Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 5 Sayfa Aralığı: 354 - 359 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20121 İndeks Tarihi: 10-10-2020

Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?

Öz:
Objective: Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is heterogeneous, and variant histologies (VH) are more frequent than initially reported. Reporting VH is recommended by several guidelines because of prognostic and therapeutic implications. We evaluated the concordance of VH between the first transurethral resections of the bladder (TURBs) and the following radical cystectomy (RC). This paper is the first to compare VH with a central pathology review between TURB and RC.Material and methods: In this retrospective study, we only included those patients who underwent TURB with VH and then RC between 01/2010 and 12/2013 at our institution. The presence of VH in both TURB and RC was assessed and compared according to the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification by a central pathology review.Results: Among 110 patients who had the initial TURB/RC, 54 (49.1%) were diagnosed with VH, 48 (43%) had a single pattern, and six had (5%) multiple histological patterns. Squamous differentiation was the most common single VH (31%). Twenty patients with UC (18%) showed discordance between TURB and RC, especially in micropapillary versus nested (n=3) cases. Concordant histology between TURB/RC was seen in 82% of the cases.Conclusion: Discrepancies can be seen between TURB and RC when reporting VH, which can be problematic for selection of therapy and management. TURB alone might be insufficient to evaluate the presence of VH, especially in VH with heavy therapeutic implications, such as micropapillary carcinomas. Nevertheless, concordance with a central review by an experienced uropathologist when applying the WHO 2016 classification is 82%.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Amin MB. Histological variants of urothelial carcinoma: diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic implications. Mod Pathol Off J U S Can Acad Pathol Inc 2009;22(Suppl 2):S96-118. [Crossref]
  • 2. Willis DL, Fernandez MI, Dickstein RJ, Parikh S, Shah JB, Pisters LL, et al. Clinical outcomes of cT1 micropapillary bladder cancer. J Urol 2015;193:1129-34. [Crossref]
  • 3. Seiler R, Ashab HAD, Erho N, van Rhijn BWG, Winters B, Douglas J, et al. Impact of Molecular Subtypes in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer on Predicting Response and Survival after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol 2017;72:544-54. [Crossref]
  • 4. Moschini M, Soria F, Klatte T, Wirth GJ, Özsoy M, Gust K, et al. Validation of Preoperative Risk Grouping of the Selection of Before Radical Cystectomy. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017;15:e267-73. [Crossref]
  • 5. Sangoi AR, Beck AH, Amin MB, Cheng L, Epstein JI, Hansel DE, et al. Interobserver reproducibility in the diagnosis of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the urinary tract among urologic pathologists. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:1367-76. [Crossref]
  • 6. Shah RB, Montgomery JS, Montie JE, Kunju LP. Variant (divergent) histologic differentiation in urothelial carcinoma is under-recognized in community practice: impact of mandatory central pathology review at a large referral hospital. Urol Oncol 2013;31:1650-5. [Crossref]
  • 7. ICCR-Urinary-Tract-Bladder-bookmarked-guide.pdf.
  • 8. Moschini M, Shariat SF, Freschi M, Soria F, D'Andrea D, Abufaraj M, et al. Is transurethral resection alone enough for the diagnosis of histological variants? A single-center study. Urol Oncol 2017;35:528.e1-528.e5. [Crossref]
  • 9. James D. Brierley, Mary K. Gospodarowicz, Christian Wittekind. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours eighth edition. Wiley-Blackwell. 2016. [Crossref]
  • 10. Moch H, Humphrey PA, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. WHO Classification of Tumours, Volume 8 IARC WHO Classification of Tumours, No 8. (IARC).
  • 11. Choi W, Porten S, Kim S, Willis D, Plimack ER, Hoffman-Censits J, et al. Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. Cancer Cell 2014;25:152-65. [Crossref]
  • 12. Abd el-Latif A, Watts KE, Elson P, Fergany A, Hansel DE. The Sensitivity of Initial Transurethral Resection or Biopsy of Bladder Tumor(s) for Detecting Bladder Cancer Variants on Radical Cystectomy. J Urol 2013;189:1263-7. [Crossref]
  • 13. Ge P, Wang ZC, Yu X, Lin J, He Q. Sensitivity of initial biopsy or transurethral resection of bladder tumor(s) for detecting histological variants on radical cystectomy. BMC Urol 2015;15:46. [Crossref]
  • 14. Amin MB, Ro JY, el-Sharkawy T, Lee KM, Troncoso P, Silva EG, et al. Micropapillary variant of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Histologic pattern resembling ovarian papillary serous carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 1994;18:1224-32. [Crossref]
  • 15. Ehdaie B, Maschino A, Shariat SF, Rioja J, Hamilton RJ, Lowrance WT, et al. Comparative outcomes of pure squamous cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation in patients treated with radical cystectomy. J Urol 2012;187:74-9. [Crossref]
  • 16. Soave A, Schmidt S, Dahlem R, Minner S, Engel O, Kluth LA, et al. Does the extent of variant histology affect oncological outcomes in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder treated with radical cystectomy? Urol Oncol 2015;33:21.e1-21. [Crossref]
APA NGO c, cussenot o, Comperat E (2020). Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. , 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
Chicago NGO carine,cussenot olivier,Comperat Eva Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. (2020): 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
MLA NGO carine,cussenot olivier,Comperat Eva Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. , 2020, ss.354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
AMA NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. . 2020; 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
Vancouver NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. . 2020; 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
IEEE NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E "Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?." , ss.354 - 359, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
ISNAD NGO, carine vd. "Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?". (2020), 354-359. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20121
APA NGO c, cussenot o, Comperat E (2020). Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(5), 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
Chicago NGO carine,cussenot olivier,Comperat Eva Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. Turkish Journal of Urology 46, no.5 (2020): 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
MLA NGO carine,cussenot olivier,Comperat Eva Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.46, no.5, 2020, ss.354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
AMA NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(5): 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
Vancouver NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(5): 354 - 359. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
IEEE NGO c,cussenot o,Comperat E "Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?." Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, ss.354 - 359, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.20121
ISNAD NGO, carine vd. "Transurethral resection of bladder and radical cystectomy: Concordance of histology. Are we good enough?". Turkish Journal of Urology 46/5 (2020), 354-359. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20121