Objective: With the increasing popularity of minimally-invasive surgery, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has become a staple in the armamentarium ofurologists. However, the surgery has a steep learning curve and longer operative time. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the results of initial 53cases of laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in our institute.Materials and Methods: A total 52 of patients with pelvi-ureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction, 30 male and 22 female, with the mean age of 23.5years were managed by transperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. The patients were placed in full lateral position and surgery was doneusing a minimum of three ports, retrograde pyelography was done in all; initial access was done by using a Veress needle. The ureter was spatulatedfirst, first suture taken and then the PUJ was dismembered to avoid rotation of the ureter. Antegrade DJ stenting was done in all patients and onedrain was left in the retroperitoneum after surgery. DJ stent was removed six weeks after surgery.Results: Fifty two patients were managed by dismembered pyeloplasty. Six patients required preoperative urinary diversion. Intrarenal pelvis wasseen in seven, crossing vessel in ten, high insertion of ureter in six and associated calculus in five patients. Conversion to open surgery was requiredin six patients. Initially, the operative time was more than three hours but after sufficient experience of 25 cases, it reduced drastically and in last28 cases, the mean operative time was 123 minutes, with shortest time reported 97 minutes. Reintervention was required in eight patients andoverall success rate was 87%.Conclusion: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a safe, minimally-invasive and viable alternative to open pyeloplasty for the management of PUJ obstruction.