Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 177 - 182 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060 İndeks Tarihi: 21-10-2020

Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study

Öz:
Objective: To evaluate the differences in aesthetically pleasing smiles and compare the smile arc parameters in males and females bydental specialists using photographs.Methods: The study was conducted on 500 North Indian subjects (Indo-Aryan race; 212 males and 288 females) aged 17-25 years(mean age, males=21.1 years; females=23.4 years), with reasonably pleasing smiles. The facial photographs were taken using a DSLRcamera. The standardized photographs were shown to 30 judges for evaluation and rated using the visual analog scale. The smileswere categorized into attractive, fair, and average. The quantification of the smile characteristics was done by using an objectivemethod that involved identifying consonant and non-consonant smiles.Results: The association between smile arc and smile attractiveness was significant (p=0.018) in females. The buccal corridor widthwas higher among those with fair to attractive smiles as compared with those with an average smile (p=0.018). Most subjects with anattractive smile had a smile arc parallel to the upper lip as compared with most subjects with a fair or average smile who did not havethe smile arc in parallel (p=0.006).Conclusion: Most females were in the fair to attractive category whereas most males were in the average to fair category. The buccalcorridor width was found to be higher among those with a fair to attractive smile as compared with those with an average smile. Therewas an association between smile arc and smile attractiveness in females.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Nash DA. Professional ethics and esthetic dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988; 115: 7E-9E. [Crossref]
  • 2. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1991; 49: 963-69. [Crossref]
  • 3. Roden-Johnson D, Gallerano R, English J. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 127: 343-50. [Crossref]
  • 4. Ritter DE, Gandini LG, Pinto Ados S, Locks A. Esthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 198-203.
  • 5. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Schols J. Smile line assessment comparing quantitative measurement and visual estimation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 174-80. [Crossref]
  • 6. Stallard H. Survival of the periodontium during and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1964; 50: 584-92. [Crossref]
  • 7. Ackerman MB, Ackerman JL. Smile analysis and design in the digital era. J Clin Orthod 2002; 36: 221-36.
  • 8. Sarver D, and Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: part 1. Evolution of the concept and dynamic records for smile capture. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 4-12. [Crossref]
  • 9. Zachrisson BU. Esthetic factors ınvolved in anterior tooth display and the smile: vertical dimension. JCO 1998; 32: 432-45.
  • 10. Frush JP, Fisher RD. The dynesthetic interpretation of the dentogenic concept. J Prosthet Dent 1958; 8: 558-81. [Crossref]
  • 11. Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationship present in the smile. Am J Orthod 1970; 57: 132-144. [Crossref]
  • 12. Rigsbee OH, Sperry TP, Begole EA. The influence of facial animation on smile characteristics. Int J Adult Orthodont Orthognath Surg 1988; 4: 233-39.
  • 13. Sarver DM. The importance of incisor positioning in the esthetic smile: the smile arc. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 120: 98- 111. [Crossref]
  • 14. Schaebel BJ, McNamara JA Jr, Franchi L, Baccetti T. Q sort assessment vs visual analog scale in the evaluation of smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135: 61-71. [Crossref]
  • 15. Krishnan V, Daniel ST, Lazar D, Ashok A. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 515-23. [Crossref]
  • 16. Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane. Angle Orthod 2005; 75: 778-84.
  • 17. Dong JK, JIn TH, Cho HW, Oh SC. The esthetics of the smile: a review of some recent studies. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12: 9-19.
  • 18. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1995; 1: 105-26. [Crossref]
  • 19. Dickens ST, Server DM, Proffit WR. Changes in frontal soft tissue dimensions of the lower face by age and gender. World J Orthod 2002; 3: 313-20.
  • 20. Maulik C and Nanda R. Dynamic smile analysis in young adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 307-15. [Crossref]
  • 21. Peck S, Peck L and Kataja M. The gingival smile line. Angle Orthod 1992; 62: 91-100.
  • 22. Parekh SM, Fields HW, Beck M, Rosential S. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontist and laymen. Angle Orthod 2006; 76: 557-63.
  • 23. Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51: 24-8. [Crossref]
  • 24. Machado AW. 10 commandments of smile aesthetics. Dent Press J Orthod 2014; 19: 136-57. [Crossref]
  • 25. Moskowitz ME, Nayyar AA. Determinants of smile esthetics: a rationale for smile analysis and treatment. The compendium of continuing education in dentistry 1995; 16: 1164-66.
  • 26. Oshagh M, Zarif NH, Bahramnia F. Evaluation of the effect of buccal corridor size on smile attractiveness. Eur J Esthet Dent 2010; 5: 370- 80.
  • 27. Graber LW, Lucker GW. Dental aesthetics self-evaluation and satisfaction. Am J Orthod 1980; 77: 163-73. [Crossref]
  • 28. Johnson DK, Smith RJ. Smile aesthetics after orthodontic treatment with or without extraction of first four premolars. Am J Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108: 162-167. [Crossref]
APA JANU A, AZAM A, TANDON R, CHANDRA P, Kulshrestha R, Umale V (2020). Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. , 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
Chicago JANU Anisha,AZAM Aftab,TANDON Ragni,CHANDRA Pratik,Kulshrestha Rohit,Umale Vinay Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. (2020): 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
MLA JANU Anisha,AZAM Aftab,TANDON Ragni,CHANDRA Pratik,Kulshrestha Rohit,Umale Vinay Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. , 2020, ss.177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
AMA JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. . 2020; 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
Vancouver JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. . 2020; 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
IEEE JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V "Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study." , ss.177 - 182, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
ISNAD JANU, Anisha vd. "Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study". (2020), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
APA JANU A, AZAM A, TANDON R, CHANDRA P, Kulshrestha R, Umale V (2020). Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33(3), 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
Chicago JANU Anisha,AZAM Aftab,TANDON Ragni,CHANDRA Pratik,Kulshrestha Rohit,Umale Vinay Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33, no.3 (2020): 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
MLA JANU Anisha,AZAM Aftab,TANDON Ragni,CHANDRA Pratik,Kulshrestha Rohit,Umale Vinay Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, vol.33, no.3, 2020, ss.177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
AMA JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(3): 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
Vancouver JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics. 2020; 33(3): 177 - 182. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
IEEE JANU A,AZAM A,TANDON R,CHANDRA P,Kulshrestha R,Umale V "Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study." Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 33, ss.177 - 182, 2020. 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060
ISNAD JANU, Anisha vd. "Photographic Evaluation, Analysis and Comparison of Aesthetically Pleasing Smiles: A Prospective Study". Turkish Journal of Orthodontics 33/3 (2020), 177-182. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19060