TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

İsmail ŞENTÜRK (Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümü, Tokat, Türkiye)
Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi
3 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 27 - 50 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004 İndeks Tarihi: 17-10-2020

TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ

Öz:
Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de istihdam içinde yer alan bireylerin serbest çalışmatercihinin belirleyicileri incelenmiştir. Bu amaca uygun şekilde, TÜİK Hanehalkıİşgücü Anketi verileri kullanılarak, iki aşamalı bir yöntem ile analiz yapılmıştır.Veri seti, istihdamda bulunanlar haricinde bireyleri de içerdiğinden, örnek seçimyanlılığı sorundan kaçınmak için öncelikle Heckman örnek seçimi uygulanmıştır.Örnek seçim yanlılığı sorununun varlığı ve bu yöntemin uygulanmasının gerekliolduğu görülmüştür. Sonrasında ise probit yöntemi tüm bireyler, erkekler vekadınlar için kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre yaşanılan bölge, yaş, eğitimdüzeyi, medeni durum, sosyal güvenliğe kayıtlı olma, evde çalışma imkanı veçalışma süresi etkili faktörler olarak belirlenmiştir. Bölgeler arası farklılıklarıngiderilmesi, gençlerin teşvik edilmesi, eğitim sisteminde serbest çalışmayı teşvikedici düzenlemelerin yapılması, çalışma süresinin ise özellikle kadınlar içindüşürülmesi bireylerin serbest çalışmayı tercih etmesi için etkili olabilecektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

DETERMINANTS OF SELF-EMPLOYMENT PREFERENCE IN TURKEY

Öz:
In this study, determinants of self-employment preferences of individuals employed in Turkey were examined. For this purpose, a two-step method was used to analyze the data by using the TURKSTAT Household Labor Force Survey data. Since the data set also includes individuals other than employers, Heckman sample selection was applied primarily to avoid sample selection bias. Existence of sample selection bias and necessity to use this method is determined. Then the probit method was used for all individuals, men and women. According to the findings, the region, age, education level, marital status, enrollment to social security, the possibility of working at home and working time were determined as effective factors. Elimination of regional disparities, encouraging young people, making arrangements in education system to encourage self-employment, and reducing working time especially for women may be effective for individuals to choose self-employment.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Abreu, M., Oner, O., Brouwer, A. ve van Leeuwen, E. (2019), Well-Being Effects of Self-Employment: A Spatial Inquiry, Journal of Business Venturing, 34(4), s.589-607.
  • Allub, L. ve Erosa, A. (2019), Financial Frictions, Occupational Choice and Economic Inequality, Journal of Monetary Economics, 107, s.63-76.
  • Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R. ve Kinnan, C. (2015), The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), s.22–53.
  • Baumeister, R. ve Leary, M. R. (1995), The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation, Psychological Bulletin, 117, s.497–529.
  • Benz, M. ve Frey, B. S., (2008), Being Independent is a Great Thing: Subjective Evaluations of Self-Employment and Hierarchy, Economica, 75(298), s.362–383.
  • Bianchi, M. ve Bobba, M, (2013), Liquidity, Risk, and Occupational Choices, The Review of Economic Studies, 80, s.491–511.
  • Binder, M. ve Coad, A. (2013), Life Satisfaction and Self-Employment: A Matching Approach, Small Business Economics, 40(4), s.1009- 1033.
  • Blanchflower, D. G. ve Oswald, A. J. (1998), What Makes an Entrepreneur?, Journal of Labour Economics, 16(1), s.26–60.
  • Blanchflower, D.G. ve Oswald, A.J., (1990), Self-employment and the Enterprise Culture, (Eds.: R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon, L. Brook), British Social Attitudes: The 1990 Report. Aldershot: Gower Press.
  • Blau, D. M. (1987), A Time-Series Analysis of Self-Employment in the United States, Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), s.445-467.
  • Block, J. ve Koellinger, P. (2009), I Can’t Get No Satisfaction - Necessity Entrepreneurship and Procedural Utility, Kyklos, 62(2), s.191–209.
  • Bogan, V. L., Fertig, A. R. ve Just, D. R. (2014), Self-Employment and Mental Health, https://ssrn.com/abstract=2259765, (Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019).
  • Borjas, G. (1987), The Self-Employment of Immigrants, Journal of Human Resources, 21, s.485–506.
  • Bruce, D. (2000), Effects of the United States Tax System on Transitions into Self-Employment, Labour Economics, 7(5), s.545– 574.
  • Burchell, B. J. ve Coutts, A. P. (2019), The Experience of SelfEmployment Among Young People: An Exploratory Analysis of 28 Low-to Middle-Income Countries, American Behavioral Scientist, 63(2), s.147-165.
  • Cagetti, M. ve De Nardi, M. (2006), Entrepreneurship, Frictions, and Wealth, Journal of Political Economy, 114(5), s.835-70.
  • Cameron, A. C. ve Trivedi, P. K. (2005), Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Clain, S. H. (2000), Gender Differences in Full-Time Self-Employment, Journal of Economics and Business, 52, s.499-513.
  • Croson, D. C. ve Minniti, M. (2012), Slipping the Surly Bonds: The value of Autonomy in Self-Employment, Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(2), s.355–365.
  • de Charms, R. (2013), Personal Causation: The Internal Affective Determinants of Behavior, New York: Routledge. de Wit G. (1993), Models of Self-Employment in a Competitive Market, Journal of Economic Surveys, 7, s.367–397.
  • Deci, E. L. (1975), Intrinsic Motivation, New York: Plenum Press.
  • Deci, E. L. ve Ryan, R. M. (1985), Intrinsic Motivation and SelfDetermination in Human Behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
  • Edwards, L. N. ve Field-Hendrey, E. (2002), Home-based Work and Women’s Labor Force Decisions, Journal of Labor Economics, 20(1), s.170–200.
  • Evans, D. S. ve Leighton, L. S. (1989), Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship, American Economic Review 79(3), s.519–535.
  • Evans, D. S. ve Jovanovic, B. (1989), An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints, Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), s.808-827.
  • Gartner, W.B. (1990), What are We Talking About When We Talk about Entrepreneurship?, Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), s.15–28.
  • Gerber, T. P. (2001), Paths to Success: Individual and Regional Determinants of Self-employment Entry in Post-communist Russia, International Journal of Sociology, 31(2), s.3-37.
  • Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C. ve Woo, C. Y., (1997), Survival of the Fittest? Entrepreneurial Human Capital and the Persistence of Underperforming Firms, Administrative Science Quarterly, s.750– 783.
  • Gindling, T. H. ve Newhouse, D. (2014), Self-Employment in the Developing World, World Development, 56, s.313-331.
  • Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J. ve Scharfstein, D., (2008), Venture Capital Investment Cycles: The Impact of Public Markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 87(1), s.1–23.
  • Hamermesh, D. S. (1990), Shirking or Productive Schmoozing: Wages and the Allocation of Time at Work, ILR Review, 43(3), s.121–128.
  • Hamilton, B. H. (2000), Does Entrepreneurship Pay? An Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self-Employment, Journal of Political Economy, 108(3), s.604–631
  • Hansson, A. (2012), Tax Policy and Entrepreneurship: Empirical Evidence from Sweden, Small Business Economics, 38(4), s.495–513.
  • Heckman, J. J. (1979), Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47(1), s.53-161.
  • House, W., Ikiara, G. ve McCormick, D. (1993), Urban Self-Employment in Kenya: Panacea or Viable Strategy?, World Development, 21, s.1205–1233.
  • Hundley, G. (2000), Male-Female Earnings Differences in SelfEmployment: The Effects of Marriage, Children, and the Household Division of Labor, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), s.95-114.
  • Hyytinen, A. ve Ruuskanen, O. P. (2007), Time Use of the Self-Employed, Kyklos, 60(1), s.105–122.
  • ILO (1993), Resolution Concerning Statistics of Employment in the Informal Sector, Adopted by the 15th International Conference of Labour Statisticians, Geneva, 19‐28 Ocak. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/download/res/icse.pd f, (Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019).
  • Jamal, M. (1997), Job Stress, Satisfaction, and Mental Health: An Empirical Examination of Self-Employed and Non-Self-Employed Canadians, Journal of Small Business Management, 35(4), s.48-57.
  • Justo, R., Congregado, E. ve Román, C. (2019), Becoming Self-Employed from Inactivity: An In-Depth Analysis of Satisfaction, Small Business Economics, s.1-43.
  • Kao, R.W. (1993), Defining Entrepreneurship: Past, Present and?, Creativity and Innovation Management, 2(1), s.69–70.
  • Kautonen, T., Kibler, E. ve Minniti, M. (2017), Late-Career Entrepreneurship, Income and Quality of Life, Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), s.318–333.
  • Langlois, A. ve Razin, E. (1995), Self‐Employment among French‐ Canadians: The Role of the Regional Milieu, Ethnic and Racial Studies, 18(3), s.581-604.
  • Lavallée, E. ve Roubaud, F. (2015), Does Corruption Matter for Informal Sector Economic Performance? Microdata Evidence from SubSaharan Africa, (Eds.: J. P. Cling, S. Lagrée, M. Razafindrakoto, F. Roubaud), The Informal Economy in Developing Countries, s.179- 196, New York: Routledge.
  • Loscocco, K. ve Smith-Hunter, A. (2004), Women Home-Based Business Owners: Insights From Comparative Analyses, Women in Management Review, 19(3), s.164–173.
  • McKenzie, D., de Mel, S. ve Woodruff, C. (2008), Who are the Microenterprise Owners?: Evidence from Sri Lanka on Tokman v. De Soto, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4635, https://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/1813-9450-4635, (Erişim tarihi: 08.12.2019).
  • Min, P. G. (1988), Korean Immigrant Entrepreneurship: A Multivariate Analysis, Journal of Urban Affairs, 10(2), s.197-212.
  • Minniti, M. ve Lévesque, M. (2008), Recent Developments in the Economics of Entrepreneurship, Journal of Business Venturing, 23, s.603–612.
  • Narita, R. (2020), Self-Employment in Developing Countries: A SearchEquilibrium Approach, Review of Economic Dynamics, 35, s.1-34.
  • OECD (2015), Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2015, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Oyekale, A. (2015), Factors Explaining Households’ Cash Payment for Solid Waste Disposal and Recycling Behaviors In South Africa, Sustainability, 7(12), s.15882-15899.
  • Parker, S. C. (2018), The Economics of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parslow, R. A., Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Rodgers, B., Strazdins, L. ve D'souza, R. M. (2004), The Associations Between Work Stress and Mental Health: A Comparison of Organizationally Employed and Self-Employed Workers, Work and Stress, 18(3), s.231–244.
  • Pietrobelli, C., Rabellotti, R. ve Aquilina, M. (2004), An Empirical Study of the Determinants of Self‐Employment In Developing Countries, Journal of International Development, 16(6), s.803-820.
  • Robson, M. T. (1998), Self-Employment in the UK Regions, Applied Economics, 30(3), s.313-322.
  • Ryan, R. M. ve Deci, E. L. (2000), Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and WellBeing, American Psychologist, 55(1), s.68-78
  • Skinner, E. A. (1995), Perceived Control, Motivation, and Coping, London: Sage Publications.
  • Stabile, M. (2004), Payroll Taxes and the Decision to Be Self-Employed, International Tax and Public Finance, 11(1), s.31–53.
  • Taşçı, H. M. ve Darıcı, B. (2009), Türkiye'de İşsizliğin Mikro Veri ile Farklı Tanımlar Altında, Cinsiyet Ayırımına Göre Analizi, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(28), s.139-159.
  • Turham, D., Salome, B. ve Schwarz, A. (1990), The Informal Sector Revisited, Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Van Praag, C. M., (1999), Some Classic Views On Entrepreneurship, De Economist, 147(3), s.311–335.
  • Yamada G. (1996), Urban Informal Employment and Self-Employment in Developing Countries: Theory and Evidence, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44, s.289–314.
APA Şentürk İ (2020). TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. , 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
Chicago Şentürk İsmail TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. (2020): 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
MLA Şentürk İsmail TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. , 2020, ss.27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
AMA Şentürk İ TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. . 2020; 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
Vancouver Şentürk İ TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. . 2020; 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
IEEE Şentürk İ "TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ." , ss.27 - 50, 2020. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
ISNAD Şentürk, İsmail. "TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ". (2020), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
APA Şentürk İ (2020). TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(1), 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
Chicago Şentürk İsmail TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 20, no.1 (2020): 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
MLA Şentürk İsmail TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol.20, no.1, 2020, ss.27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
AMA Şentürk İ TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020; 20(1): 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
Vancouver Şentürk İ TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2020; 20(1): 27 - 50. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
IEEE Şentürk İ "TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ." Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20, ss.27 - 50, 2020. 10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
ISNAD Şentürk, İsmail. "TÜRKİYE’DE BİREYLERİN SERBEST ÇALIŞMA TERCİHİNİN BELİRLEYİCİLERİ". Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 20/1 (2020), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v20i53206.665004
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 14:2

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları