Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 30 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 99 - 103 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2 İndeks Tarihi: 11-11-2020

Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen

Öz:
AIM: To evaluate the changes in the pressure values of the ulnar nerve after in-situ decompression and anterior subcutaneoustransposition of the ulnar nerve.MATERIAL and METHODS: The ulnar nerve was released in the postcondylar groove. An ultrathin (100 lm) force transducer wasembedded between the posterior of the ulnar nerve and the anterior of the medial epicondyle. The elbow joint was flexed from fullextension position to maximum flexion and was measured to obtain the maximum stress at 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° of flexion. Then,the ulnar nerve was transposed anterior subcutaneously. The same measurement was applied to the two procedures. Data werecompared between the two surgical techniques.RESULTS: Our study was performed on the right upper extremities of eight (seven men and one woman) fresh frozen cadavers.The mean age of the cadavers was 67.25 ± 12.2 years. Mean values of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° of flexion after the ulnar nerve insitu decompression were 0.41, 0.9, 1.7, and 4.3 N, respectively. Mean values of 0°, 45°, 90°, and 135° of flexion after anteriortransposition of the ulnar nerve were 0.3, 0.73, 1.63, and 2.15 N, respectively. No significant difference was noted between the twogroups in terms of 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion values. However, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the 135°of flexion measurement values.CONCLUSION: Anterior transposition is a more appropriate technique than in-situ decompression in the treatment of cubital tunnelsyndrome that does not respond to conservative treatment regardless of the severity of the symptom.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Apfelberg DB, Larson SJ: Dynamic anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Plast Reconstr Surg 51(1):79-81, 1973
  • 2. Bartels RH, Termeer EH, van der Wilt GJ, van Rossum LG, Meulstee J, Verhagen WI, Grotenhuis JA: Simple decompression or anterior subcutaneous transposition for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: A cost-minimization analysis: Part 2. Neurosurgery 56(3):531-536, 2005
  • 3. Bartels RH, Verhagen WI, van der Wilt GJ, Meulstee J, van Rossum LG, Grotenhuis JA: Prospective randomized controlled study comparing simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous transposition for idiopathic neuropathy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: Part 1. Neurosurgery 56:522- 530, 2005
  • 4. Calisaneller T, Ozdemir O, Caner H, Altinors N: Simple decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow via proximal and distal mini skin incisions. Turk Neurosurg 21(2):167-171, 2011
  • 5. Davies MA, Vonau M, Blum PW, Kwok BC, Matheson JM, Stening WA: Results of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow treated by decompression or anterior transposition. Aust N Z J Surg 61:929-934, 1991
  • 6. Dellon AL, Chang E, Coert JH, Campbell KR: Intraneural ulnar nerve pressure changes related to operative techniques. J Hand Surg Am 19:923-930, 1994
  • 7. Eliaspour D, Sedighipour L, Hedayati-Moghaddam MR, Rayegani SM, Bahrami MH, Roghani RS: The pattern of muscle involvement in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Neurol India 60:36-39, 2012
  • 8. Erbayraktar S, Sade B, Tekinsoy B: Comparison of simple decompression and superficial transposition in patients with advanced cubital tunnel syndrome. Turk Neurosurg 11:51-55, 2001
  • 9. Fernandes CH, Matsumoto MH, Honmoto PK, Lima MF, Faloppa F, Albertoni WM, Carneiro RO: Transposição anterior submuscular do nervo ulnar para o tratamento da síndrome do túnel cubital. Rev Bras Ortop 33(6):465-471, 1998
  • 10. Foran I, Vaz K, Sikora-Klak J, Ward SR, Hentzen ER, Shah SB: Regional ulnar nerve strain following decompression and anterior subcutaneous transposition in patients with cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 41(10):e343-e350, 2016
  • 11. Gelberman RH, Yamaguchi K, Hollstien SB, Winn SS, Heidenreich FP Jr, Bindra RR, Hsieh P, Silva MJ: Changes in interstitial pressure and cross-sectional area of the cubital tunnel and of the ulnar nerve with flexion of the elbow. An experimental study in human cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:492-501, 1998
  • 12. Glowacki KA, Weiss AP: Anterior intramuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 6:89-96, 1997
  • 13. Goldfarb CA, Sutter MM, Martens EJ, Manske PR: Incidence of re-operation and subjective outcome following in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve at the cubital tunnel. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 34:379-383, 2009
  • 14. Heithoff ST: Cubital tunnel syndrome does not require transposition of the ulnar nerve. J Hand Surg Am 24:898-905, 1999
  • 15. Hurvitz AP, Fitzgerald BT, Kroonen LT: Wide decompression may render the ulnar nerve unstable: A cadaveric study. J Surg Orthop Adv 25:176-179, 2016
  • 16. Hsu PA, Hsu AR, Sutter EG, Levitz SP, Rose DM, Segalman KA, Lee SK: Effect of anterior versus posterior in situ decompression on ulnar nerve subluxation. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 42:262-266, 2013
  • 17. King T, Morgan FP: Late results of removing the medial humeral epicondyle for traumatic ulnar neuritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 41:51-55, 1959
  • 18. Manske PR, Johnston R, Pruitt DL, Strecker WB: Ulnar nerve decompression at the cubital tunnel. Clin Orthop 274:231- 237, 1992
  • 19. Mondelli M, Giannini F, Ballerini M, Ginanneschi F, Martorelli E: Incidence of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow in the province of Siena (Italy). J Neurol Sci 234(1-2):5-10, 2005
  • 20. Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Kelm J, Reith W, Schwerdtfeger K, Steudel WI: Simple decompression or subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 30:521-524, 2005
  • 21. Nathan PA, Istvan JA, Meadows KD: Intermediate and longterm outcomes following simple decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. Chir Main 24:29-34, 2005
  • 22. Nellans K, Tang P: Evaluation and treatment of failed ulnar nerve release at the elbow. Orthop Clin North Am 43:487-494, 2012
  • 23. Prevel CD, Matloub HS, Ye Z, Sanger JR, Yousif NJ: The extrinsic blood supply of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: An anatomic study. J Hand Surg Am 18:433-438, 1993
  • 24. Robertson C, Saratsiotis J: A review of compressive ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28(5):345, 2005
  • 25. Shah CM, Calfee RP, Gelberman RH, Goldfarb CA: Outcomes of rigid night splinting and activity modification in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 38:1125-1130, 2013
  • 26. Simsek S, Er U, Demirci A, Sorar M: Operative illustrations of the Osborne’s ligament. Turk Neurosurg 21(2):269,270, 2011
  • 27. Song JW, Waljee JF, Burns PB, Chung KC, Gaston RG, Haase SC, Hammert WC, Lawton JN, Merrell GA, Nassab PF, Yang LJ: An outcome study for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: A multicenter study by the Surgery for Ulnar Nerve (SUN) study group. Neurosurgery 72:971-982, 2013
  • 28. Staples R, London DA,Dardas AZ, Goldfarb CA, Calfee RP: Comparative morbidity of cubital tunnel surgeries: A prospective cohort study. J Hand Surg Am 43:207-213, 2018
  • 29. Sugawara M: Experimental and clinical studies of the vascularized anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 62:755-766, 1988
  • 30. Suzuki T, Iwamoto T, Ochi K, Mito K, Nakamura T, Suzuki K, Yamada H, Sato K: Cigarette smoking is associated with cubital tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 54:1136-1138, 2016
  • 31. Uscetin I, Bingol D, Ozkaya O, Orman C, Akan M: Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow caused by the epitrochleoanconeus muscle: A case report and surgical approach. Turk Neurosurg 24(2):266-271, 2014
APA KILINC B, Celik H, ÖÇ Y, UNLU R, KESKINOZ E, YILMAZ B (2020). Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. , 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
Chicago KILINC Bekir Eray,Celik Haluk,ÖÇ Yunus,UNLU Ruhat,KESKINOZ Elif Nedret,YILMAZ BARIŞ Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. (2020): 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
MLA KILINC Bekir Eray,Celik Haluk,ÖÇ Yunus,UNLU Ruhat,KESKINOZ Elif Nedret,YILMAZ BARIŞ Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. , 2020, ss.99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
AMA KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. . 2020; 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
Vancouver KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. . 2020; 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
IEEE KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B "Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen." , ss.99 - 103, 2020. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
ISNAD KILINC, Bekir Eray vd. "Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen". (2020), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
APA KILINC B, Celik H, ÖÇ Y, UNLU R, KESKINOZ E, YILMAZ B (2020). Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. Turkish Neurosurgery, 30(1), 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
Chicago KILINC Bekir Eray,Celik Haluk,ÖÇ Yunus,UNLU Ruhat,KESKINOZ Elif Nedret,YILMAZ BARIŞ Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. Turkish Neurosurgery 30, no.1 (2020): 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
MLA KILINC Bekir Eray,Celik Haluk,ÖÇ Yunus,UNLU Ruhat,KESKINOZ Elif Nedret,YILMAZ BARIŞ Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. Turkish Neurosurgery, vol.30, no.1, 2020, ss.99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
AMA KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2020; 30(1): 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
Vancouver KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2020; 30(1): 99 - 103. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
IEEE KILINC B,Celik H,ÖÇ Y,UNLU R,KESKINOZ E,YILMAZ B "Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen." Turkish Neurosurgery, 30, ss.99 - 103, 2020. 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2
ISNAD KILINC, Bekir Eray vd. "Analysis of Subcutaneous Anterior Transposition versus in-situ Decompression of Ulnar Nerve with Force Transducer in Cadaver Specimen". Turkish Neurosurgery 30/1 (2020), 99-103. https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.27190-19.2