POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Orkun DEMİRBAĞ, (Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İşletme Bölümü, Gümüşhane, Türkiye,)
Uğur YOZGAT (Nişantaşı Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, Yönetim Bilişim Sistemleri Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Beykoz Akademi Dergisi
2 1
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 147 - 182 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182 İndeks Tarihi: 31-08-2020

POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Öz:
Politik zekâ, açık bir kavramsal tanım ve uygulanabilir bir ölçümden yoksun, olağanüstü ancakyeterince araştırılmamış bir yapı olarak kabul edilmektedir. Mevcut araştırma, yapınıngeçerliliğini sağlarken "politik zekâ" yapısını kavramsallaştırmak ve ölçmek için yapılmıştır.Tüm konuyu ayrıntılı olarak ele almak için, Türkiye'de Politik Zekâ Ölçeğinin psikometriközelliklerini ve nomolojik ağını gösteren üç örneği kapsayan iki çalışma yapılmıştır (N = 943).Hipotezleştirildiği gibi, politik zeka, stratejik düşünme, amaç için empati, güvenilirlik, güçihtiyacı ve çok yönlülük boyutlarından oluşan çok boyutlu bir yapıdır. Ölçeğin hem yakınsakhem de ayırt edici geçerliliği olduğunu ve politik zekânın politik beceri ile pozitif yönde anlamlıbir ilişkisi mevcuttur. Argümanımız doğrultusunda, politik zekâ tarafından açıklanan yapınınpolitik beceri yapısından farklı olduğu bulunmuştur. Bu ölçeğin teorik çıkarımları sayesinde,örgütsel politika, liderlik ve sosyal değişime ilişkin yeni tartışmalar ilgili literatürde yeralacaktır.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE COGNITIVE TRANSFORMATION OF POLITICAL ANIMAL: AN EVALUATION OF POLITICAL INTELLIGENCE

Öz:
Political intelligence is broadly accepted as an outstanding but under-investigated construct that is devoid of a clear conceptual definition and viable measurement. The current research was conducted to conceptualize and to measure the "political intelligence" (PI) construct while ensuring validation of the construct. In order to touch all the bases, we carried out two studies encompassing three samples (N = 943), which demonstrate the psychometric properties and nomological network of the Political Intelligence Scale, in Turkey. As hypothesized, political intelligence is a multidimensional construct that consists of the dimensions of strategic thinking, empathy for purpose, trustworthiness, need for power and versatility. It presents that the scale has both convergent and discriminant validity and that political intelligence has a positive significant relationship with political skill. In line with our argument, it was found that the construct explained by political intelligence is different from the construct of political skill. Thanks to the theoretical implications of this scale, new debates regarding organizational politics, leadership, and social change will take part a place in the related literature.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, S. M., & Zanzi, A. (2006). Developing political intelligence for making feasible decisions. Journal of Management Development, 25(4): 350-367.
  • Albrecht, T.L., Adelman, M.B., 1987. Social support and life stres: new directions communication research. Human Commun. Res. 11: 3–32.
  • Allison, G. T. (1969). Conceptual models and the Cuban missile crisis. American Political Science Review, 63(03): 689-718.
  • Allsopp, J., Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Machiavellianism as a component in psychoticism and extraversion. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(1): 29-41.
  • Alpkan, L., Ergün, E., Bulut, Ç., & Yılmaz, C. (2011). Şirket girişimciliğinin şirket performansına etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 6(2): 175-189.
  • Ammeter, A. P., Douglas, C., Gardner, W. L., Hochwarter, W. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2002). Toward a political theory of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly,13(6): 751-796.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1991). Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5): 732-740.
  • Aristoteles, (2007), Politika (Çev. Ersin UYSAL), İstanbul: Dergah Yayınları.
  • Aristotle. (1957). Aristotle’s poetics: The argument (G. F. Else, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bateman, T. S. (1980). Organizational change and the politics of success. Group & Organization Management, 5(2): 198-209.
  • Bayram, N. (2010). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş amos uygulamaları. Ezgi Kitabevi.
  • Binet, A., & Simon, T. (1916). The development of intelligence in children: The Binet-Simon Scale (No. 11). Williams & Wilkins Company.
  • Blass, F. R., Brouer, R. L., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2007). Politics understanding and networking ability as a function of mentoring the roles of gender and race. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14(2): 93-105.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
  • Blickie, G., Kramer, J., Schneider, P. B., Meurs, J. A., Ferris, G. R., Mierke, J., Witzki, A. H. ve Momm, T. D. (2011). Role of political skill in job performance prediction beyond general mental ability and personality in cross-sectional ve predictive studies, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(2): 488-514.
  • Blickie, G., Meurs, J. A., Wihler, A., Ewen, C., Plies, A. ve Günther, S. (2013). The interactive effects of conscientiousness opennes to experience, and political skill on job performance in complex jobs: The importance of context, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34: 1145-1164.
  • Blickle, G., John, J., Ferris, G. R., Momm, T., Liu, Y., Haag, R., ... & Oerder, K. (2012). Fit of political skill to the work context: A two‐study investigation. Applied Psychology, 61(2): 295-322.
  • Boehm, C. (1997). 13 Egalitarian behaviour and the evolution of political intelligence. Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations, 2: 341-365.
  • Bora, E., & Baysan, L. (2009). Empati Ölçeği-Türkçe Formunun Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Psikometrik Özellikleri. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 19: 39-47.
  • Buchanan, D. A. (2008). You stab my back, I’ll stab yours: Management experience and perceptions of organizational political behavior. British Journal of Management, 19: 49-64.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International journal of testing, 1(1): 55-86.
  • Byrne, E.F. (1998). Give Peace a Chance: A Mantra for Business Strategy, Journal of Business Ethics, 20:27-37.
  • Byrne, R. W., & Whiten, A. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence. Machiavellian intelligence II: Exte;nsions and evaluations, Cambridge University Press.
  • Cantor, N., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1987). Personality and social intelligence. Pearson College Division.
  • Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate behavioral research, 1(2): 245-276.
  • Chanlat, J. (1997). Conflict and politics. In A. Sorge & M. Warner (Eds.), Handbook of organizational behaviour, London: International Thomson.
  • Christie, R. & Geis, F. (1968). Some consequences of taking Machiavellianism seriously, In E.F. Borgotta & W.W. Lambert (Eds.) Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, Chicago: Rand NcNally.
  • Christie, R. (1970). Scale construction. In R. Christie & F. Geis (Eds.), Studies in Machiavellianism, New York: Academic Press.
  • Christoffersen, D., & Stamp, C. (1995). Examining the relationship between Machiavellianism and paranoia. Psychological Reports, 76(1): 67-70.
  • Churchill Jr, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, sf. 64-73.
  • Ciampa, D. (2005). Almost ready: How leaders move. Harvard Business Review Special Issue, 83(1): 46-53.
  • Cobb, A. T. (1986). Political diagnosis: Applications in organizational development. Academy of Management Review, 11(3): 482-496.
  • Cobb, A. T., & Margulies, N. (1981). Organization development: A political perspective. Academy of Management Review, 6(1): 49-59.
  • Cole, A. (1994). Studying political leadership: The case of François Mitterrand. Political Studies, 42(3): 453-468.;
  • Conner, D.S. (2006), Human-resource professionals’ perceptions of organizational politics as a function of experience, organizational size and perceived independence, Journal of Social Psychology, 146: 717-23.
  • Cooper, R., Sawaf, A. (1997). Executive EQ: Emotional Intelligence in Leadership and Organizations. Perigie Books, New York.
  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1987). From Evolution to Behavior: Psychology as the Missing Link, J. Dupré, editor. The Latest on the Rest: Essays on Evolution and Optimality. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
  • Cosmides, L.J. Tooby, and J. Barkow, (1992). Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psythology and the Generation of Culture, J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, and J..Tooby, eds. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3): 297-334.
  • Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52; 281-302.
  • Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(2): 159-180.
  • Cullen, K. L., Fan, J., & Liu, C. (2014). Employee popularity mediates the relationship between political skill and workplace interpersonal mistreatment. Journal of Management, 40(6): 1760-1778.
  • Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2008). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35: 219-257
  • DeBurca, S., McLaughlin, D., (1988). Business network research: a grounded theory approach. In: Nauda, P.,Turnbull, D. (Eds.), Network Dynamics in International Marketing. Pergamon, Oxford.
  • DeLuca, J. R. (1999). Political savvy: Systematic approaches to leadership behind-the-scenes. Evergreen Business Group.
