Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri

Hacer Kaya, (Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, Beyaz Meslek Lisesi Mustafa Şiran, Gümüşhane, Türkiye)
Musa Karaalp (Gümüşhane Üniversitesi, Veterinerlik Bölümü, Kelkit Aydın Doğan Meslek Yüksek Okulu, Gümüşhane, Türkiye)
Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi
3 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 617 - 623 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441 İndeks Tarihi: 28-08-2020

Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri

Öz:
Farklı yetiştirme sistemlerinde üretilen kanatlı etine tüketici ilgisinin giderek artması, piliç etiözelliklerinin daha detaylı incelenmesi ve karşılaştırılmasını gerekli kılmaktadır. Tüketicilerin buürünleri tercih etmelerine alışkanlık, güvenirlik, ürün özellikleri, hayvan refahı ve çevresel sorunlaraduyarlılık gibi faktörler etki etmektedir. Araştırmalar yetiştirme sistemleri ve genotipin piliç etiprotein, yağ, yağ asitleri, vitamin, mineral, yumuşaklık, sululuk, renk ve lezzet üzerine etkiliolabileceğini bildirmektedir. Bu derlemede yetiştirme sistemleri ve genotipin piliç etindeki bazıkimyasal, fiziksel ve duyusal özelliklerine etkileri incelenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Effects of Genotype and Production Systems on Chicken Meat Characteristics

Öz:
Increased consumer interest in poultry meat produced in different production systems necessitates more detailed examination and comparison of chicken meat characteristics. Factors such as habit, reliability, product characteristics, animal welfare and sensitivity to environmental problems affect consumers’ preference to these products. Researches report that production systems and genotypes can be effective on protein, fat, fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, tenderness, juiciness, color and flavor. It was investigated that the effects of production systems and genotype on some chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of chicken meat in this review.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abdullah FAA, Buchtova H, 2015. The quality of different types of chicken breast meat (organic, conventional, tenderized). Folia Vet., 59(3). 173-178.
  • Anonim, 2014. Organik Tarım Kanunu ve Organik Tarımın Esasları ve Uygulanmasına İlişkin Yönetmelik. Ankara. Anonymous, 2014. Council Regulation No:836/2014 amending Regualtion No.889/2008 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products with regard to organic production, labelling and control.
  • Appleby MC, Hughes BO, 1997. Animal Welfare. CAB International, New York.
  • Batkowska J, Brodacki A, Zięba G, Horbańczuk JO, Łukaszewicz M, 2015. Growth performance, carcass traits and physical properties of chicken meat as affected by genotype and production system. Arch. Anim. Breed., 58(2): 325-333.
  • https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-325-2015. [Erişim: 27.03.2018] Castellini C, Bosco AD, Mugnai C, Bernardini M, 2002a. Performance and behaviour of chickens with different growing rate reared according to the organic system. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 1(4): 290-300. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2002.291. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Castellini C, Mugnai C, Dal Bosco A, 2002b. Effect of organic production system on broiler carcass and meat quality. Meat Sci., 60(3): 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309- 1740(01)00124-3. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Castellini C, Dal Bosco A, 2017. Poultry quality evaluation: quality attributes and consumer values. Chapter 14 – Animal Welfare and Poultry Meat in Alternative Production Systems (and Ethics of Poultry Meat Production), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081 007631000143. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Cavitt LC, 2004. Development of a novel instrumental shearing method utilizing razor blade shear to evaluate tenderness and predict consumer acceptability of broiler breast fillets. PhD. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
  • Cömert M, Şayan Y, Kırkpınar F, Bayraktar ÖH, Mert S, 2016. Comparison of carcass characteristics, meat quality, and blood parameters of slow and fast grown female broiler chickens raised in organic or conventional production system. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 29(7): 987. https://dx.doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.15.0812. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Dal Bosco A, Mugnai C, Sirri F, Zamparini C, Castellini C, 2010. Assessment of a GPS to evaluate activity of organic chickens at pasture. J Appl Poult Res, 19(3): 213-218. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00153. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Dal Bosco A, Simona M, Silvia R, Cecilia M, Cesare C, 2014. Effect of slaughtering age in different commercial chicken genotypes reared according to the organic system: 1. Welfare, carcass and meat traits. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 13(2), 467-472. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3308. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Dal Bosc, A, Mugnai, C, Mattioli S, Rosati A, Ruggeri S, Ranucci D, Castellini C, 2016. Transfer of bioactive compounds from pasture to meat in organic free-range chickens. Poult. Sci., 95(10), 2464-2471. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev383. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Da Silva DCF, de Arruda AMV, Gonçalves AA, 2017. Quality characteristics of broiler chicken meat from free-range and industrial poultry system for the consumers. J Food Sci Technol, 54(7): 1818-1826. DOI 10.1007/s13197-017-2612- x. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Dervilly-Pinel G, Guérin T, Minvielle B, Travel A, Normand J, Bourin M, Royer E, Dubreil E, Mompelat S, Hommet F, Nicolas M, Hort V, İnthavong C, Saint-Hilaire M, Chafey C, Parinet J, Cariou R, Macrhand P, Engel E, 2017. Micropollutants and chemical residues in organic and conventional meat. Food Chem, 232: 218-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.013. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Eleroğlu H, Yıldırım A, Şekeroğlu A, 2014. Organik Tavukçulukta Mera Kompozisyonu, Besleme ve Barındırma Teknikleri. Tavukçuluk Araş. Derg., 11(1): 21-27. ISSN:1302-3209 - ISSN:2147-9003. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • European Commission, 2008. Regolamento della Commissione del 5 settembre 2008 recante modalità di applicazione del regolamento (CE) n. 834/2007 del Consiglio relativo alla produzione biologica e all’etichettatura dei prodotti biologici, per quanto riguarda la produzione biologica, l’etichettatura e i controlli, 889/2008/CE. In: Official Journal, L 250/1, 18/09/2008.
  • Fanatico AC, Pillai PB, Cavitt LC, Owens CM, Emmert JL, 2005. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Growth performance and carcass yield. Poult. Sci., 84(8): 1321-1327. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ps/84.8.1321. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Fanatico AC, Pillai PB, Cavitt LC, Emmert JL, Meullenet JF, Owens CM, 2006. Evaluation of slower-growing broiler genotypes grown with and without outdoor access: Sensory attributes. Poult. Sci., 85(2): 337-343. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ps/85.2.337. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Fanatico, AC, Pillai PB, Emmert JL, Owens CM, 2007. Meat quality of slow-and fast-growing chicken genotypes fed lownutrient or standard diets and raised indoors or with outdoor access.Poult. Sci., 86(10): 2245-2255. https://doi.org/10.1093 /ps/86.10.2245. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Farmer LJ, 1999. Poultry meat flavour. Pages 127–158 in: Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Science Symposium Series, Vol. 25. R. I. Richardson and G. C. Mead, ed. CABI Publishing, New York, NY.
  • Giannenas I, Nisianakis P, Gavriil A, Kontopidis G, Kyriazakis I, 2009. Trace mineral content of conventional, organic and courtyard eggs analysed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Food Chem, 114(2): 706-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.079. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Gordon SH, Charles DR, 2002. Niche and Organic Chicken Products: their technology and scientific principles. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.
