Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 21 - 30 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2020

Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance

Öz:
Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate apical root resorption and changes in tooth inclinations, marginal bone height, andlabio-lingual bone thickness at the mid-root and apical level in mandibular anterior teeth during the Forsus treatment using conebeam computed tomography (CBCT).Methods: CBCT scans of 16 subjects (8 males and 8 females) with Class II malocclusion (age group: 13–29 years) taken before and 6months after the Forsus treatment were evaluated for apical root resorption, tooth inclination, marginal bone height, and thicknessof bone at the mid-root and apical level in mandibular anterior teeth.Results: There was statistically significant root resorption of central incisors (0.39 mm) and canines (0.66 mm); a decrease in the angleof inclination for all teeth; an increase in the marginal bone measurement in labial (1.31 mm) and decrease in lingual (0.93 mm) aspectat the canine region; and an increase in bone width by 0.87 mm and 0.75 mm in central and lateral incisor regions, respectively, at themid-root level lingually. At the apex level in the canine region, bone width increased by 1.4 mm labially, while it decreased by 2.18 mmlingually; it increased significantly for incisors in the lingual region.Conclusion: The Forsus appliance therapy causes clinically insignificant root resorption and bone changes, and clinically significantproclination of mandibular anterior teeth. The findings of the present study aid clinicians in proper case selection and reinforce theprevention of incisor proclination while using the Forsus therapy to achieve better treatment results and stability.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Gegler A, Fontanella V. In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 315-9. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Cacciatore G, Alvetro L, Defraia E, Ghislanzoni LTH, Franchi L. Active-treatment effects of the Forsus fatigue resistant device during comprehensive Class II correction in growing patients. Korean J Orthod 2014; 44: 136-42. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Schwartz JP, Raveli TB, Schwartz-Filho HO, Raveli DB. Changes in alveolar bone support induced by the Herbst appliance: a tomographic evaluation. Dental Press J Orthod 2016; 21: 95-101. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Tieu L, Normando D, Toogood R, Flores-Mir C. External apical root resorption generated by Forsus simultaneously with brackets vs. Xbow followed by brackets to correct Class II malocclusions. J World Fed Orthod 2015; 4: 120-3. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Tieu LD, Saltaji H, Normando D, Flores-Mir C. Radiologically determine orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in incisors after non-surgical orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review. Prog Orthod 2014; 15: 48. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0048-7. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Samandara A, Papageorgious SN, Ioannidou- Marathiotou I, Kavvadia Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta- analysis. Eur J Orthod 2019; 41: 67-79. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Schwartz JP, Raveli TB, Almeida KC, Schwartz-Filho HO, Raveli DB. Cone beam computed tomography study of apical root resorption induced by Herbst appliance. J Appl Oral Sci 2015; 23: 479-85. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S. Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:434-437. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Lund H, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Assessment of Root Length and Marginal Bone Level during Orthodontic Treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 466-73. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Castro IO, Alencar AH, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Apical root resorption due to orthodontic treatment detected by cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 196-203. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Gerszewski C, Topolski F, Correr GM, Gomes RAP, Morais ND, Moro A. Dentoalveolar evaluation of lower incisors by CBCT after treatment with Herbst appliance. Braz Dent J 2018; 29: 562-8. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Suresh KP, Chandrashekara S. Sample size estimation and power analysis for clinical research studies. J Hum Reprod Sci 2012; 5: 6-14.
  • 13. Ni M, Lei Y, Chen WJ, Wu GR. Cone beam computed tomography study on the apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment in root-filled teeth. Stomatologie 2016; 36: 233-6.
  • 14. Deng Y, Sun Y, Xu T. Evaluation of root resorption after comprehensive orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health 2018; 18: 2-14. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Gröndahl HG. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment A proscpective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 480-7. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Nguyen T, Cevidanes L, Franchi L, Ruellas A, Jackson T. Three-dimensional mandibular regional superimposition in growing patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2018; 153: 747-54. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Nakada T, Motoyoshi M, Horinuki E, Shimizu N. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of the association of cortical plate proximity and apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment. J Oral Sci 2016; 58: 231-6. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part 2. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993; 103: 138-46. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Pasricha N, Sidana V, Bhasin S, Makkar M. Canine protected occlusion. Indian J Oral Sci 2012; 3:13-8. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Kinzinger GS, Savvaidis S, Gross U, Gülden N, Ludwig B, Lisson J. Effects of Class II treatment with a banded herbst appliance on root lengths in the posterior dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 465-9. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Narendran N, Batra P, Sonar S, Singla A. Effects of Class II treatment with hybrid fixed functional appliances on root length and root volume- a prospective study using CBCT. Int J Sci Res 2019; 8: 28-31.
  • 22. Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, Masucci C, Defraia E, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance vs the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in growing Class II patients. Angle Orthod 2015; 85: 784-9. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Hansen K, Koutsonas TG, Pancherz H. Long-term effects of Herbst treatment on the mandibular incisor segment: A cephalometric and biometric investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1997; 112: 92-103. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Mahamad IK, Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. A comparison of Twin block and a Forsus (FRD) functional appliance-a cephalometric study. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2012; 23: 49-58.
  • 25. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/ multibracket appliance treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood: a prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28: 352-60. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Gracco A, Luca L, Bongiorno MC, Siciliani G. Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 179-87. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Garlock DT, Buschang PH, Araujo EA, Behrents RG, Kim KB. Evaluation of marginal alveolar bone in the anterior mandible with pretreatment and posttreatment computed tomography in nonextraction patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 192-201. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Wehrbein H, Bauer W, Diedrich P. Mandibular incisors, alveolar bone, and symphysis after orthodontic treatment. A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996; 110: 239-46. [CrossRef]
  • 29. De Angelis V. Observations on the response of alveolar bone to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 284-94. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Yodthong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction. Angle Orthod 2013; 83: 394-401. [CrossRef]
  • 31. Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: The basic science aspects. Angle Orthod 2002; 72: 175-9.
  • 32. Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Meda P, Montet X, Kiliaridis S. Orthodontically induced cervical root resorption in humans is associated with the amount of tooth movement. Eur J Orthod 2017; 39: 534-40. [CrossRef]
APA Rekhawat A, Durgekar S, REDDY S (2020). Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. , 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
Chicago Rekhawat Amit,Durgekar Sujala,REDDY Sumitra Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. (2020): 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
MLA Rekhawat Amit,Durgekar Sujala,REDDY Sumitra Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. , 2020, ss.21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
AMA Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. . 2020; 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
Vancouver Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. . 2020; 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
IEEE Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S "Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance." , ss.21 - 30, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
ISNAD Rekhawat, Amit vd. "Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance". (2020), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
APA Rekhawat A, Durgekar S, REDDY S (2020). Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33(1), 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
Chicago Rekhawat Amit,Durgekar Sujala,REDDY Sumitra Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33, no.1 (2020): 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
MLA Rekhawat Amit,Durgekar Sujala,REDDY Sumitra Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.33, no.1, 2020, ss.21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
AMA Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(1): 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
Vancouver Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(1): 21 - 30. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
IEEE Rekhawat A,Durgekar S,REDDY S "Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33, ss.21 - 30, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037
ISNAD Rekhawat, Amit vd. "Evaluation of Root Resorption, Tooth Inclination and Changes in Supporting Bone in Class II Malocclusion Patients Treated with Forsus Appliance". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33/1 (2020), 21-30. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19037