Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 271 - 277 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5 İndeks Tarihi: 03-10-2020

Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions

Öz:
The present research work was conducted to find out the most suitable inter and intra spacing for Greenhouse transplantation of in vitro grown potato plantlets in peat moss soil in order to get maximum seed potato yield. There werenine different combinations of inter and intra row spacing (30x15, 30x10, 10x15, 20x5, 30x5, 10x5, 20x15, 10x10,20x10cm) in completely randomized design. Regarding vegetative growth, maximum plant height i.e 59.01 cm, 58.92cm, 57.01 cm was observed at 30cmx5cm, 20cmx5cm, and 10cmx5cm, respectively. Greater number of minitubers ineach tuber category i.e. large, medium and small were obtained at greater inter and intra plant spacing , whereas themaximum average tubers yield per plant (165.0g) were recorded at spacing of 30cm x15cm followed by the spacing20cm x10cm where the average yield per plant was 145.38g. It was concluded that the plant spacing of 30x15cmis the best for potato plantlets transplantation in the greenhouse benches in order to get maximum minituber yield.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ahmad, I., Iftikhar, S., Soomro, M.H and Aslam, M. (1991). Investigation of powdery scab of potato in Pakistan CDRI-PSPDR, PARC, Islamabad, Pakistan, pp. 1-2.
  • Arega, A., Tekilen, A., Solomon, T and Tekile, B. (2018). Effect of inter and intra row Spacing on Tuber Yield and Yield Components of Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Guji zone, Southern Ethiopia. Journal od advancements in plant science. 1: 1-11.
  • Chandra,R., Birhman, R.K. (1994). In vitro micropropagation in relation to pedigree in potato. J. Indian Potato Assoc. 21(1&2):87.
  • Demo, P., Low W.J, Mwenye, J.O. (2007). Potato production in Malawi: strength, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. African potato association conference proceedings, Alexandria, Egypt. 7, 339-345.
  • Demo, P., Pankomera P, Connel, L. T, Khumar, N. (2009). Potential of potato farming in improving the livelihoods of small scale farmers in Malawi. African crop science conference proceedings, Uganda: Afr. Crop Sci. Soc. P.9. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/ abstract/20133232452
  • Essah, S.Y.C. and Honeycutt, C.W. (2004). Tillage and seed-sprouting strategies to improve potato yield and quality in short season climates. American Journal of Potato Research, 81, 177-186. Doi: https://doi. org/10.1007/BF02871747
  • FAOSTAT. (2008). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistical Database. Retrived from http//faostat.fao.org
  • GOP, Govt. of Pakistan. Ministry of Finance 2016-17. Economic survey of Pakistan 2016-17. Economic advisor’s wing, Islamabad. Retrived from http://www.finance. gov.pk/survey_1617.html
  • Gulluoglu, L. and Arıoglu, H. (2009). Effects of seed size and in row spacing on growth and yield of early potato in a Mediterranean-type environment in Turkey. African Journal of Agricultural Research.4 (5):535-541. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20093175520
  • Hani, N.M.B., Said, J.A., Al-Tabbal, Haddad, M.A., Aldalin in, H.K, Al-Fraihat, Alhrout, H.H., Hasan, H.S . and Aldabbas, F.M. (2018). Effect of plant density on water use efficiency and quality of potato (Solanum Tuberosum L. Cv. Spunta) in the Jordan valley. Journal of Agricultural Science. 10: 203-214.
  • Hawkes, J. (1990). The potato evolution, biodiversity and genetic resources.1990 pp.viii + 259 pp. ref.7 pp. Retrived from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19901615687
  • Idoko, J. A., Osang, P.O. & Ngbian, Z. (2017). Effect Of Intra-Row Spacing And Portion Of Planting Material On The Growth And Yield Of Sweet Potato In Makurdi, Southern Guinea Savannah Agro-Ecological Zone Of Nigeria. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR). 3: 5, 1345-1355.
  • Lommen, W.J.M. (1999). Causes for low tuber yields of transplants from in vitro potato plantlets of early cultivars after field planting. Journal of Agricultural Science. 133:275-284. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/ S002185969900698X
  • Murashige T. & Skoog F. (1962). A revised medium for rapid growth and bio-assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15, 473-497.
  • Mahmood, A. (2005). A study of planting method and spacing on yield potato using Tps, Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 4(2):102-105. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/ ajps.2005.102.105
  • Malik, N. J. (1995). Potato in Pakistan. A handbook. Word Mate. Islamabad. pp. 3-7.
  • Naik, P., Sarkar, D. (2000). Potato Global Research and Development, Volume-I, Indian Potato Association, Shimla, pp.194-211.
  • Ritter, E., Angulo, B., Riga, P. Herran, C., Relloso, J. and San Jose, M. (2001). Comparison of hydroponic and aeroponics cultivation systems for the production of potato mini-tubers. Potato Research44:127-135. Retrived from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/ BF02410099.pdf
  • Swaminathan, M.S., Sawyer, R.L. (1983). The potential of potato as a world food.In: Hook, W.J. (Ed.). Proceeding International Congress “Research for Potato in the Year 2000”, CIP, Lima, Peru, pp. 3-10.
  • Sultana, S., Shahiduzzaman, Md. (2016). Effect of plant spacing on the growth and yield of sweet potato cultivars in medium high land condition under AEZ-9.International Journal of Applied Research. 2(3): 108-112.
  • Tokita , N., Ichikawa , M., Kainuma , K., Kitazawa , T., Shimamura , H., Kanayama , A., Sato , S., Kurita , T., Youshimura , I., Tokita , T., Iwasaki , E and Iwasaki , T.(2015). Effects of planting density and fertilizer type on growth and yield of yacon (Smallanthus sonchifolius) tubers. Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research. 5 (11): 38-41. Retrived from https://pdfs. semanticscholar.org/f84c/69b84046d70a8895a0a4dccd88956014602d.pdf
  • Getachew, T., Belew, D and Tulu, S. (2013). Combined effect of plant spacing and time of earthing up on tuber quality parameters of potato (solanumtuberosuml.) At degem district, north showa zone of oromia regional state. Asian journal of crop science, 5: 24-32. Doi: https:// doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.24.32
  • Yenagi, B.S., Meli, S.S and Angadi, S.S. (2004). Effect of row spacing, planting date and nitrogen level on tuber grade, yield and economics of potato. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17: 220-223.
  • Zerga, k., Alemu, M., Tebasa, F and Tesfaye, B. (2017). Impacts of different mulching material on seedling emergence and growth performance of hot pepper (Capsicum annum l) at gurage zone, Ethiopia. International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 7: 01-04. https:// doi.org/10.25081/imrj.2017.v7.3362
APA GUL Z, QURESHİ F, JAMAL Z (2020). Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. , 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Chicago GUL Zishan,QURESHİ Faizan,JAMAL Zafar Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. (2020): 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
MLA GUL Zishan,QURESHİ Faizan,JAMAL Zafar Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. , 2020, ss.271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
AMA GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. . 2020; 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Vancouver GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. . 2020; 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
IEEE GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z "Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions." , ss.271 - 277, 2020. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
ISNAD GUL, Zishan vd. "Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions". (2020), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
APA GUL Z, QURESHİ F, JAMAL Z (2020). Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 4(3), 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Chicago GUL Zishan,QURESHİ Faizan,JAMAL Zafar Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences 4, no.3 (2020): 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
MLA GUL Zishan,QURESHİ Faizan,JAMAL Zafar Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, vol.4, no.3, 2020, ss.271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
AMA GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences. 2020; 4(3): 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
Vancouver GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions. International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences. 2020; 4(3): 271 - 277. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
IEEE GUL Z,QURESHİ F,JAMAL Z "Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions." International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences, 4, ss.271 - 277, 2020. 10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5
ISNAD GUL, Zishan vd. "Growth and minituber yield response of potato plantlets in micropropagation to different plant spacing under greenhouse conditions". International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Food Sciences 4/3 (2020), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.31015/jaefs.2020.3.5