  • Husak RL, Sebranek JG, Bregendahl KA, 2008. Survey of commercially available broilers marketed as organic, freerange, and conventional broilers for cooked meat yields, meat composition and relative value. Poul. Sci., 87(11): 2367-2376. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00294. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Jahan K, Paterson A, Piggott JR, 2005. Sensory quality in retailed organic, free range and corn-fed chicken breast. Food Res. Int., 38(5): 495-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres. 2004.09.013. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Le Bihan-Duval E, Berri C, Baeza E, Millet N, Beaumont C, 2001. Estimation of the genetic parameters of meat characteristics and their genetic correlations with growth and body composition in an experimental broiler line. Poult. Sci., 80(7): 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.7.839. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Le Bihan-Duval E, Debut M, Berri CM, Sellier N, SantéLhoutellier V, Jégo Y, Beaumont C, 2008. Chicken meat quality: genetic variability and relationship with growth and muscle characteristics. BMC genetics, 9(1): 53. https: //doi.org/10.1186/1471-2156-9-53. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Macrae VE, Mahon M, Gilpin S, Sandercock DA, Mitchell MA, 2006. Skeletal muscle fibre growth and growth associated myopathy in the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus). Br. Poult. Sci., 47(3): 264–272. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00071660600753615. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Michalczuk M, Zdanowska-Sąsiadek Ż, Damaziak K, Niemiec J, 2017. Influence of indoor and outdoor systems on meat quality of slow-growing chickens. CYTA-J FOOD, 15(1): 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/19476337.2016.1196246. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Mikulski D, Celej J, Jankowski J, Majewska T, Mikulska M, 2011. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of slowergrowing and fast-growing chickens raised with and without outdoor access. Asian-australas. J. Anim. Sci. 24(10), 1407- 1416. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11038. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Napolitano F, Castellini C, Naspetti S, Piasentier E, Girolami A, Braghieri A, 2013. Consumer preference for chicken breast may be more affected by information on organic production than by product sensory properties. Poult. Sci., 92(3): 820- 826. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02633. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Połtowicz K, Doktor J, 2011. Effect of free-range raising on performance, carcass attributes and meat quality of broiler chicken. Anim. Sci. Pap. Rep. 29(2):139-149
  • Ponte PIP, Rosado CMC, Crespo JP, Crespo DG, Mourão JL, Chaveiro-Soares MA, Bras JLA, Mende, I, Gama LT, Prates JAM, Ferreira LMA, Fontes MGA, 2008. Pasture intake improves the performance and meat sensory attributes of freerange broilers. Poult. Sci., 87(1): 71-79. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00147. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Rehfeldt C, Fiedler I, Stickland NC, 2004. Number and size of muscle fibres in relation to meat production. Alınmıştır: Muscle development of livestock animals: physiology, genetics and meat quality. (Ed) Haagsman, H.P., CABI Publ., Cambridge, MA, 1–37 pp.
  • Sirri F, Castellini C, Roncarati A, Franchini A, Meluzzi A, 2010. Effect of feeding and genotype on the lipid profile of organic chicken meat. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol, 112 (9): 994-1002. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.200900204. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Sossidou EN, Dal Bosco A, Castellini C, Grashorn MA, 2015. Effects of pasture management on poultry welfare and meat quality in organic poultry production systems. Worlds Poult Sci J, 71(2): 375-384. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915000379. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Stadig LM, Rodenburg TB, Reubens B, Aerts J, Duquenne B, Tuyttens FA, 2016. Effects of free-range access on production parameters and meat quality, composition and taste in slow-growing broiler chickens. Poult. Sci, 95(12): 2971-2978. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew226. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Viana FM, Canto ACVCS, Costa-Lima BRC, Salim APAA, Conte-Junior CA, 2017. Color stability and lipid oxidation of broiler breast meat from animals raised on organic versus non-organic production systems. Poult. Sci., 96(3): 747-753. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew331. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
  • Woo-Ming A, Arsi K, Moyle JR, Gaunsalis VB, Owens CM, Clark FD, Fanatico A, Upadhyay A, Donoghue DJ, Donoghue AM, 2018. Meat quality characteristics of fastgrowing broilers reared under different types of pasture management: Implications for organic and alternative production systems (Part II). J Appl Poult Res 27(2): 215- 222. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr/pfx060. [Erişim: 27.11.2018]
  • Yunis R, Ben-David A, Heller ED, Cahaner A, 2000. Immunocompetence and viability under commercial conditions of broiler groups differing in growth rate and in antibody response to Escherichia coil vaccine. Poult. Sci., 79(6): 810-816. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.6.810. [Erişim: 27.03.2018]
APA Kaya H, Karaalp M (2019). Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. , 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
Chicago Kaya Hacer,Karaalp Musa Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. (2019): 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
MLA Kaya Hacer,Karaalp Musa Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. , 2019, ss.617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
AMA Kaya H,Karaalp M Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. . 2019; 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
Vancouver Kaya H,Karaalp M Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. . 2019; 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
IEEE Kaya H,Karaalp M "Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri." , ss.617 - 623, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
ISNAD Kaya, Hacer - Karaalp, Musa. "Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri". (2019), 617-623. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
APA Kaya H, Karaalp M (2019). Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7(4), 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
Chicago Kaya Hacer,Karaalp Musa Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7, no.4 (2019): 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
MLA Kaya Hacer,Karaalp Musa Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.7, no.4, 2019, ss.617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
AMA Kaya H,Karaalp M Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(4): 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
Vancouver Kaya H,Karaalp M Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(4): 617 - 623. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
IEEE Kaya H,Karaalp M "Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7, ss.617 - 623, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
ISNAD Kaya, Hacer - Karaalp, Musa. "Yetiştirme Sistemleri ve Genotipin Piliç Eti Özelliklerine Etkileri". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7/4 (2019), 617-623. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i4.617-623.2441
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 15:24

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları