Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi

Süleyman BOLAT, (Aksaray Üniversitesi, İİBF, Maliye Bölümü, Aksaray, Türkiye)
Özgür KOÇBULUT (Bozok Üniversitesi, Akdağmadeni MYO, Muhasebe ve Vergi Uygulamaları, Yozgat, Türkiye)
Maliye Dergisi
0 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 176 Sayfa Aralığı: 201 - 224 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 12-08-2020

Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi

Öz:
Çalışma, 37 gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkede 1993-2016 dönemindedoğrusal olmayan panel birim kök testlerinden Sıralı Panel Seçim Yöntemi(SPSM) ve Uçar ve Omay (2009) tarafından geliştirilen Fourier fonksiyonludoğrusal olmayan panel birim kök testlerini kullanarak işsizlik histeresiningeçerliliğini test etmektedir. 37 gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülke içindurağanlık sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Fourier fonksiyonlu panel KSS birim köktestleri, 37 ülke lehinde uzun dönemli güçlü/önemli kanıtlar ortayakoymuştur. Analizden elde edilen sonuca göre tüm ülkelerde işsizlik serisinindurağan olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Bu sonuç gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olanülkeler açısından uzun dönemli analizlerin belirlenmesi bakımından önemtaşımaktadır.
Anahtar Kelime:

An Empirical Analysis of Unemployment Hysteresis and Natural Rate Hypothesis for the Developed and Developing Countries

Öz:
This study tests the validity of the hysteresis of unemployment rate for 37 developed and developing countries over the period 1993-2016 using the Sequential Panel Selection Method (SPSM) among nonlinear panel unit root tests and a nonlinear panel unit root test developed by Ucar and Omay (2009) with a Fourier function. According to the test results, 37 developed and developing countries are in a stationary process. The Panel KSS unit root tests with a Fourier function have shown long-term evidence in favour of 37 countries. According to the results of the analysis, it is concluded that the unemployment series are stable in all countries. This result is important in terms of the determination of long-term analysis in developed and developing countries.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Arestis, P. ve Mariscal, I.B.F. (1999), “Unit Roots and Structural Breaks in OECD Unemployment”, Economics Letters, 65(2), 149-156.
  • Ball, L.M. (2009), “Hysteresis in Unemployment: Old and New Evidence”, NBER Working Paper, No: 1481.
  • Becker, R., Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2006), “A Stationarity Test in the Presence of an Unknown Number of Smooth Breaks", Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409.
  • Blanchard, O.J. ve Summers, L.H. (1986), “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem”, NBER Working Paper Series, Macroeconomics Annual, 1-78.
  • Bolat, S., Tiwari, A.K. ve Erdayı, A.U. (2014), “Unemployment Hysteresis in the Eurozone Area: Evidences from Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panel Unit Root Test”, Applied Economics Letters, 21(8), 536-540.
  • Breuer, J.B., McNown, R. ve Wallace, M.S. (2001), “Misleading Inferences From Panel Unit-Root Tests with an Illustration from Purchasing Power Parity”, Review of International Economics, 9(3), 482-493.
  • Brunello, G. (1990), “Hysteresis and the Japanese Experience: a Preliminary Investigation”, Oxford Economic Papers, 42(3), 483-500.
  • Camarero, M., Carrión-i-Silvestre, J.L. ve Tamarit, C. (2006), “Testing for Hysteresis in Unemployment in OECD Countries: New Evidence Using Stationarity Panel Tests with Breaks”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(2), 167-182.
  • Camarero, M., Carrión-i-Silvestre, J.L. ve Tamarit, C. (2008), “Unemployment Hysteresis in Transition Countries: Evidence Using Stationarity Panel Tests with Breaks”, Review of Development Economics, 12(3), 620-635.
  • Carrión-i-Silvestre, J.L., Barrio, J.T. del., Lopez, E. (2005), “Breaking the Panels. An Application to the GDP per capita”, Economics Journal, 8, 159-175.
  • Chalmers, A. (1997), Bilim Dedikleri (Çev.: Hüsamettin Arslan) 3. Basım, Vadi Yayınları, Konya.
  • Chang, C.-K. ve Chang, T. (2012a), “Revisiting the Sustainability of Current Account Deficit: SPSM Using the Panel KSS Test with a Fourier Function”, Economics Bulletin, 32(1), 538-550.
  • Chang, C-K. ve Chang, T. (2012b), “Statistical Evidence on the Mean Reversion of Real Interest Rates: SPSM Using the Panel KSS Test with a Fourier Function”, Applied Economics Letters, 19, 1299-1304.
  • Chang, T. (2011), “Hysteresis in Unemployment for 17 OECD Countries: Stationary Test with a Fourier Function”, Economic Modelling, 28(5), 2208-2214.
  • Chen, Y., Chang, H.L. ve Su, C.W. (2016), “Does Real Wage Converge in China?”, Springer, 11(1), 77-93.
  • Cheng, S-C. C., Wu, T.P., Lee, K-C. ve Chang, T. (2014), “Flexible Fourier Unit Root Test of Unemployment for PIIGS Countries”, Economic Modelling, 36(C), 142-148.
  • Chortareas, G. ve Kapetanios, G. (2009), “Getting PPP Right: Identifying Mean-Reverting Real Exchange Rates in Panels”, Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 390-404.
  • Chou, H-C. ve Zhang, Y.C. (2012), “Unemployment Hysteresis in G20 Countries: Evidence from Non-linear Panel Unit-Root Tests”, African Journal of Business Management, 6(49), 11887-11890.
  • Clemente, J., Montañés, A. ve Reyes, M. (1998), “Testing for a Unit Root in Variables with a Double Change in the Mean”, Economics Letters, 59(2), 175-182.
  • Cuestas, J.C. ve Gil-Alana, L.A. (2011), “Unemployment Hysteresis, Structural Changes, Non-linearities and Fractional Integration in European Transition Economies”, Sheffield Economic Research Paper Series, SERP Number: 2011005.
  • Cuestas, J.C. ve Gil-Alana, L.A. ve Staehr, K. (2011), “A Further Investigation of Unemployment Persistence in European Transition Economies”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(4), 514-532.
  • N. (1991), “Metodolojik Sorunlara Bir Bakış”, Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih, Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, 35(2), 47-59.
  • Çevik, E.I. ve Dibooğlu, S. (2013), “Persistence and Non-Linearity in US Unemployment: A Regime-Switching Approach”, Economic Systems, 37(1), 61-68.
  • Enders, W. ve Lee, J. (2012), “A Unit Root Test Using a Fourier Series to Approximate Smooth Breaks”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74(4), 574-599.
  • Friedman, M. (1968), “The Role of Monetary Policy”, American Economic Review, 58(1), 1-17.
  • Furuoka, F. (2015), “Unemployment Hysteresis in the "Nordic Kitten": Evidence from Five Estonian Regions”, Panoeconomicus, 62(5), 631-642.
  • Gali, J. (2016), “Insider-Outsider Labor Markets, Hysteresis and Monetary Policy”, Universitat Pompeu Fabra working Paper 1506.
  • Garcia-Cintado, A., Romeo-Avila, D. ve Usabiaga, C. (2015), “Can the Hysteresis Hypothesis in Spanish Regional Unemployment be Beaten? New Evidence from Unit Root Tests with Breaks”, Economic Modelling, 47(C), 244-252.
  • Gustavsson, M. ve Osterholm, P. (2006), “Hysteresis and Non-linearities in Unemployment Rates”, Applied Economics Letters, 13(9), 545-548.
  • Güriş, B., Tiftikçigil, B.Y. ve Tıraşoğlu, M. (2017), “Testing for Unemployment Hysteresis in Turkey: Evidence from Nonlinear Unit Root Tests”, Quality&Quantity, 51, 35-46.
  • Hall, S.G., Psaradakis, Z. ve Sola, M. (1999), “Detecting Periodically Collapsing Bubbles: a Markov-Switching Unit Root Test”, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 14, 143-154.
  • Im, K., Pesaran, M. ve Shin, Y. (1997), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels,” Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge, Manuscript.
  • Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H. ve Shin, Y. (2003), “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74.
  • Im, K-S., Lee, J. ve Tieslau, M. (2005), “Panel LM Unit Root Tests with Level Shifts”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 393-419.
  • Jaeger, A. ve Parkinson, M. (1994), “Some Evidence on Hysteresis in Unemployment Rates”, European Economic Review, 38(2), 329-342.
  • Jiang, Y. ve Chang, T. (2016), “Bring Quantile Unit Root Test Back in Testing Hysteresis in Unemployment for the United States”, Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 19(1), 5-13.
  • Kapetanios, G., Shin, Y. ve Snell, A. (2003), “Testing for a Unit Root in the Nonlinear Star Framework”, Journal of Econometrics, 112, 359-379.
  • Kelvin, P. ve Jarret, J. (1985), Social Psychological Consequences of Unemployment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Klinger, S. ve Weber, E. (2016), “Detecting Unemployment Hysteresis: a Simultaneous Unobserved Components Model with Markov Switching”, Economics Letters, 144(C), 115-118.
  • Koenker, R. ve Xiao, Z. (2004), “Unit Root Quantile Autoregression Inference”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99(467), 775–787.
  • Kristic, I.R., Dumancic, L.R. ve Arcabic, V. (2019), “Persistence and Stochastic Convergence of Euro Area Unemployment Rates”, Economic Modelling, 76, 192-198.
  • Kruse, R. (2011), “A New Unit Root Test Against ESTAR Based on a Class of Modified Statistics”, Statistical Papers, 52, 71-85.
  • Lee, C-C. ve Chang, C-P. (2008), “Unemployment Hysteresis in OECD Countries: Centurial Time Series Evidence with Structural Breaks”, Economic Modelling, 25(2), 312-325.
  • Lee, J. ve Strazicich, M.C. (2003), “Minimum Lagrange Multiplier Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 1082-1089.
  • Lee, J-D., Lee, C-C. ve Chang, C-P. (2009), “Hysteresis in Unemployment Revisited: Evidence from Panel LM Unit Root Tests with Heterogeneous Structural Breaks”, Bulletin of Economic Research, 61(4), 324-325.
  • Leon-Ledesma, M. ve Mcadam, P. (2004), “Unemployment Hysteresis and Transition”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 51(3), 377-401.
  • Lumsdaine, R.L. ve Papell, D.H. (1997), “Multiple Trend Breaks and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(2), 212- 218.
  • Maddala, G.S. ve Wu, S. (1999), “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test". Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(Special Issue), 631-652.
  • Marjanovic, G., Maksimovic, L. ve Stanisic, N. (2015), “Hysteresis and the NAIRU: The Case of Countries in Transition”, Prague Economic Papers, 24(5), 503-515.
  • Meng, M., Im, K.S., Lee, J. ve Tieslau, M.A. (2014), “More Powerful LM Unit Root Tests With Non-Normal Errors”, Festschrift in Honor of Peter Schmidt, 343–357. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_11
  • Meng, M., Lee, J. ve Payne, J.E. (2016), “RALS-LM Unit Root Test with Trend Breaks and Non-Normal Errors: Application to the Prebisch- Singer Hypothesis”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, 21(1), 31-45.
  • Meng, M., Strazicich, M.C. ve Lee, J. (2017), “Hysteresis in Unemployment? Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Unit Root Tests and Tests with Non- Normal Errors”, Empirical Economics, 53(4), 1399-1414.
  • Mitchell, W.F. (1993), “Testing for Unit Roots and Persistence in OECD Unemployment Rates”, Applied Econometrics, 25(12), 1489-1501.
  • Modigliani, F. ve Papademos, L. (1975), “Monetary Policy for the Coming Quarters: The Conflicting Views, The New England Review”, March- April, 2-35. Reprinted in: The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani, (1980), Vol. 3, MIT Press, Cambridge.
  • Narayan, P.K. ve Popp, S. (2010), “A New Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks in Level and Slope at Unknown Time”, Journal of Applied Statistics, 37(9), 1425-1438.
  • Neudorfer, P., Chelmann, K. ve Wagner, M. (1990), “Hysteresis, NAIRU and Long Term Unemployment in Austria”, Empirical Economics, 15(2), 217-229.
  • Pan, G., Chang, T., Lee, C-H. ve Liu, W-C. (2012), “Revisiting Purchasing Power Parity for 18 African Countries: Sequential Panel Selection Method”, Applied Economics Letters, 19, 877–881.
  • Papell, D.H., Murray, C. ve Ghiblawi, H. (2000), “The Structure of Unemployment”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(2), 309–315.
  • Perron, P. (1989), “The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis”, Econometrica, 57, 1361-1401.
  • Perron, P. ve Vogelsang, T.J. (1992). “Testing for a Unit Root in a Time Series with a Changing Mean: Corrections and Extensions”, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(4), 467-470.
  • Phelps, E.S. (1968), “Money, Wage Dynamics and Labour Market Equilibrium”, Journal of Political Economy, 76(4-2), 678-711.
  • Phelps, E.S. (1967), “Phillips Curves, Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment Over Time”, Economica, New Series, 34(135), 254-281.
  • Phelps, E.S. (1994), Structural Slumps: The Modern Equilibrium Theory of Unemployment, Interest, and Assets, First Edition, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Phelps, E.S. ve Zoega, G. (1998), “Natural-Rate Theory and OECD Unemployment”, Royal Economic Society, 108, 782-801.
  • Rodenburg, P. (2007), “Derived Measurement in Macroeconomics: Two Approaches for Measuring the NAIRU Considered”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 1-30.
  • Røed, K. (1996), “Unemployment Hysteresis-Macro Evidence from 16 OECD Countries”, Empirical Economics, 21(4), 589-600.
  • Røed, K. (1997), “Hysteresis in Unemployment”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 11(4), 389-418.
  • Schmidt, P. ve Phillips P.C.B. (1992), “LM Tests for a Unit Root in the Presence of Deterministic Trends”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 54(3), 257-287.
  • Song, F.M. ve Wu, Y. (1998), “Hysteresis in Unemployment: Evidence from OECD Countries”, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 38(2), 181-192.
  • Tekin, İ. (2018), “Türkiye’de İşsizlik Histerisi: Fourier Fonksiyonlu Durağanlık Sınamaları”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 33(1), 97-127.
  • Tobin, J. (1980), “Stabilization Policy Ten Years after”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 19-71.
  • Uçar, N. ve Omay, T. (2009), “Testing for Unit Root in Nonlinear Heterogeneous Panels”, Economics Letters, 104, 5-8.
APA BOLAT S, KOÇBULUT O (2019). Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. , 201 - 224.
Chicago BOLAT SÜLEYMAN,KOÇBULUT OZGÜR Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. (2019): 201 - 224.
MLA BOLAT SÜLEYMAN,KOÇBULUT OZGÜR Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. , 2019, ss.201 - 224.
AMA BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. . 2019; 201 - 224.
Vancouver BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. . 2019; 201 - 224.
IEEE BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O "Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi." , ss.201 - 224, 2019.
ISNAD BOLAT, SÜLEYMAN - KOÇBULUT, OZGÜR. "Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi". (2019), 201-224.
APA BOLAT S, KOÇBULUT O (2019). Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Maliye Dergisi, 0(176), 201 - 224.
Chicago BOLAT SÜLEYMAN,KOÇBULUT OZGÜR Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Maliye Dergisi 0, no.176 (2019): 201 - 224.
MLA BOLAT SÜLEYMAN,KOÇBULUT OZGÜR Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Maliye Dergisi, vol.0, no.176, 2019, ss.201 - 224.
AMA BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Maliye Dergisi. 2019; 0(176): 201 - 224.
Vancouver BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi. Maliye Dergisi. 2019; 0(176): 201 - 224.
IEEE BOLAT S,KOÇBULUT O "Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi." Maliye Dergisi, 0, ss.201 - 224, 2019.
ISNAD BOLAT, SÜLEYMAN - KOÇBULUT, OZGÜR. "Gelişmiş ve Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerde İşsizlik Histeresi ve Doğal Oran Hipotezinin Ampirik Bir Analizi". Maliye Dergisi 176 (2019), 201-224.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 12:54

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları