The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements

İlknur ACAR ATA, (Konya Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Konya, Türkiye)
Mehmet Emin BAŞAR (Konya Teknik Üniversitesi, Mimarlık Fakültesi, Konya, Türkiye)
ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning
0 0
Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 251 - 285 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2020

The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements

Öz:
The population exchange between Turkey and Greece was decided in1923 as a result of Lausanne Treaty. By this decision, non-Muslim Greeksliving in Turkey and Muslim Turks living in Greece were mandatorymutual migration. The immigrants left their architectural heritage thatwas built with cultural, ethnic and faith values in the settlements wherethey were born and grew. Many religious structures (churches,monasteries, chapels), civil buildings (housing, education, health, trade,accommodation, social), technical and economic structures (mills, ovens,bridges, fountain) remained after Greek-Turkish population exchange invarious regions of Turkey.Besides to being the witness to history each of the original heritagestructures that reflect Greek immigrants’ economic, social conditions,cultural wealth and belief have architectural tourism potentials. Withinthe scope of the study, the architectural tourism potentials were evaluated by selecting the Uluagac Greek School, Fertek Church, HancerliLaundry and Church Fountain as a sample among the different buildinggroups located in the Uluagac, Fertek and Hancerli settlements locatedin Nigde/Turkey. The analyzes for the selected buildings were conductedaccording to the determinants of architectural tourism potential(architectural and environmental factors, targeted tourist).The dataobtained from the analysis were synthesized architectural tourism withcultural, ethnic, religious and ancestral tourism and suggestions weredeveloped.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ağanoğlu, H. Y. (2001). Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Balkanların Makus Talihi, Göç. In. İstanbul: Kum Saati Yay.
  • Arı, K. (2008). Büyük Mübadele Türkiye’ye Zorunlu Göç 1923- 1925,. In (pp. 166). İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları.
  • Ata, İ. A. (2017). Mübadelenin mimari tanıkları: Niğde Yeşilburç (Tenei) Köyü Fatma-İbrahim Oral Konağı örneği. (Master Thesis), Selcuk University,
  • Brown, B. B., & Perkins, D. D. (1992). Disruptions in place attachment. In Place attachment (pp. 279-304): Springer.
  • Cetin, M. (2015). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: a case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu.
  • International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(6), 490–495.
  • Chen, C. F., & Chen, F. S. (2010). Experience quality, perceived value, satisfaction and behavioral intentions for heritage tourists. Tourism Management, 31(1), 29–35.
  • Chhabra, D., Healy, R., & Sills, E. (2003). Staged authenticity and heritage tourism. Annals of tourism research, 30(3), 702- 719.
  • Cohen, E. (1972). Towards a Sociology of International Tourism. Social Research, 39(1), 164-182.
  • Cohen, E. (1974). Who is a Tourist? A Conceptual Clarification. Sociological Review, 22(4), 527–555.
  • Dinçer, F. (2008). Fertek tarihine ekistik bir yaklaşım. Retrieved from http://blog.milliyet.com.tr/fertek-tarihine-ekistikbir- yaklasim/Blog/?BlogNo=92403: [01.12.2018]
  • Du Cros, H. (2001). A new model to assist in planning for sustainable cultural heritage tourism. International journal of tourism research, 3(2), 165-170.
  • Dümcke, C., & Gnedovsky, M. (2013). The social and economic value of cultural heritage: literature review. EENC paper, 1-114.
  • E. Lowyck, Langenhove, L. V., & Bollaert, L. (1992). Typologies of tourist roles. In s (eds) Choice and Demand in Tourism (pp. 13–32). . In P. J. a. B. Thoma (Ed.), Choice and Demand in Tourism (pp. 13-32). London: Mansell Publishing.
  • Ebadi, M. (2014). Typologies of the visitors at Khaled Nabi shrine, Iran: tourists or pilgrims? International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(3), 310-321.
  • Ekiz, M. (2015). Niğde İli ve İlçeleri Arkeolojik Yüzey Araştırması 2015 Raporu. Retrieved from
  • Enlil, Z., Dinçer, İ., Evren, Y., & Seçkin, E. (2011). İstanbul’da Kültür Turizmi İçin Yenilikçi Stratejiler, İstanbul: . İstanbul İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Erkal, N. (2007). Gösteri Olarak Mimarlık: Turizmin Güncel Mimarlığa Etkileri Üzerine. Mimarlık Dergisi, 336
  • Eryaman, M. (2013). Uluağaç Köyü (Niğde). Kapadokya Yazıları Retrieved from http://www.cappadociaexplorer.com/d etay.php?id=988&cid=172: [09.08.2018]
  • Feilden, B. (2007). Conservation of historic buildings: Routledge. Flores, L. F. B. N. (1995). Mémoires migrantes: Migration et idéologie de la mémoire sociale. Ethnologie française, 43- 50.
  • Franklin, A. (2003). Tourism: An introduction. London: Sage Publications.
  • Gabriel, A. (1962). Niğde Tarihi. Ankara: Bengi Matbaası. Gedik, İ. (1997). “Niğde Tarihi”. Ankara: Niğde Valiliği Yayını.
  • Halewood, C., & Hannam, K. (2001). Viking heritage tourism: Authenticity and commodification. Annals of tourism research, 28(3), 565-580.
  • Harrison, R. (2010). What is heritage. Understanding the politics of heritage, 5-42.
  • Henderson, J. C. (2003). Managing tourism and Islam in peninsular Malaysia. Tourism Management, 24(4), 447-456.
  • Holden, A. (2007). Environment and Tourism (2 ed.): Taylor & Francis.
  • Hudman, L. E., & Jackson, R. H. (2003). Geography of Travel & Tourism (4th Edition ed.). NY: Thomson Delmar Learning.
  • İncedayı, D. (2007). Madalyonun Ters Yüzünde Mimarlık. Mimarlık Dergisi, 336.
  • Jokilehto, J. (2007). History of architectural conservation: Routledge.
  • Khodeir, L. M., Aly, D., & Tarek, S. (2016). Integrating HBIM (Heritage Building Information Modeling) Tools in the Application of Sustainable Retrofitting of Heritage Buildings in Egypt. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 34, 258-270.
  • Kiracı, M. (2006). Cumhuriyet Döneminin İlk Göçü: Türk- Yunan Nüfus Mübadelesi. (Yüksek lisans), Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Edirne.
  • Lewis, R. C. (1993). Hospitality Management Education: Here Today, Gone Tomorrow? Hospitality Research Joumal, 17, 273-783.
  • Macdonald, S. (2006). Undesirable heritage: Fascist material culture and historical consciousness in Nuremberg. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(1), 9–28.
  • Meskell, L. (2009). Talking of human rights: Histories, heritages, and human remains. Reviews in Anthropology, 38(4), 308- 326.
  • Murphy, P. E. (1985). Tourism: A Community Approach. . London: Routledge.
  • NiğdeValiliği. (2016). Niğde Culture Inventory 2016. Niğde.
  • Nuryanti, W. (1996). Heritage and Postmodern Tourism. Annals of Tourirm Research, 23(2), 249-260.
  • Orbasli, A. (2008). Architectural conservation: principles and practice.
  • Orbaşlı, A. (2000). Tourists in Historic Towns. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Özkan, S. (2007). 1923 Tarihli Türk-Rum Nüfus Mübadelesinin Niğde’nin Demografik Yapısına Etkisi. TÜBAR, XXI, 169- 178.
  • Parman, E. (1988). Niğde Çevre Araştırmaları Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 123-148.
  • Pekak, S. (1999). 18.-19. Yüzyıllarda Niğde ve Çevresinde Hıristiyan Dini Mimarisi (K. B. M. K. Basımevi Ed. Vol. 1). Tarsus: Kültür Bakanlığı Anıtlar ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü.
  • Perreault, W. D., Darden, D. K., & Darden, W. R. (1977). A Psychographic Classification of Vacation Life Styles. Journal of Leisure Research, 9(3), 208-224.
  • Plog, S. (1972). Why destination areas rise and fall in popularity. Paper presented at the Southern California Chapter of the Travel Research Association.
  • Poria, Y., Butler, R., & Airey, D. (2003). The core of heritage tourism. Annals of tourism research, 30(1), 238-254.
  • Prentice, R. (1993). Tourism and heritage attractions: Routledge.
  • Ray, N. M., & McCain, G. (2009). Guiding tourists to their ancestral homes. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 3(4), 296-305.
  • Richards, G. (2007). Cultural Tourism: Global and local perspectives: Psychology Press.
  • Riegel, A. (1996). The modern cult of monuments: its essence and its development. Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage (Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute,), 69-83.
  • Selamoğlu, E. (2011). Karamanlıların Niğde’si. Paper presented at the 1. Uluslarası Nevşehir Tarih ve Kültür Sempozyumu, Nevşehir.
  • Sepetçioğlu, T. E. (2007). Cumhuriyetin İlk Yıllarında Girit'ten Söke'ye Mübadele Öyküleri. (Master Thesis), TC Adnan Menderes University,
  • Smith, S. L. J. (1990). A test of Plog’s allocentric/psychocentric model: Evidence fromseven nations. Journal of Travel Research, 28(4), 40-43.
  • Smith, V. L. (1977). Hosts and Guests: The Anthropology of Tourism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  • Strabon. Antik Anadolu Coğrafyası. İstanbul: Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları.
  • TürkiyeKültürPortalı. Niğde Kültür Envanteri. Retrieved from https://www.kulturportali.gov.tr/turkiye/nigde/kulture nvanteri/fertek-hamami: [01.08.2018]
  • Uysal, M., & Mcdonald, C. D. (1989). Visitor Segmentation By Trip Index. Journal of Travel Research, 27(3), 38–42.
  • Yang, L., Wall, G., & Smith, S. L. (2008). Ethnic tourism development:: Chinese Government Perspectives. Annals of tourism research, 35(3), 751-771.
  • Yavaşcan, E. E. (2018). Kapadokya Bölgesi, Niğde İli, Fertek Köyü’nde Yer Alan Fertek Evi’nin Belgelenmesi ve Koruma Sorunları. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(1), 451-464.
  • Zeppel, H., & Hall, C. M. (1991). Selling art and history: cultural heritage and tourism. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(1), 29- 45.
APA peng x, Başar M (2019). The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. , 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
Chicago peng xueni,Başar Mehmet Emin The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. (2019): 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
MLA peng xueni,Başar Mehmet Emin The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. , 2019, ss.251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
AMA peng x,Başar M The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. . 2019; 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
Vancouver peng x,Başar M The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. . 2019; 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
IEEE peng x,Başar M "The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements." , ss.251 - 285, 2019. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
ISNAD peng, xueni - Başar, Mehmet Emin. "The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements". (2019), 251-285. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
APA peng x, Başar M (2019). The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 7(1), 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
Chicago peng xueni,Başar Mehmet Emin The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 7, no.1 (2019): 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
MLA peng xueni,Başar Mehmet Emin The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, vol.7, no.1, 2019, ss.251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
AMA peng x,Başar M The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2019; 7(1): 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
Vancouver peng x,Başar M The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements. ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning. 2019; 7(1): 251 - 285. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
IEEE peng x,Başar M "The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements." ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning, 7, ss.251 - 285, 2019. 10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
ISNAD peng, xueni - Başar, Mehmet Emin. "The Evaluation of Architectural Tourism Potentials of Greek Heritage Structures Remained after the Population Exchange in Niğde’s Settlements". ICONARP International Journal Of Architecture And Planning 7/1 (2019), 251-285. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.75
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 13:44

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları