Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 165 - 170 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2020

Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants

Öz:
Objective: Sealants are used in orthodontics to help prevent demineralization during treatment. This study aimed to determine ifthere is a difference in the shear bond strength (SBS) between 2 different resin sealants bonded to teeth.Methods: Extracted human premolars (n=20/group) were randomly divided and prepared by acid etching, followed by application ofprimer or sealant. Group 1, the control group, used Transbond XT Primer (3M Unitek). Groups 2 and 3 were prepared with the sealantsL.E.D. Pro Seal (Reliance Orthodontic Products) and Opal Seal (Opal Orthodontics) as the respective primers. Transbond XT Adhesivewas applied to a stainless steel bracket and bonded to each tooth. Each group was stored in distilled water at 37°C for 48 hours before.SBS was measured using a universal testing machine, and the adhesive remnant index (ARI) was scored.Results: The SBS (MPa) of the groups was as follows: Group 1 (Transbond): 20.1±6.0; Group 2 (Pro Seal): 16.5±4.8; and Group 3 (OpalSeal): 15.7±3.9. The SBS of Transbond XT Primer was significantly greater than that of Opal Seal (p<0.05/analysis of variance-Tukey),while Pro Seal and Opal Seal sealants were not significantly different from each other (p<0.05). The Opal Seal group had significantlygreater ARI scores, indicating that more adhesive remained on the teeth after debonding.Conclusion: Opal Seal and Pro Seal sealants have similar SBS but generally exhibit lower bond strengths than an adhesive primer.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Sundararaj D, Venkatachalapathy S, Tandon A, Pereira A. Critical evaluation of incidence and prevalence of white spot lesions during fixed orthodontic appliance treatment: A meta-analysis. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2015; 5: 433-9. [Crossref]
  • 2. Oz AZ, Oz AA, Yazıcıoglu S. In vivo effect of antibacterial and fluoride-releasing adhesives on enamel demineralization around brackets: A micro-CT study. Angle Orthod 2017; 87: 841-6. [Crossref]
  • 3. Premaraj TS, Rohani N, Covey D, Premaraj S, Hua Y, Watanabe H. An in-vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 487-92. [Crossref]
  • 4. Behnan SM, Arruda AO, González-Cabezas C, Sohn W, Peters MC. In-vitro evaluation of various treatments to prevent demineralization next to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 712.e1-7; discussion 712-3. [Crossref]
  • 5. Hu W, Featherstone JD. Prevention of enamel demineralization: An in-vitro study using light-cured filled sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 592-600. [Crossref]
  • 6. Buren JL, Staley RN, Wefel J, Qian F. Inhibition of enamel demineralization by an enamel sealant, Pro Seal: An in-vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133(4 Suppl): 88-94. [Crossref]
  • 7. Maxfield BJ, Hamdan AM, Tüfekçi E, Shroff B, Best AM, Lindauer SJ. Development of white spot lesions during orthodontic treatment: perceptions of patients, parents, orthodontists, and general dentists. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012; 141: 337-44. [Crossref]
  • 8. Bishara SE, Oonsombat C, Soliman MM, Warren J. Effects of using a new protective sealant on the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 243-6.
  • 9. Lowder PD, Foley T, Banting DW. Bond strength of 4 orthodontic adhesives used with a caries-protective resin sealant. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134: 291-5. [Crossref]
  • 10. Premaraj TS, Rohani N, Covey D, Premaraj S. In vitro evaluation of surface properties of Pro Seal® and Opal® SealTM in preventing white spot lesions. Orthod Craniofac Res 2017; 20: 134-8. [Crossref]
  • 11. Hadler-Olsen S, Sandvik K, El-Agroudi MA, Øgaard B. The incidence of caries and white spot lesions in orthodontically treated adolescents with a comprehensive caries prophylactic regimen--a prospective study. Eur J Orthod 2012; 34: 633-9. [Crossref]
  • 12. Product Catalog. Reliance Orthodontic Products, Inc. 2020.
  • 13. Opal Seal Primer and Sealer IFU. Ultradent Products, Inc. 2017.
  • 14. Bartels AA, Evans CA, Viana G, Bedran-Russo AK. Demineralization of resin-sealed enamel by soft drinks in a clinically relevant pH cycling model. Am J Dent 2016; 29: 115-9.
  • 15. Tarvade SM, Deshmukh AA, Daokar SG. Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal. J Int Oral Health 2014; 6: 1-3.
  • 16. Paschos E, Okuka S, Ilie N, Huth KC, Kickel R, Rudzki-Janson I. Investigation of shear-peel bond strength of orthodontic brackets on enamel after using Pro Seal. J Orofac Orthop 2006; 67: 196-206. [Crossref]
  • 17. El Bokle D, Munir H. An in vitro study of the effect of Pro Seal varnish on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. World J Orthod 2008; 9: 141-6.
  • 18. Phan X, Akyalcin S, Wiltshire WA, Rody WJ Jr. Effect of tooth bleaching on shear bond strength of a fluoride-releasing sealant. Angle Orthod 2012; 82: 546-51. [Crossref]
  • 19. Seeliger JH, Botzenhart UU, Gedrange T, Kozak K, Stepien L, Machoy M. Enamel shear bond strength of different primers combined with an orthodontic adhesive paste. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2017; 62: 415-20. [Crossref]
  • 20. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 333-40. [Crossref]
  • 21. Tasios T, Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Tsapas A, Haidich AB. Prevention of orthodontic enamel demineralization: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Orthod Craniofac Res 2019; 22: 225-35. [Crossref]
  • 22. Hellak A, Ebeling J, Schauseil M, Stein S, Roggendorf M, Korbmacher-Steiner H. Shear bond strength of three orthodontic bonding systems on enamel and restorative materials. Biomed Res Int 2016; 2016: 6307107. [Crossref]
  • 23. Tavas MA, Watts DC. A visible light-activated direct bonding material: An in vitro comparative study. Br J Orthod 1984; 11: 33-7. [Crossref]
  • 24. Murray SD, Hobson RS. Comparison of in vivo and in vitro shear bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 2-9. [Crossref]
  • 25. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC. Effect of aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 716-20. [Crossref]
  • 26. Sokucu O, Siso SH, Ozturk F, Nalcaci R. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets cured with different light sources under thermocycling. Eur J Dent 2010; 4: 257-62. [Crossref]
  • 27. Bishara SE, Soliman M, Laffoon J, Warren JJ. Effect of changing a test parameter on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 832-5.
  • 28. Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 139-44. [Crossref]
  • 29. Shooter KJ, Griffin MP, Kerr B. The effect of changing crosshead speed on the shear bond strength of orthodontic bonding adhesive. Aust Orthod J 2012; 28: 44-50.
  • 30. Guzman UA, Jerrold L, Vig PS, Abdelkarim A. Comparison of shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index between precoated and conventionally bonded orthodontic brackets. Prog Orthod 2013; 14: 39. [Crossref]
  • 31. Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1994; 21: 33-43. [Crossref]
  • 32. Arici S, Arici N. Effects of thermocycling on the bond strength of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement: an in vitro comparative study. Angle Orthod 2003; 73: 692-6.
  • 33. Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF. Effect of thermocycling on the shear bond strength of a cyanoacrylate orthodontic adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 123: 21-4. [Crossref]
  • 34. Lopes GV, Correr-Sobrinho L, Correr AB, Godoi APT, Vedovello SAS, Menezes CC. Light activation and thermocycling methods on the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Braz Dent J 2020; 31: 52-6. [Crossref]
  • 35. Turk T, Elekdag-Turk S, Isci D, Cakmak F, Ozkalayci N. Shear bond strength of a self-etching primer after 10,000 and 20,000 thermal cycles. J Adhes Dent 2010; 12: 117-22.
  • 36. Costa AR, Correr AB, Puppin-Rontani RM, Vedovello SA, Valdrighi HC, Correr-Sobrinho L, et al. Effects of thermocycling and light source on the bond strength of metallic brackets to bovine teeth. Braz Dent J 2011; 22: 486-9. [Crossref]
  • 37. Yuasa T, Iijima M, Ito S, Muguruma T, Saito T, Mizoguchi I. Effects of long-term storage and thermocycling on bond strength of two self-etching primer adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32: 285- 90. [Crossref]
  • 38. Cerekja E, Cakirer B. Effect of short curing times with a high-intensity light-emitting diode or high-power halogen on shear bond strength of metal brackets before and after thermocycling. Angle Orthod 2011; 81: 510-6. [Crossref]
  • 39. Hioki M, Shin-Ya A, Nakahara R, Vallittu PK, Nakasone Y, Shin-Ya A. Shear bond strength and FEM of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement--effects of tooth enamel shape and orthodontic bracket base configuration. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 700-7. [Crossref]
  • 40. Hobson RS, McCabe JF, Hogg SD. Bond strength to surface enamel for different tooth types. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 184-9. [Crossref]
  • 41. Linklater RA, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study to investigate bond strengths of different tooth types. J Orthod 2001; 28: 59-65. [Crossref]
  • 42. Oztürk B, Malkoç S, Koyutürk AE, Catalbas B, Ozer F. Influence of different tooth types on the bond strength of two orthodontic adhesive systems. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 407-12. [Crossref]
APA Kolstad J, Cianciolo D, Ostertag A, Berzins D (2020). Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. , 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
Chicago Kolstad James,Cianciolo Danielle,Ostertag Alan,Berzins David Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. (2020): 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
MLA Kolstad James,Cianciolo Danielle,Ostertag Alan,Berzins David Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. , 2020, ss.165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
AMA Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. . 2020; 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
Vancouver Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. . 2020; 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
IEEE Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D "Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants." , ss.165 - 170, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
ISNAD Kolstad, James vd. "Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants". (2020), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
APA Kolstad J, Cianciolo D, Ostertag A, Berzins D (2020). Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33(3), 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
Chicago Kolstad James,Cianciolo Danielle,Ostertag Alan,Berzins David Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33, no.3 (2020): 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
MLA Kolstad James,Cianciolo Danielle,Ostertag Alan,Berzins David Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.33, no.3, 2020, ss.165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
AMA Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(3): 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
Vancouver Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(3): 165 - 170. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
IEEE Kolstad J,Cianciolo D,Ostertag A,Berzins D "Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33, ss.165 - 170, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049
ISNAD Kolstad, James vd. "Orthodontic Bond Strength Comparison between Two Filled Resin Sealants". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33/3 (2020), 165-170. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19049