Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 11 Sayfa Aralığı: 1972 - 1981 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977 İndeks Tarihi: 03-09-2020

The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China

Öz:
Greenhouse gas emissions constitute the basis of global warming. One of the sectors contributing tothe greenhouse gas emissions is the agriculture sector which accounts for 24% of the globalgreenhouse gas emissions. In this study, the effect of cattle husbandry, small ruminant husbandry,poultry husbandry, paddy production, which are the main causes of emissions in the agriculturesector, on agricultural CO2 release was investigated. The research covers the years 1991-2017 ofTurkey and China. In the study, time-series analyses such as Augmented Dickey-Fuller BreakpointUnit Root Test, Johansen Cointegration Test, Ordinary Least Square Regression, Full ModifiedOrdinary Least Square, Canonical Cointegrating Regression and Impulse-Response Analysis wereused. According to the results of the analysis, the effects of cattle husbandry, small ruminanthusbandry, and paddy production activities on agricultural CO2 emissions were statisticallysignificant in Turkey. We determined that the most effective variable on agricultural CO2 emissionswas cattle husbandry both in the long- and short-term. On the other hand, poultry farming had nostatistically significant effect on agricultural CO2 emissions. According to the results of the analysisfor China, all variables were statistically significant. As a result, it is important to adopt methodsthat will not cause environmental damage or will have minimal impact in determination processesof effective parameters on agricultural CO2. The government should determine the boundaries ofagricultural production processes through legal arrangements and the relevant ministries shouldimplement them seriously. To take these measures and implement them are seen as a necessity for asustainable world and a sustainable agricultural sector.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Aggarwal PK, Mall RK. 2002. Climate Change and Rice Yields in Diverse Agro-Environments of India. II. Effect of Uncertainties in Scenarios and Crop Models on Impact Assessment. Climatic Change, 52(3): 331-343.
  • Agovino M, Casaccia M, Ciommi M, Ferrara M, Marchesano K. 2018. Agriculture, climate change and sustainability: The case of EU-28. Ecological Indicators. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.04.064
  • Akalin M. 2014. “Effect on Agriculture of Climate Change”: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies for Eliminating These Effects. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute. Year: 7, Number: 2: 351-377. (in Turkish)
  • Akpolat AG, Altıntaş N. 2013. The Relationship Between Energy Consumption and Real GDP: Nexus of Cointegration and Causality. 1961-2010 Period. Journal of Knowlede Economy & Knowledge, 8(2): 115-127. (in Turkish)
  • Bayraç N, Doğan E. 2016. Effect on Agriculture Sector of Climate Change in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences April, 11(1): 23- 48. (in Turkish)
  • Brooks C. 2008. Introductory Econometrics for Finance (Second Edition). USA:Cabridge Univerty Pres.
  • Casey JW, Holden NM. 2005. The relationship between greenhouse gas emissions and the intensity of milk production in Ireland. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34(2): 429-436.
  • Chhabra A, Manjunath KR, Panigrahy S, Parihar JS. 2013. Greenhouse gas emissions from Indian livestock. Climatic Change, 117(1), 329-344. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0556-8.
  • Choi I. 2001. Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Financ., 20: 249-272.
  • Çağlar AE. 2015. Comparison of Small Sampling Specifications The Structural Breakpoint Unit Root Tests. Pamukkale University, Institute of Social Science, Master Thesis, Econometrics Department, Turkey. (In Turkish).
  • Daccache A, Sataya W, Knox JW. 2015. Climate change impacts on rain-fed and irrigated rice yield in Malawi. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 13(2): 87-103.
  • Dellal İ. 2008. “Global Climate Change and Agriculture and Food Sector in Clamp of Energy, İGEME from the point of view, Issue: 35, Ankara Province, 103-111. (in Turkish)
  • Dellal İ, Engürülü B, Ulukan H, Özevren AŞ, Ünal M. 2015. “Economic Reflections of Climate Change to Agricultural Sector”, Turkey Agriculture Engineer VIII. Technical Congress, Full Text Book-I, Ankara Province , 62-80.
  • Demir P, Cevger Y. 2007. “Global Warming and Livestock Sector”, Journal of Turkish Veterinary Medical Society, Volume: 78, Issue: 1: 13-16. (in Turkish)
  • Doğan HG, Kan A. 2019. The effect of precipitation and temperature on wheat yield in Turkey: a panel FMOLS and panel VECM approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 21(1): 447-460.
  • Doğan HG, Kan M. 2018. The Nexus of CO2 Emission, Population, Agricultural Area Size, GDP and Energy Use in Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(10): 6812-6823.
  • Doğan S, Tüzer M. 2011. Global climate change and its potential impacts. Cumhuriyet University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 12(1): 21-34. (in Turkish).
  • Dudu H, Çakmak EH. 2018. Climate change and agriculture: an integrated approach to evaluate economy-wide effects for Turkey. Climate and Development, 10(3): 275-288.
  • Eckard RJ, Grainger C, De Klein Cam. 2010. Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: A review. Livestock Science, 130(1): 47-56.
  • Enders W. 1995. Applied Applied Econometric Time Series. (2. ed.), New York:Jonh Wiley&Sons. Inc.
  • FAO. 2014. Emissions of Greenhouse Gases from Animal Husbandry. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QA/visualize (Accessed on 08.07.2018)
  • Galton F. 1886. Family likeness in stature. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 40(242-245): 42-73.
  • Gerardeaux E, Giner M, Ramanantsoanirina A, Dusserre J. 2012. Positive effects of climate change on rice in Madagascar. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32(3): 619-627.
  • Göçer İ, Mercan M, Peker O, Bulut Ş. 2013. Causes of Current Account Deficit in Turkey, Financing Quality and Sustainability: An Econometrics Analysis. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 8(1): 213-242, (in Turkish)
  • Griffin M, Sobal J, Lyson TA. 2009. An analysis of a community food waste stream. Agriculture and Human Values, 26, 67- 81.
  • Gülmez A, Yardimcioğlu F. 2012. Nexus of R & D Expenditures and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Panel Cointegration and Panel Causality Analysis (1990-2010). Finance Journal, 163: 335-353. (in Turkish)
  • Hadri K. 2000. Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data. Econometric Journal, 3: 148-161.
  • Im K, Pesaran M, Shin Y. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econom, 115: 53-74.
  • IPCC. 2014. The Fifth Assessment Report (AR5), The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. (http://www.ipcc.ch.).
  • IPM. 2017. İstanbul Policy Center. Strategies for Reducing the greenhouse gas emissions arising from the Agriculture Sector in Turkey. Tuğba Ağaçayak, Levent Öztürk, ISBN: 978-605- 9178-95-2, September 2017, Istanbul Province. (in Turkish).
  • Johansen S. 1988. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3): 231- 254.
  • Kao C, Chiang M. 2000. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Adv Econom, 15: 179- 222.
  • Karakurt I, Aydin G, Aydiner K. 2012. "Sources and mitigation of methane emissions by sectors: a critical review." Renewable energy 39(1): 40-48.
  • Khan MTI, Ali Q, Ashfaq Mç 2018. The nexus between greenhouse gas emission, electricity production, renewable energy and agriculture in Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 118, 437-451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.11.043
  • Ke X, Lu Y, Conrad R. 2014. "Different behaviour of methanogenic archaea and Thaumarchaeota in rice field microcosms." FEMS microbiology ecology 87(1): 18-29.
  • Kummu M, De Moel H, Porkka M, Siebert S, Varis O, Ward PJ. 2012. Lost food, wasted resources: Global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Science of The Total Environment, 438: 477-489.
  • Levin A, Lin C, Chu C. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. JEconom., 108, 1- 24.
  • Liu J, Fritz S, Van Wesenbeeck Cfa, Fuchs M, You L, Obersteiner M, Yang HA. 2008. Spatially explicit assessment of current and future hotspots of hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa in the context of global change. Global and Planetary Change, 64(3): 222-235.
  • Lobell DB. 2014. Climate change adaptation in crop production: Beware of illusions. Global Food Security, 3(2): 72-76.
  • Lütkepohl H, Saikkonen P. 1997. Impulse response analysis in infinite order cointegrated vector autoregressive processes. Journal of Econometrics, vol. 81, no. 1, 127-157.ss.
  • Mackinnon J. 1996. Numerical Distribution Functions for Unit Root and Cointegration Tests. J. Applied Econm., 11: 601- 618.
  • Maddala G, Shaowen W. 1999. Comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxf Bull Econ Stat, 61, pp. 631-652.
  • Mehmood B, Feliceo A, Shahid A. 2014. What Causes What? Aviation Demand and Economic Growth in Romania: Cointegration Estimation and Causality Analysis, Romanian Economic and Business Review, 9(1): 21-34.
  • NCCC. 2012. National Coordination Committee on Climate Change (NCCC) Second National Communication on Climate Change of the People's Republic of China, China Planning Press, Beijing (2012).
  • Özsoy C. 2009. The Analysis with VAR model of relationship between education and economic growth in Turkey. Journal of Knowlede Economy & Knowledge Management 4(1): 71- 83. (in Turkish)
  • Pachauri RK, Allen MR, Barros VR, Broome J, Cramer W, Christ R, Church JA, Clarke L, Dahe Q, Dasgupta P. 2014. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.
  • Park J. 1992. Canonical Cointegrating Regressions. Econometrica, 60: 119-143.
  • Pedroni P. 2000. Fully-modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels, Non-stationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels. In B. Baltagi (Ed.), Advances in Econometrics (pp. 93-130). Amsterdam; New York and Tokyo: Elsevier Science.
  • Pedroni P. 2001. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(4): 727- 731
  • Peker K, Kan M, Nadeem M. 2019. Corporate governance of climate change adaptation. J. Glob. Innov. Agric. Soc. Sci., 7 (1):1-5
  • Perron P. 1989. “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57/6: 1361-1401.
  • Perron P, Vogelsang TJ. 1993. A note on the asymptotic distributions of unit root tests in the additive outlier model with breaks. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 13(2): 8-20l.
  • Ripple WJ, Smith P, Haberl H, Montzka SA, Mcalpine C, Boucher DH. 2013. Ruminants, climate change and climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 4, 2.
  • Tao F, Hayashi Y, Zhang Z, Sakamoto T, Yokozawa M. 2008. Global warming, rice production, and water use in China: Developing a probabilistic assessment. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148(1): 94-110.
  • Tao L, Toshihiro H, Xinyou Y, Yan Z, Kenneth B, Myriam A, Bas B. 2015. Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Global Change Biology, 21(3): 1328-1341.
  • Tari R. 2010. Econometrics (6b.). Kocaeli Province: Umuttepe Publishing. (in Turkish).
  • Van Oort PAJ, Zwart SJ. 2018. Impacts of climate change on rice production in Africa and causes of simulated yield changes. Global Change Biology, 24(3): 1029-1045.
  • Wang W, Koslowski F, Nayak DR, Smith P, Saetnan E, Ju X, Guo L, Han G, de Perthuis C, Lin E, Moran D. 2014. "Greenhouse gas mitigation in Chinese agriculture: Distinguishing technical and economic potentials." Global Environmental Change 26: 53-62.
  • Waheed R, Chang D, Sarwar S, Chen W. 2018. Forest, agriculture, renewable energy, and CO2 emission. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4231-4238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.287
APA DOĞAN H, KARAKAS G (2019). The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. , 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
Chicago DOĞAN Hasan Gökhan,KARAKAS GUNGOR The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. (2019): 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
MLA DOĞAN Hasan Gökhan,KARAKAS GUNGOR The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. , 2019, ss.1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
AMA DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. . 2019; 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
Vancouver DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. . 2019; 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
IEEE DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G "The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China." , ss.1972 - 1981, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
ISNAD DOĞAN, Hasan Gökhan - KARAKAS, GUNGOR. "The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China". (2019), 1972-1981. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
APA DOĞAN H, KARAKAS G (2019). The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7(11), 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
Chicago DOĞAN Hasan Gökhan,KARAKAS GUNGOR The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7, no.11 (2019): 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
MLA DOĞAN Hasan Gökhan,KARAKAS GUNGOR The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, vol.7, no.11, 2019, ss.1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
AMA DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(11): 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
Vancouver DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China. Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi. 2019; 7(11): 1972 - 1981. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
IEEE DOĞAN H,KARAKAS G "The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China." Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi, 7, ss.1972 - 1981, 2019. 10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977
ISNAD DOĞAN, Hasan Gökhan - KARAKAS, GUNGOR. "The Nexus of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Agriculture Sector: Case of Turkey and China". Türk Tarım - Gıda Bilim ve Teknoloji dergisi 7/11 (2019), 1972-1981. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v7i11.1972-1981.2977