Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership

İsmail ÇİMEN, (Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi)
Fatih BEKTAŞ, (Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi)
Cemil YÜCEL (Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi)
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
2 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 254 - 272 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 15-04-2020

Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership

Öz:
The performance evaluation of teachers is a matter of debate in many respects. Bywhom and for what purposes the evaluations are carried out is an important issue forthese debates. Different arrangements were made for that issue in the TurkishEducation System. Recently, the school principals take an important role in theevaluation of teachers. However, there is a need to determine how school principals,seen as instructional leaders who need to work for the development andtransformation of the school, make evaluations and what roles those evaluations havefor instructional leadership. In recent research, it was aimed to examine theevaluations made by the school principals in the context of instructional leadership.The case study was used for the research design. The study group was constructedusing the maximum diversity sampling method and included school principals whoworked at different school levels and socio-economic environments and had differentwork experience. It was concluded that evaluations made by the school principals aremore positive in general terms than the evaluations made by external evaluators.School principals have accepted that although this process has many points to bedeveloped, it will reveal more positive results in the future. When considered in thecontext of instructional leadership, it can be said that the evaluation process will beappropriate in many aspects. However, there are some problems - intangibility of thecriteria, increasing tension between teacher and principal, and ineffective evaluationson different field of specializations- to be addressed and overcame in the practice ofthe system that may lead to more compatibility of the evaluations with instructionalleadership.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları

Okul Müdürlerinin Öğretmenlerle İlgili Değerlendirmelerinin Öğretimsel Liderlik Bağlamında İncelenmesi

