Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 367 - 372 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20111 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2020

Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging

Öz:
Objective: The prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) is an accessory tool when suspecting prostate cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate has a high rate of false negatives. The aim of this study is to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) when adding the PSAD and negative or equivocal mpMRI.Material and methods: A retrospective study that included prostate biopsies performed using a transperineal approach and guided by ultrasound between 2015 and 2019 was conducted. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as Gleason score ≥3+4. The population was divided into groups according to the PSAD level-≤0.15 and >0.15. Sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of mpMRI were calculated.Results: A total of 292 patients were included; 12.1% (4/33 patients) of the negative mpMRI group presented csPCa, and only 7 in the equivocal mpMRI group presented csPCa. NPV and sensitivity were 91.15% and 90.5%, respectively. In the positive mpMRI group, 53.7% (96/179) had csPCa, with a PPV of 53.6% and specificity of 55.3%. Of the patients with PSAD ≤0.15, 23 (16.54%) presented csPCa. All of them presented a positive mpMRI. All patients with a negative or equivocal mpMRI and a PSAD ≤0.15 presented a clinically non-significant tumor or benign result. The addition of this tool to mpMRI resulted in 100% sensitivity, 69% specificity, and 34.8% PPV.Conclusion: In our series, PSAD ≤0.15 increased the NPV in negative or equivocal mpMRI, and through this unnecessary prostate biopsies could be avoided.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Center MM, Jemal A, Lortet-Tieulent J, Ward E, Ferlay J, Brawley O, et al. International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates. Eur Urol 2012;61:1079-92. [Crossref]
  • 2. Roobol MJ, Kranse R, Bangma CH, van Leenders AG, Blijenberg BG, van Schaik RH, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2013;64:530-9. [Crossref]
  • 3. Pokorny MR, De Rooij M, Duncan E, Schröder FH, Parkinson R, Barentsz JO, et al. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2014;66:22-9. [Crossref]
  • 4. Rosario DJ, Lane JA, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, Doble A, Goodwin L, et al. Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study. BMJ 2012;344:d7894. [Crossref]
  • 5. Ramon J, Boccon-Gibod L, Billebaud T, Astier L, Kobelinsky M, Meulemans A, et al. Prostate-specific antigen density: a means to enhance detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 1994;25:288-94; discussion 304. [Crossref]
  • 6. Mueller EJ, Coventry J, Desmond PM, Zeidman EJ, Thompson IM. Relative performance characteristics of prostate specific antigen and prostatic specific antigen density for the diagnosis of carcinoma of the prostate. Urol Oncol 1995;1:84-7. [Crossref]
  • 7. Van den Bergh RCN, Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, Roobol W, Schröder FH, Bangma CH. Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 2007;52:1560-3. [Crossref]
  • 8. Akdas A, Tarcan T, Türkeri L, Cevik I, Biren T, Ilker Y. The impact of prostate- specific antigen density in predicting prostate cancer when serum prostate- specific antigen levels are less than 10 ng/ml. Eur Urol 1996;29:189-92.
  • 9. De Castro HAS, Iared W, Santos JEM, Solha RS, Shigueoka DC, Ajzen SA. Contribution of PSA density in the prediction of prostate cancer in patients with PSA values between 2.6 and 10.0 ng/ml. Radiol Bras 2011;44:205-9. [Crossref]
  • 10. Quentin M, Blondin D, Arsov C, Schimmöller L, Hiester A, Godehardt E, et al. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naive men with elevated prostate specific antigen. J Urol 2014;192:1374-9. [Crossref]
  • 11. de Rooij M, Hamoen EH, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta- analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:343-51. [Crossref]
  • 12. Ahmed HU, El-Shater Bosaily A, Brown LC, Gabe R, Kaplan R, Parmar MK, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 2017;389:815-22. [Crossref]
  • 13. Renard-Penna R, Mozer P, Cornud F, Barry-Delongchamps N, Bruguière E, Portalez D, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System and Likert Scoring System: Multiparametric MR Imaging Validation Study to Screen Patients for Initial Biopsy. Radiology 2015;275:458-68. [Crossref]
  • 14. Panebianco V, Barchetti G, Simone G, Del Monte M, Ciardi A, Grompone MD, et al. Negative multipara- metric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: what’s next? Eur Urol 2018;74:48-54. [Crossref]
  • 15. Contreras P, Blas L, Mieggi M, Ríos Pita H, Vitagliano G, Amer Ci. Resonancia multiparamétrica y biopsia prostática por vía transrectal dirigida por estimación visual. Nuestra experiencia en 150 casos. Rev Arg de Urol 2017;82:102-7.
  • 16. Washino S, Okochi T, Saito K, Konishi T, Hirai M, Kobayashi Y, et al. Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (Pi-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients. BJU Int 2017;119:225-33. [Crossref]
  • 17. Martorana E, Pirola GM, Scialpi M, Micali S, Iseppi A, Bonetti LR, et al. G. Lesion volume predicts prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness: validation of its value alone and matched with prostate imaging reporting and data system score. BJU Int 2017;120:92-103. [Crossref]
  • 18. Scialpi M, Martorana E, Aisa MC, Rondoni V, D'Andrea A, Bianchi G. Score 3 prostate lesions: a gray zone for PI-RADS v2. Turk J Urol 2017;43:237-40. [Crossref]
  • 19. Scialpi M, Martorana E, Scialpi P, D’Andrea A, Torre R, Di Blasi A, et al. Round table: arguments in supporting abbreviated or biparametric MRI of the prostata protocol. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02510-w. [Crossref]
  • 20. Scialpi M, Aisa MC, D'Andrea A, Martorana E. Simplified Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Biparametric Prostate MRI: A Proposal. Am J Roentgenol 2018;211:379-82. [Crossref]
  • 21. van der Sar ECA, Kasivisvanathan V, Brizmohun M, Freeman A, Punwani S, Hamoudi R, et al. Management of radiologically indeterminate magnetic resonance imaging signals in men at risk of prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2019;5:62-8. [Crossref]
  • 22. Gómez Rivas J, Giganti F, Álvarez-Maestro M, Freire MJ, Kasivisvanathan V, Martinez-Piñeiro L, et al. Prostate inde- terminate lesions on magnetic resonance imaging-biopsy versus surveillance: a literature review. Eur Urol Focus 2018;5:799-806. [Crossref]
  • 23. Veneziano S, Pavlica P, Compagnone G, Martorana G. Usefulness of the (F/T)/PSA density ratio to detect prostate cancer. Urol Int 2005;74:13-8. [Crossref]
  • 24. Jue JS, Barboza MP, Prakash NS, Venkatramani V, Sinha VR, Pavan N, et al. Re-examining Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) density: defining the optimal psa range and patients for using psa density to predict prostate cancer using extended template biopsy. Urology 2017;105:123-8. [Crossref]
  • 25. Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Shinojima T, Miyajima A, Kikuchi E, Tanaka N, et al. The implications of prostate- specific antigen density to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men ≤ 50 years. Am J Clin Exp Urol 2014;2:332-6.
  • 26. Bastian PJ, Mangold LA, Epstein JI, Partin AW. Characteristics of insignificant clinical T1c prostate tumors - A contemporary analysis. Cancer 2004;101:2001-5. [Crossref]
  • 27. Kundu SD, Roehl KA, Yu X, Antenor JAV, Suarez BK, Catalona WJ. Prostate specific antigen density correlates with features of prostate cancer aggressiveness. J Urol 2007;177:505-9. [Crossref]
  • 28. Corcoran NM, Casey RG, Hong MK, Pedersen J, Connolly S, Peters J, et al. The ability of prostate- specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume. BJU Int 2012;110:36-42. [Crossref]
  • 29. Partin AW, Carter HB, Chan DW, Epstein JI, Oesterling JE, Rock RC, et al. Prostate specific antigen in the staging of localized prostate cancer: infl uence of tumor differentiation, tumor volume and benign hyperplasia. J Urol 1990;143:747. [Crossref]
APA Rico L, Contreras P, Vitagliano G, RIOS PITA H, Ameri C, Blas L (2020). Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
Chicago Rico Luis,Contreras Pablo,Vitagliano Gonzalo,RIOS PITA HERNANDO,Ameri Carlos,Blas Leandro Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. (2020): 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
MLA Rico Luis,Contreras Pablo,Vitagliano Gonzalo,RIOS PITA HERNANDO,Ameri Carlos,Blas Leandro Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. , 2020, ss.367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
AMA Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. . 2020; 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
Vancouver Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. . 2020; 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
IEEE Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L "Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging." , ss.367 - 372, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
ISNAD Rico, Luis vd. "Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging". (2020), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20111
APA Rico L, Contreras P, Vitagliano G, RIOS PITA H, Ameri C, Blas L (2020). Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(5), 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
Chicago Rico Luis,Contreras Pablo,Vitagliano Gonzalo,RIOS PITA HERNANDO,Ameri Carlos,Blas Leandro Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Urology 46, no.5 (2020): 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
MLA Rico Luis,Contreras Pablo,Vitagliano Gonzalo,RIOS PITA HERNANDO,Ameri Carlos,Blas Leandro Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.46, no.5, 2020, ss.367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
AMA Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(5): 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
Vancouver Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(5): 367 - 372. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
IEEE Rico L,Contreras P,Vitagliano G,RIOS PITA H,Ameri C,Blas L "Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging." Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, ss.367 - 372, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.20111
ISNAD Rico, Luis vd. "Value of prostate-specific antigen density in negative or equivocal lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging". Turkish Journal of Urology 46/5 (2020), 367-372. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20111