Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi

Ahmet Fevzi KEKEÇ, (Dörtyol Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, Hatay, Türkiye)
Tuğçe Kozaklı Ülger, (Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Eğitimi, Bursa, Türkiye)
Bilgin BOZGEYİK, (Dörtyol Devlet Hastanesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Kliniği, Hatay, Türkiye)
Işıl Bozkurt, (Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Eğitimi, Bursa, Türkiye)
Murat Altun (Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi, İlköğretim Matematik Eğitimi, Bursa,Türkiye)
Eğitim ve Bilim
15 4
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1 - 37 Metin Dili: Türkçe DOI: 10.15390/EB.2020.8028 İndeks Tarihi: 05-10-2020

Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi

Öz:
Matematik okuryazarlığı başarı düzeyinin nasıl artırılabileceği hususu matematik eğitimi ile ilgili çalışmaların odağına yerleşmiştir. Mevcut durumda çok sayıda araştırma olmasına rağmen bunların yöntemlerini, içeriğini, matematik okuryazarlığının hangi bileşeni ile ilgili olduğu gibi hususlarda ayrıntılı bir çalışmaya rastlanamamıştır. Bu çalışmanın amacı eğitim-öğretim sürecinde matematik okuryazarlığına odaklanan makalelerin tematik analizini yapmak suretiyle araştırılan hususların nitelik ve nicelik bakımından ihtiyacı ne ölçüde karşıladığını, ne tür araştırmalara ihtiyaç olduğunu ortaya koymaktır. Bununla birlikte matematik okuryazarlığını konu alan çok sayıda (181) çalışmanın olması, yapılacak tematik analizden önce makalelerin sınıflanması ihtiyacını doğurmuştur. Okul Matematiğinin İlkeleri (eşitlik, müfredat, öğretim, öğrenme,değerlendirme ve teknoloji) referans alınarak, makalelerin bir ön tasnifi yapıldıktan sonra ilkelerden en az birine uyan 74 makaleanaliz edilmek üzere belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, incelenen makalelerin genel özellikleri (yayınlandıkları dergilerin türleri ve yayın yılı), gerekçeler, amaç, araştırma yöntemleri, örneklem,sonuçlar ve önerileri analiz edilip sunulmuştur. Bu çalışmada incelenen araştırmalarda iki temel kategori belirlenmiştir: (i) Bilgiyi özetlemek suretiyle bir durumu tasvir edip daha kolay algılanabilir hale getirmek, (ii) Problemi belirleyip bu problemin çözümü için model önermek, bu modeli denemek ve değerlendirmek suretiyle matematik okuryazarlığı başarı düzeyini yükseltmeyi sağlamaktır. İncelenen araştırmaların çoğu birinci kategoride sınıflanmaktadır. İkinci kategorideki araştırmaların ise sayıca yetersiz olduğu görülmüştür. Özellikle matematik okuryazarlığı problemlerinin çözümünde yaşanan zorlukları rapor eden araştırmaların sonuçları, öğretimi iyileştirmek için bir hareket noktası olabilir ve bu tür araştırmaların çoğaltılması ihtiyaç olarak görülmektedir
Anahtar Kelime:

Anterior Knee Pain after Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Fractures: Medial Parapatellar versus Transtendinous Approach

Öz:
Objective: Chronic anterior knee pain has been considered as the most frequent postoperative complication of tibial nailing surgery technique. Surgical approaches used for tibial intramedullary nailing include medial parapatellar, transtendinous, and lateralparapatellar techniques, but lateral parapatellar approach is less preferred. The aim of the present study was to determine the roleof medial parapatellar and transtendinous approaches on anterior knee pain of patients with tibial diaphyseal fractures treatedwith intramedullary nail.Methods: A total of 132 patients who were admitted to our emergency clinic with tibial shaft fracture between January 2015 andJanuary 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. Of the 132 patients, 45 patients who were treated with intramedullary nail wereincluded in the present study. Medial parapatellar approach was used in 20 fractures, and transtendinous approach was used in27 fractures.Results: The mean follow-up period of the patients was 12 (6–15) months. The mean union time of fractures was 5 (3–15) months.Severity of anterior knee pain was assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). There was no statistically significant difference betweenthe medial parapatellar method and the transtendinous method according to proximal nail entry exposures in anterior knee pain(p=0.927).Conclusion: In conclusion, although tibial nailing is a highly successful procedure for fracture healing, anterior knee pain remainsthe main disadvantage of it. Although our data showed no differences between the groups, the groups were relatively small toaccept this null hypothesis with full confidence
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. McGrath L, Royston S. Fractures of the tibial shaft (including acute compartment syndrome). Surgery 2007; 25: 439-44. [CrossRef]
  • Akın, A. ve Kabael, T. (2016). Bir matematik eğitimi araştırmasına dayalı öğretim deneyi deneyimi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(3), 7-27.
  • 2. Väistö O, Toivanen J, Paakkala T, Järvelä T, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: an ultrasound study of the patellar tendons of 36 patients. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 311-6.
  • Akyüz, G. ve Pala, N. M. (2010). PISA 2003 sonuçlarına göre öğrenci ve sınıf özelliklerinin matematik okuryazarlığına ve problem çözmeye etkisi. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 668-678.
  • 3. Orfaly R, Keating JE, O’Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing: does the entrypoint matter? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 976-7. [CrossRef]
  • Altun, M. (2018). A model suggestion in order to write real life mathematics questions in the PISA and TIMMS character. International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education kongresinde sunulmuş bildiri, Ordu Üniversitesi, Ordu.
  • 4. Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta III P, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, et al. Randomizedtrial of reamedandunreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90: 2567-78. [CrossRef]
  • Altun, M. ve Bozkurt, I. (2017). Matematik okuryazarlığı problemleri için yeni bir sınıflama önerisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 42(190), 171-188.
  • 5. Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Chan H, Blachut PA. Long-termfollow-up of tibial shaft fracture streated with intramedullary nailing. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22: 525-9. [CrossRef]
  • Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J. ve Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597-606.
  • 6. Toivanen JA, Väistö O, Kannus P, Latvala K, Honkonen SE, Järvinen MJ. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft. A prospective, randomized study comparing two diffrent nail-insertion techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 580-5. [CrossRef]
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • 7. Väistö O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain after intramedullary nailing of fractures of the tibial shaft: an eight-year follow-up of a prospective, randomized study comparing two diffrent nail-insertion techniques. J Trauma 2008; 64: 1511-6. [CrossRef]
  • Bansilal, S. (2011). Unpacking mathematical literacy teachers' understanding of the concept of inflation. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2), 179-190.
  • 8. Väistö O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain and thigh muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of a tibial shaft fracture: an 8-year follow-up of 28 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21: 165-71. [CrossRef]
  • Bansilal, S. (2014). Exploring the notion of mathematical literacy teacher knowledge. South African Journal of Higher Education, 28(4), 1156-1172.
  • 9. Court-Brown CM, Gustilo T, Shaw AD. Knee pain after intramedullary tibial nailing: it’sincidence, etiology, andoutcome. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 103-5. [CrossRef]
  • Bansilal, S., Goba, B., Webb, L., James, A. ve Khuzwayo, H., (2012). Tracing the impact: A case of a professional development programme in Mathematical Literacy. Africa Education Review, 9(1), 106-120.
  • 10. Court-Brown CM. Fractures of the tibia and fiula. In: Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, Court-Brown CM, editors. RockwoodandGreen’sfractures in adults. Vol. 2, 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2006. p. 2079- 146.
  • Bansilal, S., Mkhwanazi, T. ve Mahlabela, P. (2012). Mathematical literacy teachers' engagement with contextual tasks based on personal finance. Perspectives in Education, 30(3), 98-109.
  • 11. Katsoulis E, Court-Brown C, Giannoudis PV. Incidenceandaetiology of anteriorkneepainafterintramedullarynailing of thefemurandtibia. J Bone Joint Surg 2006; 88: 576-80. [CrossRef]
  • Bansilal, S., Webb, L. ve James, A. (2015). Teacher training for mathematical literacy: A case study taking the past into the future. South African Journal of Education, 35(1), 1-10.
  • 12. Al Hussainy HAJ, Deeb A, Choudhary AK. Anterior knee pain following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: does bony portal point in the sagittal plane affct the outcome? Eur J Orthop Surg Trauma 2005; 15: 113-7. [CrossRef]
  • Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance (OECD Education Working Papers, No.71). Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • 13. Väistö O, Toivanen J, Kannus P, Järvinen M. Anterior knee pain and thigh muscle strength after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a report of 40 consecutive cases. J Orthop Trauma 2004; 18: 18-23. [CrossRef]
  • Brown, B. ve Schäfer, M. (2006). Teacher education for mathematical literacy: A modelling approach. Pythagoras, 64, 45-51.
  • 14. Keating JF, Orfaly R, O’Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibial nailing. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 10-3. [CrossRef]
  • Burkhardt, H. (2008). Making mathematical literacy a reality in classrooms. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education içinde (s. 2090-2100).
  • 15. Orfaly R, Keating JE, O’Brien PJ. Knee pain after tibia nailing: does the entry point matter? J Bone Joint Surg Br 1995; 77: 976-7. [CrossRef]
  • Chen, C. H. ve Chiu, C. H. (2016). Collaboration scripts for enhancing metacognitive self-regulation and mathematics literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(2), 263-280.
  • 16. Aitken RC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc R Soc Med 1969; 62: 989-93. [CrossRef]
  • Cheung, K. C. (2017). The effects of resilience in learning variables on mathematical literacy performance: A study of learning characteristics of the academic resilient and advantaged lowachievers in Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 965-982.
  • 17. Bhattacharyya T, Seng K, Nassif NA, Freedman I. Knee pain after tibial nailing: the role of nail prominence. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: 303-7. [CrossRef]
  • Christensen, L. B., Johnson, R. B. ve Turner, L. A. (2015). Research methods design and analysis. Pearson Education.
  • 18. Duan X, Al-Qwbani M, Zeng Y, Zhang W, Xiang Z. Intramedullary nailing for tibial shaft fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 1: CD008241. [CrossRef]
  • Colwell, J. ve Enderson, M. C. (2016). “When I hear literacy”: Using pre-service teachers' perceptions of mathematical literacy to inform program changes in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 63-74.
  • 19. Hernigou P, Cohen D. Proximal entry for intramedullary nailing of the tibia. The risk of unrecognised articular damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2000; 82: 33-41. [CrossRef]
  • Çalık, M., Ayas, A. ve Ebenezer, J. V. (2005). A review of solution chemistry studies: Insights into students’ conceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(1), 29-50.
  • 20. Devitt AT, Coughlan KA, Ward T, McCormack D, Mulcahy D, Felle P, et al. Patellofemoral contact forces and pressures during intramedullary tibial nailing. Int Orthop 1998; 22: 92-6. [CrossRef]
  • De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. B. L. Madison ve L. A. Steen (Ed.), Quantitative literacy. Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges içinde (s. 75-89). Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
  • 21. Leliveld MS, Verhofstad MH. Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve, a possible cause for anterior knee pain after tibial nailing? Injury 2012; 43:779-83. [CrossRef] 182
  • Demir, E. (2015). Türkiye'de on beş yaş grubu öğrencilerin matematik okuryazarlık becerileri ile ilişkili duyuşsal özellikleri. Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(2), 165 184.
  • Dewantara, A. H., Zulkardi, Z. ve Darmawijoyo, D. (2015). Assessing seventh graders’ mathematical literacy in solving PISA-like tasks. Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(2), 117-128.
  • Dossey, J., McCrone, S., Turner, R. ve Lindquist, M. (2008). PISA 2003 mathematical literacy and learning in the Americas. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8(2), 140-152.
  • Doyle, K. (2007) The teacher, the tasks: Their role in students? Mathematical literacy. J. Watson ve K. Beswick (Eds.), Proceedings 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice içinde (s. 246-254). Hobart: MERGA.
  • Evans, J. (2002). Adults' mathematical thinking and emotions: A study of numerate practice. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Firdaus, F. M., Wahyudin ve Herman, T. (2017). Improving primary students' mathematical literacy through problem based learning and direct instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 212-219.
  • Frith, V. ve Prince, R. (2006). Reflections on the role of a research task for teacher education in data handling in a mathematical literacy education course. Pythagoras, 12, 52-61.
  • Gabriel, F., Signolet, J. ve Westwell, M. (2018). A machine learning approach to investigating the effects of mathematics dispositions on mathematical literacy. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(3), 306-327.
  • Garfunkel, S. A. (2007). Math is more: Toward a national consensus on improving mathematics education. UMAP Journal, 28, 185-190.
  • Gatabi, A. R., Stacey, K. ve Gooya, Z. (2012). Investigating grade nine textbook problems for characteristics related to mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(4), 403-421.
  • Geldenhuys, J. L., Kruger, C. ve Moss, J. (2013). Selected South African grade 10 learners' perceptions of two learning areas: Mathematical literacy and life orientation. Africa Education Review, 10(2), 298-322.
  • Gellert, U. (2004). Didactic material confronted with the concept of mathematical literacy. EducationalStudies in Mathematics, 55(1), 163-179.
  • Goldman, S. R. ve Hasselbring, T. S. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(2), 198- 208.
  • Gül, Ş. ve Sözbilir, M. (2015). Fen ve matematik eğitimi alanında gerçekleştirilen ölçek geliştirme araştırmalarına yönelik tematik içerik analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(178), 85-102.
  • Gülten, D. Ç. (2013). An investigation of pre-service primary mathematics teachers' math literacy selfefficacy beliefs in terms of certain variables. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 393-408.
  • Güneş, G. ve Gökçek, T. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının matematik okuryazarlık düzeylerinin belirlenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 70-79.
  • Hillman, A. M. (2014). A literature review on disciplinary literacy: How do secondary teachers apprentice students into mathematical literacy?. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(5), 397-406.
  • Hoogland, K. (2003). Mathematical literacy and numeracy. Utrecht: APS, National Center for School Improvement.
  • Howie, S. ve Plomp, T. (2002). Mathematical literacy of school leaving pupils in South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(6), 603-615.
  • İskenderoğlu, T. ve Baki, A. (2011). Classification of the questions in an 8th grade mathematics textbook with respect to the competency levels of PISA. Egitim ve Bilim, 36(161), 287-301.
  • Jablonka, E. (2003). Mathematical literacy. A. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick ve F. S. K. Leung (Ed.), Second international handbook of mathematics education içinde (s. 75-102).
  • SpringerNetherlands. Jablonka, E. (2015). The evolvement of numeracy and mathematical literacy curricula and the construction of hierarchies of numerate or mathematically literate subjects. ZDM, 47(4), 599-609.
  • Julie, C. ve Mbekwa, M. (2005). What would grade 8 to 10 learners prefer as context for mathematical literacy? The case of Masilakele secondary school: Research article: Mathematics and science education. Perspectives in Education, 23(1), 31-43.
  • Julie, C. (2006). Teachers' preferred contexts for mathematical literacy as possible initiators for mathematics for action. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 49-58.
  • Jurdak, M. (2016). Learning and teaching real world problem solving in school mathematics: A Multipleperspective framework for crossing the boundary. Springer International Publishing.
  • Jürges, H., Schneider, K., Senkbeil, M. ve Carstensen, C. H. (2012). Assessment drives learning: The effect of central exit exams on curricular knowledge and mathematical literacy. Economics of Education Review, 31(1), 56-65.
  • Kabael, T. ve Barak, B. (2016). Ortaokul matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik okuryazarlık becerilerinin PISA soruları üzerinden incelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 321-349.
  • Kaiser, G. ve Willander, T. (2005). Development of mathematical literacy: Results of an empirical study. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 24(2-3), 48-60.
  • Khaerunisak, K., Kartono, K., Hidayah, I. ve Fahmi, A. Y. (2017). The analysis of diagnostic assessment result in PISA mathematical literacy based on students self-efficacy in RME learning. Infinity Journal, 6(1), 77-94.
  • Kilpatrick, J. (2001). Understanding mathematical literacy: The contribution of research. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 101-116.
  • Kramarski, B. ve Mizrachi, N. (2004). Enhancing mathematical literacy with the use of metacognitive guidance in forum discussion. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 169-176.
  • Kurnaz, M. A. ve Çalık, M. (2009). A thematic review of ‘energy’ teaching studies: Focuses, needs, methods, general knowledge claims and implications. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 1(1), 1-26.
  • Leibowitz, D. (2016). Supporting mathematical literacy development: A case study of the syntax of introductory algebra. Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Research Journal, 2(1), 7-13.
  • Lengnik, K. (2005). Reflecting mathematics: An approach to achieve mathematical literacy. ZDM, 37(3), 246-249.
  • Liang, X. (2010). Assessment use, self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: Comparative analysis of PISA 2003 data of Finland, Canada and the USA. Evaluation & Research in Education, 23(3), 213-229.
  • Lutzer, C. V. (2005). Fostering mathematical literacy. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 15(1), 1-6.
  • Lydia, L. O. ve Wilson, M. (2009). Gender differences and similarities in PISA 2003 mathematics: A comparison between the United States and Hong Kong. International Journal of Testing, 9(1), 20-40.
  • Machaba, F. ve Mwakapenda, W. (2017). Implications of differences and similarities of mathematics and mathematical literacy. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 17(1-3), 148-160.
  • Matteson, S. M. (2006). Mathematical literacy and standardized mathematical assessments. Reading Psychology, 27(2-3), 205-233.
  • Mbekwa, M. (2006). Teachers' views on mathematical literacy and on their experiences as students of the course. Pythagoras, 2006(63), 22-29.
  • McCrone, S. S. ve Dossey, J. A. (2007). Mathematical literacy-it’s become fundamental. Principal Leadership, 7(5), 32-37.
  • Meaney, T. (2007). Weighing up the influence of context on judgements of mathematical literacy. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 681-704.
  • Memnun, D. S., Akkaya, R. ve Hacıömeroğlu, G. (2012). The effect of prospective teachers' problem solving beliefs on self-efficacy beliefs about mathematical literacy. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (Online), 9(4), 289-298.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2017). Ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara:Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  • Mosher, C. A. (2015). Curriculum redesign with an emphasis on mathematical literacy in an 8th grade function unit (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). University of New York College, New York.
  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, Va: National Council of Mathematics Teachers.
  • Nel, B. (2012). Transformation of teacher identity through a mathematical literacy re-skilling programme. South African Journal of Education, 32(2), 144-154.
  • Niss, M. (2003). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education içinde (s. 115-124).
  • OECD. (1999).Measuring student knowledge and skills. A new framework for assesment. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 assesment framework - mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2006). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy. A framework for PISA 2006. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2009). PISA 2009 assesment framework. Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework. Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. Science, reading, mathematics and financial literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/b25efab8-en Ojose, B. (2011). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use? Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 89-100.
  • Oktiningrum, W., Zulkardi, Z. ve Hartono, Y. (2016). Developing PISA-like mathematics task with indonesia natural and cultural heritage as context to assess students’ mathematical literacy. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7, 1-8.
  • Ormancı, U., Çepni, S., Deveci, I. ve Aydin, O. (2015). A thematic review of interactive whiteboard use in science education: Rationales, purposes, methods and general knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 532-548.
  • Özgen, K. (2013a). Self-efficacy beliefs in mathematical literacy and connections between mathematics and real world: The case of high school students. Journal of International Education Research, 9(4),305.
  • Özgen, K. (2013b). An analysis of high school students’ mathematical literacy self-efficacy beliefs in relation to their learning styles. The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, 22(1), 91-100.
  • Özgen, K. (2015). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik okuryazarlığına yönelik öz yeterlik inançları. Elektronik Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(4), 1-12.
  • Özgen, K. ve Bindak, R. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığına yönelik öz-yeterlik inançlarının belirlenmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 11(2), 1073-1089.
  • Özgen, K. ve Kutluca, T. (2013). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının matematik okuryazarlığına yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5(10), 1-22.
  • Pope, C., Ziebland, S. ve Mays, N. (2000). Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320(7227), 114-116.
  • Pugalee, D. K. (1999). Constructing a model of mathematical literacy. The Clearing House, 73(1), 19-22.
  • Ross, S. (2008). Motivation correlates of academic achievement: Exploring how motivation influences academic achievement in the PISA 2003 dataset (Yayımlanmamısş doktora tezi). University of Victoria, Canada.
  • Saenz, C. (2009). The role of contextual, conceptual and procedural knowledge in activating mathematical competencies (PISA). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(2), 123-143.
  • Sari, F. A., Yandari, I. A. V. ve Fakhrudin. (2017). The application of problem based learning model to improve mathematical literacy skill and the independent learning of student. Journal of Physics:Conference Series, 812(1), 1-6.
  • Sari, R. H. N. ve Wijaya, A. (2017). Mathematical literacy of senior high school students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 100-107.
  • Satıcı, K. (2008). PISA 2003 sonuçlarına göre matematik okuryazarlığını belirleyen faktörler: Türkiye ve Hong Kong-Çin (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Balıkesir Üniversitesi, Balıkesir.
  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children: Issues of standards, testing, and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
  • Solomon, Y. (2009). Mathematical literacy. Developing identities of inclusion (1. bs.). New York: Routledge.
  • Spangenberg, E. D. (2012). Thinking styles of mathematics and mathematical literacy learners: Implications for subject choice. Pythagoras, 33(3), 1-12.
  • Stacey, K. (2015). The real world and the mathematical world. K. Stacey ve R. Turner (Ed.), Assessing mathematical literacy: The PISA experience içinde (s. 57-84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  • Steen, L. A., Turner, R. ve Burkhardt, H. (2007). Developing mathematical literacy. W. Blum., P. L.
  • Galbraith, H. W. Henn ve M. Niiss (Ed.), Modelling and applications in mathematics education içinde (s. 285-294). New York: Springer.
  • Sümen, Ö. Ö. ve Çalışıcı, H. (2016). The relationships between preservice teachers’ mathematical literacy self efficacy beliefs, metacognitive awareness and problem solving skills [Özel sayı]. Participatory Educational Research (PER), 3(5), 11-19.
  • Şefik, Ö. ve Dost, Ş. (2016). Secondary preservice mathematics teachers' views on mathematical literacy. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 320-338.
  • Tai, W. C. ve Lin, S. W. (2015). Relationship between problem-solving style and mathematical literacy. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(11), 1480.
  • Tarım, K., Baypınar, K. ve Keklik, G. (2015). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinin matematik okuryazarlığı özyeterlik düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(21), 846-870.
  • Thompson, D. R. ve Chappell, M. F. (2007). Communication and representation as elements in mathematical literacy. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(2), 179-196.
  • Ultay, N. ve Çalık, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(6), 686-701.
  • Uysal, E. ve Yenilmez, K. (2011). The mathematics literacy level of eighth grade students. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 1-15.
  • Uzun, Ö. ve Yenilmez, K. (2016). İktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültesi ögrencilerinin matematik okuryazarlığı özyeterliklerinin incelenmesi: ESOGÜ İİBF öğrencileri örneği. Eskisehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(1), 71.
  • Ünal, S., Çalık, M., Ayas, A. ve Coll, R. K. (2006). A review of chemical bonding studies: Needs, aims, methods of exploring students’ conceptions, general knowledge claims and students’ alternative conceptions. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24(2), 141-172.
  • Venkat, H., Graven, M., Lampen, E., Nalube, P., & Chitera, N. (2009). 'Reasoning and reflecting'in mathematical literacy. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 2009(7), 47-53.
  • Verster, M. (2009). Creating an online learning ecology in support of mathematical literacy teachers. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 5(5), 85-100.
  • Vithal, R. (2006). Developing mathematical literacy through project work: A teacher/teaching perspective. Pythagoras, 12, 37-44.
  • Wood, B. (2007). The impact of students’ skills in self-regulated learning on mathematics literacy and problem solving scales as measured by PISA 2003: A comparison of the United States and Finland (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). California State University, Long Beach, the USA.
  • Yavuz, G., Günhan, G., Ersoy, E. ve Narlı, S. (2013). Self-efficacy beliefs of prospective primary mathematics teachers about mathematical literacy. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 10(4), 279-288.
  • Yenilmez, K. (2011). Matematik öğretmeni adaylarının matematik tarihi dersine ilişkin düşünceleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(30), 79-90
APA Kozaklı T, Kekeç A, BOZKURT I, Bozgeyik B, Altun M (2020). Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. , 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
Chicago Kozaklı Tuğçe,Kekeç Ahmet Fevzi,BOZKURT Işıl,Bozgeyik Bilgin,Altun Murat Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. (2020): 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
MLA Kozaklı Tuğçe,Kekeç Ahmet Fevzi,BOZKURT Işıl,Bozgeyik Bilgin,Altun Murat Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. , 2020, ss.1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
AMA Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. . 2020; 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
Vancouver Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. . 2020; 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
IEEE Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M "Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi." , ss.1 - 37, 2020. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
ISNAD Kozaklı, Tuğçe vd. "Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi". (2020), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8028
APA Kozaklı T, Kekeç A, BOZKURT I, Bozgeyik B, Altun M (2020). Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 25(3), 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
Chicago Kozaklı Tuğçe,Kekeç Ahmet Fevzi,BOZKURT Işıl,Bozgeyik Bilgin,Altun Murat Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim 25, no.3 (2020): 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
MLA Kozaklı Tuğçe,Kekeç Ahmet Fevzi,BOZKURT Işıl,Bozgeyik Bilgin,Altun Murat Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim, vol.25, no.3, 2020, ss.1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
AMA Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2020; 25(3): 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
Vancouver Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi. Eğitim ve Bilim. 2020; 25(3): 1 - 37. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
IEEE Kozaklı T,Kekeç A,BOZKURT I,Bozgeyik B,Altun M "Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi." Eğitim ve Bilim, 25, ss.1 - 37, 2020. 10.15390/EB.2020.8028
ISNAD Kozaklı, Tuğçe vd. "Matematik Öğrenme-Öğretme Sürecinde Matematik Okuryazarlığına Odaklanan Makalelerin Tematik Analizi". Eğitim ve Bilim 25/3 (2020), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8028
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
17-04-2024 15:51

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları