Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 42 Sayı: 366 Sayfa Aralığı: 64 - 77 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 08-06-2020

Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik

Öz:
Son 150 yılda dünya genelinde birçok ülkedevergi yükü önemli ölçüde genişlemiştir. Bu doğrultuda,verginin kapsamı hem kamusal hem desosyal bilimlerde kendisini önemli bir konu halinegelmiştir. Bu çalışmada, Dünya Bankası veri tabanındabulunan 80 ülkede vergi yükünü etkileyenfaktörler (ekonomik, politik) incelenmiştir. 1990-2015 yıllarının 5’er yıllık ortalamalarının kullanıldığıaraştırmada, ekonomik ve politik faktörlerin vergiyükü üzerindeki etkisi En Küçük Kareler (EKK) veİki Aşamalı En Küçük Kareler (2AEKK) yöntemlerikullanılarak test edilmiştir. Ampirik bulgulara göre,politik kutuplaşmanın vergi yükünü azalttığı veheterojen toplumların kamu hizmetlerinin finansmanınadaha az katılma arzusu içinde olduğu görülmüştür.
Anahtar Kelime:

TAX BURDEN, POLITICAL POLARIZATION AND SOCIAL DIVERSITY

Öz:
In many countries in the world over the last 150 years, the tax burden has expanded significantly. In this respect, the tax size and scope of the governments are a theme that repeats itself in both public and public and academic discussions. In this study, the factors affecting the tax burden of the government (economic, political) in the 80 countries on the database of the World Bank were examined. In the study which used the 5-year averages of 1990-2015 years, the effect of economic and political factors on the tax burden was tested using the OLS and 2SLS methods. According to empirical findings, political polarization decreases the tax burden and that heterogeneous societies are less willing to participate in the financing of public services.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Bibliyografik
  • Abdurrahman Akdoğan, Kamu Maliyesi, Gazi Kitabevi, 10 Baskı, Ankara: 2003.
  • Adam, A., Kammas, P., Lapatinas, A. Income inequality and the tax structure:evidence from developed and developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, Cilt:43,Sayı: 1, ss.138- 154.2015.
  • Andrew, Pickering, Sheraz, Rajput, Inequality and the composition of taxes, International Tax and Public Finance,Volume:25, No:4,pp.1001-1028.2018.
  • Antonio, Afonso, Joao, Tovar, Jalles, Economic Performance and Government Size, European Central Bank Working Paper Series, 2001.
  • Antonis, Adam, Pantelis, Kammas, Athanasios, Lapatinas, Income inequality and the tax structure:evidence from developed and developing countries, Journal of Comparative Economic s,Volume:43,No:1,pp.138-154.2015.
  • Arı, Ayşe, Özcan, Burcu, Hollanda Hastalığı: Gelişmekte Olan Ülkeler Üzerine Bir Uygulama, Sosyoekonomi, Cilt:18,Sayı:18,ss.153-172.2012.
  • Arye, L. Hillman, Public Finance and Public Policy, Responsibilities and Limitations of Government (Second Edition). Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  • Berger, Marron, Eric, Toder, Tax Policy and the Size of Government, Urban Institute and Urban- Brookings Tax Policy Center, 2013.
  • Boris Gramc, Factor of the Size of Government in Developed Countries, Prague Economic Papers, Volume:16, No:2, pp.130-142.2007.
  • Ceyhun, Elgin, Türkmen, Güksel, Mehmet, Y. Gürdal, Cüneyt, Orman, Religion, income inequality, and the size of the government, Economic Modelling, Cilt:30,ss.225-234.2013.
  • Cheol-Sung, Lee, Income Inequality, Democracy, and Public Sector Size, American Sociological Review, Volume:70,No:1,pp.158-181.2005.
  • Damodar, N. Gujarati, Econometric By Exemple. Boston: The Mc-Graw-Hill Companies.2011.
  • David R. Cameron, The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis, The American Political Science Review, Volume:72, No:4, pp.1243-1261,1978.
  • David,Kim, Tax Structure, Welfare and Government Spending: The Adoption of a VAT and the Causal Effect on Government Size. Doctoral Thesis, Faculty of Claremont Graduate University, California,2010.
  • Enlinson, Mattos, Vitor, França, Public employment and income redistribution: causal evidence for Brazilian municipalities, Public Choice, Volume :146,No:1/2,pp.43-73.2011.
  • Erik, Lindqvist, Robert, Östling, Political Polarization and the Size of Government. The American Political Science Review, Volume:104, No:3, pp.543-565.2010.
  • European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Wave 2 1990-1994. Version 2014-04-29. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV2. jsp (erişim Temmuz 17, 2017).
  • European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Wave 3 1995-1998. Version 2014-04-09. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV3. jsp (erişim Temmuz 17, 2017).
  • European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Wave 4 1999-2004. Version 2014-04-09. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV4. jsp (erişim Temmuz 17, 2017).
  • European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Wave 5 2005-2009. Version 2014-04-09. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV5. jsp (erişim Temmuz 17, 2017).
  • European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Wave 6 2010-2014. Version 2014-04-09. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6. jsp (erişim Temmuz 17, 2017).
  • Frank, M. Häge, Determinants of Government Size: The Capacity for Partisan Policy under Political Constraints, Department of Politics and Management, University of Konstanz,2003.
  • Gary, S. Becker, Casey, B. Mulligan, Deadweight Costs and the Size of Government, Journal of Law and Economics, Volume:46, No:2,pp. 293- 340.2003.
  • Halil, Nadaroğlu, Kamu Maliyesi Teorisi,Beta Yayınları,İstanbul, 1998.
  • Hülya,Kirmanoğlu, Kamu Ekonomisi Analizi, Beta Yayıncılık, 5. Baskı, İstanbul:2014.
  • IMF, Sweeden Selected Issues-The Role of Government, IMF Country Report, 01/169, 2001.
  • Islam, M. Rabiul, Madsen, Jakob B., & Doucouliagos, Hristos Does inequality constrain the power to tax? Evidence from the OECD, European Journal of Political Economy, Volume:52, pp.1-17.2017.
  • James, B. Kau, Paul, H. Rubin, The Growth of Government: Sources and Limits, Public Choice, Volume:113,No: 3-4,pp.389-402.2002.
  • James, B. Kau, Paul, H., Rubin, The size of government, Public Choice, Volume:37, No:2,pp.261-274.1981.
  • Jeeban, Amgain, Estimating Optimal Level of Taxation for Growth Maximization in Asia, Applied Economics and Finance, Volume:4, No:3, pp.47- 55. 2017.
  • John, Ashworth, Bruno, Heyndels, Political Fragmentation and the Evolution of National Tax Structures in the OECD, International Tax and Public Finance, Volume:8,No:4,pp.377-393.2001.
  • Jorgen, Juel, Andersen, Costs of taxation and the size of government, Public Choice,Volume:153, No:1/2,pp.83-115.2012.
  • Konstantinos, Angelopoulos, George, Economides, Pantelis, Kammas,Does cabinet ideology matter fort he structure of tax policies?, European Journal of Political Economy,Volume:28,No:4, pp.620-635.2012.
  • Libor, Dusek, Do Government Grow When They Become More Efficient? Evidence from Tax Withholding. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Economics, University of Chicago.2002.
  • Lina, Sineviciene, Ginta, Railiene, The Nexus between Government Size, Tax Burden and Private Investment, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences,Volume:213, pp.485-490.2015.
  • Margit, Tavits, The Size of Government in Majoritarian and Consensus Democracies, Comparative Political Studies, Volume: 37,No: 3,pp.340- 359.2004.
  • Mark, Schneider, Income Homogeneity and the Size of Suburban Government, The Journal of Politics, Volume:49,No:1,pp.36-53. 1987.
  • Rabiul, M. Islam, Jakob, B.Madsen, Hristos, Doucouliagos, Does inequality constrain the power to tax? Evidence from the OECD. European Journal of Political Economy, Volume:3, pp.1-17.2017.
  • Richard A. Posner, Taxation by Regulation, The Bell Journal of Economics, Volume:2, No:1, pp.22- 50.1971.
  • Richard, K. Vedder, Lowell, E. Gallaway, Government Size and Economic Growth, A Joint Economic Committee Study, Ohio University,1998.
  • Roberto, Perotti,Yianos, Kontopoulos, Fragmented fiscal policy, Journal of Public Economics, Volume:86,No:2, pp.191-222. 2002.
  • Suat H. Şentürk, Vergilemede Fayda İlkesine İlişkin Geleneksek ve Modern Yorumların Karşılatırmalı Analizi, Küresel İktisat ve İşletme Çalışmaları, Cilt: 6, Sayı:11, ss.1-16.2017.
  • Şükrü Kızılot, ve Mustafa Durmuş, Ekonomik Kriz ve Kamu Maliyesi, Alkım Yayınları, İstanbul, 2002.
  • Thomas A. Garrett, Russell M. Rhine, On the Size and Growth of Government, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, Volume::88, No:1, pp.13- 30. 2006.
  • Thomas, Piketty Emmanuel, Saez, How Progressive is The U.S. Federal Tax System? A Historical and International Perspective, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume:21,No:1, pp.3-24.2007.
  • Toke, Aidt, David, Eterovic, Political competition, electoral participation and public finance in 20th century Latin America, European Journal of Political Economy,Volume:27,No:1, pp.181-200.2011.
  • Toke, Aidt, Peter, Jensen, Tax structure, size of government, and the extension of the voting franchise in Western Europe 1860-1938, International Tax and Public Finance,Volume:16,No:3, pp.362-394.2009.
  • Torsten, Persson, Guido, Tabellini, Political institutions and policy outcomes: What are the stylized facts?, London: Center For Economic Policy Research.2001.
  • Torsten, Persson, Guido, Tabellini, The Economic Effects of Constitutions, What do the data say?.MIT Press. 2003.
  • William, D. Berry, David, Lowery, Explaining the Size of the Public Sector: Responsive and Excessive Government Interpretations, The Journal of Politics, Volume:49, No:2,pp.401-440.1987.
  • William, D. Berry, David, Lowery, The Measurement of Government Size: Implications for the Study of Government Growth, The Journal of Politics, Volume:46, No:4, pp.1193-1206. 1984
APA Akdede S, keyifli n (2019). Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. , 64 - 77.
Chicago Akdede Sacit Hadi,keyifli nazlı Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. (2019): 64 - 77.
MLA Akdede Sacit Hadi,keyifli nazlı Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. , 2019, ss.64 - 77.
AMA Akdede S,keyifli n Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. . 2019; 64 - 77.
Vancouver Akdede S,keyifli n Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. . 2019; 64 - 77.
IEEE Akdede S,keyifli n "Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik." , ss.64 - 77, 2019.
ISNAD Akdede, Sacit Hadi - keyifli, nazlı. "Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik". (2019), 64-77.
APA Akdede S, keyifli n (2019). Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 42(366), 64 - 77.
Chicago Akdede Sacit Hadi,keyifli nazlı Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi 42, no.366 (2019): 64 - 77.
MLA Akdede Sacit Hadi,keyifli nazlı Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, vol.42, no.366, 2019, ss.64 - 77.
AMA Akdede S,keyifli n Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi. 2019; 42(366): 64 - 77.
Vancouver Akdede S,keyifli n Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi. 2019; 42(366): 64 - 77.
IEEE Akdede S,keyifli n "Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik." Vergi Sorunları Dergisi, 42, ss.64 - 77, 2019.
ISNAD Akdede, Sacit Hadi - keyifli, nazlı. "Ülkelerin Vergi Yükü, Politik Kutuplaşma ve Sosyal Çeşitlilik". Vergi Sorunları Dergisi 42/366 (2019), 64-77.