ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S

Gökçeçiçek Savaşır, (Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye)
Ece Güleç (İzmir Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Mimarlık Bölümü, İzmir, Türkiye)
Art-e Sanat Dergisi
9 1
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 13 Sayı: 25 Sayfa Aralığı: 301 - 333 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 22-10-2020

ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S

Öz:
Emerged in the mid-19th century, the mechanical reproduction techniques changed the definitionsof work of art, artist, and social role of art. These transformations have triggered an extensive sociocultural revolution during the 20th century. Art turned out to be an instrument for guiding themasses; and the communist ideology politicized aesthetics as a strategy of the power. The RussianConstructivists of the 1920s utilized agitation and propaganda techniques (agit-props) in their art forcreating an aesthetic language for the political propaganda. This study argues that the Russian avantgarde aiming to bring art into everyday life and urban space became an instrument foraestheticization of politics. The scope is limited to the agit-props appropriated by the Bolshevikpower. Dwelling on textual and visual documents from literature, it scrutinizes the topic with ahistorical interpretation research method. It aims to discuss the agit-props within the framework ofpolitics and aesthetic revolution in everyday life and urban space.
Anahtar Kelime:

POLİTİK BİR EYLEM OLARAK SANAT: 1920'LERDEKİ RUS AGİT-PROP UYGULAMALARI

Öz:
19. yüzyılın ortalarında ortaya çıkan mekanik yeniden üretim teknikleri, sanat eserinin ve sanatçının tanımları ile sanatın toplumsal rolünü dönüştürmüş; 20. Yüzyıl boyunca sürecek geniş kapsamlı bir sosyo-kültürel devrimi de tetiklemiştir. Sanat, kitleleri yönlendirme aracına dönüşmüştür ve komünist ideoloji, iktidar stratejileri bağlamında estetiği siyasallaştırmıştır. 1920’lerin Rus Konstrüktivistleri sanatlarında, yeni bir estetik dil ve siyasi propaganda oluşturmak için ajitasyon ve propaganda tekniklerini (ajit-proplar) kullanmıştır. Bu çalışma, sanatı kente ve gündelik hayata katmayı amaçlayan Rus avangardının siyasetin estetikleştirilmesinde bir araç haline geldiğini savlamaktadır. Çalışmanın kapsamı, Bolşevik iktidar eliyle oluşturulmuş ajit-proplar ile sınırlandırılmıştır. Literatürden yazılı ve görsel kaynaklara başvuran çalışma, konuyu tarihselyorumlama araştırma yöntemiyle ele almaktadır. Ajit-propları, estetik-siyaset ilişkisi, kentsel mekânda ve gündelik hayatta estetik devrim çerçevesinde tartışmayı hedeflemektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Altman, N. (1918). “Futurism and Proletarian Art”, in (1976), Russian Art of the AvantGarde: Theory and Criticism 1902-1934, J. Bowlt (ed.), New York: The Viking Press, p.161- 164.
  • Artun, A. (2009). Sanatın İktidarı, 1917 Devrimi, Avangard Sanat ve Müzecilik [Power of Art. Revolution in 1917, Avant-garde Art and Museology_Translation by author(s)], İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  • Benjamin, W. (1934). “Author as Producer”, in Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, M. W. Jennings, B. Doherty & T. Y. Levin (eds.), trans. E. Jephcott, R. Livingstone, H. Eiland, et. Al., Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p.79-95.
  • Benjamin, W. (1936). “The Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility: Second Version”, , in Work of Art in the Age of its Technological Reproducibility, and Other Writings on Media, M. W. Jennings, B. Doherty & T. Y. Levin (eds.), trans. E. Jephcott, R. Livingstone, H. Eiland, et. Al., Cambridge, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, p.19-55.
  • Berger, J. (1997). Art and Revolution: Ernst Neizvestny, Endurance, and the Role of the Art, New York: Vintage Books.
  • Bogdanov, A. (1918). “The Proletarian and Art”, in Russian Art of the Avant-Garde: Theory and Criticism 1902-1934, J. Bowlt (ed.), (1976), New York: The Viking Press, p.176-177.
  • Bowlt, J. (ed.) (1976). Russian Art of the Avant-Garde: Theory and Criticism 1902-1934, New York: The Viking Press.
  • Buck-Morss, S. (2000). Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
  • Chipp, H. B. (1968). Theories of Modern Art. A Source Book by Artists and Critics. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  • Clark, T. (1997). “Art, Propaganda, and Fascism”, in Art and Propaganda in the Twentieth Century, New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., p.49-73.
  • Clark, T. (1997). “Propaganda in the Communist State”, in Art and Propaganda in the Twentieth Century, New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc., p.74-102.
  • Concoran, S. (2010). "Introduction", in S. Concoran (ed.), Dissensus on Politics and Aesthetics Jacques Rancière (S. Concoran, trans). New York: Continuum International Publishing Group, p.1-24.
  • Conrads, U. (ed.) (1971). Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, (M. Bullock, trans.), Massachusetts: MIT Press. (First published in 1964).
  • Cooke, C. (1995). Russian avant-garde: Theories of art, architecture and the city, Academy Editions.
  • Dondero, G. A. (1949). “Modern Art Shackled to Communism”, in H. B. Chipp (ed.), (1968), Theories of Modern Art. A Source Book by Artists and Critics. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, p.496-497.
  • Douglas, C. (1975). "The New Russian Art and Italian Futurism", Art Journal,34, No 3, p.229- 239, DOI: 10.2307/775994.
  • Erstad, L. (1996). The Storming of the Winter Palace: Bolshevik Agitation and Propaganda 1917-1928, Ph. D dissertation, New York: New York University, Department of History.
  • Gabo, N. & Pevsner, A. (1920). "Basic Principles of Constructivism", in U. Conrads (ed.), Programs and Manifestoes on 20th-Century Architecture, trans. M. Bullock, Massachusetts: MIT Press, p.56.
  • Gan, A. (1922). “Constructivism [Extracts]”, in Russian Art of the Avant-Garde: Theory and Criticism 1902-1934, J. Bowlt (ed.), (1976), New York: The Viking Press, p.214-225.
  • Herbert, R. L. (ed.). (1964), Modern Artists on Art, Ten Unabridged Essays, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., p.103-113.
  • Gough, M. (2005). Artist as Producer, Russian Constructivism in Revolution, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  • Gray, C. (2000). The Russian Experiment in Art 1863-1922, London: Thames & Hudson Ltd.
  • Gruber, K. (2010). “An Early Staging o Media, Gustav Klutsis’s Loudspeaker Stands”, ACTA Univ. Sapientiae, Film and Media Studies, 2, p.125-132.
  • Harrison, C. & Wood, P. (eds.). (2003). Art in Theory 1900-2000 An Anthology of Changing Ideas, Cornwall: Robin Hood Free Library.
  • Heftberger, A. (2015). "Propaganda in Motion. Dziga Vertov, Aleksandr Medvedkin, Soviet Agitation on Agit-trains, Agit-steamers, and the Film Train in the 1920s and 1930s", Apparatus Film, Media and Digital Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe 1. DOI: 10.17892/app.2015.0001.2.
  • Kemenov, V. (1947). “Aspects of Two Cultures”, in Theories of Modern Art, A Source Book by Artists and Critics, H. B. Chipp (ed.), (1968), Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press, p.490-496.
  • Kenez, P. (1985). The Birth of the Propaganda State: Soviet Methods of Mass Mobilization, 1917-1929. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lodder, C. (1983). Russian Constructivism, London: Yale University Press.
  • Lowton, A. & Eagle, H. (eds.). (1988). Russian Futurism through its Manifestos, 1912-1928. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
  • Lunacharsky, A. (1920). “Revolution and Art”, in J. Bowlt (ed.), (1976), Russian Art of the Avant-Garde: Theory and Criticism 1902-1934, New York: The Viking Press, p.190-196.
  • Malevich, K. (1927).Suprematism, in R. L. Herbert (ed.), (1964), Modern Artists on Art, Ten Unabridged Essays, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., p.92-102.
  • Mally, L. (2000).Revolutionary Acts: Amateur Theater and the Soviet State, 1917-1938, London: Cornell University Press.
  • Mally, L. (2003). “Exporting Soviet Culture: The Case of Agitprop Theater”, Slavie Review, 62, No 2, p.324-342.
  • Markov, V. (1968). Russian Futurism: A History, Berkeley & Los Angeles: The University of California Press.
  • Margolin, V. (1997). The Struggle for Utopia, Rodchenko, Lissitzky, Moholy-Nagy, 1917- 1946, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Milner, J. (1984). Vladimir Tatlin and the Russan Avant- Garde, New Haven & London: Yale University Press. MoMA. (1948). Gabo - Pevsner, New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
  • Rancière, J. (2004). The Politics of Aesthetics the Distribution of the Sensible, trans. G. Rockhill, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Rancière, J. (2010). Dissensus on Politics and Aesthetics, S. Concoran (ed.), trans. S. Concoran, New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Stites, R. (1989). Revolutionary Dreams Utopian Vision and the Experimental Life in the Russian Revolution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Taylor, R. (1971). "A Medium for the Masses: Agitation in the Soviet Civil War", Soviet Studies, 22, No 4, p.562-574. DOI: 10.1080/09668137108410776.
  • Tehranchian, H. (1982). Agitprop theatre: Germany and the Soviet Union, Ph. D dissertation, New York: New York University, Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Department of Performance Studies.
  • Internet References
  • Artun, A. (2015). “Formların Siyaseti ve Tatlin Kulesi [Tatlin Tower and Politics of Forms_Translation by author(s)]”, e-skop, https://www.e-skop.com/skopbulten/rusavangardi-formlarin-siyaseti-ve-tatlin-kulesi/2748, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Brown, K. (2013). “Agitprop in Soviet Russia”, Constructing the Past, 14, No 1. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol14/iss1/4, Date accessed: 05.02.2020.
  • Burliuk, D., Kruchenykh, A. Mayakovsky, V, & Khlebnikov, V. (1912). “A Slap in the Face of Public Taste”, https://www.unknown.nu/futurism/slap.html, Date accessed: 05.02.2020.
  • Gough, M. (2014). “Model Exhibition”, October, 150, Fall 2014, p.13, https://www.jstor.org/ stable/24586562?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents, Date accessed: 01.06.2020.
  • Groys, B. (2014). “On Art Activism”, E-flux, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/56/60343/onart-activism/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Monoskop. (2016, May). “Art styles and movements”, http://monoskop.org/Art/Styles_ and_movements, Date Accessed: 05.03.2020.Monoskop, (2017, December 10), “INKhUK. Institut Khudozhestvennoy Kultury”, https://monoskop.org/INKhUK, Date accessed: 05.03.2020.
  • Marinetti, F. T. (1909). “The Founding Manifesto of Futurism”, https://www.unknown.nu/futurism/manifesto.html, Date accessed: 05.02.2020.
  • Merriam-Webster. (2019a). “Agitation”, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ agitation, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Merriam-Webster. (2019b). “Propaganda”, https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ propaganda, Date accessed: 21.05.2019. Then. (2019). “Agitation and Propaganda”,http://www.togdazine.ru/article/1678, Date accessed: 01.03.2020.
  • Wilde, Robert. (2020, February 11). “The Russian Civil War”, https://www.thoughtco.com/ the-russian-civil-war-1221809, Date accessed: 01.03.2020. List of Figures
  • Figure 1. Rodchenko, Design for a kiosk (Proekt kioska), 1919, Black and colored ink on paper, The Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow. https://ww.moma.org/ interactives/exhibitions/1998/rodchenko/texts/new_cultural_jpg.html, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 2. Tatlin, Monument to the Third International, 1920, Black and white photograph. https://monoskop.org/Vladimir_Tatlin, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 3. Naum Gabo, Project for a radio station, 1919-1920, Pen and ink.https://www.abc. net.au/radionational/programs/archived/soundproof/project-for-a-radio-station/8103680, Date accessed: 1.3.2020.
  • Figure 4. Klutsis, Design for loudspeaker no.7 and no.5, 1922, Pencil, ink and gouache on paper, Costakis Collection, Thessaloniki. https://artblart.com/tag/russian-artists/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 5. Lavinsky, Sketch for Design proposal for The Hut with a Reading Room, 1925, Pencil, ink and gouache on paper. http://www.togdazine.ru/article/1033, Date accessed: 01.03.2020.
  • Figure 6. Suprematist streetcar paintings, 1920, Colored sketches, Nina Kogan. http://www.togdazine.ru/article/1678, Date Accessed: 01.03.2020. https://astrofella. wordpress.com/2015/03/09/adventures-of-the-black-square-whitechapel-art-gallery/, Date accessed: 21.09.2019.
  • Figure 7. Blue Blouse performance at a Club of Karl Liebknecht, 1924, Black and white photograph. https://soviet-art.ru/soviet-agitprop-theater-blue-blouse/blue-blouse-at-aclub-of-karl-liebknecht-1924/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 8. Performance of the Blue Blouse actors in Moscow Park of Culture, 1929, Black and white photograph. https://soviet-art.ru/soviet-agitprop-theater-blue-blouse/performanceof-the-blue-blouse-actors-in-moscow-park-of-culture-1929/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 9. Rodchenko, Books (Please)! In all branches of knowledge, 1924, poster, photomontage, Frye Museum Collection. https://fryemuseum.org/exhibition/, Date accessed: 21.02.2020.
  • Figure 10. The Storming of the Winter Palace by the insurgents, 1920, Black and white photograph. https://www.rbth.com/history/326637-fall-of-winter-palace-how-1917, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 11. Red Platform in the Storming of the Winter Palace, 1920, Black and white photograph. Von Geldern, J., (1993). Bolshevik festivals, 1917-1920. http://ark.cdlib.org /ark:/13030/ft467nb2w4/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 12. Stage in mass performance at Toward a World Commune in Petrograd Stock Exchange Building, 1920, Black and white photograph. Von Geldern, J., (1993). Bolshevik festivals, 1917-1920. https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft467nb2 w4;chunk.id=d0e3394;doc.view=print, Date accessed: 31.03.2020.
  • Figure 13. Mass performance The Mystery of Liberated Labour in Petrograd, 1920, Black and white photograph. https://icwpredflag.org/wp/wordpress/volume-9-number2/communist-street-theatre-premieres-as-russian-revolution-rages/, Date accessed: 31.03.2020.
  • Figure 14. Cinema car of agit-train V. I. Lenin No. 1, 1918, Still from the film Conquerors of the Sun by Anna Baumgart. https://contemporarylynx.co.uk/tag/conquerors-of-the-sun-isa-film-by-anna-baumgart, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 15. Malevich, Drawing for agit-train, ca. 1920, Pencil on paper, State Museum of Contemporary Art Costakis Collection, Thessaloniki. [photography, authors’ archive, February 10, 2019], from The Russian Avant-garde. Dreaming the Future tThrough Art and Design Exhibition, Sabancı University Sakıp Sabancı Museum, İstanbul.
  • Figure 16. Dziga Vertov, Kinonedelia No. 17, 1918, Still Courtesy of Danish Film Institute and Austrian Film Museum, Vienna. www.apparatusjournal.net/index.php/apparatus/article/ view/2/75, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 17. Lenin Agit-train No.1 Interior of Movie-theatre car, (n.d.), Black and white photograph. http://modvisart.blogspot.com/2006/03/kino-eyes-and-agit-trains.html, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 18. Outdoor use of an Agit-train, (n.d.), Black and white photograph. https://oneartyminute.com/lexique-artistique/agit-prop, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 19. Exhibition car on agit-train, (n.d.), Still from the film Conquerors of the Sun by Anna Baumgart. https://contemporarylynx.co.uk/anna-baumgart-and-her-historiographyart, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 20. The famous agit-steamer Red Star with theatre on board, 1919-1921, Black and white photograph. https://www.culturematters.org.uk/index.php/culture/theory /item/2673-books-please-the-russian-revolution-arts-and-culture, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 21. Saratov, Agit-prop steamer “The Red Star”, 1920, Black and white photograph.https://philipstanfield.com/2014/09/15/art-and-social-life-the-russianrevolution-and-the-creative-power-of-idealism-6/, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 22. Agit-steamer with a theatre on board, (n.d.), Black and white photograph.https://burevestn1k.livejournal.com/10313.html, Date accessed: 21.05.2019.
  • Figure 23. RSFSR, Literary-Instructional Train of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee, Our Train, 1920, photomontage in a newspaper. http://soviethistory.msu.edu/1917-2/culture-and-revolution/culture-and-revolutionimages/#bwg25/292, Date accessed: 21.02.2020.
APA SAVAŞIR G, Güleç E (2020). ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. , 301 - 333.
Chicago SAVAŞIR GÖKÇEÇİÇEK,Güleç Ece ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. (2020): 301 - 333.
MLA SAVAŞIR GÖKÇEÇİÇEK,Güleç Ece ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. , 2020, ss.301 - 333.
AMA SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. . 2020; 301 - 333.
Vancouver SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. . 2020; 301 - 333.
IEEE SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E "ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S." , ss.301 - 333, 2020.
ISNAD SAVAŞIR, GÖKÇEÇİÇEK - Güleç, Ece. "ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S". (2020), 301-333.
APA SAVAŞIR G, Güleç E (2020). ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 13(25), 301 - 333.
Chicago SAVAŞIR GÖKÇEÇİÇEK,Güleç Ece ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. Art-e Sanat Dergisi 13, no.25 (2020): 301 - 333.
MLA SAVAŞIR GÖKÇEÇİÇEK,Güleç Ece ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. Art-e Sanat Dergisi, vol.13, no.25, 2020, ss.301 - 333.
AMA SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. Art-e Sanat Dergisi. 2020; 13(25): 301 - 333.
Vancouver SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S. Art-e Sanat Dergisi. 2020; 13(25): 301 - 333.
IEEE SAVAŞIR G,Güleç E "ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S." Art-e Sanat Dergisi, 13, ss.301 - 333, 2020.
ISNAD SAVAŞIR, GÖKÇEÇİÇEK - Güleç, Ece. "ART AS A POLITICAL ACT: THE RUSSIAN AGIT-PROPS OF THE 1920S". Art-e Sanat Dergisi 13/25 (2020), 301-333.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 16:24

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları