Yıl: 2018 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 181 - 186 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260 İndeks Tarihi: 16-09-2020

Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy

Öz:
Objective: The aim of study was to investigate the perception of pain associated withrenal biopsy with visual analog scale (VAS), and the factors that might influence pain perception.Material and Methods: A total of 100 patients who had undergone native kidney biopsy in our hospital between May 2014-November 2016 were enrolled. Patients were not receiving analgesics,sedatives, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or antihistamines at the time of biopsy. Renalbiopsy was performed under ultrasound guidance following local anesthesia. Pain was rated by VAS(1-10) when anesthetic agent was injected (VAS-1), when biopsy was performed (VAS-2), and 30minutes after biopsy (VAS-3). Associations of clinical, laboratory, and radiological data with painscores were analysed. Results: A total of 100 patients undergoing renal biopsy were enrolled. VAS2 was found significantly higher than VAS-1, and VAS-3 scores. Patient age, past surgical history,serum creatinine, biopsy side, vertical length and paranchimal thickness of the kidney in whichbiopsy was performed, needle size, number of cores taken were not associated with VAS 1-2-3scores. Proteinuria (≥3.5 g/dL) was found associated with VAS scores. Conclusion: Perception ofpain associated with renal biopsy was independent from many clinical and anatomical factors, andwas difficult to be predicted.
Anahtar Kelime:

Böbrek Biyopsisinde Ağrının Görsel Analog Skala ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz:
Amaç: Bu çalışmada böbrek biyopsine bağlı ağrı algısını görsel analog skala (VAS) ile değerlendirmeyi, ağrı algısını etkileyebilecek faktörleri araştırmayı hedefledik. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Mayıs 2014-Kasım 2016 tarihleri arasında hastanemizde yapılan 100 nativ böbrek biyopsisi çalışmaya alındı. Biyopsi yapılan dönemde hastalar analjezik, sedatif, steroid olmayan antiinflamatuar ilaç veya antihistaminik kullanmıyordu. Böbrek biyopsisi lokal anestezi altında ultrason eşliğinde yapıldı. Ağrı VAS’a göre; anestezik ajanın yapıldığı an (VAS-1), biyopsinin yapıldığı zaman (VAS-2) ve biyopsiden 30 dakika sonra (VAS-3) olacak şekilde derecelendirildi. Ağrı skorları ile klinik, laboratuvar ve radyolojik bilgiler analiz edildi. Bulgular: Böbrek biyopsisi yapılan toplam 100 hasta çalışmaya alındı. VAS-2 skoru, VAS-1 ve VAS-3’e göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulundu. Hasta yaşı, ameliyat öyküsü, serum kreatinin değeri, biyopsinin yapıldığı taraf, biyopsi yapılan böbreğin vertikal uzunluğu, parankim kalınlığı, iğne çapı, alınan kor sayısı ile VAS 1-2-3 skorları arasında ilişki saptanmadı. Proteinüri (≥3.5 g/dL) ise VAS skorları ile ilişkili bulundu. Sonuç: Böbrek biyopsisi ile ilişkili ağrı algısı birçok klinik ve anatomik faktörden bağımsızdı. Bu nedenle öngörülebilmesi zordur.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Iversen P, Brun C. Aspiration biopsy of the kidney. Am J Med 1951;11(3):324-30.
  • 2. Carrington CP, Williams A, Griffiths DF, Riley SG, Donovan KL. Adult day-case renal biopsy: a single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2011;26(5):1559-63.
  • 3. Maya ID, Allon M. Percutaneous renal biopsy: outpatient observation without hospitalization is safe. Semin Dial 2009;22(4):458-61.
  • 4. Mahoney MC, Racadio JM, Merhar GL, First MR. Safety and efficacy of kidney transplant biopsy: Tru-Cut needle vs sonographically guided Biopty gun. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160(2):325-6.
  • 5. Price DD, McGrath PA, Rafili A, Buckingham B. The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and expermental pain. Pain 1983;17(1):45-56.
  • 6. Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain 2003;4(7):407-14.
  • 7. Prasad N, Kumar S, Manjunath R, Bhadauria D, Kaul A, Sharma RK, et al. Real-time ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal biopsy with needle guide by nephrologists decreases post-biopsy complications. Clin Kidney J 2015;8(2):151-6.
  • 8. Visconti L, Cernaro V, Ricciardi CA, Lacava V, Pellicanò V, Lacquaniti A, et al. Renal biopsy: still a landmark for the nephrologist. World J Nephrol 2016;5(4):321-7.
  • 9. Corapi KM, Chen JL, Balk EM, Gordon CE. Bleeding complications of native kidney biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 2012;60(1):62-73.
  • 10. Manno C, Strippoli GF, Arnesano L, Bonifati C, Campobasso N, Gesualdo L, et al. Predictors of bleeding complications in percutaneous ultrasound- guided renal biopsy. Kidney Int 2004;66(4):1570-7.
  • 11. Finderup J, Peschardt L, Sander MR, Nielsen MU. How do patients experience a kidney biopsy? J Ren Care 2016;42(3):137-43.
  • 12. Singer M, Webb AR. Pain and post-operative intensive care. Oxford Handbook of Critical Care. 2nd ed. United States: Oxford University Press; 2005. p.532-5.
  • 13. Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM, White SA, Morgan JD, Veitch PS, et al. A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 2000;58(1): 390-5.
  • 14. Babaei Jandaghi A, Lebady M, Zamani AA, Heidarzadeh A, Monfared A, Pourghorban R. A randomised clinical trial to compare coaxial and noncoaxial techniques in percutaneous core needle biopsy of renal parenchyma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017;40(1):106-11.
  • 15. Kilcoyne A, Gervais DA. Kidney, ureter, and bladder biopsy. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2016;19(3):237-44.
  • 16. Appel GB, Saltzman MJ, King DL, Hardy MA. Use of ultrasound for renal allograft biopsy. Kidney Int 1981;19(3):471-3.
APA Bardak S, turgutalp k, DOLARSLAN M, Esen K, TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M, Demir S, Kiykim A (2018). Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. , 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
Chicago Bardak Simge,turgutalp kenan,DOLARSLAN MURSIDE ESRA,Esen Kaan,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL Merve,Demir Serap,Kiykim Ahmet Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. (2018): 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
MLA Bardak Simge,turgutalp kenan,DOLARSLAN MURSIDE ESRA,Esen Kaan,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL Merve,Demir Serap,Kiykim Ahmet Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. , 2018, ss.181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
AMA Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. . 2018; 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
Vancouver Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. . 2018; 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
IEEE Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A "Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy." , ss.181 - 186, 2018. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
ISNAD Bardak, Simge vd. "Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy". (2018), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
APA Bardak S, turgutalp k, DOLARSLAN M, Esen K, TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M, Demir S, Kiykim A (2018). Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3), 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
Chicago Bardak Simge,turgutalp kenan,DOLARSLAN MURSIDE ESRA,Esen Kaan,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL Merve,Demir Serap,Kiykim Ahmet Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3, no.3 (2018): 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
MLA Bardak Simge,turgutalp kenan,DOLARSLAN MURSIDE ESRA,Esen Kaan,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL Merve,Demir Serap,Kiykim Ahmet Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, vol.3, no.3, 2018, ss.181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
AMA Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 3(3): 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
Vancouver Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy. Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018; 3(3): 181 - 186. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
IEEE Bardak S,turgutalp k,DOLARSLAN M,Esen K,TÜRKEGÜN ŞENGÜL M,Demir S,Kiykim A "Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy." Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3, ss.181 - 186, 2018. 10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260
ISNAD Bardak, Simge vd. "Evaluation of Pain with Visual Analog Scale in Renal Biopsy". Türkiye Klinikleri Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi 3/3 (2018), 181-186. https://doi.org/10.5336/healthsci.2017-59260