Hillary OTİENO
(Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya)
George. CHEMİNİNG WA
(Department of Plant Science and Crop Protection, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya)
Charles GACHENE
(Department of Land Resource Management and Agricultural Technology, University of Nairobi, Nairobi Kenya)
Shamie ZİNGORE
(International Plant Nutrition Institute, Sub-Saharan Africa Program, Nairobi, Kenya)
Yıl: 2019Cilt: 7Sayı: 10ISSN: 2148-127X / 2148-127XSayfa Aralığı: 1548 - 1553İngilizce

9 0
Economics of Maize and Bean Production: Why Farmers need to Shift to Conservation Agriculture for Sustainable Production
Maize and dry bean are the most important food crops that feed over 85% of Kenyan households. However, the productivity of these crops is low due to the high costs of land preparation and weed control, soil infertility and limited soil moisture under the current conventional tillage system of production. A study was carried in Embu County and Kirinyaga County to determine the economic returns of a maize-bean rotation system under different tillage systems and fertilizer regimes. Maize was produced during the long rains under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) and conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR) and inorganic fertilizer regimes (NK, NP, PK, NPK, and NPK+CaMgZnBS). Dry bean was planted in the short rains in the same plots where maize under different nutrient management regimes and tillage systems had been grown and harvested. The trial was laid out in a split-plot design with the tillage method as the main plot and fertilizer as sub-plot. Economic performance was assessed using partial budget analysis based on labor data and prices of all inputs used during the production period. Grain yields were reduced by 10% to reflect farmers’ yield levels. Maize and dry bean grains were sold at the prevailing farm gate prices. Results showed that maize-bean rotation was KE 22,718 cheaper under no-till with crop residue retention (NT+CR) than under conventional tillage with no crop residue retention (CT-CR). On average, NT+CR recorded KE 29,569 higher net benefit than CT-CR. The NT+CR tillage recorded a benefit to cost ratio of 3.7 compared to 2.7 recorded under CT-CR tillage system. The NT+CR with NK combined was the most profitable treatment with a benefit to cost ratio of 4.92 for maize and 4.33 for maize-bean rotation system. Based on this research, combination of no-till with crop residue retention has the potential to improve economic status and alleviate poverty among resource-constrained farmers.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Abate T, Alene AD, Bergvinson D, Shiferaw B, Silim S, Orr A and Asfaw S. 2012. Tropical grain legumes in Africa and South Asia: knowledge and opportunities. Nairobi, Kenya: International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. 112 pp. Available online: www.icrisat.org/ tropical legumes II.
  • CIAT, ICRISAT, and IITA. 2013. A bulletin of the tropical legumes II project, pp. 1–12.
  • CIMMYT. 1988. Economics Program. (1988). From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: an economics training manual (No. 27). CIMMYT.
  • Erenstein O, Sayre K, Wall PC, Dixon J, and Hellin J. 2008. Adapting No-tillage agriculture to the conditions of smallholder maize and wheat farmers in the tropics and subtropics, World Association of Soil and Water Conservation (WASWC), 253–278.
  • FAO. 2011. Socio-economic analysis of conservation agriculture in Southern Africa, Network No. 2. Rome: FAO.
  • Giller KE, Corbeels M, Nyamangara J, Triomphe B, Affholder F, Scopel E and Tittonell P. 2011. A research agenda to explore the role of conservation agriculture in African smallholder farming systems. Field crops research, 124(3): 468-472.
  • Hobbs PR, Sayre K, and Gupta R. 2008. The role of conservation agriculture in sustainable agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1491): 543-555.
  • Kihara J, Martius C, Bationo A, and Vlek PLG. 2011. Effects of tillage and crop residue application on soybean nitrogen fixation in a tropical ferralsol. Journal of Agriculture, 1(1): 22–37.
  • Lal R, Follett RF, and Kimble JM. 2003. Achieving soil carbon sequestration in the United States: a challenge to the policy makers. Soil Science, 168: 827-845.
  • Lampurlanes J, Angas P, and Cantero-Martinez C. 2001. Root growth, soil water content and yield of barley under different tillage systems on two soils in semiarid conditions. Field Crops Research, 69: 27-40.
  • Mazvimavi K, Ndlovu PV, An H and Murendo C. 2012. Productivity and efficiency analysis of maize under Conservation Agriculture in Zimbabwe. In selected paper for presentation at the International Conference for Agricultural Economists (IAAE) Triennial Conference, Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 18-24 August, 2012.
  • Micheni A, Ouma J, Kanampiu F, Mburu D and Mugai N. 2014. Maize-bean farming system under conservation agriculture: Assessing productivity and sustainability in Eastern Kenya, 2012–2014. Available at: http://www.ctic.org
  • Mloza-Banda HR, Nanthambwe SJ. 2011. Conservation agriculture program and projects in Malawi: Impacts and lessons. National Conservation Agriculture Task Force Secretariat Land Resources Conservation Department, Lilongwe. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/69913
  • Mucheru-muna BM, Mugendi D, Pypers P, Mugwe J, U, J. K, Vanlauwe B and Merckx R. 2013. Enhancing maize productivity and profitability using organic inputs and inorganic mineral fertilizers in central Kenya under small holder farms. Experimental Agriculture, 50(2): 250-269.
  • Muui CW, Muasya, RM, Rao N and Anjichi VE (2007) Pollen longevity in ecologically different zones of western Kenya. African Crop Science Journal, 15: 43–49.
  • Neubert S, Valeska H, Simone I, Japheth OO, Wilfred O, Valérie P, Antti S and Daniel T. 2007. Poverty oriented irrigation policy in Kenya. Empirical results and suggestions for reform. discussion paper / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, 12.
  • Nicholson, SE. 2000. The nature of rainfall variability over Africa on time scales of decades to millennia Global and Planet. Change, 26: 137–158.
  • Okalebo JR, Othieno CO, Woomer PL, Karanja NKM, Semoko JRM, Bekunda, MA, Mugendi DN, Muasya RM and Batiano A. 2007. In Batiano A (Eds.) Advances in integrated soil fertility management in Sub-Sahara Africa: Challenges and Opportunities, 45-62.
  • Olwande J. 2012. Small holder maize production efficiency in Kenya. Regional workshop on an integrated policy approach to commercializing smallholder maize production on 6th – 7th June, 2012 at The Norfolk Hotel, Nairobi Kenya.
  • Otieno, HMO, Chemining’wa GN, Zingore S, and Gachene CK. 2018. Effects of Inorganic Fertilizer Application on Grain Yield, Nutrient-use Efficiency and Economic Returns of Maize in Western Kenya. Journal of Advanced Studies in Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Sciences, 5 (4): 11-22.
  • Otieno, HMO, Chemining’Wa, GN, & Zingore, S. 2018. Effect of farmyard manure, lime and inorganic fertilizer applications on soil pH, nutrients uptake, growth and nodulation of soybean in acid soils of western Kenya. J Agr Sci, 10: 199- 208.
  • Otieno, HMO. 2017. Nutrient Management Options for Enhancing Productivity of Maize and Beans Under Conservation and Conventional Tillage Systems.
  • Otieno, HMO. 2019. Growth and Yield Response of Maize (Zea mays L.) to a Wide Range of Nutrients on Ferralsols of Western Kenya. World Scientific News, 129: 96-106.
  • Otieno, HMO. 2019. Pesticide training tool: A simplified guide for Agricultural Extension Officers and Farmers. Asian Journal of Research in Crop Science, 1-5.
  • Pannell DJ, Llewellyn RS, and Corbeels M. 2014. Agriculture, ecosystems and environment the farm-level economics of conservation agriculture for resource-poor farmers. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 187: 52–64.
  • Rockström J, Kaumbutho P, Mwalley J, Nzabi AW, Temesgen M and Mawenya L. 2009). Conservation farming strategies in East and Southern Africa: Yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research. Soil and Tillage Research, 103: 23-32
  • Sánchez-Girón, V, Serrano, A, Hernanz, JL, & Navarrete, L. 2004. Economic assessment of three long-term tillage systems for rainfed cereal and legume production in semiarid central Spain. Soil and Tillage Research, 78(1): 35-44.
  • Shaxson TF, Kassam AH, Friedrich T, Boddey R and Adekunle A. 2008. Underpinning Conservation Agriculture’s Benefits: The Roots of Soil Health and Function. Integrated Crop Management Vol.6-2008, Appendix 1, FAO, Rome.
  • Uri ND. 1999. The economic benefits and costs of conservation tillage. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 15(1): 5-27.
  • Vanlauwe B, Wendt J, Giller KE, Corbeels M, Gerard B, and Nolte C. 2014. A fourth principle is required to define conservation agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa: The appropriate use of fertilizer to enhance crop productivity. Field Crops Research, 155: 10-13.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.