Zeynep ÇOPUR
(Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Betül GÜREL
(Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 11Sayı: 40ISSN: 2146-1961Sayfa Aralığı: 358 - 379İngilizce

75 0
GENDER DIFFERENCES IN DETERMINANTS OF FAMILY LIFE, MARITAL QUALITY AND MARITAL HAPPINESS
Marital satisfaction and happiness refer to subjective evaluations of positive effect in the marital relationship by one or both spouses. For most married people in modern societies, the quality of their marriages strongly affects their happiness. Nevertheless, societal norms suggest that the quality of marriage significantly impacts women’s happiness than that of men. Spouses’ different characteristics, traditional family behaviors, decision making, division of household labor, equality in family relations, and so on are parameters related to women’s and men’s views of marital quality and marital happiness. This study investigates the general attitudes of married individuals by gender toward family life includes non-marital sex, traditional family behaviors, and importance of autonomy and equality and marital quality includes marital disagreement, marital unfairness, decision making, chance of dissolution to measure the effect of these parameters on marital happiness. Participants comprised married employees in Ankara, Turkey. Sample size was determined by random sampling method (n = 305). 59.7% of the sample were men; 40.3% were women. The average age of the men was 40.3 (SD = 8.05) and that of women was 37.2 (SD = 7.39). Questionnaires assessed participants’ attitudes toward family life, marital quality, and marital happiness using scales drawn from previous studies related to family life, marital quality and marital happiness. According to the results, women reported more marital disagreement, a more unilateral view of decision-making, and higher risk of dissolution than men. The highest levels of marital happiness were experienced with briefer length of marriage, beginning and contracting life stages, more progressive attitudes about non-marital sex, less disagreement and more fairness, and low chance of dissolution.
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • Acker, J. (1992). “From sex roles to gendered institutions.” Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565-569.
  • Adana, F., Arslanbaş, H., Ergin, F., Biçer, N., Kıranşal, N. & Şahin, S. (2011). “Views of male university students about social gender roles: An example from East of Turkey.” Journal of Family Violence, 26 (7), 519-526.
  • Amato, P.R. & Booth, A. (1995). “Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality.” American Sociological Review, 60, 58-66.
  • Amato, P. R. & Booth, A. (2001). “The legacy of parents' marital discord: Consequences for children's marital quality.” Journal of personality and social psychology, 81(4), 627.
  • Amato, P.R., Johnson, D. R., Booth, A. & Rogers, S. J. (2003). “Continuity and change in marital quality between 1980 and 2000.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 1–22
  • Arıcı, F. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinde toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin algılar ve psikolojik iyi oluş. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Bartley, S. J., Blanton, P. W. & Gilliard, J. L. (2005). “Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: decision making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity.” Marriage and Family Review, 37(4), 69-94.
  • Başaran, F. (1984). Ailede cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin tutum değişmeleri. Sosyal Bilimler Derneği Yayınları, 145-160.
  • Baykal, S. (1988). Üniversite öğrencilerinin cinsiyet rolleri ile ilgili kalıp yargılarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Beam C. R., Marcus, K., Turkheimer, E. & Emery, R. E. (2018). “Gender differences in the structure of marital quality.” Behavior Genetics, 48, 209–223.
  • Becker, G. S. (1973). “A theory of marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy, 81(4), 813-846.
  • Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Berscheid, E. & Regan, P. (2005). The psychology of interpersonal relationships. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Bhasin, K. (2003). Toplumsal cinsiyet: Bize yüklenen roller. Kadınlarla Dayanışma Vakfı Yayınları. İstanbul: Kuşak Ofset.
  • Bird, C. E. (1999). “Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: The impact of the amount and division of housework.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 40, 32-45.
  • Brooks, C. & Bolzendahl, C. (2004). “The transformation of US gender role attitudes: Cohort replacement, social-structural change, and ideological learning.” Social Science Research, 33, 106-133.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık, 2. Baskı.
  • Carr, D., Freedman, V. A., Cornman, J. C. & Schwarz, N. (2014). “Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life.” Journal of Marriage Family, 76(5), 930-948.
  • Cherry, A. L. (2005). Examining global social welfare issues. Thomson Brookes Cole, Belmont.
  • Copur, Z. (2015). “Assessing the casual relationship among financial problems, financial management practices, financial satisfaction, and life satisfaction.” The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Organizational Studies, 9 (2), 15-32.
  • Çabuk, H. A., Özgür, E. & Örk Özel, S. (2017). “Factors affecting marital quality and its determinants: Adana/Turkey fieldwork.” Ç.Ü. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26, (2), 57-70.
  • Çağ, P. & Yıldırım, İ. (2013). “Evlilik doyumunu yordayan ilişkisel ve kişisel değişkenler.” Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(39), 13-23.
  • Deaux, K. K. & Bieri, J. (1967). “Latitude of acceptance in judgments of masculinity-femininity.” Journal of Personality, 35(1), 109-117.
  • Dismuke, C. & Lindrooth, R. (2006). “Ordinary least squares.” Methods and Designs for Outcomes Research, (Ed: E. C. G. Chumney and K. N. Simpson), 93–104. Bethesda: ASHP.
  • Dökmen, Z. Y. (2004). Toplumsal cinsiyet-sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar. İstanbul: Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • Fox, G. L. & Murry, V. M. (2000). “Gender and families: Feminist perspectives and family research.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1160-1172.
  • Frisco, M. L. & Williams, K. (2003). “Perceived housework equity, marital happiness, and divorce in dual-earner households”. Journal of Family Issues, 24 (1), 51-73.
  • Glenn, N. D. & Weaver, C.N. (1981). “The contribution of marital happiness to global happiness.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 43 (1), 161-168.
  • Glenn, N. D. (1990). “Quantitative research on marital quality in the 1980s: A critical review.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(4), 818-831.
  • Gottman, J. M., Coan, J., Carrere, S. & Swanson, C. (1998). “Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 60 (1), 5-22.
  • Gray-Little, B. & Burks, N. (1983). “Power and satisfaction in marriage: A review and critique.” Psychological Bulletin, 93(3), 513-538.
  • Greenstein, T. N. (1990). “Marital disruption and the employment of married women.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 31-42.
  • Hayward, M. & Zhang, Z. (2006). “Gender, the marital life course, and cardiovascular disease in late midlife.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(3), 639-657.
  • Heaton, T. B. & Blake, A. M. (1999). “Gender differences in determinants of marital disruption.” Journal of Family Issues, 20, 25-45.
  • Inglehart, R. & Norris, P. (2003). “Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world.” Cambridge University Press.
  • Johnson, D. R. (1995). Assessing marital quality in longitudinal and life course. Family Assessment, Jane Close Conoley and Elaine Buterick Werth (Eds), Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
  • Karney, B. R. & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). “The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research.” Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.
  • Kiecolt, K.J. & Acock, A. C. (1988). “The long-term effects of family structure on gender-role attitudes.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(3), 709-717.
  • Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M. & Van de Vliert, E. (1996). “Marital conflict about the division of household labor and paid work.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 958-969.
  • Kluwer, E. S., Heesink, J. A. M. & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). “The marital dynamics of conflict over the division of labor.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 635-653.
  • Koropeckyj-Cox, T. & Çopur, Z. (2015). “Attitudes about Childlessness and Infertility Treatments: A Comparison of Turkish and American University Students.“ Journal of Comparative Family Studies, XLVI (3), 373-402.
  • Kubricht, B. C., Miller, R. B., Yang, K., Harper, J. M. & Sandberg, J. G. (2017). “Division of household labor and marital satisfaction in China: Urban and rural comparisons.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 48 (2), 261-274.
  • Kulik, L. (2002). “Marital equality and the quality of long term marriage in later life.” Ageing and Society, 22 (4), 459-481.
  • Lye, D. N. & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). “The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction.” Journal of Family Issues, 14, 157-188.
  • Machaty, A. (2013). Dispositional optimism and marital adjustment. Master of Science, College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky.
  • Maness, P., Gomez, N., Velasquez, R. J., Silkowski, S. & Savino, A. (2000). Gender differences on the MMPI-2 for Colombian University Students (Notice). Annual Conference of the American Psychological Association.
  • Marshall, G. (1998). Sosyoloji Sözlüğü, (Çev: Osman Akınhay, Derya Kömürcü), Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları: Ankara.
  • McGovern J. & Meyers S. (2002). “Relationships between sex-role attitudes, division of household tasks, and marital adjustment.” Contemporary Family Therapy, 24(4), 601-18.
  • McRae, J. A. & Brody, C. J. (1989). “The differential importance of marital experiences for the well-being of women and men: A research note.” Social Science Research, 18, 237-248.
  • Nourani, Sh., Seraj, F., Shakeri, M.T. & Mokhber, N. (2019). “The relationship between gender-role beliefs, household labor division and marital satisfaction in couples.” Journal of Holistic Nursing and Midwifery, 29(1),43-49.
  • Peplau, L. A. (1983). Roles and gender. In H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, A. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger, E. McClintock, L. A. Peplau and D. R. Petersen (Eds), Close Relationships, 220-264, New York: Freeman.
  • Perry-Jenkins, M. & Folk, K. (1994). “Class, couples and conflict: Effects of the division of labor on assessments of marriage in dual-earner families.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 165-180.
  • Pina, D. L. & Bengston, V. L. (1993). “The division of household labor and wives’ happiness: ideology, employment, and perceptions of support.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 901-912.
  • Ponzetti, J. J. & Mutch, B. H. (2006). “Marriage as a covenant: Tradition as a guide to marriage education in the pastoral context.” Pastoral Psychology, 54 (3), 215-230.
  • Previti, D. & Amato, P. R. (2004). “Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality?” Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21(2), 217-230.
  • Proulx, C. M., Helms, H. M. & Buehler, C. (2007). “Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 69 (3), 576-593.
  • Research on Turkish Family Structure (2011) The Ministry of Family and Social Policies Publications: Ankara.
  • Rice, F. P. (1996). Intimate relationships, marriages, and families (3.edition). California: Mayfield Publishing.
  • Rostami, A. Ghazinour, M., Nygren, L., & Richter, J. (2014). “Marital satisfaction with a special focus on gender differences in medical staff in Tehran, Iran.” Journal of Family Issues, 35 (14), 1940-1958.
  • Rutgers, D.C., Freedman, V.A., Cornman, J.C. & Schwarz, N. (2014). “Happy marriage, happy life? marital quality and subjective well-being in later life.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 930-948.
  • Scott, J. (2006). Family and gender roles: How attitudes are changing? GeNet Working Paper No. 21, University of Cambridge.
  • Spanier, G. B. (1976). “Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 38, 15-28.
  • Spanier, G. B. & Lewis, R A. (1980). “Marital quality: A review of the seventies.” Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 825-839.
  • Sprecher, S., Metts, S., Burleson, B., Hatfield, E. & Thompson, A. (1995). “Domains of expressive interaction in intimate relationships: Associations with satisfaction and commitment.” Family Relations, 44(2), 203-210.
  • Spitze, G. & South, S. J. (1985). “Women’s employment, time expenditure, and divorce.” Journal of Family Issues, 6, 307-329.
  • Stanley, S. C., Hunt, J. G. & Hunt, L. L. (1986). “The relative deprivation of husbands in dual-earner households.” Journal of Family Issues, 7, 3-20.
  • Steil, J. M. & Weltman, K. (1991). “Marital inequality: The importance of resources, personal attributes, and social norms on career valuing and allocation of domestic responsibilities.” Sex Roles, 24, 161-179.
  • Stohs, J. H. (2000). “Multicultural women’s experience of household labor, conflicts, and equity.” Sex Roles, 42, 339-361.
  • Stoller, R. J. (1984). Sex and gender: Development of masculinity and femininity. Karnac Books Ltd. London.
  • Suitor, J. J. (1991). “Marital quality and satisfaction with the division of household labor across the family life cycle.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 53, 221-230.
  • Sullivan, T. J. (2003). Introduction to social problems. Sixth Edition, Pearson Education: Boston.
  • Thompson, L. & Walker, A. J. (1989). “Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work, and parenthood.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 51, 845-871.
  • United Nations (2001). Principles and recommendations for a vital statistics system revision 2, Sales No.E.01 XVII.10, New York.
  • Vefikuluçay, D., Demirel, S., Taşkın, L. & Eroğlu, K. (2007). “Kafkas Üniversitesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin bakış açıları.” Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 14(2), 12-27.
  • Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M. & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). “Gender and fairness: Marital satisfaction in two-earner couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 60, 577-594.
  • Voydanoff, P. & Donnelly, B.W. (1999). “The intersection of time in activities and perceived unfairness in relation to psychological distress and marital quality.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, 739-751.
  • White, L. K. & Booth, A. (1991). “Divorce over the life course: The role of marital happiness.” Journal of Family Issues, 12, 5-21.
  • Williams, K. (2003). “Has the future of marriage arrived? A contemporary examination of gender, marriage and psychological well-being.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 470-487.
  • Xu, Q., Qiu, Z. & Li, J. (2016). Is the “seven-year itch” real?—a study on the changing divorce pattern in Chinese marriages. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 3(1), 17.
  • Yee, O. J., Vun, P. R. S. & Zhi, T. J. (2018). “A study of sexual related determinants and marital quality among married couple in Malaysia.” Final Year Project, UTAR.
  • Yılmaz, V. D., Zeyneloğlu, S., Kocaöz, S., Kısa, S., Taşkın, L. & Eroğlu, K. (2009). “Üniversite öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin görüşleri.” Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 775-792.
  • Yogev, S. & Brett, J. (1985). “Perceptions of the division of housework and childcare and marital satisfaction.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 47, 609-618.
  • Young, M., Wallace, J. E. & Polachek, A. J. (2013). “Gender differences in perceived domestic task equity: A study of professionals.” Journal of Family Issues, 30 (1), 1-31.

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.