Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 50 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 689 - 696 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.3906/sag-1910-11 İndeks Tarihi: 28-08-2020

Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery

Öz:
Background/aim: To compare the clinical use, image quality and viewing angle of a commonly used contact wide angle viewing (WAV)system (Advanced Visual Instruments (AVI) Panoramic Imaging Systems, NY, USA) with a commonly used noncontact WAV system(Leica RUV800, Leica Microsystems, Switzerland).Materials and methods: Images of 42 consecutively operated eyes were obtained with both systems at the same surgical stages and werecompared for image quality using the Imatest Master 4.5.13 (Imatest LLC, Boulder, USA) software. The viewing angles of the imageswere calculated using the optic disc sizes measured from the OCT and infrared fundus images. The 68-degree AVI lens was comparedwith the 90-dioptre (D) Leica RUV800 lens, while the 130-degree AVI lens was compared with the 132-D Leica RUV800 lens. Thesurgical assistants were asked to grade the difficulty of holding the lens in place from 1 to 10, 1 being the easiest and 10 being the mostdifficult.Results: The contact system provided wider viewing angles with higher quality compared to the noncontact system both under fluid andair media. The difference was clinically significant in eyes with impaired corneal clarity, very high myopia, or small pupil. The difficultyof holding the lens in place ranged from 4 to 7, and decreased gradually with practice.Conclusions: Both WAV systems provided high image quality and adequate viewing angles in most cases. However, the contact systemappeared to provide a superior image quality and/or a wider viewing angle in more challenging situations. The difficulty of holding thecontact lens in place was found to be moderate.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Konferans Bildirisi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Inoue M. Wide-angle viewing system. Developments in Ophthalmology 2014; 54: 87-91. doi: 10.1159/000360453
  • 2. De Oliveira PRC, Berger AR, Chow DR. Vitreoretinal instruments: vitrectomy cutters, endoillumination and wideangle viewing systems. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 2016; 2: 28. doi: 10.1186/s40942-016-0052-9
  • 3. Read SP, Fortun JA. Visualization of the retina and vitreous during vitreoretinal surgery: new technologies. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2017; 28 (3): 238-241. doi: 10.1097/ ICU.0000000000000368
  • 4. Spitznas M. A binocular indirect ophthalmomicroscope (BIOM) for non-contact wide-angle vitreous surgery. Graefes Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 1987; 225 (1): 13-15. doi: 10.1007/bf02155797
  • 5. Horiguchi M, Kojima Y, Shimada Y. New system for fiberopticfree bimanual vitreous surgery. Archives of Ophthalmology 2002; 120 (4): 491-494. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.4.491
  • 6. Landers MB, Peyman GA, Wessels IF, Whalen P, Morales V. A new, non-contact wide field viewing system for vitreous surgery. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 136 (1): 199-201. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(03)00103-x
  • 7. Shah VA, Chalam KV. Self-stabilizing wide-angle contact lens for vitreous surgery. Retina 2003; 23 (5): 667-669. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200310000-00010
  • 8. Peyman GA, Canakis C, Livir-Rallatos C, Whalen P. Small-size pediatric vitrectomy wide-angle contact lens. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003; 135 (2): 236-237. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)01911-6
  • 9. Chalam KV, Shah VA. Optics of wide-angle panoramic viewing system–assisted vitreous surgery. Survey Ophthalmology 2004; 49 (4): 437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.04.010
  • 10. Nakata K, Ohji M, Ikuno Y, Kusaka S, Gomi F et al. Wide-angle viewing lens for vitrectomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2004; 137 (4): 760-762. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.09.035
  • 11. MacDonald L. Framework for an image sharpness management system. In: 7th Color and Imaging Conference Final Program and Proceedings. Society for Imaging Science and Technology 1999; Arizona, USA; pp. 75-79.
  • 12. Ohji M, Tada E, Futamura H. Combining a contact lens and wide-angle viewing system for a wider fundus view. Retina 2011; 31 (9): 1958-1960. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31822a900b
  • 13. Tabandeh H, London NJS, Boyer DS, Flynn HW Jr. Outcomes of small-gauge vitreoretinal surgery without scleral-depressed shaving of the vitreous base in the era of wide-angle viewing systems. British Journal of Ophthalmology 2019; 103 (12): 1765-1768. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-313626
  • 14. Ikuno Y, Ohji M, Kusaka S, Gomi F, Nakata K et al. Sutureless contact lens ring system during vitrectomy. American Journal of Ophthalmology 2002; 133 (6): 847-848. doi: 10.1016/s0002- 9394(02)01409-5
  • 15. Kreps EO, Lemm JM, Ruagh EA, Ramkissoon YD. Fogging of non-contact viewing lenses during vitreoretinal surgery. Retina 2016; 36 (12): 2428-2429. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001216
APA BAYRAKCEKEN K, Hondur A, Atalay H, Arıbaş Y (2020). Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. , 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
Chicago BAYRAKCEKEN KEMAL,Hondur Ahmet,Atalay Hatice Tuba,Arıbaş Yavuz Kemal Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. (2020): 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
MLA BAYRAKCEKEN KEMAL,Hondur Ahmet,Atalay Hatice Tuba,Arıbaş Yavuz Kemal Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. , 2020, ss.689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
AMA BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. . 2020; 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
Vancouver BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. . 2020; 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
IEEE BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y "Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery." , ss.689 - 696, 2020. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
ISNAD BAYRAKCEKEN, KEMAL vd. "Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery". (2020), 689-696. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-11
APA BAYRAKCEKEN K, Hondur A, Atalay H, Arıbaş Y (2020). Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 50(4), 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
Chicago BAYRAKCEKEN KEMAL,Hondur Ahmet,Atalay Hatice Tuba,Arıbaş Yavuz Kemal Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 50, no.4 (2020): 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
MLA BAYRAKCEKEN KEMAL,Hondur Ahmet,Atalay Hatice Tuba,Arıbaş Yavuz Kemal Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, vol.50, no.4, 2020, ss.689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
AMA BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 50(4): 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
Vancouver BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 50(4): 689 - 696. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
IEEE BAYRAKCEKEN K,Hondur A,Atalay H,Arıbaş Y "Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery." Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 50, ss.689 - 696, 2020. 10.3906/sag-1910-11
ISNAD BAYRAKCEKEN, KEMAL vd. "Real-life comparison of the viewing angle and the image quality of two commonly used viewing systems for vitreoretinal surgery". Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 50/4 (2020), 689-696. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1910-11