Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 213 - 220 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 İndeks Tarihi: 22-10-2020
Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline
Öz: Tuz Lake and its surrounding lakes (Tersakan Lake, Duden Lake, Bolluk Lake, Esmekaya Lake, Kopek Lake, Akgol) are placed in the Central Anatolia region. These lakes maintain the ecosystem's integrity and make a good habitat for numerous bird species, especially flamingos. The Duden Lake is located within the boundaries of the Tuz Lake Special Environmental Protection Area andwas declared as a protected area in 1992. The surface and underground water around Kulu District of Konya feed the Duden Lake, which is tectonically formed through the Kulu Stream. The lake with the average area of 860 hectares is unfortunately at the risk of extinction. Remote sensing has been the most useful tool to obtain spatial and temporal information about wetlands and it providesup-to-date, accurate, and cost-effective information. Remote sensing methods and applications are used quite effectively on wetlands. The traditional pixel-based classification method is applied to different satellite images in wetlands over many decades, and the usage of object-based classification method has started recently comparing to the pixel-based one. This study aimed to determine thecoastline of the wetlands. Sentinel 2 satellite images, which provide free access and high spatial resolution, are used to observe the coastline of Duden Lake through the usage of pixel-based and object-based classification methods in all the seasons. The applicability of the methods in the determination of shallow wetland coastline is studied and evaluated. The results of the pixel-based and the object-based classification images are compared by accuracy assessment.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Abbas, AW., Minallh, N., Ahmad, N., Abid, SAR., Khan, MAA. (2016). K-Means and ISODATA clustering algorithms for land cover classification using remote sensing. Sindh University Research Journal-SURJ (Science Series), 48(2), pp. 315-318.
- Alesheikh, AA., Ghorbanali, A., Nouri, N. (2007). Coastline change detection using remote sensing. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology, 4(1), pp. 61-66.
- Alganci, U., Sertel, E., Kaya, S. (2018). Determination of the olive trees with the object-based classification of Pleiades satellite image", International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO) 132- 139.
- Bayram, B., Bayraktar, H., Acar, U. (2004). Coastline change detection using CORONA, SPOT and IRS 1D images Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 35, 437-441.
- Blaschke, T., Hay, G. J., Weng, Q., Resch, B. (2011). Collective sensing: Integrating geospatial technologies to understand urban systems- an overview. Remote Sensing, 3(8), 1743-1776.
- Burak, S. A., Dogan, E., Gazioglu, C. (2004). Impact of urbanization and tourism on coastal environment. Ocean & Coastal Management, 47, 515-527.
- Buyuksalih, I., Gazioglu, C., Buyuksalih, G., Muftuoglu, AE., Demir, V. (2009). The object-oriented image analysis method of using in Coastal Zone, The Ninth International Conference on the Mediterranean Coastal Environment, 1-10.
- Carleer, AP., Wolff, E. (2006). Region-Based classification potential for land cover classification with very high spatial resolution satellite data, in Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Object-based Image Analysis, Austria, Vol. XXXVI, ISSN 1682-1777, 4-5.
- Celik, OI., Gazioglu, C. (2020). Coastline Difference Measurement (CDM) Method, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 7(1):1-5.
- Doganyigit, R. (2016). Works on Lakes and Wetlands. http://www.suyonetimi.gov.tr/ (Turkish)
- Dronova, I., Gong, P., Wang, L. (2011). Object-based analysis and change detection of major wetland cover types and their classification uncertainty during the low water period at Poyang Lake, China. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12), 3220-3236.
- Esetlili, MT., Bektas Balcik, F., Balik Sanli, F., Ustuner, M., Kalkan, K., Goksel, Ç., Gazioglu, C. Kurucu, Y. (2018). Comparison of Object and Pixel-Based Classifications for Mapping Crops Using Rapideye Imagery: A Case Study of Menemen Plain, Turkey, International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics (IJEGEO), 5(2), 231-243.
- Guariglia, A., Buonamassa, A., Losurdo, A., Saladino, R., Trivigno, M. L., Zaccagnino, A., Colangelo, A., (2006). A multisource approach for coastline mapping and identification of shoreline changes. Annals of geophysics, 49(1).
- Haibo, Y., Zongmin, W., Hongling, Z., Yu, G. (2011). Waterbody extraction methods study based on RS and GIS. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 10, pp. 2619-2624.
- Kalkan, K., Bayram, B., Maktav, D., Sunar, F. (2013). Comparison of support vector machine and objectbased classification methods for coastline detection. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 7, W2.
- Kalkan, K., Maktav, D., Bayram, B. (2019). Shoreline Extraction From Cloud Removed Landsat 8 Image: Case Study Lake Ercek, Turkey, Mathematical Modeling of Real World Problems, Interdisciplinary Studies in Applied Mathematics, 37-54.
- Kaplan, G., Avdan, U. (2017). Object-based water body extraction model using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 50(1), pp. 137- 143.
- Kaya, H., Ertek, T., Gazioğlu, C. (2019). Geomorphological Features of Terkos Lake. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 6(2), 192-205. DOI: 10.30897/ijegeo.569748.
- Li, X., Damen, M. C. (2010). Coastline change detection with satellite remote sensing for environmental management of the Pearl River Estuary, China. Journal of Marine Systems, 82, pp. 54-61.
- Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W. Chipman, J. (2014). Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.
- McFeeters, S.K. (1996). The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7), 1425–1432.
- Prusty, B.A. K, Chandra, R., Azeez, P.A. (2017). Wetland Science.Springer.
- Rasuly, A., Naghdifar, R. Rasoli, M. (2010). Monitoring of Caspian Sea coastline changes using objectoriented techniques. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, pp. 416-426.
- Shang, K., Zhang, X., Dong, Z. Zhang, X. (2012). Information extraction method on coastal wetland using TM data: A case study in Dongying, Shandong, China. In 2012 Second International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications, 77-81.
- Strahler, AH., 1980. The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotelysensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 10, 135–163.
- URL1:https://www.sentinel-hub.com/eoproducts/ndwinormalized-difference-water-index
| APA | DERVİŞOĞLU A, YAGMUR N, BİLGİLİOĞLU B (2020). Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. , 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| Chicago | DERVİŞOĞLU Adalet,YAGMUR Nur,BİLGİLİOĞLU Baha B. Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. (2020): 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| MLA | DERVİŞOĞLU Adalet,YAGMUR Nur,BİLGİLİOĞLU Baha B. Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. , 2020, ss.213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| AMA | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. . 2020; 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| Vancouver | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. . 2020; 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| IEEE | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B "Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline." , ss.213 - 220, 2020. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| ISNAD | DERVİŞOĞLU, Adalet vd. "Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline". (2020), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| APA | DERVİŞOĞLU A, YAGMUR N, BİLGİLİOĞLU B (2020). Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7(2), 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| Chicago | DERVİŞOĞLU Adalet,YAGMUR Nur,BİLGİLİOĞLU Baha B. Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 7, no.2 (2020): 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| MLA | DERVİŞOĞLU Adalet,YAGMUR Nur,BİLGİLİOĞLU Baha B. Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, vol.7, no.2, 2020, ss.213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| AMA | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics. 2020; 7(2): 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| Vancouver | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics. 2020; 7(2): 213 - 220. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| IEEE | DERVİŞOĞLU A,YAGMUR N,BİLGİLİOĞLU B "Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline." International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7, ss.213 - 220, 2020. 10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
| ISNAD | DERVİŞOĞLU, Adalet vd. "Comparison of Pixel-Based and Object-Based Classification Methods in Determination of Wetland Coastline". International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics 7/2 (2020), 213-220. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo. 713307 |
