Rabah TOUAİBİ
(Djilali Bounaama University, Laboratory of FIMA, Khemis Miliana, Algeria)
Hasan KOTEN
(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Özlem BOYDAK
(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi, Makine Mühendisliği Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 7Sayı: 1ISSN: 2149-2123 / 2148-4171Sayfa Aralığı: 41 - 44İngilizce

79 0
An Energy Investigation of An Organic Rankine Cycle Utilizing Three Organic Fluids
This study presents an energy study of an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) by comparing three organic fluids. The latter is considered as a promising cycle for the conversion of heat into mechanical energy adapted to low-temperature heat sources; it uses more volatile organic fluids than water, which generally has high molecular weights, thus allowing operating pressures at temperatures lower than those of the traditional Rankine cycle. This study devoted to the energy analysis of the ORC cycle, taking into account the effect of the operating temperatures and the choice of the organic fluid on the cycle performance. The utilized three fluids were Toluene, R245fa and R123. The results obtained show that the Toluene organic fluid has the best energy efficiency of the cycle with 7.45%.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • 1. Energy Information Administration (2017). International energyoutlook, USA: Accessed from "https://www.eia.gov/ outlooks/ieo/#1".
  • 2. Braimakis, K., &Karellas, S. (2018). Energetic optimization of regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) configurations. Energy Conversion and Management, 159, 353-370.
  • 3. Heberle, F., &Brüggemann, D. (2010). Exergy based fluid selection for a geothermal Organic Rankine Cycle for combined heat and power generation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 30(11-12), 1326- 1332.
  • 4. Liu, Q., Duan, Y., & Yang, Z. (2013). Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids. Energy, 63, 123-132.
  • 5. Bu, X., Wang, L., & Li, H. (2013). Performance analysis and working fluid selection for geothermal energy-powered organic Rankinevapor compression air conditioning. Geothermal Energy, 1(1), 2.
  • 6. Drescher, U., &Brüggemann, D. (2007). Fluid selection for the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) in biomass power and heat plants. Applied thermal engineering, 27(1), 223-228.
  • 7. Taljan, G., Verbič, G., Pantoš, M., Sakulin, M., &Fickert, L. (2012). Optimal sizing of biomass-fired Organic Rankine Cycle CHP system with heat storage. RenewableEnergy, 41, 29-38.
  • 8. Sun, W., Yue, X., & Wang, Y. (2017). Exergy efficiency analysis of ORC (Organic Rankine Cycle) and ORC-based combined cycles driven by low-temperature waste heat. Energy Conversion and Management, 135, 63-73.
  • 9. Rayegan, R., & Tao, Y. X. (2011). A procedure to select working fluids for Solar Organic Rankine Cycles (ORCs). RenewableEnergy, 36(2), 659-670.
  • 10. Shaaban, S. (2016). Analysis of an integrated solarc ombined cycle with steam and organic Rankine cycles as bottoming cycles. Energy Conversion and Management, 126, 1003-1012.
  • 11. Solkane 8.0.0, Solvay Special Chemicals.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.