Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 44 - 50 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 İndeks Tarihi: 07-07-2020
Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease
Öz: Objective: Freezing of gait (FOG) is one of the disabling symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). The diagnosis and assessment of FOG may be difficult, but it is absolutely necessary. The aim of this study was to develop a Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG-Q) and to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the FOG- Q in patients with PD. This study also investigated whether FOG-Q scores changed in subgroups based on severity of PD, fear of falling (FOF), and subtype of PD, and if the reliability of the FOG-Q was affected by these conditions.Methods: Following the translation process, 48 consecutive patients with PD were evaluated using the Turkish version of FOG-Q, the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), modified Hoehn and Yahr (mHY), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and Five Times Sit to Stand Test (FTSST).Results: The mean (SD) and median (q1-q3) FOG-Q scores were 4.44 (5.3) and 2 (0–15). FOG-Q demonstrated positive, stron-gest correlations with FES, TUG, UPDRS total score, and UPDRS part II-III (rs=0.693-0.603), and moderate correlations with FTSST, mHY, and UPDRS part I (rs = 0.579-0.448). BBS negatively correlated with FOG-Q (rs = -0.643). Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability ranged from 0.849 and 0.914. The FOG-Q scores increased with disease progression and FOF (p<0.05).Conclusion: The Turkish version of the FOG-Q is a valid and reliable tool for the assessment of FOG in PD patients who are native Turkish speakers.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Nieuwboer A, Giladi N. Characterizing freezing of gait in Parkin-son’s disease: models of an episodic phenomenon. Mov Disord 2013; 28: 1509-1519. [CrossRef]
- 2. Giladi N, McDermott MP, Fahn S, et al. Freezing of gait in PD: pro-spective assessment in the DATATOP cohort. Neurology 2001; 56: 1712-1721. [CrossRef]
- 3. Tan D, Danoudis M, McGinley J, Morris ME. Relationships be-tween motor aspects of gait impairments and activity limita-tions in people with Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012; 18: 117-124. [CrossRef]
- 4. Hely MA, Reid WG, Adena MA, Halliday GM, Morris JG. The Syd-ney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years. Mov Disord 2008; 23: 837-844. [CrossRef]
- 5. Okuma Y, Yanagisawa N. The clinical spectrum of freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2008; 23(Suppl 2): S426-430. [CrossRef]
- 6. Nilsson MH, Hagell P. Freezing of gait questionnaire: validity and reliability of the Swedish version. Acta Neurol Scand 2009; 120: 331-334. [CrossRef]
- 7. Moore O, Peretz C, Giladi N. Freezing of gait affects quality of life of peoples with Parkinson’s disease beyond its relation-ships with mobility and gait. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 2192-2195. [CrossRef]
- 8. Rosqvist K, Hagell P, Odin P, Ekström H, Iwarsson S, Nilsson MH. Factors associated with life satisfaction in Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 2017; 136: 64-71. [CrossRef] 9. Suppa A, Kita A, Leodori G, et al. l-DOPA and Freezing of Gait in Parkinson’s Disease: Objective Assessment through a Wearable Wireless System. Front Neurol 2017; 8: 406. [CrossRef ]
- 10. Mancini M, Priest KC, Nutt JG, Horak FB. Quantifying freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease during the instrumented timed up and go test. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012; 2012: 1198- 49 1201. [CrossRef]
- 11. Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Herman T, et al. Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: agreement between patients with Parkinson’s disease and their carers. Gait Posture 2009; 30: 459-463. [CrossRef]
- 12. Giladi N, Shabtai H, Simon ES, Biran S, Tal J, Korczyn AD. Con-struction of freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2000; 6: 165-170. [CrossRef]
- 13. Baggio JA, Curtarelli MB, Rodrigues GR, Tumas V. Validity of the Brazilian version of the freezing of gait questionnaire. Arq Neu-ropsiquiatr 2012; 70: 599-603. [CrossRef] 14. Tambasco N, Simoni S, Eusebi P, et al. The validation of an Italian version of the Freezing of Gait Questionnaire. Neurol Sci 2015; 36: 759-764. [CrossRef] 15. Vogler A, Janssens J, Nyffeler T, Bohlhalter S, Vanbellingen T. Ger-man translation and validation of the “freezing of gait question-naire” in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis 2015; 2015: 982058. [CrossRef]
- 16. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000; 25: 3186-3191. [CrossRef] 17. Sencan H. Sosyal ve davranissal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik. 1. Baskı, 2005. 18. Bloem BR, Marinus J, Almeida Q, et al. Measurement instruments to assess posture, gait, and balance in Parkinson’s disease: Cri-tique and recommendations. Mov Disord 2016; 31: 1342-1355. [CrossRef] 19. Fahn S. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Raven Pr; 1986. 20. Movement Disorder Society Task Force on Rating Scales for Par-kinson’s Disease. The Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS): status and recommendations. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 738-750. [CrossRef]
- 21. Akbostancı M, Balaban H, Atbaşoğlu C. Birleşik Parkinson Hastalığı Değerleme Ölçeği Motor Muayene Bölümü ve Anor-mal İstemsiz Hareketler Ölçeği’nin değerlendiriciler arası güve-nilirlik çalışması. Parkinson Hastalığı ve Hareket Bozuklukları Dergisi 2000; 3: 7-13.
