In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 37 - 42 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2020
In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
Öz: Objective: Sonic and ultrasonic instrumentations generate vibrations that may influence debonding characteristics. The objective ofthis in vitro study was to assess the direct and indirect effects of sonic and ultrasonic periodontal instrumentations on the shear bondstrength (SBS) and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of metallic orthodontic brackets.Methods: Metallic brackets were bonded to 75 extracted mandibular central incisors that were embedded in acrylic resin. Instrumentations around the bracket base performed with ultrasonic (UltrasonicB group, n=15) and sonic (SonicB group, n=15) scalerswere used to evaluate the direct effects on the SBS of brackets. Lingual surface instrumentations with ultrasonic (UltrasonicL group,n=15) and sonic (SonicL group, n=15) scalers were performed to assess the indirect effects. The control group (n=15) did not have anytreatment. Instrumentations were performed for 30 s with 0° scaler tip angulations with settings recommended by manufacturers.The SBS of the brackets tested with a universal testing machine and ARI scores were recorded. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallisand Mann–Whitney U tests.Results: The mean SBS of the control group was significantly higher than that of the UltrasonicB and SonicB groups (p=0.008). TheUltrasonicL and SonicL group instrumentations also decreased the SBS, although the difference was statistically insignificant. UltrasonicB instrumentations caused significantly higher frequency of ARI scores than the control group.Conclusion: The decrease of the SBS of metallic brackets indicates the influence of ultrasonic and sonic instrumentations on thebreakage behavior at the bracket–resin interface. Instrumentations around the bracket base should be conducted with caution todecrease the bond failure risk of metallic brackets.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Freitas AO, Marquezan M, Nojima Mda C, Alviano DS, Maia LC. The influence of orthodontic fixed appliances on the oral microbiota: a systematic review. Dental Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 46-55. [CrossRef]
- 2. Chapman JA, Roberts WE, Eckert GJ, Kula KS, González-Cabezas C. Risk factors for incidence and severity of white spot lesions during treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 188-94. [CrossRef]
- 3. Richter AE, Arruda AO, Peters MC, Sohn W. Incidence of caries lesions among patients treated with comprehensive orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 657-664. [CrossRef]
- 4. Bollen AM, Cunha Cruz J, Bakko DW, Huang GJ, Hujoel PP. The effects of orthodontic therapy on periodontal health: A systematic review of controlled evidence. J Am Dent Assoc 2008; 139: 413-22. [CrossRef]
- 5. Atack NE, Sandy JR, Addy M. Periodontal and microbiological changes associated with the placement of orthodontic appliances. A review. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 78-85. [CrossRef]
- 6. Türkkahraman H, Sayin MO, Bozkurt FY, Yetkin Z, Kaya S, Onal S. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 231-6.
- 7. Tunkel J, Heinecke A, Flemmig TF. A systematic review of efficacy of machine-driven and manual subgingival debridement in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 2002: 29; 72-81. [CrossRef]
- 8. Petersilka GJ, Ehmke B, Flemmig TF. Antimicrobial effects of mechanical debridement. Periodontol 2000 2002; 28: 56-71. [CrossRef]
- 9. Baehni P, Thilo B, Chapuis B, Pernet D. Effects of ultrasonic and sonic scalers on dental plaque microflora in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Periodontol 1992; 19: 455-9. [CrossRef]
- 10. Menne A, Griesinger H, Jepsen S, Albers H, Jepsen K. Vibration characteristics of oscillating scalers. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 434.
- 11. Lea SC, Landini G, Walmsley AD. Displacement amplitude of ultrasonic scaler inserts. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 505-10. [CrossRef]
- 12. Arabaci T, Ciçek Y, Canakçi CF. Sonic and ultrasonic scalers in periodontal treatment: a review. Int J Dent Hyg 2007; 5: 2-12. [CrossRef]
- 13. Laird WRE, Walmsley AD. Ultrasound in dentistry. Part 1-biophysical interactions. J Dent 1991; 19: 14-7. [CrossRef]
- 14. Khambay BS, Walmsley AD. Acoustic microstreaming detection and measurement around ultrasonic scalers. J Periodontol 1999; 70: 626-31. [CrossRef]
- 15. Walmsley AD, Laird WR, Williams AR. Intra-vascular thrombosis associated with dental ultrasound. J Oral Pathol 1987; 16: 256-9. [CrossRef]
- 16. Olin PS. Effect of prolonged ultrasonic instrumentation on the retention of cemented cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 64: 563-5. [CrossRef]
- 17. Marchan SM, White D, Smith W, Dhuru V. The influence of sonic and ultrasonic vibration on the shear bond strength of a selected resin luting cement. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015; 23: 29-32.
- 18. Bishara SE, Trulove TS. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Part II. Findings and clinical implications. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98: 263-73. [CrossRef]
- 19. Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103: 258-66. [CrossRef]
- 20. Alessandri Bonetti G, Incerti Parenti S, Ippolito DR, Gatto MR, Luigi C. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets. Korean J Orthod 2014; 44: 44-9. [CrossRef]
- 21. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-91. [CrossRef]
- 22. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch pretreatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1984; 85: 333-40. [CrossRef]
- 23. Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 158-63. [CrossRef]
- 24. Petersilka GJ, Draenert M, Mehl A, Hickel R, Flemmig TF. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30: 551-5. [CrossRef]
- 25. Flemmig TF, Petersilka GJ, Mehl A, Hickel R, Klaiber B. Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 547-53. [CrossRef]
- 26. Loos B, Kiger R, Egelberg J. An evaluation of basic periodontal therapy using sonic and ultrasonic scalers. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 29-33. [CrossRef]
- 27. Badersten A, Nilveus R., Egelberg J. Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8: 57-72. [CrossRef]
- 28. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 184-9. [CrossRef]
- 29. King GJ, Keeling SD, Wronski TJ. Histomorphometric study of alveolar bone turnover in orthodontic tooth movement. Bone 1991; 12: 401-9. [CrossRef]
- 30. Davidovitch Z. Tooth movement. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1991; 2: 411-50. [CrossRef]
| APA | ODUNCUOGLU B, Yamanel K, Şahinoğlu Koçak Z (2020). In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. , 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| Chicago | ODUNCUOGLU BAHAR FUSUN,Yamanel Kıvanç,Şahinoğlu Koçak Zahire In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. (2020): 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| MLA | ODUNCUOGLU BAHAR FUSUN,Yamanel Kıvanç,Şahinoğlu Koçak Zahire In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. , 2020, ss.37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| AMA | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. . 2020; 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| Vancouver | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. . 2020; 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| IEEE | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z "In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets." , ss.37 - 42, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| ISNAD | ODUNCUOGLU, BAHAR FUSUN vd. "In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets". (2020), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| APA | ODUNCUOGLU B, Yamanel K, Şahinoğlu Koçak Z (2020). In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33(1), 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| Chicago | ODUNCUOGLU BAHAR FUSUN,Yamanel Kıvanç,Şahinoğlu Koçak Zahire In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33, no.1 (2020): 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| MLA | ODUNCUOGLU BAHAR FUSUN,Yamanel Kıvanç,Şahinoğlu Koçak Zahire In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.33, no.1, 2020, ss.37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| AMA | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(1): 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| Vancouver | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(1): 37 - 42. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| IEEE | ODUNCUOGLU B,Yamanel K,Şahinoğlu Koçak Z "In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33, ss.37 - 42, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
| ISNAD | ODUNCUOGLU, BAHAR FUSUN vd. "In Vitro Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Effects of Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentations on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33/1 (2020), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19067 |