  • Demirutku, K. (2000). Influence of motivational profile on organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A cultural exploration. Unpublished master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
  • DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dulebohn, J. H. (1997). Social influence in justice evaluations of human resources systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,15: 241-292. Ellen, B. P., Ferris, G. R., & Buckley, M. R. (2013). Leader political support: Reconsidering leader political behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6); 842-857.
  • Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American Sociological Review, 27: 31- 41.
  • Etzioni, A. (Ed.). 1969. The semi-professions and their organization; teachers, nurses, social workers. New York: Free Press.
  • Ewen, C., Wihler, A., Blickle, G., Oerder, K., Ellen, B. P., Douglas, C., & Ferris, G. R. (2013). Further specification of the leader political skill–leadership effectiveness relationships: Transformational and transactional leader behavior as mediators. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(4): 516-533.
  • Ferketich, S. (1990). Internal consistency estimates of reliability. Research in nursing & health, 13(6): 437-440.
  • Ferris, G. R., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2011). Organizational politics. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology 3,435–459. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Ferris, G. R., Fedor, D. B., & King, T. R. (1994). A political conceptualization of managerial behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 4(1): 1-34.
  • Ferris, G. R., Perrewé, P. L., Anthony, W. P., & Gilmore, D. C. (2000). Political skill at work. Organizational Dynamics, 28(4): 25-37.
  • Ferris, G. R., Treadway, D. C., Perrewe, P. L., Brouer, R. L., Douglas, C. ve Lux, S. (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of Management. 33(3): 290-320.
  • Ferris, G.R. & Treadway, D.C. (2012), Politics in organizations, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
  • Ferris, G.R., Davidson, S.L. and Perrewé, P.L. (2005). Political Skill at Work. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
  • Ferris, G.R., Frink, D.D., Beehr, T.A. and Gilmore, D.C. (1995), Political fairness and fair politics: the conceptual integration of divergent constructs, in Cropanzano, R.S. and Kacmar, K.M. (Eds), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace, Quorum, Westport, CT, 21-36.
  • Ferris, G.R., Russ, G.S. and Fandt, P.M. (1989). Politics in organizations. In Giacalone, R.A. and Rosenfield, P. (eds), Impression Management in the Organization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 143–170.
  • Field, A. P. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd edition). London: Sage.
  • Ford, D., (1998). Two forms of interaction, relationships and networks. In: Nauda, P., Turnbull, D. (Eds.), Network Dynamics in International Marketing. Pergamon, Oxford, UK, s264–273.
  • Fornell, C., Larker, D.F., (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error, Journal of Marketing Research, 39-50.
  • Franz, R. S. 1998. Task interdependence and personal power in teams. Small Group Research, 29: 226-253.
  • French, R. (2011). Organizational behaviour. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic books.
  • Gardner, H., (1999). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. Barrie Books, New York.
  • Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth.
  • Goleman, D, (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ, Bantam Books, New York.
  • Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C, Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864-888.
  • Harlow, L. L.(2005). Essence of Multivariate Thinking: Basic Themes and Methods, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, USA.
  • Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford University Press.
  • Harvey, M., & Novicevic, M. M. (2002). The co-ordination of strategic initiatives within global organizations: The role of global teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(4): 660-676.
  • Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step-by-Step Aproach to Using SAS for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  • Heckhausen, H. 1991. Motivation and action. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5): 967-988.
  • Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1): 104-121.
  • Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis and interpretation with SPSS (2nd Edition). CRC Press.
  • Hochwarter, W. A. (2012). The positive side of organizational politics. In G. R. Ferris, &D. C. Treadway (Eds.), Politics in organizations: Theory and research considerations (27– 65). New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.
  • Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Prentice Hall.
  • Holland, J. L. (1997). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments, Third edition Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Ressources.
  • Holland, J.L. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd edn.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6: 53– 60.
  • İslamoğlu, G., & Börü, D. (2007). Politik davranış boyutları: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, 14: 135-153.
  • Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 1(4): 598-614.
  • Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2004). Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leadermember exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3): 368-384.
  • Jones, E. E. (1990). Interpersonal perception. New York: W. H. Freeman.
  • Joplin, J. R., & Daus, C. S. (1997). Challenges of leading a diverse workforce. The Academy of Management Executive, 11(3): 32-47.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2006). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kaplan, D. M., & Ferris, G. R. (2001). Fairness Perceptions of Employee Promotion Systems: A Two‐Study Investigation of Antecedents and Mediators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(6): 1204-1222.
  • Keegan, W., (1982) Keegan Type Indicator Form B. Warren Keegan Associates Press, London.
  • Keleş, H. N. ve Kıral Özkan, T. (2010). Liderlik, kültür ve performans arasındaki ilişkinin örgütsel zeka modelinden hareketle incelenmesi. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (1): 65-70.
  • Kelloway, E. K., Francis, L., Prosser, M., & Cameron, J. E. (2010). Counterproductive work behavior as protest. Human Resource Management Review, 20(1): 18-25.
  • Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of behavioral science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010). Re‐Examining Machiavelli: A Three‐Dimensional Model of Machiavellianism in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,40(8): 1868-1896.
  • Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1983). An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations. In M. H. Bazerman & R. J. Lewicki (Eds.), Negotiating in organizations: 303-319. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Levy, D. A., Collins, B. E., & Nail, P. R. (1998). A new model of interpersonal influence characteristics. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13: 715–733.
  • Liedtka, J. M. (1998a). Strategic thinking: Can it be taught?. Long Range Planning, 31(1): 120- 129.
  • Liedtka, J. M. (1998b). Linking strategic thinking with strategic planning. Strategy and Leadership, Sep/October, 26(4): 30-35.
  • Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The development and validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management, 36(6): 1372-1405.
  • Liu, Y., Liu, J. Ve Wu, L. (2010). Are you willing and able? Roles of motivation, power, and politics in career growth. Journal of Management, 36(6): 1432-1460.
  • Lubart, T., Sternberg, R., (1995). An investment approach to creativity: theory and data. In: Smith, S.M., Finke, R. (Eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 269–301.
  • Lux, S., Ferris, G. R., Brouer, R. L., Laird, M. D., & Summers, J. (2008). A multilevel conceptualization of politics. Em J. Barling & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational behavior, vol. 1: Micro approaches (353-370). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maritz, J., Poggenpoel, M., & Myburg, C. (2009). Core competencies necessary for a managerial psycho-educational training programme for business team coaches. Journal of Human Resource Management, 7(1): 1-7.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1975). Power: The inner experience. Irvington.
  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. American Psychologist, 40(7): 812-825
  • McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (1976). Power is the Great Motivator. Harvard Business Review, 54(2): 100-110.
  • McDaniel, M. A., & Snell, A. F. (1999). Holland's theory and occupational information. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55: 74−85.
  • McHoskey, J. (1995). Narcissism and machiavellianism. Psychological reports,77(3): 755-759.
  • McHoskey, J. W., Worzel, W., & Szyarto, C. (1998). Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1): 192-210
  • McIntyre, M. G. (2005). Secrets to winning at office politics: How to achieve your goals and increase your influence at work. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.
  • Meydan, C. H., & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi AMOS uygulamaları. Detay Yayıncılık.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies, 22(2): 133–154.
  • Mulgan, R. G. (1987). Aristotle's political theory. Clarendon Press.
  • Mumford, A., 1999. Learning styles and learning organization. In: Landale, A. (Ed.), Grower Handbook of Training and Development, 3rd ed.
  • Mutlu, M. D., (2019) Comparing Managerial Leadership in Knowledge Intensive Context: How Leadership Skills and Styles Differs among Organizational Levels?, 2(5): 149-160.
  • Naktiyok, A., & Çiçek, M. (2014). Stratejik Düşünmenin Bir Öncülü Olarak Eleştirel Düşünme: Yöneticiler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(2): 157-178.
  • Nunnally, J. C. & Benstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory. Newyork: Mc-Graw Hill.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1979). Citation classic-psychometric theory. Current Contents/Social & Behavioral Sciences, 22: 12-12.
  • Oerder, K., Blickie, G. ve Summer, J. K. (2013). How work context and shape political skill, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5): 582-599.
  • Ohmae, K. (1982), The Mind of the Strategist, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
  • Okur, E., & Yalçin-Özdilek, Ş. (2012). Environmental attitude scale developed by structural equation modeling. İlköğretim Online, 11(1): 86-94.
  • Orbell, J., Morikawa, T., & Allen, N. (2002). The evolution of political intelligence: simulation results. British Journal of Political Science, 32(04), sf. 613-639.
  • Özkan, K., & Alkan, H. (2004). Q-Tipi Faktör Analizinin Gerçekleştirilmesi İçin Tersinir Matrisin Oluşturulmasında Minimum Etkili Değişkenlerin Eklenmesi Yaklaşımı (Isparta İli Şarkikaraağaç İlçesi Orman Köyleri Örneği). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(1): 165-178.
  • Pala, A. (2008). Öğretmen adaylarının empati kurma düzeyleri üzerine bir araştırma. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1): 13-23
  • Parikh, J., 1994. Intuition: The New Frontier of Management. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
  • Perrewe. P. L., Ferris. G. R., Frink. D. D: ve Anthony W. P. (2000). Political Skill: An antidote for workplace stressors. Academy of Management Executive. 14(3): 115-123.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations (Vol. 33). Marshfield, MA: Pitman.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business Press.
  • Porter, L. W., Allen, R. W., & Angle, H. L. (1981). The politics of upward influence in organizations. In L. L. Cummings, & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, 3. (109–149) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Post, J. E., Murray, E. A., Dickie, R. B., & Mahon, J. F. (1983). The public affairs function. California Management Review, 26(1): 135-150.
  • Privitera, G. (2014). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Ranker, G., Gautrey, C., & Phipps, M. (2008). Political dilemmas at work: how to maintain your integrity and further your career. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Reardon, K. K. (2005). It’s all politics: Winning in a world where hard work and talent aren’t enough. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday.
  • Reffo, G. ve Wark, V. (2014). Leadership PQ: How Political Intelligence Sets Successful Leaders,Apart, London. Kogan Page Publishers.
  • Reynolds, S. (2014). Political Intelligence, http://www.stephaniereynolds.com/wpcontent/ uploads/2009/08/Political-Intelligence-Fact-Sheet-2014.pdf
  • Rosen, R. H. (1998). İnsan yönetimi. Çev: G. Bulut). İstanbul: MESS Yayınları.
  • Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4): 453-473.
  • Saruhan, Ş. C., & Özdemirci, A. (2013). Bilim, felsefe ve metodoloji: araştırmada yöntem problemi-SPSS uygulamalı, Beta Yayınevi, İstanbul.
  • Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of psychological research online, 8(2), 23-74.
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Psychology Press.
  • Searle, W., & Ward, C. (1990). The prediction of psychological and sociocultural adjustment during cross-cultural transitions. International journal of intercultural relations, 14(4): 449-464.
  • Shirley, D. A., & Langan-Fox, J. (1996). Intuition: A review of the literature. Psychological Reports, 79(2): 563-584.
  • Smith, R.L., 1997. Intercultural network theory: a cross-paradigmatic approach to Smith R.L. Int. J. Intercult. Relat. 23 (4): 629–658.
  • Sokolon, M. K. (2006). Political emotions: Aristotle and the symphony of reason and emotion . DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.
  • Stemberg, R. J. (1997). Managerial intelligence: Why IQ isn’t enough. Journal of Management, 23(3): 475-493.
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K. (Eds.). (1986). Practical intelligence: Nature and origins of competence in the everyday world. CUP Archive.
  • Sternberg, R., (1996). Successful Intelligence: How Practical and Creative Intelligence Determine Success in Life. Simon and Schuster, New York.
  • Sternberg, R., Lubart, T., (1995). Defying the Crowd: Cultivating Creativity in a Culture of Conformity. Free Press, New York.
  • Sternberg, R., Lubart, T., 1996. Investing in creativity. Am. Psychol. 51: 677–688.
  • Sternberg, R., Smith, C., 1985. Social intelligence and decoding skill in nonverbal communication. Soc. Cognit. 2: 168–192.
  • Sütütemiz, N. (2005). Müşteri sadakati belirleyicileri ve modellerinin karşılaştırılması: Bankacılık ve sağlık sektöründe bir araştırma, Doktora tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  • Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. Ankara: Ekinoks.
  • TDK(2016) http://www.tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&kelime=
  • Tedeschi, J. T., & Rosenfeld, P. (1981). Impression management theory and the forced compliance situation. Impression Management Theory And Social Psychological Research, 147-177.
  • Terman, L. M. (1921). Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium--II. Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(3): 127-133.
  • Thorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper's magazine.
  • Touhey, J. C. (1973). Intelligence, Machiavellianism and social mobility. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12(1): 34-37.
  • Treadway, D. C., Adams, G., Hanes, T. J., Perrewe, P. L., Magnusen, M. J. ve Ferris, G. R. (2014). The roles of recruiter political skill and performance resource leveraging in NCAA footbal recruitment effectiveness, Journal of Management, 40(6), 1607-1626.
  • Treadway, D. C., Breland, J. W., Williams, L. M., Cho, J. Yang, ve J. Ferris, G. R. (2013). Soxial influence and interpesonal power in organizations: Roles of performance and political skill in two studies, Journal of Management, 36, (6): 1529-1553.
  • Treadway, D. C., Ferris, G. R., Duke, A. B., Adams, G. L. Ve Thatcher, J. B. (2007). The moderating role of subordinate political skill on supervisors’ impressions of subordinate ingratiation and ratings of subordinate interpersonal facilitation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(3), 848-855.
  • Vigoda, E. (2003). Developments in organizational politics: How political dynamics aaffect employee performance in modern work sites. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Vigoda, E., & Cohen, A. (2002). Influence tactics and perceptions of organizational politics: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Research, 55(4): 311-324.
  • Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kapun, D. (2005). Perceptions of politics and perceived performance in public and private organisations: a test of one model across two sectors. Policy & Politics, 33(2): 251-276.
  • Wagner, R., Sternberg, R., (1991). Tacit Knowledge Inventory for Managers. Psychological, San Antonio, TX.
  • Wechsler, D. (1991). WISC-III: Wechsler intelligence scale for children: Manual. Psychological Corporation.
  • Wechsler, D., 1950. Cognitive, conative and non-intellective intelligence. Am. Psychol. 5, 78– 83.
  • Wei, L.-Q., Chiang, F.F.T. and Wu, L.-Z. (2012). Developing and utilizing network resources: roles of political skill. Journal of Management Studies, 49: 381–402.
  • Weick, K., (1998). The attitude of wisdom: ambivalence as the optimal compromise. In: Srivasta, S., Cooperider, D. (Eds.), Organizational Wisdom and Executive Courage. Lexington Press, San Francisco, 40–64.
  • Westen, D. (2008). Political brain: The role of emotion in deciding the fate of the nation. PublicAffairs.
  • Whiten, A. (1997). Machiavellian intelligence II: Extensions and evaluations(Vol. 2). Cambridge University Press.
  • Yılmaz, C. (1999). Salesforce Cooperation: The Impact of Relational, Task, Organizational and Personal Factors, PhD Thesis, Texas Tech University.
  • Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied psychology, 77(4): 525-535
  • Yüksel, A. (1993). Troilus Ve Cressida: “Bozuk Düzende Savaş Ve Aşk”. Tiyatro Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(10): 59-66.
  • Zait, P. A., & Bertea, P. S. P. E. (2011). Methods for testing discriminant validity. Management & Marketing Journal, 9 (2): 217-224.
APA DEMİRBAĞ O, YOZGAT U (2019). POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. , 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
Chicago DEMİRBAĞ Orkun,YOZGAT UĞUR POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. (2019): 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
MLA DEMİRBAĞ Orkun,YOZGAT UĞUR POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. , 2019, ss.147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
AMA DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. . 2019; 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
Vancouver DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. . 2019; 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
IEEE DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U "POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME." , ss.147 - 182, 2019. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
ISNAD DEMİRBAĞ, Orkun - YOZGAT, UĞUR. "POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME". (2019), 147-182. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
APA DEMİRBAĞ O, YOZGAT U (2019). POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 7(2), 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
Chicago DEMİRBAĞ Orkun,YOZGAT UĞUR POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 7, no.2 (2019): 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
MLA DEMİRBAĞ Orkun,YOZGAT UĞUR POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, vol.7, no.2, 2019, ss.147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
AMA DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2019; 7(2): 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
Vancouver DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi. 2019; 7(2): 147 - 182. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
IEEE DEMİRBAĞ O,YOZGAT U "POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME." Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 7, ss.147 - 182, 2019. 10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
ISNAD DEMİRBAĞ, Orkun - YOZGAT, UĞUR. "POLİTİK HAYVAN’IN BİLİŞSEL DÖNÜŞÜMÜ: POLİTİK ZEKÂYA YÖNELİK BİR DEĞERLENDİRME". Beykoz Akademi Dergisi 7/2 (2019), 147-182. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/2. 147-182
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 13:3

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları