Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 539 - 564 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m İndeks Tarihi: 17-10-2020

Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study

Öz:
The aim of this meta-synthesis is to determine the findings of qualitative research on prospective teacher training in Turkey, the aspects of future prospective teacher training programs, and the deep knowledge and insights in them. Fourteen studies dealing with new prospective teacher training program using qualitativemethods introduced in Turkey in 2016 were included in this meta-synthesis. As a result of the analyses, four themes were revealed; mentoring, contribution of prospective teacher training to teacher education, activities, evaluation, and problems encountered in the execution of the program. Then, a second level abstraction was performed, and syntheses were made as follows; 1) mentor selection and workload, 2) professional development, 3) program content and planning, 4) school context, and 5) program accountability. These syntheses point out the aspects that need to be focused on in the in the process of prospective teacher training program development.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Akyıldız, S., Altun, T.ve Kasım, Ş. (2020). Adaylık eğitimi uygulama sürecinin aday öğretmenlerin görüşlerine göre incelenmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6, 117-131.
  • Altıntaş, S., & Görgen, İ. (2017). Teachers candidates' reviews on teacher candidate training system.Online Submission,12(6), 15-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
  • Alataş, H. (2017). The evaluation of “induction program” implementation in Turkey in 2016. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van.
  • Aydın, İ. (2018). Teacher career cycles and teacher professional development. Journal of Human Sciences,15(4), 2047-2065. http://dx.doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v15i4.5450
  • Bakioğlu, A.,Goğüş, N., Ulker, N.,Bayhan, G. veOzgen, B. (2015). Mentorluk ve eğitimde mentorluk”. A.Bakioğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde mentorluk (ss. 1-40).Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  • Balkar, B., & Şahin, S. (2015).Teacher ınduction programme as a new teacher training approach. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 11(1), 1-19.
  • Bartlett, L., & Johnson, L. S. (2010). The evolution of new teacher induction policy: Support, specificity, and autonomy.Educational Policy,24(6), 847-871. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904809341466
  • Bickmore, D. L., & Bickmore, S. T. (2010). A multifaceted approach to teacher induction.Teaching and Teacher Education,26(4), 1006-1014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.043
  • Blömeke, S., Hoth, J., Döhrmann, M., Busse, A., Kaiser, G., & König, J. (2015). Teacher change during induction: Development of beginning primary teachers’ knowledge, beliefs and performance.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(2), 287-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9619-4
  • Bondas, T., & Hall, E. O. (2007). Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research.Qualitative Health Research,17(1), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306295879
  • Cengiz, E. (2019). MilliEğitim Bakanlığı tarafından uygulanan aday öğretmen yetiştirme sürecine ilişkin yapılan çalışmaların analizi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20, 829-849.
  • Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Çakmak, Z., Kaçar, T., & Arıkan, I. (2017). The opinions of social studies candidate teachers about the process of candidate teacher training.The Journal of Academic Social Science,5(54), 576-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.12754
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?European Journal of Teacher Education,40(3), 291-309.40:3, 291-309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
  • Ekinci, A., & Sakız, H. (2019). Aday öğretmen yetiştirme programının etkililiğine ilişkin aday ve danışman öğretmen görüşlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 52(3), 801-836.
  • Fantilli, R. D., & McDougall, D. E. (2009). A study of novice teachers: Challenges and supports in the first years.Teaching and Teacher Education,25(6), 814-825. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.021
  • Feiman-Nemser, S., Schwille, S., Carver, C., & Yusko, B. (1999). A conceptual review of literature on new teacher induction. Washington, DC: National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103, 1013–1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tcre.2001.103.issue-6
  • Fessler, R., & Christensen, J. C. (1992). The teacher career cycle: Understanding and guiding the professional development of teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Finfgeld, D. L. (2003). Metasynthesis: The state of the art-so far.Qualitative Health Research,13(7), 893-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732303253462
  • Gökulu, A. (2017). Prospective teachers’ views about the prospective teacher training process in Turkey.International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research,3(1), 111-123. https://dx.doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.283593
  • Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: attrition, mentoring, and induction. In J. P. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: A project of the Association of Teacher Educators (2nd ed.). (pp. 548e594) NY: Macmillan Library Reference USA.
  • Goldrick, L., Osta, D., Barlin, D., & Burn, J. (2012). Review of state policies on teacher induction. Santa Cruz, CA: New Teacher Center. Retrieved from http://www.newteachercenter.org/sites/ default/files/ntc/main/resources/brf-ntc-policy-state-teacher-induction.pdf
  • Greenlee, B. J., & Dedeugd, I. S. (2002). From hope to despair: the need for beginning teacher advocacy.Teacher Development,6(1), 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530200200157
  • Gujarati, J. (2012) A Comprehensive induction system: A key to the retention of highly qualified teachers, The Educational Forum, 76(2), 218-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2011.652293
  • Gul, I., Turkmen, F., & Aksel, N. (2017). Evaluation of the candidate teacher training course according to candidate teacher opinions.Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute,10(1), 365-388.http://dx.doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.289419
  • Hacettepe Education Faculty Report. (2017). Turkey in teacher training and employment: current status and recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.egitim.hacettepe.edu.tr/belge/OgretmenEgitimi-istihdam_Raporu.pdf
  • Hammerness, K., & Matsko, K. K. (2013). When context has content: A case study of new teacher induction in the University of Chicago’s Urban Teacher Education Program.Urban Education,48(4), 557-584.https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912456848
  • Hangül, S. (2017). An evaluation of the new teacher ınduction Program in Turkey through the eyes of beginning teachers.Journal of Education and Practice,8(10), 191-201.
  • Helms-Lorenz, M., van de Grift, W., & Maulana, R. (2016). Longitudinal effects of induction on teaching skills and attrition rates of beginning teachers.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,27(2), 178-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2015.1035731
  • Howe, E. R. (2006). Exemplary teacher induction: An international review.Educational Philosophy and Theory,38(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2006.00195.x
  • Huberman, M. A. (1993). The lives of teachers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Huling-Austin, L. (1990). Teacher induction programs and internships. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research in teacher education. New York: Macmillan.
  • İlyas, I. E., Coşkun, İ., & Toklucu, D. (2017). Türkiye'de aday öğretmen yetiştirme modeli: İzleme ve değerlendirme.İstanbul: SETA Yayınları.
  • Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81, 201–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654311403323
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2012). Beginning teacher induction what the data tell us.Phi Delta Kappan,93(8), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300811
  • Irwin, B., & Hramiak, A. (2010). A discourse analysis of trainee teacher identity in online discussion forums.Technology, Pedagogy and Education,19(3), 361-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2010.513767
  • Kana, F., & Yasar, E. (2017). A case study on the opinions of the pre-service teachers on the prospects of candidate teaching. The Journal of Turk & Islam World Social Studies, 4(13), 164-176. http://dx.doi.org/10.16989/TIDSAD.1334
  • Kane, R. G., & Francis, A. (2013). Preparing teachers for professional learning: is there a future for teacher education in new teacher induction?Teacher Development,17(3), 362-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2013.813763
  • Kearney, S. (2014). Understanding beginning teacher induction: A contextualized examination of best practice.Cogent Education,1(1), 967477. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2014.967477
  • Kearney, S. (2015). Reconceptualizingbeginning teacher induction as organizational socialization: A situated learning model.Cogent Education,2(1), 1028713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015.1028713
  • Kılıc, D., Babayigit, Ö., & Erkuş, B. (2016). The views of teacher candidates about candidacy training.Ekev Akademi Dergisi,20(68), 81-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.17753/Ekev711
  • Kozikoğlu, I., & Cokuk, K. (2017). Beginning teachers' completion of induction program in a different province: opinions and experiences of beginning teachers.Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences,50(2), 167-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000001401
  • Köse, A. (2016). Assessment of the candidate teachers training process according to the opinions of school administrators. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(3), 924-944. Retrievedfrom http://efdergi.ibu.edu.tr/index.php/efdergi/article/view/2069/3052
  • Köse, A., & Atalmış, E. H. (2017). Contribution of the training taken during candidate teacher training to teaching practices: problems and solution suggestions. Electronic Turkish Studies,12(25), 491-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.
  • Long, J. S., McKenzie-Robblee, S., Schaefer, L., Steeves, P., Wnuk, S., Pinnegar, E., & Clandinin, D. J. (2012).
  • Literature review on induction and mentoring related to early career teacher attrition and retention.Mentoring & tutoring: partnership in learning,20(1), 7-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.645598
  • McCann, T. M., & Johannessen, L. R. (2004). Why do new teachers cry?The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas,77(4), 138-145. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.77.4.138-145.
  • MEB. (2015). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Öğretmen Atama ve Yer Değiştirme Yönetmeliği. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/04/20150417-4.htm
  • MEB. (2016). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Aday Öğretmen Yetiştirme Sürecine İlişkin Yönerge. Retrieved from http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1769.pdf
  • MEB. (2017a). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı 2017 Faaliyet Raporu.Retrieved from https://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2018_02/28093718_Faaliyet_Raporu_yayYn_28022018_1707.pdf
  • MEB. (2017b). Öğretmen Strateji Belgesi (2017-2023). Retrieved from http://oygm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_06/09140719_Strateji_Belgesi_Resmi_Gazete_sonrasY_ilan.pdf
  • Memduhoğlu, H. B. (2008). Örgütsel sosyalleşme ve türk eğitim sisteminde örgütsel sosyalleşme süreci. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 137-153. Retrieved from http://efdergi.yyu.edu.tr/uploads/h_memduhoglu-1542114831.pdf
  • Nayır, F., & Çetin, S. K. (2017). Opinions of teacher candidates on mentor teacher program (Example of Muğla).Journal of Education, (12), 137-155. Retrieved from http://dergipark.gov.tr/jef/issue/30777/332823
  • Neuman, W.L. (2011).Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  • Nielsen, D. C., Barry, A. L., & Addison, A. B. (2007). A model of a new-teacher induction program and teacher perceptions of beneficial components.Action in Teacher Education,28(4), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01626620.2007.10463425
  • Noah Jr, P. D. (2017). A systematic approach to the qualitative meta-synthesis.Issues in Information Systems,18(2), 196-205. Retrieved from http://www.iacis.org/iis/2017/2_iis_2017_196-205.pdf
  • Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988).Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ocakcı, E., & Samancı,O. (2018). Opinions of prospective teachers towards prospective teacher training process. Journal of the Faculty of Education, 19(3), 547-563.
  • Ohio Department of Education. (2011). Introduction to the Ohio Resident Educator Program standards. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.oh.usOkçabol, R. (2005). Öğretmen yetiştirme sistemimiz. Ankara: Ütopya Yayınevi.
  • Önder, E. (2018). Prospective teacher training program according to prospective teachers’ opinions. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 143-189. https://doi.org/10.14527/kuey.2018.004
  • Özen, H., Kılıçoğlu, G., & Yılmaz-Kılıçoğlu, D. (2019). Aday öğretmenlerin aday öğretmen yetiştirme programına ilişkin görüşleri: Nitel bir araştırma. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 49(49), 99-120.
  • Pala, A. (2017). The teacher mentoring process applied to teacher canditates appointed to primary and secondary schools. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep.
  • Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Focus on qualitative methods Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques.Research in nursing and health,20, 365-372. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SİCİ)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AİD-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Sandelowski, M., Barroso, J., & Voils, C. I. (2007). Using qualitative metasummaryto synthesize qualitative and quantitative descriptive findings.Research in nursing & health,30(1), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20176
  • Sarıkaya, İ., Samancı, O., & Yilar, Ö. (2017). Assessment of candidate teacher training process in the scope of candidate and mentor primary school teachers' opinions: a mixed method study. GUJGEF,37(3), 939-989. Retrieved from http://www.gefad.gazi.edu.tr/issue/33422/313807
  • Sarıca, R.ve Özpolat, E.T. (2018). Aday öğretmen yetiştirme sürecine ilişkin aday öğretmen görüşleri (Gaziantep-Osmaniye illeri örneği). Tarih Okulu Dergisi (TOD), XXXVII(2), 186-217.
  • Şayir, G., & Yardibi, N. (2017). Opinions of consultant teachers on evaluating the candidate teacher training process.Capadocia Journal of History and Social Sciences, (8), 140-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.18299/cahij.112
  • TEDMEM. (2018). 2017 Eğitim değerlendirmeraporu(TEDMEM Değerlendirme Dizisi 4). Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği Yayinlari.
  • Topsakal, C., & Duysak, A. (2017). Opinions of candidate teachers and other stakeholders related to the candidate teacher training process.Sakarya University Journal of Education,7(3), 625-639.http://dx.doi.org/10.19126/suje.368228
  • Turan Özpolat, E.,& Gürsoy, G. (2019). A longitudinal study on pre and post service views of teacher candidates on teacher candidate training program. Pegem Eğitimve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(2), 605-652, http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.020
  • Ulubey, Ö. (2018). Evaluation of novice teacher training program. H. U. Journal of Education, 33(2), 480-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017031014
  • Valeeva, R., Baklashova, T., & Latypova, L. (2018). Management of novice teachers' induction to the profession: Modernization of the Russian school methodological system.Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society,14(2), 39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1493
  • Van de Grift, W. (2010). Ontwikkeling van de beroepsvaardigheden van leraren[Development of teaching skills] (Inauguration speech). University of Groningen, Groningen.
  • Wanzare, Z. O. (2007). The transition process: The early years of being a teacher. Inhandbook of teacher education(pp. 343-364). Springer, Dordrecht.
  • Weed, M. (2005). "Meta interpretation": A method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), 1-21.http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.1.508
  • Whisnant, E., Elliott, K., & Pynchon, S. (2005). A review of literature on beginning teacher induction.Center for Strengthening the teaching profession. Retrieved from http://utminers.utep.edu/hhernandez10/documents/Articles/A_Review_of_Literature.pdf
  • Williams, N. V., & Gillham, J. C. (2016). New teacher perceptions of induction programs: A study of open-ended commentary.Mid-Western Educational Researcher,28(3), 218-231. Retrieved from https://www.mwera.org/MWER/volumes/v28/issue3/v28n3-Williams-FEATURE-ARTICLE-R.pdf
  • Wong, H. K. (2004). Induction programs that keep new teachers teaching and improving. NASSP Bulletin, 88, 41–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019263650408863804
  • Yirci, R., Özalp, U., & Kocabaş, İ. (2018). Relationship between mentor teachers’ mentoring functions and beginning teachers’ subjective happiness. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 24(2), 387-435 doi: 10.14527/kuey.2018.010
  • Zimmer, L. (2006). Qualitative meta-synthesis: a question of dialoguing with texts.Journal of Advanced Nursing,53(3), 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03721.x
APA çelik o, Atik S (2020). Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. , 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
Chicago çelik osman tayyar,Atik Servet Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. (2020): 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
MLA çelik osman tayyar,Atik Servet Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. , 2020, ss.539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
AMA çelik o,Atik S Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. . 2020; 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
Vancouver çelik o,Atik S Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. . 2020; 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
IEEE çelik o,Atik S "Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study." , ss.539 - 564, 2020. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
ISNAD çelik, osman tayyar - Atik, Servet. "Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study". (2020), 539-564. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
APA çelik o, Atik S (2020). Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(2), 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
Chicago çelik osman tayyar,Atik Servet Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 8, no.2 (2020): 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
MLA çelik osman tayyar,Atik Servet Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, vol.8, no.2, 2020, ss.539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
AMA çelik o,Atik S Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2020; 8(2): 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
Vancouver çelik o,Atik S Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi. 2020; 8(2): 539 - 564. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
IEEE çelik o,Atik S "Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study." Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8, ss.539 - 564, 2020. 10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m
ISNAD çelik, osman tayyar - Atik, Servet. "Prospective Teacher Training Program in Turkey: A Meta Synthesis Study". Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi 8/2 (2020), 539-564. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-624.1.8c.2s.6m