Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 10 Sayı: 37 Sayfa Aralığı: 899 - 915 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 17-06-2020

PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE

Öz:
The effect of social support has been investigated in numerous studies. Indeed, studies showedthat social support is associated with health in many ways. As accepted, structural and functionalsupport are distinct types of social support. The MOS Social Support Survey is an assessment toolthat includes items measuring both types of social support. The MOS Social Support Survey waslinguistically adapted to Turkish by translation and back-translation process. The study included apre-test (N = 241) and a post-test (N = 99) conditions with one-month interval. The questionnaireset included a demographic information form, the MOS Social Support Survey, U.C.L.A. LonelinessScale, Symptom Checklist 90-Revised, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support, andInventory of Socially Supportive Behaviors. Factor analysis confirmed the fit of the 4-factormodel. While the internal consistency reliability of the whole scale was .96, the test-retestreliability was .73. The internal consistency reliabilities of the subscales ranged between .58 and.73. As an indicator for the divergent validity, the scale was negatively correlated with U.C.L.ALoneliness Scale (r = -.65, p < .01) and SCL-90-Revised (r = -.276, p < .01). For the convergentvalidity, the MOS Social Support Survey was correlated positively with MSPSS (r = .657, p < .01)and ISSB (r = .404, p < .01). The results of the study indicated that Turkish adaptation of the MOSSocial Support Survey has satisfactory reliability and validity values..
Anahtar Kelime:

MEDİKAL SONUÇ ÇALIŞMASI SOSYAL DESTEK ÖLÇEĞİ’NİN (MSÇ-SDÖ) TÜRK KÜLTÜRÜNDEKI PSiKOMETRİK ÖZELLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Öz:
Sosyal desteğin etkisi birçok çalışma tarafından incelenmiştir. Aslında, çalışmalar sosyal desteğin sağlıkla çeşitli şekillerde ilişkili olduğunu göstermektedir. Genel olarak kabul edildiği üzere sosyal desteğin yapısal ve işlevsel olmak üzere iki farklı türü bulunmaktadır. Medikal Sonuç ÇalışmasıSosyal Destek Ölçeği (MSÇ-SDÖ) iki tür sosyal desteği de ölçen maddeleri içeren bir değerlendirme aracıdır. Çeviri ve tekrar-çeviri yöntemi ile MSÇ-SDÖ Türkçe’ye çevrilmiştir. Çalışmanın bir ay arayla gerçekleştirilen ön-test (N = 241) ve son-test (N = 99) aşamaları vardır. Kullanılan ölçekler U.C.L.A. Yalnızlık Ölçeği, Belirti Tarama Testi, Çokboyutlu Sosyal Destek Ölçeği ve Sosyal Destek Davranışları Ölçeği’dir. Faktör analizi 4 faktör modelin uygunluğunu doğrulamıştır. Tüm ölçeğin iç tutarlığı .96 iken, test tekrar-test güvenirliği .73’tür. Ayrışan geçerlik için tüm ölçek U.C.L.A. Yalnızlık Ölçeği (r = -.65, p < .01) ve Belirti Tarama Testi ile (r = -.276, p < .01) negative korelasyon göstermiştir. Birleşen geçerlik için ise tüm ölçek Çokboyutlu Sosyal Destek Ölçeği (r = .657, p < .01) ve Sosyal Destek Davranışları Ölçeği (r = .404, p < .01) ile pozitif korelasyon göstermiştir. Bulgular MSÇ-SDÖ’nün Türkçe uyarlamasının yeterli psikometrik özelliğinin olduğunu göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Anderson, D., Bilodeau, B., Deshaies, G., Gilbert, M., & Jobin, J. (2005). French Canadian validation of the MOS social support survey. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 21(10), 861-873.
  • Andrade, C. R., Chor, D., Faerstein, E., Griep, R.H., Lopes, C. S., & Fonseca, M. J. M. (2005). Social support and breast self-examination in the Pró-Saúde study. Reports in Public Health, 21(2), 379–386.
  • Barrera, M. (1986). Distinction between social support concepts, measures and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14(4), 413–445.
  • Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory (2nd ed). San Antonio TX: Psychological Corporation.
  • Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance and mortality: a nine year follow up study of Alameda Country residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109, 186–204.
  • Brislin, R. W., Lonner, W. J., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973). Cross-Cultural Research Methods. New York, Wiley.
  • Butcher, J. N., Dahlstrom, W. G., Graham, J. R., Tellegen, A., & Kaemmer, B. (1989). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Bozo, Ö., Tathan, E., & Yılmaz, T. (2014). Does perceived social support buffer the negative effects of type c personality on quality of life of breast cancer patients? Social Indicators Research, 119(2), 791-801.
  • Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support and the buffering hypothesis, Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
  • Dağ, İ. (1991). Symptom checklist (SCL-90-R): A reliability and validity study. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 2(1), 5–12.
  • Demir, A. (1989). Reliability and validity of U.C.L.A. loneliness scale. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 7(23), 14–18.
  • Derogatis, L. R. (1977). SCL-90: Administration, scoring and procedure manual I for the revised version. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Clinical Psychometrics Unit.
  • DiMatteo, M. R. (2004). Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 23, 207– 218.
  • Eker, D., & Arkar, H. (1995). Perceived social support: Psychometric properties of the MSPSS in normal and pathological groups in a developing country. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 30, 121– 126.
  • Eker, D., Arkar, H., & Yaldız, H. (2001). The factor structure, reliability, and validity of revised multidimensional perceived social support scale. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 12(1), 17–25.
  • Erol, R. Y., & Bozo, Ö. (2012). Adaptation, reliability and validity study of the Inventory of Socially Supportive Behaviors. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 13, 210–215.
  • Fleishman, J. A., Sherbourne, C. D., & Crystal, S. (2000). Coping, conflictual social interactions, social support, and mood among HI- infected persons. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28, 421–453.
  • Giangrasso, B., & Casale, S. (2014). Psychometric properties of medical outcomes study social support survey with a general population sample of undergraduate students. Social Indicators Research, 116, 185-197.
  • Hernández, S. O., Parga, M. X. F., & Azgar, C. M. (2007). Illness behavior: Prediction by symptoms, the Grossarth-Maticek and Eysenck personality types, neuroticism, life events, coping, health locus of control, social support, and attribution style. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 388–398.
  • Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational, and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15(2), 135–148
  • Hisli, N. (1989). Validity and reliability study of Beck Depression Inventory for university students. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 23(7), 3–13.
  • House, J. S., Landis, K. R., & Umberson, D. (1988). Social relationships and health. Science, 241, 540–545.
  • Jackson, T. (2006). Relationships between perceived close social support and health practices within community samples of American women and men. The Journal of Psychology, 140(3), 229–246.
  • Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course: Attachment, roles and social support. In P. B. Baltes and O.Brim (Eds). Life Span Development and Behavior(pp. 253–286). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Kang, S. H., Bloom, J. R., & Romano, P. S. (1994). Cancer screening among African-American women: their use of tests and social support. American Journal of Public Health, 8(1), 101–103.
  • Katapodi, M. C., Facione, N. C., Miaskowski, C., Dodd, M. J., & Waters, C. (2002). The influence of social support on breast cancer screening in a multicultural community sample. Oncology Nursing Forum, 29(5), 845– 852.
  • Langford, C. P. H., Bowsher, J., Maloney, J. P., & Lillis, P. P. (1997). Social support: a conceptual analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 25, 95–100.
  • Messina, C. R., Lane, D. S.,West, D. S., Frishman, W., Glanz, K., Taylor, W., & Powell, L. (2004). Relationship of social support and social burden to repeated breast cancer screening in the women’s health initiative. Health Psychology, 23(6), 582–594.
  • Miller, T. A., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2013). Importance of family/social support and impact adherence to diabetic therapy. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy ,6, 421–426..
  • Norhayati, M. N., Aniza, A. A., Hazlina, N. H. N., & Azman, M. Y. (2015). Psychometric properties of the revised malay version medical outcome study social support survey using confirmatory factor analysis among postpartum mothers. Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 7(4), 398-405.
  • Önder, N., & Le Compte, A. (1985). Durumluk-Sürekli Kaygı Envanteri El Kitabı (İkinci baskı) [Handbook of StateTrait Anxiety Inventory]. Istanbul: Boğaziçi Press.
  • Reblin, M., & Uchino, B. N. (2009). Social and emotional support and its implication for health. Current Opinions in Psychiatry, 21(2), 201-205.
  • Russell, D., Peplau, L. A., & Ferguson, M. L. (1978). Developing a measure of loneliness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 42, 290–294.
  • Seeman, T, E., & Berkman, L. F. (1988). Structural characteristics of social networks and their relationship with social support in the elderly: who provides support? Social Science & Medicine, 26, 737–749.
  • Seow, A., Huang, J., & Straughan, P. T. (2000). Effects of social support, regular physician and health related attitudes on cervical cancer screening in an Asian population. Cancer Causes and Control, 11, 223–230.
  • Sherbourne, C. D., & Steward, A. L. (1991). The MOS social support survey. Social Science & Medicine, 32(6), 705–714.
  • Soares, A., Biasoli, I, Scheliga, A., Baptista, R. L., Brabo, E. P., Morais, J. C.,…Spector, N. (2012). Supportive Care in Cancer, 20(8), 1895-1900.
  • Specht, J., Egloff, B., & Schmugle, S. C. (2011). Stability and change in personality across the lifecourse: The impact of age and major life events on mean-level and rank-order stability of the Big-Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 862–882.
  • Straughan, P. T., & Seow, A. (2000). Attitudes as barriers in breast screening: a prospective study among Singapore women. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 1695—1703.
  • Strine, T. W., Chapman, D. P., Balluz, L., & Mokdad, A. H. (2008). Health related quality of life and health behaviors by emotional and social support. Their relevance of psychiatry and medicine. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(2), 151-159.
  • Suarez, L., Llyord, L., Weiss, N., Rainbolt, T., & Pulley, L. (1994). Effect on social networks on cancer screening behavior of older Mexican American women. Journal of National Cancer Institute, 86(10), 775–779.
  • Suarez, L., Ramirez, A. G., Villarreal, R., Marti, J., McAlister, A., Talavera, G. A., Trapido, E., & Perez-Stable, E. J. (2000). Social networks and cancer screening in four US hispanic groups. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 19(1), 47–52.
  • Wang, W., Zheng, X., He, H-G, Thompson, D. R. (2013). Psychometric testing of the chinese mandarin version of the medical outcomes study social support survey in patients with coronary heart disease in mainland china. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1965-1971.
  • Uchino, B. N., Uno, D., & Holt-Unstad, J. (1999). Social support, physiological processes, and health. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(5), 145–148.
  • Yu, D. S. F., Lee, D. T. F., & Woo, J. (2004). Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the medical outcomes study social support survey (MOS-SSS-C). Research in Nursing & Health, 27, 135–143.
  • Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 30–41.
APA Yilmaz T, BOZO O (2019). PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. , 899 - 915.
Chicago Yilmaz Tugba,BOZO OZLEM PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. (2019): 899 - 915.
MLA Yilmaz Tugba,BOZO OZLEM PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. , 2019, ss.899 - 915.
AMA Yilmaz T,BOZO O PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. . 2019; 899 - 915.
Vancouver Yilmaz T,BOZO O PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. . 2019; 899 - 915.
IEEE Yilmaz T,BOZO O "PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE." , ss.899 - 915, 2019.
ISNAD Yilmaz, Tugba - BOZO, OZLEM. "PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE". (2019), 899-915.
APA Yilmaz T, BOZO O (2019). PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(37), 899 - 915.
Chicago Yilmaz Tugba,BOZO OZLEM PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 10, no.37 (2019): 899 - 915.
MLA Yilmaz Tugba,BOZO OZLEM PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol.10, no.37, 2019, ss.899 - 915.
AMA Yilmaz T,BOZO O PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; 10(37): 899 - 915.
Vancouver Yilmaz T,BOZO O PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE. Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2019; 10(37): 899 - 915.
IEEE Yilmaz T,BOZO O "PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE." Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10, ss.899 - 915, 2019.
ISNAD Yilmaz, Tugba - BOZO, OZLEM. "PSYCHOMETRIC QUALITIES OF MEDICAL OUTCOMES STUDY SOCIAL SUPPORT SURVEY (MOS-SSS) IN TURKISH CULTURE". Uluslararası Avrasya Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 10/37 (2019), 899-915.