Öz:
Öğretmenlerin performans değerlendirmesi birçok bakımdan tartışılan bir konudur. Değerlendirmelerin kimler tarafından yapılacağı ve ne amaçla kullanılacağı da bu tartışmalarda önemli bir alanı kapsamaktadır. Türk eğitim sisteminde de öğretmenlerin performans değerlendirmesinde farklı düzenlemeler gidilmiştir. Son olarak yapılan düzenlemeyle birlikte öğretmenlerin değerlendirmesinde okul müdürlerine önemli bir rol verilmiştir. Günümüzde okulun gelişimi ve dönüşümü için çalışması gereken öğretimsel liderler olarak görülen okul müdürlerinin uygulamada değerlendirmeleri nasıl yaptığının ve değerlendirmelerin öğretimsel liderlikteki rolünün belirlenmesine ihtiyaç vardır. Buradan yola çıkarak bu araştırmada Türk eğitim sisteminde okul müdürleri tarafından yapılan değerlendirmelerin öğretimsel liderlik bağlamında incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırmada nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Maksimum çeşitlilik örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak oluşturulan çalışma grubuna farklı okul düzeylerinde ve sosyoekonomik çevrelerde görev yapan ve farklı yöneticilik tecrübesine sahip olan okul müdürleri dâhil edilmiştir. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular sonucunda okul müdürleri tarafından yapılan değerlendirmelerin dış değerlendiriciler tarafından yapılan değerlendirmelere nazaran genel anlamda daha olumlu yanlarının olduğunu söylemek mümkündür. Okul müdürleri, bu sürecin geliştirilmesi gereken birçok noktaya sahip olduğunu kabul etmekle birlikte daha olumlu sonuçlar doğuracağını belirtmişlerdir. Öğretimsel liderlik bağlamında ele alındığında ise okul müdürlerinin etkin rol aldığı değerlendirme sürecinin birçok bakımdan uygun olacağı söylenebilir. Ancak sistemin işleyişindeki kriterlerin somut olmaması, öğretmen ve yönetici arasındaki gerilimin artması, farklı uzmanlık alanlarında değerlendirmenin yetersizliği gibi sorunların giderilmesi değerlendirmelerin öğretimsel liderlikle daha fazla bağdaşmasını sağlayabilir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Konular: Eğitim, Eğitim Araştırmaları
Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Alig-Mielcarek, J. M., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Instructional leadership: its nature, meaning, and influence. C. G. Miskel, & W. K. Hoy içinde, Educational Leadership and Reform (s. 29-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
  • Andrews, R. L., Basom, M. R., & Basom, M. (1991). Instuctional Leadership: Supervision That Makes a Difference. Theory Into Practice, 30(2), 91-101.
  • Aslanargun, E. ve Göksoy, S. (2013). Öğretmen Denetimini Kim Yapmalıdır? Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14, 98-121.
  • Aydın, M. (2013). Çağdaş Eğitim Denetimi. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Basım ve Yayın.
  • Ballou, D., & Springer, M. G. (2015). Using Student Test Scores to Measure Teacher Performance: Some Problems in the Design and Implementation of Evaluation Systems. Educational Researcher, 44(2), 77-86.
  • Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349-378.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CL: SAGE Publications.
  • Christie, C. A., Ross, R. M. & Klein, B. M. (2004). Moving toward collaboration by creating a participatory internal-external evaluation term: A case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30, 125-134.
  • Danielson, C. (2010). Evaluations That Help Teachers Learn. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 35-39.
  • Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). One Piece of the Whole: Teacher Evaluation as Part of Comprehensive System for Teaching and Learning. American Educator, 4-44. https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/Darling-Hammond.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2014). Improving instruction through supervision, evaluation, and professional development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43, 100-107.
  • Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (2000). A study of individual differences and self-awareness in the context of multisource feedback. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 303-319.
  • Frase, L. E., & Streshly, W. (1994). Lack of accuracy, feedback and commitment in teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 8, 47-57.
  • Fulmer, C. L. (2006). Becoming Instructional Leaders: Lessons Learned from Instructional Leadership Work Samples. Educational Leadership and Admnistration, 18, 109-129.
  • Glickman, C. D. (2002). Leadership for Learning: How to Help Teachers Succeed. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Glickman, C. D., Ross-Gordon, J. M., & Gordon, S. P. (2014). Denetim ve Öğretimsel Liderlik: Gelişmsel Bir Yaklaşım. (M. B. Aksu, & E. Ağaoğlu, Çev.) Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Goff, P. T., Mavrogordato, M., & Goldring, E. (2012). Instructional Leadership in Charter Schools: Is There an Organizational Effect or Are Leadership Practices the Result of Faculty Characteristics and Preferences? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 11, 1-25.
  • Goldring, E., Porter, A., Murphy, J., Elliott, S. N., & Cravens, X. (2009). Assessing learning-centered leadership: Connections to research, professional standards, and current practices. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 8(1), 1-36.
  • Göksoy, S., & Argon, T. (2016). Conflicts at Schools and Their Impact on Teachers. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(4), 197-205.
  • Graczewski, C., Knudson, J., & Holtzman, D. J. (2009). Instructional leadership in practice: What does it look like, and what influence does it have? Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 14(1), 72-96.
  • Hallinger, P. (2005). Instructional Leadership and the School Principal: A Passing Fancy that Refuses to Fade Away. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 221-239.
  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals. The Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217-247.
  • Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Instructional leadership in the school context. W. Greenfield içinde, Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues, and Controversies. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Hancock, D. R. & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing Case Study Research: A Practical Guide for Beginning Researchers. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Examining Contextual Differences in the Development of Instructional Leadership and School Achievement. The Urban Review, 22(4), 247-265.
  • Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice (9 b.). New York, NY: The McGraw Hill Companies.
  • Johnston, W. R., Kaufman, J. H., & Thompson, L. E. (2016). Support for Instructional Leadership: Supervision, Mentoring, and Professional Development for U.S. School Leaders: Findings from the American School Leader Panel. RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, CA. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1580-1.html adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Kayıkçı, K. (2005). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Müfettişlerinin Denetim Sisteminin Yapısal Sorunlarına İlişkin Algıları ve İş Doyum Düzeyleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 44, 507-527.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, CL: SAGE Publications.
  • Köroğlu, H. ve Oğuz, E. (2011). Eğitim müfettişlerinin rehberlik rollerine yönelik öğretmen, yönetici ve eğitim müfettişi görüşleri. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 9-25.
  • Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Lincoln, S. Y., & Guba, G. E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
  • Mangin, M. M., & Stoelinga, S. R. (2010). The Future of Instructional Teacher Leader Roles. The Educational Forum, 74(1), 49-62.
  • Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An inteintegration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370-397.
  • Meador, D. (2017, Aralık 16). Why Principals Must Build Relationships with Parents. ThoughtCo.: https://www.thoughtco.com/why-principals-must-build-relationships-with-parents-3956178 adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı İlköğretim Müfettişleri Kurulu Yönetmeliği (1990). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 20678, 27 Ekim 1990.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Atama ve Yer Değiştirme Yönetmeliği (2015). T.C. Resmi Gazete, 29329, 17 Nisan 2015.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Performans Değerlendirme ve Aday Öğretmenlik İş ve İşlemleri Yönetmeliği (Taslak) (2018). https://www.memurlar.net/common/news/documents/ 730414/ogretmen_performans_degerlendirme_ve_aday_ogretmenlik.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Msila, V. (2012). Conflict Management and School Leadership. Journal of Communication, 3(1), 25-34.
  • Murphy, J., Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: The case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher, 42, 349-354.
  • Neumerski, C. M. (2012). Rethinking Instructional Leadership, a Review: What Do We Know About Principal, Teacher, and Coach Instructional Leadership, and Where Should We Go From Here? Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(2), 310-347.
  • Nwaokugha, D. O. & Danladi, S. A. (2016). Language and Communication: Effectice Tools for Educational Supervision and Inspection in Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 420-428.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Poole, W. L. (1994). Removing the “süper” from supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 9(3), 284-309.
  • Reitzug, U. C., West, D. L., & Angel, R. (2008). Conceptualizing Instructional Leadership: The Voices of Principals. Education and Urban Society, 40(6), 694-714.
  • Saiti, A. (2015). Conflicts in schools, conflict management styles and the role of the school leader: A study of Greek primary school educators. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 582-609.
  • Sindhu, I. S. (2012). Educational Administration and Management. Delhi: Pearson India.
  • Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How Principals and Peers Influence Teaching and Learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31-56.
  • Şahin, S., Elçiçek, Z. ve Tösten, R. (2013). Türk Eğitim Sisteminde Teftişin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Bu Gelişim Süreci İçerisindeki Sorunlar. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 6(5), 1105-1126.
  • Şişman, M. (2012). Öğretim Liderliği (4 b.). Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2017). The role of feedback from the school leader during teacher evaluation for teacher and school improvement. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(1), 6-24.
  • Uçar, R. (2012). İlköğretim Okullarında Görev Yapan Öğretmenlerin Sınıflardaki Denetim Uygulamalarına İlişkin Görüşleri. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, 3(2), 82-96.
  • Valentine, J. W., & Prater, M. (2011). Instructional, Transformational, and Managerial Leadership and Student Achievement: High School Principals Make a Difference. NASSP Bulletin, 95(1), 5-30.
  • Wahlstrom, K., & Louis, K. S. (2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 458-495.
  • Webster, C. (2015). Competition and collaboration in teaching and learning. Enhancing Learning in the Social Sciences, 4(1), 1-4.
  • Yılmaz, K. (2009). Okul Müdürlerinin Denetim Görevi. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 19- 35. 272
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255-316.
  • Zepeda, S. J. (2013). Instructional Supervision: Applying Tools and Concepts. New York, NY: Eye On Education.
APA ÇİMEN İ, BEKTAŞ F, YÜCEL C (2019). Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. , 254 - 272.
Chicago ÇİMEN İsmail,BEKTAŞ FATİH,YÜCEL Cemil Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. (2019): 254 - 272.
MLA ÇİMEN İsmail,BEKTAŞ FATİH,YÜCEL Cemil Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. , 2019, ss.254 - 272.
AMA ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. . 2019; 254 - 272.
Vancouver ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. . 2019; 254 - 272.
IEEE ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C "Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership." , ss.254 - 272, 2019.
ISNAD ÇİMEN, İsmail vd. "Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership". (2019), 254-272.
APA ÇİMEN İ, BEKTAŞ F, YÜCEL C (2019). Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 254 - 272.
Chicago ÇİMEN İsmail,BEKTAŞ FATİH,YÜCEL Cemil Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 20, no.1 (2019): 254 - 272.
MLA ÇİMEN İsmail,BEKTAŞ FATİH,YÜCEL Cemil Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.20, no.1, 2019, ss.254 - 272.
AMA ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 20(1): 254 - 272.
Vancouver ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 20(1): 254 - 272.
IEEE ÇİMEN İ,BEKTAŞ F,YÜCEL C "Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership." İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, ss.254 - 272, 2019.
ISNAD ÇİMEN, İsmail vd. "Examining School Principals’ Evaluations on Teachers in the Context of Instructional Leadership". İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 20/1 (2019), 254-272.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 11:14

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları