Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 35 - 37 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2020
Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy
Öz: Objective: We aimed to report the consistency between transrectal needle biopsy (TRNB) Gleason scores (GSs) and prostatectomy specimen GSsbased on upgrading and downgrading rates.Materials and Methods: Data of patients who underwent open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with the diagnosis of prostatecancer between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.Results: Two hundred and fifty two patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 61.9±6.1 years. The mean serum prostatespecificantigen (PSA) TRNB was 9±5.3 ng/dL. The distribution of TRNB GSs was as follows: G6 (3+3)=178, G7 (3+4)=21, G7 (4+3)=48, G8 (4+4)=1,G9 (4+5)=9. According to the final pathology result after radical prostatectomy, GSs were as follows: G6 (3+3)=141, G7 (3+4)=25, G7 (4+3)=74, G8(4+4)=3, G9 (4+5)=8. Prostate cancer was limited to prostate in 220 patients and extracapsular spread was observed in 32 patients. There was seminalvesicle invasion in 24 patients and perineural invasion in 49 patients. When TRNB GSs and prostatectomy specimen GSs were compared, 57 (22.6%)patients were upgraded and nine (3.6%) patients had downgrading. The preoperative PSA of the patients undergoing upgrading were significantlyhigher than those without upgrading, 10.7+6.2 ng/dL versus 8.5+4.9 ng/dL, p=0.018. The age and body mass index of the upgrading and nonupgradedpatients were similar, p=0.598 and p=0.133, respectively.Conclusion: Upgrading in the final pathology assessment after radical prostatectomy is still an important problem for clinicians today. It may bebeneficial to develop biopsy sampling techniques for accurate grading of the disease and to use radiological imaging for this purpose.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- 1. Bekelman JE, Rumble RB, Freedland SJ. Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Endorsement of an AUA/ ASTRO/SUO Guideline Summary. J Oncol Pract 2018;14:618-624.
- 2. D’Elia C, Cerruto MA, Cioffi A, Novella G, Cavalleri S, Artibani W. Upgrading and upstaging in prostate cancer: From prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy. Mol Clin Oncol 2014;2:1145-1149.
- 3. Athanazio D, Gotto G, Shea-Budgell M, Yilmaz A, Trpkov K. Global Gleason grade groups in prostate cancer: concordance of biopsy and radical prostatectomy grades and predictors of upgrade and downgrade. Histopathology 2017;70:1098-1106.
- 4. Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB, Egevad LL; ISUP Grading Committee. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2005;29:1228-1242.
- 5. Corcoran NM, Hong MK, Casey RG, et al. Upgrade in Gleason score between prostate biopsies and pathology following radical prostatectomy significantly impacts upon the risk of biochemical recurrence. BJU Int 2011;108:E202-210.
- 6. Henderickx MMEL, Brits T, Muilwijk T, Adams T, Vandeursen H. Localized prostate cancer and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective, comparative study between pre- and post-operative Gleason scores. Acta Chir Belg 2018;118:15-20.
- 7. de Cobelli O, Terracciano D, Tagliabue E, et al. Body mass index was associated with upstaging and upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who met the inclusion criteria for active surveillance. Urol Oncol 2015;33:201.e1-8.
- 8. Dinh KT, Mahal BA, Ziehr DR, et al. Incidence and Predictors of Upgrading and Up Staging among 10,000 Contemporary Patients with Low Risk Prostate Cancer. J Urol 2015;194:343-349.
- 9. Maurice MJ, Sundi D, Schaeffer EM, Abouassaly R. Risk of Pathological Upgrading and Up Staging among Men with Low Risk Prostate Cancer Varies by Race: Results from the National Cancer Database. J Urol 2017;197:627-631.
- 10. Park HJ, Ha YS, Park SY, et al. Incidence of upgrading and upstaging in patients with low-volume Gleason score 3+4 prostate cancers at biopsy: finding a new group eligible for active surveillance. Urol Int 2013;90:301-305.
- 11. Sfoungaristos S, Katafigiotis I, Perimenis P. The role of PSA density to predict a pathological tumour upgrade between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy for low risk clinical prostate cancer in the modified Gleason system era. Can Urol Assoc J 2013;7:E722-27.
- 12. Oh JJ, Park S, Lee SE, et al. The use of exome genotyping to predict pathological Gleason score upgrade after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients. PLoS One 2014;9:e104146.
| APA | GUNER E, Şimşek A (2020). Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. , 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| Chicago | GUNER EKREM,Şimşek Abdulmuttalip Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. (2020): 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| MLA | GUNER EKREM,Şimşek Abdulmuttalip Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. , 2020, ss.35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| AMA | GUNER E,Şimşek A Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. . 2020; 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| Vancouver | GUNER E,Şimşek A Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. . 2020; 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| IEEE | GUNER E,Şimşek A "Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy." , ss.35 - 37, 2020. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| ISNAD | GUNER, EKREM - Şimşek, Abdulmuttalip. "Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy". (2020), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| APA | GUNER E, Şimşek A (2020). Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, 19(1), 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| Chicago | GUNER EKREM,Şimşek Abdulmuttalip Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni 19, no.1 (2020): 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| MLA | GUNER EKREM,Şimşek Abdulmuttalip Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni, vol.19, no.1, 2020, ss.35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| AMA | GUNER E,Şimşek A Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni. 2020; 19(1): 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| Vancouver | GUNER E,Şimşek A Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy. Üroonkoloji Bülteni. 2020; 19(1): 35 - 37. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| IEEE | GUNER E,Şimşek A "Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy." Üroonkoloji Bülteni, 19, ss.35 - 37, 2020. 10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
| ISNAD | GUNER, EKREM - Şimşek, Abdulmuttalip. "Preoperative and Postoperative Gleason Score Correlation of Patients Who Underwent Radical Prostatectomy". Üroonkoloji Bülteni 19/1 (2020), 35-37. https://doi.org/10.4274/uob.galenos.2019.1338 |
