Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 1252 - 1257 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791 İndeks Tarihi: 11-10-2020

3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density

Öz:
AbstractAim: The aim of this study was to investigate the maximum Von Misses stress values of implants with different diameters in patients with different bone densities depending on the forces that are applied with different angles to the bone around the implant neck and implant surface, by using finite element analysis method.Material and Methods: 3.8 mm and 4.6 mm diameter dental implants of an implant system that had an in vitro laser-microtextured neck design were used in this study. Computational models were generated for implants with different diameters which were placed in the maxillary and mandibular 1st molar teeth using flat and oblique (20°angled) abutments. Vertical and oblique (30°angled) forces of 300 N were applied to all models and the results were evaluated by finite element analysis.Results: The results show that both vertical and oblique forces on the implants and placement of abutments in the flat and oblique position caused tension in the bone around the neck of the implant and the implant surface. When the oblique and vertical loads applied to the bone models were compared, the forces applied in the oblique direction exhibited a significant increase of Von Misses stress values in the cortical bone around the crest module of the implant compared to the other group. In our study, the minimum stress distribution with respect to the direction of the applied forces and placement positions of the abutments was obtained by applying the implant and the force in the same direction (abutment straight, force vertical). However, in the groups with the angled application of the force direction and the angled placement position of the abutments, the maximum Von Misses stress valueincreased in the bone around the implant neck and implant surface.Conclusion: Placing the implants at the right angle and within bone tissues with adequate cortical bone density around the implant will ensure minimal stress values on both the supporting bone and the implant surface.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.
  • 2. Akagawa Y, Sato Y, Teixeira ER, et al. A mimic osseointegrated implant model for three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:41-5.
  • 3. Neldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:622-32.
  • 4. Nevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, et al.Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:111-21.
  • 5. Botos S, Yousef H, Zweig B, et al. The effects of laser microtexturing of the dental implant collar on crestal bone levels and peri-implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:492-8.
  • 6. Pecora GE, Ceccarelli R, Bonelli M, et al. Clinical evaluation of laser microtexturing for soft tissue and bone attachment to dental implants. Implant Dent 2009;18:57-66.
  • 7. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of a mandibuler mode. J Oral Rehabil 1988;15:615-24.
  • 8. Torcato LB, Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, et al.. Influence of parafunctional loading and prosthetic connection on stress distribution: a 3D finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:644-51.
  • 9. Clift SE, Fisher J, Watson CJ. Finite element stress and strain analysis of the bone surrounding a dental implant: effect of variations in bone modulus. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1992;206:233-41.
  • 10. Magne P. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data. Dent Mater 2007;23:539-48.
  • 11. Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, et al. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-31.
  • 12. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, et al. Determining the force absorbtion quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:361-4.
  • 13. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, et al. 3D-FEA of osseointegration percentages and patterns on implant-bone interfacial stresses. J Dent 1997:25:485-91.
  • 14. Hojjatie B, Anusavice KJ. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glass-ceramic dental crowns. J Biomech 1990;23:1157-66.
  • 15. Bishara SE, Saunders WB. Textbook of orthodontics. Saunders Book Company, 15st Edition, Philadelphia, 2001;592.
  • 16. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants: a clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-52.
  • 17. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GVB. Mechanical loading of Brånemark fixtures affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:345-60.
  • 18. Celebi A, Gulsun B. Investigation of tension distribution of bone in the neck of the implant with switching platform by using 3-D finite element analysis. J Dent Dicle 2018;19:1-6.
  • 19. Sevimay M, Turhan F. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on the effect of different bone quality on stress distribution in implant-supported crown. J Prosthet Dent 2005;93:227-34.
  • 20. Yalcin M, Kaya B, Lacin N, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effect of endosteal implants with different macro designs on stress distribution in different bone qualities. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:43-50.
  • 21. Premnath K, Sridevi J, Kalavathy N, et al.Evaluation of stress distribution in bone of different densities using different implant designs: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013 ;13:555-9.
  • 22. Chang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys 2012;34:153-60.
  • 23. Chiang C, Shyh-Yuan L, Ming-Chang W, et al. Finite element modelling of implant designs and cortical bone thickness on stress distribution in maxillary type IV bone. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014:17:516-26.
  • 24. Kitamura E, Stegaroiu R, Nomura S, et al. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:279-86.
  • 25. Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Spintig T, et al. Finite element analysis of the biomechanical effects of peek dental implants on the peri-implant bone. J Biomech 2015;48:1-7.
  • 26. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, et al. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:207-18.
  • 27. Pilliar RM, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al.Dental implant design effect on bone remodeling. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:467-83.
  • 28. Holmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endoosseos implants. J Oral Implantol 1997;23:104-11.
  • 29. Akca K, Cehreli MC. Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput 2006;44:527-35.
  • 30. Himmlová L, Dostálová T, Kácovský A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:20- 5.
  • 31. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest: a threedimensional finite-element analysis. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2005;16:486-94.
  • 32. Raaj G, Manimaran P, Kumar CD, et al. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on stress and strain in the mandibular segment: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11:347-54.
  • 33. Pellizzer EP, Verri FR, de Moraes SL, et al. Influence of the implant diameter with different sizes of hexagon: analysis by 3-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:425-31.
  • 34. Demenko V, Linetskiy I, Nesvit K, et al. Importance of diameter to length ratio in selecting dental implants: a methodological finite element study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014;17:443-9.
  • 35. Ding X, Zhu XH, Liao SH, et al. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2009;18:393-402.
  • 36. Eazhil R, Swaminathan SV, Gunaseelan M, et al.Impact of implant diameter and length on stress distribution in osseointegrated implants: a 3D FEA study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2016;6:590-6.
  • 37. Anitua E, Tapia R, Luzuriaga F, et al. Influence of implant length, diameter, and geometry on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. Int J Period Rest Dent 2010;30:89-95.
  • 38. Mohammed Ibrahim M, Thulasingam C, Nasser KS, et al. Evaluation of design parameters of dental implant shape, diameter and length on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11:165-71
APA ÇELEBİ A, Gülsün B (2020). 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. , 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
Chicago ÇELEBİ Adalet,Gülsün Belgin 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. (2020): 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
MLA ÇELEBİ Adalet,Gülsün Belgin 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. , 2020, ss.1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
AMA ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. . 2020; 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
Vancouver ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. . 2020; 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
IEEE ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B "3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density." , ss.1252 - 1257, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
ISNAD ÇELEBİ, Adalet - Gülsün, Belgin. "3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density". (2020), 1252-1257. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
APA ÇELEBİ A, Gülsün B (2020). 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research, 27(4), 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
Chicago ÇELEBİ Adalet,Gülsün Belgin 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research 27, no.4 (2020): 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
MLA ÇELEBİ Adalet,Gülsün Belgin 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research, vol.27, no.4, 2020, ss.1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
AMA ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(4): 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
Vancouver ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B 3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density. Annals of Medical Research. 2020; 27(4): 1252 - 1257. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
IEEE ÇELEBİ A,Gülsün B "3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density." Annals of Medical Research, 27, ss.1252 - 1257, 2020. 10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791
ISNAD ÇELEBİ, Adalet - Gülsün, Belgin. "3-Dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution of dental implants on the bone tissue around the neck region of the implant and on the implant surface with respect to bone density". Annals of Medical Research 27/4 (2020), 1252-1257. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2019.12.791