- 22. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. 1967. Neurology 1998; 50: 318-334. [CrossRef]
- 23. Berg K, Wood-Dauphine S, Williams JI, Gayton D. Measuring bal-ance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada 1989; 41: 304-311. [CrossRef]
- 24. Sahin F, Yilmaz F, Ozmaden A, Kotevolu N, Sahin T, Kuran B. Re-liability and validity of the Turkish version of the Berg Balance Scale. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2008; 31: 32-37. [CrossRef] 25. Tinetti ME, Richman D, Powell L. Falls efficacy as a measure of fear of falling. J Gerontol 1990; 45: P239-P243. [CrossRef]
- 26. Gazibara T, Stankovic I, Tomic A, et al. Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Falls Efficacy Scale in patients with Parkinson’s disease in Serbia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2013; 13: 936-941. [CrossRef]
- 27. Morris S, Morris ME, Iansek R. Reliability of measurements ob-tained with the Timed “Up & Go” test in people with Parkinson disease. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 810-818. [CrossRef]
- 28. Duncan RP, Leddy AL, Earhart GM. Five times sit-to-stand test performance in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1431-1436. [CrossRef]
- 29. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174. [CrossRef]
- 30. Giladi N, Tal J, Azulay T, et al. Validation of the freezing of gait questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2009; 24: 655-661. [CrossRef]
- 31. Tan DM, McGinley JL, Danoudis ME, Iansek R, Morris ME. Freez-ing of gait and activity limitations in people with Parkinson’s dis-ease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011; 92: 1159-1165. [CrossRef]
- 32. Schaafsma JD, Balash Y, Gurevich T, Bartels AL, Hausdorff JM, Giladi N. Characterization of freezing of gait subtypes and the response of each to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2003; 10: 391-398. [CrossRef]
- 33. Duncan RP, Earhart GM. Measuring participation in individu-als with Parkinson disease: relationships with disease severity, quality of life, and mobility. Disabil Rehabil 2011; 33: 1440-1446. [CrossRef]
- 34. Elbers RG, van Wegen EE, Verhoef J, Kwakkel G. Is gait speed a valid measure to predict community ambulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease? J Rehabil Med 2013; 45: 370-375. [CrossRef]
- 35. Lamberti P, Armenise S, Castaldo V, et al. Freezing gait in Parkin-son’s disease. Eur Neurol 1997; 38: 297-301. [CrossRef] 36. Okuma Y. Freezing of gait in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2006; 253(Suppl 7): VII27-32. [CrossRef]
| APA | ACARÖZ CANDAN S, ÇATIKER A, Özcan T (2019). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. , 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| Chicago | ACARÖZ CANDAN SEVİM,ÇATIKER Aslıhan,Özcan Tuba Şaziye Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. (2019): 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| MLA | ACARÖZ CANDAN SEVİM,ÇATIKER Aslıhan,Özcan Tuba Şaziye Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. , 2019, ss.44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| AMA | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. . 2019; 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| Vancouver | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. . 2019; 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| IEEE | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T "Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease." , ss.44 - 50, 2019. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| ISNAD | ACARÖZ CANDAN, SEVİM vd. "Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease". (2019), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| APA | ACARÖZ CANDAN S, ÇATIKER A, Özcan T (2019). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), 36(1), 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| Chicago | ACARÖZ CANDAN SEVİM,ÇATIKER Aslıhan,Özcan Tuba Şaziye Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) 36, no.1 (2019): 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| MLA | ACARÖZ CANDAN SEVİM,ÇATIKER Aslıhan,Özcan Tuba Şaziye Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), vol.36, no.1, 2019, ss.44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| AMA | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online). 2019; 36(1): 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| Vancouver | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online). 2019; 36(1): 44 - 50. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| IEEE | ACARÖZ CANDAN S,ÇATIKER A,Özcan T "Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease." Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), 36, ss.44 - 50, 2019. 10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
| ISNAD | ACARÖZ CANDAN, SEVİM vd. "Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the freezing of gait questionnaire for patients with Parkinson’s disease". Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) 36/1 (2019), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.5152/NSN.2019.11115 |
