Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 18 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002 İndeks Tarihi: 23-09-2020

Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

Öz:
Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkçe’ye uyarlanan Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin (AHÖ) psikometrik özelliklerini inceleyerek geçerlik ve güvenirliğini sınamaktır. Çalışma verileri, bir devlet üniversitesinin farklı fakültelerinde öğrenim görmekte olan ve seçkisiz örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 472 (295 kadın, 177 erkek) lisans öğrencisinden elde edilmiştir. AHÖ’nün geçerliğini test etmek için çalışmada doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) yönteminden yararlanılmıştır. DFA sonuçlarına göre ölçeğin Türkçe formunun, “akran desteği”, “öğretim elemanı desteği”, “öğretim elemanlarının empatik anlayışı”, “sınıf konforu” ve “izolasyon” olarak adlandırılan beş faktörlü bir yapı sergilediği belirlenmiştir. AHÖ’nün güvenirliğinin incelenmesi sonucunda ise ölçekte yer alan beş faktörün Cronbach alfa iç tutarlık katsayıları akran desteği için . 72, öğretim elemanı desteği için .88, öğretim elemanlarının empatik anlayışı için .92, sınıf konforu için .89 ve izolasyon için .66 olup, ölçeğin bütününe ilişkin elde edilen iç-tutarlık değeri .85’dir. AHÖ’nün üç hafta arayla yapılan ölçümler temelinde gerçekleştirilen güvenirlik analizi sonucunda ise faktörlerin test-tekrar test güvenirlik katsayılarının .64 (izolasyon) ile .77 (sınıf konforu) arasında değiştiği görülmüştür. Ölçeğin toplam puanı kapsamında elde edilen test tekrarı güvenirliği de .80 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, AHÖ’nün Türkçe formunun orijinal ölçekte olduğu üzere beş faktörlü bir yapı sergilediği ve güvenilirlik ölçütlerini sağladığı belirlenmiştir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Turkish Adaptation of the Sense of Belongingness Scale: Validity and Reliability Studies

Öz:
The purpose of the study is to investigate the validity and reliability of the Sense of Belongingness Scale (SBS) adapted to Turkish culture. The sample of the study consisted of 472 (295 female, 177 male) undergraduate students enrolled in various faculties of a state university in Turkey. The construct validity of the scale was examined using confirmatory factor analysis. The result of the analysis showed that the SBS was composed of five factors, namely “perceived peer support”, “perceived faculty support”, “perceived empathy”, “perceived classroom comfort” and “perceived isolation”. The reliability analysis also revealed that the Cronbach alpha internal consistency coefficients of the factors were 0.72 for perceived peer support, 0.88 for perceived faculty support, 0.92 for perceived empathy, 0.89 for perceived classroom comfort and 0.66 for isolation. The test-retests reliability coefficients of the factors (after a three week interval) also changed, ranging from 0.64 (perceived isolation) and 0.77 (perceived classroom comfort). As a result, all the findings indicated that the Turkish adapted form of the SBS has similar psychometric features to the original scale.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The meditational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 36-46. [CrossRef]
  • Allen, K., Kern, M., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychological Review, 30, 1-34. [CrossRef]
  • Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Bacanlı, H. (2003). Gelişim ve öğrenme (6. Baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  • Bean, J. P., & Metzner, B. S. (1985). A conceptual model of nontraditional undergraduate student attrition. Review of Educational Research, 55(4), 485-540. [CrossRef]
  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. [CrossRef]
  • Cemalcılar, Z. (2010). Schools as socialisation contexts: Understanding the impact of school climate factors on students’ sense of school belonging. Applied Psychology, 59, 243-272. [CrossRef]
  • Cheng, D. X. (2005). Assessing students’ perceptions of campus community: A focus group approach. Professional File, 95, 2-10.
  • Chickering, A., & Reisser, L. (1993). Education and identity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Cotten, S. R., & Wilson, B. (2006). Student–faculty interactions: Dynamics and determinants. Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 51(4), 487-519. [CrossRef]
  • Çetinsaya, G. (2014). Büyüme, kalite, uluslararasılaşma: Türkiye yükseköğretimi için bir yol haritası (Rapor No. 2014/2). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi Basımevi.
  • Eurydice (2014). Avrupa yükseköğreniminde modernizasyon: Giriş, eğitimin sürdürülmesi ve istihdam. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142. [CrossRef]
  • Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203-220. [CrossRef]
  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148-162. [CrossRef]
  • Harvey, A., & Szalkowicz, G. (2015). From departure to arrival: Re-engaging students who have withdrawn from university, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(1), 79-97. [CrossRef]
  • Hausmann, L. R. M., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and white first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803-839. [CrossRef]
  • Hoffman, M., Richmond, J., Morrow, J., & Salomone, K. (2002). Investigating “sense of belonging” in first-year college students. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 4(3), 227-256. [CrossRef]
  • Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial cliamte on latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70, 324-345. [CrossRef]
  • Gizir, S. (2019). The sense of classroom belonging among pre-service teachers: Testing a theoretical model. European Journal of Educational Research, 8, 87-97. [CrossRef]
  • Gummadam, P., Pittman, L. D., & Ioffe, M. (2016). School belonging, ethnic identity, and psychological adjustment among ethnic minority college students, The Journal of Experimental Education, 84(2), 289-306. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1048844 [CrossRef]
  • Kennedy, G. J., & Tuckman, B. W. (2013). An exploration into the influence of academic and social values, procrastination, and perceived school belongingness on academic performance. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 435-470. [CrossRef]
  • Kim, Y. K., & Lundberg, C. A. (2016). A Structural model of the relationship between student–faculty interaction and cognitive skills development among college students. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 288-309. [CrossRef]
  • Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Are the effects of student-faculty interaction dependent on major? An examination using multi-level modeling. Research in Higher Education, 52(6), 589-615. [CrossRef]
  • Lester, L., Waters, S., & Cross, D. (2013). The relationship between school connectedness and mental health during the transition to secondary school: A path analysis. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 23, 157-171. [CrossRef]
  • Ma, X. (2003). Sense of belonging to schools make a difference. Journal of Educational Research, 96(6), 340-349. [CrossRef]
  • Maunder, R. E. (2018). Students’ peer relationships and their contribution to university adjustment: the need to belong in the university community, Journal of Further and Higher Education, 42(6), 756-768. [CrossRef]
  • Maunder, R., Cunliffe, M., Galvin, J., Mjali, S., & Rogers, J. (2013). Listening to student voices: Student researchers exploring undergraduate experiences of university transition. Higher Education, 66(2), 139-152. [CrossRef]
  • Micari, M., & Pazos, P. (2012). Connecting to the professor: impact of the student–faculty relationship in a highly challenging course. College Teaching, 60(2), 41–47. [CrossRef]
  • Morrow, J. A., & Ackermann, M. E. (2012). Intention to persist and retention of first-year students: The importance of motivation and sense of belonging. College Student Journal, 46(3), 483-491.
  • Murphy, S. C. (2010). The first-year student experience: Examining student satisfaction and the use of learning communities in the first-year of the college. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, USA). Retrieved from http://purl.umn.edu/92414
  • OECD (2010). Tertiary education entry rates 2010. Retrieved from OECD iLibrary website: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/tertiary-education-entry-rates-2010_20755120-2010-table2
  • Osborne, J. W. & Walker, C. (2006). Stereotype threat, identification with academics, and withdrawal from school: Why the most successful students of color might be most likely to withdraw. Educational Psychology, 26(4), 563-577. [CrossRef]
  • Osterman, K. F. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 323-367. [CrossRef]
  • Osterman, K. F. (2010). Teacher practice and students’ sense of belonging. In T. Lovat, R. Toomey, & N. Clement (Eds.), International Research Handbook on Values Education and Student Wellbeing (pp. 239–260). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. [CrossRef]
  • Oswald, D. L., & Clark, E. M. (2003). Best friends forever?: High school best friendships and the transition to college. Personal Relationship, 10(2), 187-196. [CrossRef]
  • Özkan, C. ve Gizir, S. (2013). Motives of undergraduate students to study at higher education institutions and their socialization tactics. Education & Science, 38, 223-236.
  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Pichon, H. W. (2016). Developing a sense of belonging in the classroom: community college students taking courses on a four-year college campus. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(1), 47-59. doi: 10.1080/10668926.2014.964429 [CrossRef]
  • Pittman, L. D., & Richmond, A. (2008). University belonging, friendship quality and psychologial adjustment during the transition to college. The Journal of Experimental Education, 76, 343-361. [CrossRef]
  • Quinn, J. (2013). Drop-out and completion in higher education in europe among students from under-represented groups. Retrieved from NESET website: http://nesetweb.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/2013-Drop-out-and-Completion-in-Higher-Education-in-Europe-among-students-from-under-represented-groups.pdf
  • Schulman, M., Sassenberg, K., Nagengast, B. & Trautwein, U. (2018). Belonging mediates effects of student-university fit on well-being, motivation, and dropout intention. Social Psychology, 49(1), 16-28. [CrossRef]
  • Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. New York: Routledge.
  • Sevinç, S. ve Gizir, C. A. (2014). Üniversite birinci sınıf öğrencilerinin bakış açılarından üniversiteye uyumu olumsuz etkileyen faktörler (Mersin Üniversitesi Örneği). Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 14(4), 1285-1308.
  • Shim, S. S., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). What do students want socially when they arrive at college? Implications of social achievement goals for social behaviors and adjustment during the first semester of college. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 504-515. [CrossRef]
  • Sidelinger, R. J., & Booth-Butterfield, M. B. (2010). Co-constructing student involvement: An examination of teacher confirmation and student-to-student connectedness in the college classroom. Communication Education, 59(2), 165-184. [CrossRef] Sing, A. (2018). Investigating the sense of belonging of international students through a predictive model. (Doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, USA). Retrieved from https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16467
  • Steingass, S, J. & Sykes, S. (2008). Centralizing advising to improve student outcomes. Peer Review, 10(1), 18-20. Strayhorn, T. L. (2012). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. New York: Routledge. [CrossRef]
  • Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal eşitlik modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49-74.
  • Tachine, A. R., Cabrera, N. L., & Yellow-Bird, E. (2017). Home away from home: Native American students’ sense of belonging during their first year in college. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(5), 785-807. [CrossRef]
  • Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. [CrossRef]
  • Tovar, E. (2013). A conceptual model on the impact of mattering, sense of belonging, engagement/involvement, and socio-academic integrative experiences on community college students’ intent to persist (Doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, USA). Retrieved from https://scholarship.claremont.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1083&context=cgu_etd
  • Tovar, E., & Simon, M. A. (2010). Factorial structure and invariance analysis of the sense of belonging scales. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(3), 199-217. [CrossRef]
  • Uslu-Gülşen, F. (2017). Yükseköğretimde okul terkinin değerlendirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, Eskişehir). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi adresinden edinilmiştir.
  • Vincent, E. A. (2016). Social media as an avenue to achieving sense of belonging among college students. Vistas Online, Article 63, 1-14. Retrieved from ACA website: https://www.counseling.org/docs/default-source/vistas/social-media-as-an-avenue.pdf?sfvrsn=f684492c_8
  • Voelkl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105(3), 294-318. [CrossRef]
  • Yengimolki, S., Kalantarkousheh, S. M., & Malekitabar, A. (2015). Self-concept, social adjustment and academic achievement of Persian students. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 8(2), 50-60.
  • Wheeless, V. E., Witt, P. L., Maresh, M., Bryand, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2011). Instructor credibility as a mediator of instructor communication and students’ intent to persist in college. Communication Education, 60, 314–339. [CrossRef]
  • Wilson, D., Jones, D., Bocell, F., Crawford, J., Kim, M.J., Veilleuz, N., Floyd-Smith, T., Bates, R., & Plett, M. (2015). Belonging and academic engagement among undergraduate STEM students: A multi-institutional study. Research in Higher Education, 56(7), 750-776. [CrossRef]
  • Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study, Instructional Science, 42(5), 661-684. [CrossRef]
APA sevinç tuhanioğlu s, GİZİR C (2019). Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. , 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
Chicago sevinç tuhanioğlu seda,GİZİR CEM ALİ Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. (2019): 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
MLA sevinç tuhanioğlu seda,GİZİR CEM ALİ Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. , 2019, ss.1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
AMA sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. . 2019; 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
Vancouver sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. . 2019; 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
IEEE sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C "Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları." , ss.1 - 18, 2019. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
ISNAD sevinç tuhanioğlu, seda - GİZİR, CEM ALİ. "Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları". (2019), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
APA sevinç tuhanioğlu s, GİZİR C (2019). Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Hayef:journal of education (Online), 16(1), 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
Chicago sevinç tuhanioğlu seda,GİZİR CEM ALİ Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Hayef:journal of education (Online) 16, no.1 (2019): 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
MLA sevinç tuhanioğlu seda,GİZİR CEM ALİ Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Hayef:journal of education (Online), vol.16, no.1, 2019, ss.1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
AMA sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2019; 16(1): 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
Vancouver sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları. Hayef:journal of education (Online). 2019; 16(1): 1 - 18. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
IEEE sevinç tuhanioğlu s,GİZİR C "Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları." Hayef:journal of education (Online), 16, ss.1 - 18, 2019. 10.26650/hayef.2019.19002
ISNAD sevinç tuhanioğlu, seda - GİZİR, CEM ALİ. "Aidiyet Hissi Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları". Hayef:journal of education (Online) 16/1 (2019), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.26650/hayef.2019.19002