan ve olmayan ilkokul öğrencilerinin okuma akıcılıkları. İlköğretim Online, 16(4), 1652-1671.
  • Shapiro, L. R., Carroll, J. M., & Solity, J. E. (2013). Separating the influences of prereading skills on early word and nonword reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 278-295.
  • Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Hartranft, A. M., Doyle, B., & Zelinke, S. B. (2015). Language skills and reading comprehension in English monolingual and Spanish-English bilingual children in grades 2-5. Reading&Writing, 28, 1381-1405.
  • Sodoro, J., Allinder, R. M., & Rankin-Erickson, J. L. (2002). Assessment of Phonological Awareness: Review of Methods and Tools. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 223-260.
  • Solís, M., Scammacca, N., Barth, A. E., & Roberts, G. J. (2017). Text-Based Vocabulary Intervention Training Study: Supporting Fourth Graders with Low Reading Comprehension and Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 15(1), 103-115.
  • Soltani, A., & Roslan, S. (2013). Contributions of phonological awareness, phonological short-term memory, and rapid automated naming, toward decoding ability in students with mild intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 1090–1099.
  • Sürgen, D. (2019). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin fonolojik farkındalık, hızlı-otomatik isimlendirme ve çalışma belleği performanslarının incelenmesi. (Unpublished master’s thesis). İstanbul University, İstanbul.
  • Tankersley, K. (2003). Threads of reading: Strategies for literacy development. Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381-398.
  • Taub, G. E., & Szente, J. (2012). The impact of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness on the reading fluency of a minority student population. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 26(4), 359-370.
  • Tobia, V., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2014). Predictors of reading fluency in Italian orthography: evidence from a cross-sectional study of primary school students. Child Neuropsychology, 20(4), 449-469.
  • Tong, X., Deacon, S. H., Kirby, J. R., Cain, K., & Parrila, R. (2011). Morphological awareness: A key to understanding poor reading comprehension in English. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 523–534.
  • Tong, X., Deacon, S.H., & Cain, K. (2013). Morphological and syntactic awareness in poor comprehenders: another piece of the puzzle. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(1), 22-33.
  • Topbaş, S. (2005). Dilin bileşenleri. Dil ve kavram gelişimi içinde (s. 21-30). Ankara: Kök Yayıncılık.
  • Topbaş, S. ve Güven, O. S. (2017). Türkçe okul çağı dil gelişim testi. Detay Yayıncılık: Ankara.
  • Topbaş, S. ve Maviş, İ. (2004). Dil ve konuşma bozuklukları İngilizce-Türkçe terimler sözlüğü. Ankara: Karatepe Yayınları.
  • Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(3), 213–231.
  • Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Introduction to this special issue: Vocabulary growth and reading skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 1-7.
  • Verhoeven, L., & Van Leeuwe, J. (2008). Prediction of the development of reading comprehension: A longitudinal study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 407-423.
  • Wang, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2013). Working memory deficits in children with reading difficulties: Memory span and dual task coordination. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 188-197.
  • Yıldırım, K. T., Yıldız, M. T. ve Ateş, S. T. (2011). Kelime bilgisi okuduğunu anlamanın anlamlı bir yordayıcısı mıdır ve yordama gücü metin türlerine göre farklılaşmakta mıdır? Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(3), 1531-1547.
  • Yıldız, M. (2013). Okuma motivasyonu, akıcı okuma ve okuduğunu anlamanın beşinci sınıf öğrencilerinin akademik başarılarındaki rolü. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 8(4), 1461-1478.
APA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş, BAYDIK B (2020). Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. , 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
Chicago SEÇKİN YILMAZ Şaziye,BAYDIK BERRİN Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. (2020): 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
MLA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Şaziye,BAYDIK BERRİN Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. , 2020, ss.782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
AMA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. . 2020; 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
Vancouver SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. . 2020; 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
IEEE SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B "Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties." , ss.782 - 802, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
ISNAD SEÇKİN YILMAZ, Şaziye - BAYDIK, BERRİN. "Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties". (2020), 782-802. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
APA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş, BAYDIK B (2020). Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19(2), 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
Chicago SEÇKİN YILMAZ Şaziye,BAYDIK BERRİN Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19, no.2 (2020): 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
MLA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Şaziye,BAYDIK BERRİN Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. İlköğretim Online (elektronik), vol.19, no.2, 2020, ss.782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
AMA SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(2): 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
Vancouver SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties. İlköğretim Online (elektronik). 2020; 19(2): 782 - 802. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
IEEE SEÇKİN YILMAZ Ş,BAYDIK B "Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties." İlköğretim Online (elektronik), 19, ss.782 - 802, 2020. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
ISNAD SEÇKİN YILMAZ, Şaziye - BAYDIK, BERRİN. "Comparison of language skills of students with and without reading difficulties". İlköğretim Online (elektronik) 19/2 (2020), 782-802. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.694604
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:11

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları