The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century

Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 230 - 239 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333 İndeks Tarihi: 13-11-2020

The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century

Öz:
Despite the fact that during the sixteenth century, the so-called golden age of classical Ottoman architecture, thousands of significantbuildings were constructed, the methods of designing in the classical Ottoman period still raises several unanswered questions. The present paper surveys some features of classical Ottoman designs, the types of drawing documents used by the craftsmen, and the operationof the architectural institutions. By outlining the dimensions of a specific group of commemorative buildings, the mausolea or türbeserected in Ottoman Hungary, this article aims at providing historical contributions to the evaluation and construction methods of theremaining examples of this building type in Hungary. For this reason, the dimensions of the Türbe of Gül Baba and the Türbe of Idris Baba,the two Shrines in Hungary that still stand, will be investigated.
Anahtar Kelime:

Macaristan’da Ayakta Kalan İki Osmanlı Türbesinin Ölçüleri: 16. Yüzyıl Osmanlı Yapım Tekniklerine Katkılar

Öz:
16. yüzyıl boyunca klasik Osmanlı mimarisinin ‘altın çağı’ olarak adlandırılan dönemde binlerce önemli bina inşa edilmesine rağmen, klasik Osmanlı dönemi tasarım yöntemlerine ilişkin hala cevaplanmamış birkaç soru olduğu görülmüştür. Bu yazıda, klasik Osmanlı tasarımlarının bazı özellikleri, zanaatkârların kullandığı çeşitli çizim belgeleri ve mimari kurumların işleyişi incelenmektedir. Makale, Osmanlı Macaristanı’nda inşa edilen belirli bir anıtsal yapı türü olan türbelerin boyutlarını ana hatlarıyla açıklayarak, bu tür yapıların günümüze dek kalan örneklerinin değerlendirilmesi ve yapım tekniklerinin anlaşılmasına katkı sağlamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu nedenle, makalede Macaristan’da halen ayakta duran iki türbenin, Gül Baba Türbesi ve İdris Baba Türbesi’nin boyutları incelenecektir.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Derleme Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ágoston, G.–Sudár, B. (2002) Gül Baba és a magyarországi bektasi dervisek (Gül Baba and the Bektashi Dervishes in Hungary), Budapest, Terebess.
  • Daragó, L.–Bakonyi, D. (2015) “Report about the Architectural Survey of the Parish Church of the Settlement of Chiddes,” Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, Number 1, pp. 6-16.
  • Derman, M.U. (2012) “Hat Sanatında Kullanılan Alet ve Malzemeler” Ed. Özcan, A. R., Hat ve Tezhip Sanatı, Ankara, T.C. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, p. 229.
  • Develi, H. (ed.) (2002) Sāī Mustafa Çelebi: Book of buildings. Teẓkiretü’l-bünyān and Teẓkiretü’l-ebniye, İstanbul, Koçbank.
  • Dündar, A. (2008) “Çorum Abdal Ata Zaviyesi,” Ed.: M. M. Söylemez, M. Okumuş and İ. Yiğit (editors) Uluslararası Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyete Çorum Sempozyumu, Çorum, Çorum Belediyesi Kültür ve Sosyal Müdürlüğü Kent Arşivi, pp.961–991.
  • Fehér, K., Halmos, B. (2017) “A középkori építészet szerkesztési módszerei a hazai szakirodalom tükrében,” (Architectural Design Methods of the Middle Ages by the Hungarian Historiography), Építés – Építészettudomány, Number 3–4, pp. 237–284.
  • Gerelyes, I. (1994) “A szultáni szeráj művészete a XVI. században (The Art of the Palace of Sultan in the Sixteenth Century),” Ed. Gerelyes, I. (editor) Nagy Szulejmán szultán és kora (Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent and His Age), Budapest, Hungarian National Museum, pp. 22–23.
  • Gerelyes, I. (2007) “Nakkasháne (naqqāsh̲̲-kh̲̲āna),” Ed. Fajcsák, Gy. (editor) Keleti Művészeti Lexikon (Encyclopedia of Oriental Art), Budapest, Corvina, p. 236.
  • Günay, R. (2016) Sinan. The Architect and His Works, İstanbul, YEM Yayın.
  • Hasol, D. (2016) Ansiklopedik Mimarlık Sözlüğü, İstanbul, YEM Yayın.
  • Horváth, I.–Zsembery, Á. (2008) “Az esztergomi Özicseli Hadzsi Ibrahim-dzsámi kutatása és műemléki bemutatása (The Monumental Presentation of the mosque of Uzičeli Ḥacci Ibrahim Pasha),” Építés – Építészettudomány, Number 1–2, pp.3–41.
  • İnalcık, H. (1994) “Weights and measures,” Ed. İnalcık, H., Quataert, D. (editors) An Economic and Social History of the Ottoman Empire, 1200–1914, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kiss, Zs. E. (2013) “Disturbed Symmetry in Ancient Greek and Roman Architecture,” Makarova, V., Nagy, D. (editors) Symmetry: Art and Science. The Journal of the International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry, Athens, International Society for the Interdisciplinary Study of Symmetry, pp. 184–187.
  • Kuban, D. (2011) Sinan’s Art and Selimiye, İstanbul, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  • Necipoğlu, G. (1995) The Topkapi Scroll – Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture, Santa Monica, The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.
  • Necipoğlu, G. (2005) The Age of Sinan. Architectural Culture in the Ottoman Empire, London, Reaktion.
  • Necipoğlu, G. (2017) Sinan Çağı. Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nda Mimarî Kültür, İstanbul, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
  • Necipoğlu-Kafadar, G. (1986) “Plans and Models in 15th- and 16th-Century Ottoman Architectural Practice,” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Number 3, pp. 224–243.
  • Orgun, Z. (1938) “Hassa Mimarları”, Arkitekt, Number 96, pp. 333–342.
  • Rabb, P. (2013) “We are all servants here!’ Mimar Sinan – Architect of the Ottoman Empire”, Periodica Polytechnica Architecture, Number 1, pp. 26-37.
  • Schmidt, A., Sz. Simon, É., Yıldıztas, M. (ed.) (2016) Törökmagyar kapcsolatok az Oszmán Birodalomtól napjainkig a levéltári dokumentumok tükrében. – Arşiv belgelerine göre Osmanlı’dan günümüze Türk-Macar ilişkileri İstanbul, Başbakanlık Osmanlı Arşivi.
  • Şenyurt, O. (2015) Osmanlı Mimarisinin Temel İlkeleri, İstanbul, Doğu Kitabevi.
  • Somogyi, Á., Fehér, K., Lovas, T., Halmos, B., Barsi, Á. (2007) “Analysis of Gothic Architectural Details by Spatial Object Reconstruction Techniques”, Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, Number 3, pp.640-651.
  • Sudár, B. (2013) A pécsi Idrisz baba-türbe (The Idris Baba Türbe of Pécs), Budapest, Forster Gyula Nemzeti Örökséggazdálkodási és Szolgáltatási Központ.
  • Ünsal, B. (1963) “Topkapı Sarayı Arşivinde Bulunan Mimari Planlar Üzerine”, Türk Sanat Tarihi Araştırma ve İncelemeleri 1, İstanbul: İstanbul Güzel Sanatlar Akademisi Türk Sanatı Enstitüsü Yayınları: pp.168–197.
  • BOA KK 67 (5 M 980) 5. (Turkish Presidency State Archives of the Republic of Turkey – Department of Ottoman Archives, the order mentioning the conversion of the Virgin Mary Church of Buda to an imperial mosque, 1572)
  • BOA, MD. 23, #58, (25. Ca. 981) (Turkish Presidency State Archives of the Republic of Turkey – Department of Ottoman Archives, the order to the beylerbeyi of Buda contains the written sources of draft (resm) according to preparing resm about the castle of Szigetvár, which would be sent for the sultan’s court for approval, 1573.
  • TKSM E.9495/11., Çorum’daki Abdal Ata Zaviyesi’nin kārnāmesi (Topkapı Palace Museum Archive, the drawings for the türbe of Abdal ʿAṭa, Emīr Seyyid, Receb and Burqān (Bermekan) Dede in Çorum, sixteenth century)TKSM H 1244 f. 190V-191R, Sūrnāme-yi hümāyūn. (Topkapı Palace Museum Archive, Imperial Festival Book, sixteenth century)
  • TS.MA.d, 7000, Budin’de merḥūm Muṣṭafā Pash̲̲a’nın waqfnāmesi. (Topkapı Palace Museum Archive, Waqf-nāme of the beylerbey of Buda, Soqollu Muṣṭafa Pash̲̲a, p. 10, line 2, sixteenth century)
  • Káldy-Nagy, Gy. (2012) “Ḳāḍī ʿAskar”, Eds.: P. Bearman, Th. Bianquis, C.E. Bosworth, E. van Donzel, W.P. Heinrichs. Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. https:// referenceworks.brillonline.com/browse/encyclopaedia-ofislam-2 [Accessed on 28 April 2020]
APA Kovács G, Rabb P (2020). The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. , 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
Chicago Kovács Gergő Máté,Rabb Péter The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. (2020): 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
MLA Kovács Gergő Máté,Rabb Péter The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. , 2020, ss.230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
AMA Kovács G,Rabb P The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. . 2020; 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
Vancouver Kovács G,Rabb P The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. . 2020; 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
IEEE Kovács G,Rabb P "The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century." , ss.230 - 239, 2020. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
ISNAD Kovács, Gergő Máté - Rabb, Péter. "The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century". (2020), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
APA Kovács G, Rabb P (2020). The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron, 15(2), 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
Chicago Kovács Gergő Máté,Rabb Péter The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron 15, no.2 (2020): 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
MLA Kovács Gergő Máté,Rabb Péter The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron, vol.15, no.2, 2020, ss.230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
AMA Kovács G,Rabb P The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron. 2020; 15(2): 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
Vancouver Kovács G,Rabb P The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century. Megaron. 2020; 15(2): 230 - 239. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
IEEE Kovács G,Rabb P "The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century." Megaron, 15, ss.230 - 239, 2020. 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333
ISNAD Kovács, Gergő Máté - Rabb, Péter. "The Dimensions of the Two Remaining Türbes in Ottoman Hungary: Contributions to the Methods of Ottoman Construction Practices in the Sixteenth Century". Megaron 15/2 (2020), 230-239. https://doi.org/10.14744/MEGARON.2020.51333