Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 80 - 86 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 İndeks Tarihi: 16-10-2020
Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books
Öz: Objective: Efforts to determine crimes and culprits were carried out in the Ottoman Empire as in every society. Until the second half of the 19th century, when forensic medicine was institutionalized, the records belonging to these applications were held by the institution of “Qadi” in court registry books. In this study, based on these Shariah court records, we aimed to reveal Ottoman period forensic science procedures and urology’s place in them.Material and methods: Literature searches were made with certain keywords in Ottoman medical sources. Ottoman archive documents and relevant literature were examined in terms of forensic practices and urol-ogy, especially in Shariah court records belonging to several cities.Results: Signing Ottoman consent documents before medical interventions, the judgment of physicians due to fraud and mistakes, the consultation of physicians in injuries, infectious diseases, and on-site exploration of deaths were identified as the main forensic medicine applications. Extensive information about urologic diseases and forensic urology of the period in the consent documents was uncovered.Conclusion: Shariah court records provided information, through consent documents, about forensic medi-cine procedures, urogenital diseases, and urologic forensic cases of the period. Informed consent docu-ments, which were introduced in Europe in the 19th century, were used in the Ottoman Empire since the 15th century, showing the Ottomans’ medical ethics in terms of physician and patient rights.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Sarı N. Osmanlı’larda hekimin eğitimi. Tıp Tarihi Araştırmaları 1988;2:40-64.
- 2. Bingöl S. The Notes Relating to the Forensic Medicine in the Ottoman Empire According to the Principles of Tanzimat. Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi 2007;26:37-65. [CrossRef]
- 3. Eş H. A Glimpse of Forensic Medicine Practices in Otto-man Court Records: Review. Türkiye Klinikleri J Foren Med 2016;13:8-13. [CrossRef]
- 4. Koç S, Biçer Ü. Adli Tıbbın Tarihsel Gelişimi, Türkiye’deki Yapılanması ve Sorunları. Klinik Gelişim 2009;22:1-5.
- 5. Yildirim RV, Ulman YI. A look at the Ottoman social and medical modernization through the life of Dr. Servichen. Bulgarian Histori-cal Review 2013;3:140-50.
- 6. Gamsız Bilgin N, Ögenler O, Akça T. History of Forensic Autopsy in Türkiye. Lokman Hekim Journal 2011;1:8-12.
- 7. Yıldız B. Non-Muslim doctors and health officials in the Province of Denizli, in the Ottoman era. Pamukkale Tıp Dergisi 2014;7:1-17. [CrossRef]
- 8. Buharî Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. İ. Sahîhu ́l-buhârî “kitâbü ́l-ilm”. İstanbul:Çağrı Yayınları, 1981.
- 9. Demirsoy N. An example of Istanbul sharia court records (Ser’iyye Sicilleri) a start date for Home Care: A document date 1766. Turk-ish Journal of Family Practice 2017;21:66-73. [CrossRef]
- 10. Akgündüz A. Osmanlı Devleti’nde Belediye Teşkilâtı ve Belediye Kanunları. İstanbul:Osmanlı Araştırmaları Vakfı, 2005.
- 11. Çetin O. Bursa Şer’iyye Sicilleri Işığında Osmanlılarda İlk Tıp Fakültesi Bursa Darüşşifası ve Tıbbî Faaliyetler. OTAM Dergisi 1993;4:122-50. [CrossRef]
- 12. Gedikli F. Court Records as a Source for the History of Ottoman Law. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi 2005;3:187-213.
- 13. Uzun C. 1638-1639 (H.1048-1049) Dated Harput Shari’ah Reg-ister’s Presenttation and Index. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2013;23:255-90.
- 14. Gündüz T, Kırımlıoğlu N, Eşiyok B, Demirhan Erdemir A. In-formed consent and the legal procedures related to child patient. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics 2001;9:27-34.
- 15. Sarı N. Ethical aspects of Ottoman surgical practice. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics 2000;8:9-14.
- 16. Tok Ö. Relations of patient-physician in the ottoman period. Turk-ish Studies 2008;3:788-805. [CrossRef]
- 17. Arda B, Acıduman A. Some observations on medicine with the samples from ayıntab sheria court registers. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 2014;57:283-7.
- 18. Düzbakar Ö. The role of medicine and doctors in judge records dur-ing Ottoman period. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Ethics 2005;13:105-9.
- 19. Kepecioğlu, K. Bursa Kütüğü, IV. Bursa:Bursa Büyükşehir Beledi-yesi Yayınları; 2010.
- 20. Yağmur F, Din H. Evaluation of forensic postmortem examination and autopsies cases performed in Kayseri, 2007. Adli Tıp Dergisi 2009;23:18-24.
- 21. Özen C. Kısa Adlî Tıp Ders Kitabı. İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları; 1980.
- 22. Öztürel A. Adlî Tıp. Ankara: Güzel İstanbul Matbaası; 1971.
- 23. Kavaklı S. Assessment of Criminal Investigations on Death and Injury Incidents: Examples from the Seventeenth Century Amasya Court Records. History Studies 2013;5:117-42.
- 24. Tok Ö. Criminal investigations in the judicial records of Kayseri (1650-1660). Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2007;22:327-47.
- 25. Gedikli F. The Medical Liability in the Ottoman Law and the Fa-mous Physician of Hernia of the I7th Century, Türk Hukuk Tarihi Araştırmaları 2007;1:15-27.
- 26. Kara MA, Aksoy S. On the Ottoman consent documents for medi-cal interventions and the modern concept of informed consent. Saudi Med J 2006;27:1306-10.
- 27. Demir A. The Sample of Acceptance Form in Konya Ser’iyye Reg-isters (1659-1749). History Studies 2012;4:31-46. [CrossRef]
- 28. Göktaş H. XIX. Doctor-Patient Relations and Uncertificated Doc-tors in 19th Century Ottoman Empire. History Studies 2014;6:99-115.
- 29. Aydın S, Verit A. Informed consent in bladder stone treatment from the Ottoman archives. Schultheiss D, editor. de Historia Urologiae Europaeae Vol.15. Arnhem-The Netherlands: European Associa-tion of Urology, Historical Committee; 2008. p.27-35.
- 30. Maskar Ü. İslam’da ve Osmanlılarda Otopsi sorunu üzerine bir etüd. Patoloji Bülteni, Ankara Patoloji Derneği Yayın Organı 1976;3:259-74.
APA | GUNER E (2020). Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. , 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
Chicago | GUNER EKREM Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. (2020): 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
MLA | GUNER EKREM Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. , 2020, ss.80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
AMA | GUNER E Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. . 2020; 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
Vancouver | GUNER E Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. . 2020; 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
IEEE | GUNER E "Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books." , ss.80 - 86, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
ISNAD | GUNER, EKREM. "Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books". (2020), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
APA | GUNER E (2020). Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(1), 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
Chicago | GUNER EKREM Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. Turkish Journal of Urology 46, no.1 (2020): 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
MLA | GUNER EKREM Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.46, no.1, 2020, ss.80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
AMA | GUNER E Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(1): 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
Vancouver | GUNER E Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(1): 80 - 86. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
IEEE | GUNER E "Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books." Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, ss.80 - 86, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |
ISNAD | GUNER, EKREM. "Urology in forensic medicine registries in Ottoman court registry books". Turkish Journal of Urology 46/1 (2020), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2019.19067 |