Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 13 - 26 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.21031/epod.562586 İndeks Tarihi: 15-11-2020

Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables

Öz:
In this study, probabilities of preservice middle school mathematics teachers’ possession of four fundamentalcognitive skills required for learning and teaching statistics and probability topics were examined by using thelog-linear cognitive diagnostic model, which is one of the cognitive diagnostic models. Moreover, theprobabilities of preservice teachers’ possession of these skills were investigated according to gender, universityranking, and grade level variables. Hence, it was examined whether there was a significant relationship betweenthe probabilities of having each skill and these variables. A Statistical Reasoning Test, which was developed byArican and Kuzu in 2019, measured preservice teachers’ possession of four critical skills was used in collectingthe data. These four skills included representing and interpreting data, drawing inferences about populationsbased on samples, selecting and using appropriate statistical methods to analyze data, and understanding andapplying basic concepts of probability. In the 2016-2017 academic year, the test was applied to 456 preserviceteachers selected from four different universities in Turkey, and probabilities of their possession of each attributewere calculated. Later, the relationship between the preservice teachers’ test scores and gender was examinedby using the Mann-Whitney U test, and the relationship between their test scores and ranking of the attendeduniversity and grade level were examined using the Kruskal Wallis-H test. Although probabilities of thepreservice teachers’ possession of these four skills did not significantly differ according to gender, somesignificant differences were detected for university ranking and grade level variables
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Ardıç, E. Ö., Yılmaz, B., & Demir, E. (2012, June). İlköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin merkezi eğilim ve yayılım ölçüleri hakkındaki istatistiksel okuryazarlık düzeylerinin solo taksonomisine göre incelenmesi. Paper session presented at the meeting of X. Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, Niğde, Türkiye. Retrieved from http://kongre.nigde.edu.tr/xufbmek/dosyalar/tam_metin/pdf/2430-30_05_2012- 18_28_56.pdf
  • Arican, M., & Kuzu, O. (2019). Diagnosing preservice teachers’ understanding of statistics and probability: Developing a test for cognitive assessment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 1-20. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10763-019-09985-0, Online first.
  • Atuahene, F., & Russell, T. A. (2016). Mathematics readiness of first-year university students. Journal of Developmental Education, 39(3), 12-20. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/44987415
  • Batanero, C., & Díaz, C. (2010). Training teachers to teach statistics: What can we learn from research? Statistique et Enseignement, 1(1), 5-20. Retrieved from http://statistique-etenseignement.fr/article/view/3
  • Batanero, C., & Díaz, C. (2012). Training school teachers to teach probability: Reflections and challenges. Chilean Journal of Statistics, 3(1), 3-13. Retrieved from http://chjs.mat.utfsm.cl/volumes/03/01/Batanero_Diaz(2012).pdf
  • Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., & Roa, R. (2004). Training teachers to teach probability. Journal of statistics Education, 12(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n1/batanero.html
  • Boyacıoğlu, H., Erduran, A., & Alkan, H. (1996, September). Permütasyon, kombinasyon ve olasılık öğretiminde rastlanan güçlüklerin giderilmesi. Paper session presented at the meeting of II. Ulusal Eğitim Sempozyumu, Marmara University, İstanbul.
  • Bradshaw, L., Izsak, A., Templin, J., & Jacobson, E. (2014). Diagnosing teachers’ understandings of rational numbers: Building a multidimensional test within the diagnostic classification framework. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 33(1), 2-14. doi: 10.1111/emip.12020
  • Bulut, S., Yetkin, İ. E., & Kazak, S. (2002). Matematik öğretmen adaylarının olasılık başarısı, olasılık ve matematiğe yönelik tutumlarının cinsiyete göre incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(22), 21-28. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/87889
  • Çepni, S., Bayrakçeken, S., Yılmaz, A., Yücel, C., Semerci, Ç., Köse, E., …, Gündoğdu, K. (2008). Ölçme ve değerlendirme. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Chambers, E. A., & Schreiber, J. B. (2004). Girls’ academic achievement: Varying associations of extracurricular activities. Gender and Education, 16(3), 327-346. doi: 10.1080/09540250042000251470
  • Chiesi, F., & Primi, C. (2015, February). Gender differences in attitudes toward statistics: Is there a case for a confidence gap? In K. Krainer & N. Vondrova (Eds.), CERME 9-Ninth congress of the European societyfor research in mathematics education (pp. 622-628). Prague, Czech Republic: Charles University & ERME.
  • Choi, K. M., Lee, Y. S., & Park, Y. S. (2015). What CDM can tell about what students have learned: An analysis of TIMSS eighth grade mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(6), 1563-1577. doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1421a
  • de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically based method of Q‐matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(4), 343-362. doi: 10.1111/j.1745- 3984.2008.00069.x
  • de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179-199. doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
  • DiBello, L. V., Stout, W. F., & Roussos, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive/psychometric diagnostic assessment likelihood–based classification techniques. In P. Nichols, S. Chipman, & R. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 361-390). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dogan, E., & Tatsuoka, K. (2008). An international comparison using a diagnostic testing model: Turkish students’ profile of mathematical skills on TIMSS-R. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68(3), 263- 272. doi: 10.1007/s10649-007-9099-8
  • Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198-208. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.198
  • Eitle, T. M. (2005). Do gender and race matter? Explaining the relationship between sports participation and achievement. Sociological Spectrum, 25(2), 177-195. doi: 10.1080/02732170590883997
  • Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(1), 103-127. doi: 10.1037/a0018053
  • Farooq, M. S., Chaudhry, A. H., Shafiq, M., & Berhanu, G. (2011). Factors affecting students’ quality of academic performance: A case of secondary school level. Journal of Quality and Technology Management, 7(2), 1-14. Retrieved from http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/iqtm/PDF-FILES/01- Factor.pdf
  • Felson, R. B., & Trudeau, L. (1991). Gender differences in mathematics performance. Social Psychology Quarterly, 54(2), 113-126. doi: 10.2307/2786930
  • Franklin, C., & Mewborn, D. (2006). The statistical education of PreK-12 teachers: A shared responsibility. In G. Burrill (Ed.), NCTM 2006 Yearbook: Thinking and reasoning with data and chance (pp. 335-344). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  • Franklin, C., Kader, G., Mewborn, D. S., Moreno, J., Peck, R., Perry, M., & Scheaffer, R. (2007). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) report: A pre-K-12 curriculum framework. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved from https://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/gaise/gaiseprek-12_full.pdf
  • Fryer Jr, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2010). An empirical analysis of the gender gap in mathematics. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2), 210-40. doi: 10.1257/app.2.2.210
  • Gürbüz, R., Toprak, Z., Yapıcı, H., & Doğan, S. (2011). Subjects perceived as difficult in secondary mathematics curriculum and their reasons. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(4), 1311-1323. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/223364
  • Hartz, S. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the unified model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Henson, R., Templin, J., & Willse, J. (2009). Defining a family of cognitive diagnosis models using log-linear models with latent variables. Psychometrika, 74(2), 191-210. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9089-5
  • Im, S., & Park, H. J. (2010). A comparison of US and Korean students’ mathematics skills using a cognitive diagnostic testing method: Linkage to instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(3), 287- 301. doi: 10.1080/13803611.2010.523294
  • Jones, G. A. (2005). Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions, and connections with nonparametric Madde response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258-272. doi: 10.1177/01466210122032064
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi
  • Kim, H. Y. (2013). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 38(1), 52-54. doi: 10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
  • Lee, Y. S., Park, Y. S., & Taylan, D. (2011). A cognitive diagnostic modeling of attribute mastery in Massachusetts, Minnesota, and the US national sample using the TIMSS 2007. International Journal of Testing, 11(2), 144–177. doi: 10.1080/15305058.2010.534571
  • Leighton, J. P., & Gierl, M. J. (2007). Why cognitive diagnostic assessment? In J. P. Leighton & M. J. Gierl (Eds.), Cognitive diagnostic assessment for education (pp. 3-18). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and mathematics performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(6), 1123-1135. doi: 10.1037/a0021276
  • Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82-105. Retrieved from https://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ8(1).pdf#page=85
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2013). Ortaokul matematik dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı.
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9802/a1fabea7578ffd251e50bec4ac13831fbca0.pdf
  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 international results in mathematics. Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study. Retrieved from http://timssandpirls.bc.edu/timss2015/international-results/
  • Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. O. (2011). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
  • Nichols, P. D., Chipman, S. F., & Brennan, R. L. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitively diagnostic assessment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Olpak, Y. Z., Baltaci, S., & Arican, M. (2018). Investigating the effects of peer instruction on preservice mathematics teachers’ achievements in statistics and probability. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2323-2340. doi: 10.1007/s10639-018-9717-3
  • Ravand, H., & Robitzsch, A. (2015). Cognitive diagnostic modeling using R. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 20(11), 1-12. doi: 10.7275/5g6f-ak15
  • Rupp, A. A., Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic assessment: Theory, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Saraçbaşı, T., & Kutsal, A. (1987). Betimsel istatistik. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi.
  • Sen, S., & Arican, M. (2015). A diagnostic comparison of Turkish and Korean students’ mathematics performances on the TIMSS 2011 assessment. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 6(2), 238-253. doi: 10.21031/epod.65266
  • Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 957-1009). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within-and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PloS One, 8(3), 1-253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057988
  • Templin, J., & Bradshaw, L. (2013). Measuring the reliability of diagnostic classification model examinee estimates. Journal of Classification, 30(2), 251-275. doi: 10.1007/s00357-013-9129-4
  • Templin, J., & Henson, R. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods, 11(3), 287-305.
  • Tsakiridou, H., & Vavyla, E. (2015). Probability concepts in primary school. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(4), 535-540. doi: 10.12691/education-3-4-21
  • Ulutaş, F., & Ubuz, B. (2008). Matematik eğitiminde araştırmalar ve eğilimler: 2000 ile 2006 yılları arası. İlköğretim Online, 7(3), 614-625. Retrieved from http://ilkogretimonline.org.tr/index.php/io/article/view/1751/1587
  • von Davier, M. (2005). A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data (ETS Research Report No. RR-05-16). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. doi: 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2005.tb01993.x
  • Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Zhang, X., & Maas, Z. (2019). Using R as a simulation tool in teaching introductory statistics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 599-610. doi: 10.29333/iejme/5773
APA KUZU O, Arican M (2020). Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. , 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
Chicago KUZU OKAN,Arican Muhammet Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. (2020): 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
MLA KUZU OKAN,Arican Muhammet Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. , 2020, ss.13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
AMA KUZU O,Arican M Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. . 2020; 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
Vancouver KUZU O,Arican M Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. . 2020; 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
IEEE KUZU O,Arican M "Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables." , ss.13 - 26, 2020. 10.21031/epod.562586
ISNAD KUZU, OKAN - Arican, Muhammet. "Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables". (2020), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.562586
APA KUZU O, Arican M (2020). Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 11(1), 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
Chicago KUZU OKAN,Arican Muhammet Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 11, no.1 (2020): 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
MLA KUZU OKAN,Arican Muhammet Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, vol.11, no.1, 2020, ss.13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
AMA KUZU O,Arican M Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
Vancouver KUZU O,Arican M Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi. 2020; 11(1): 13 - 26. 10.21031/epod.562586
IEEE KUZU O,Arican M "Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables." Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 11, ss.13 - 26, 2020. 10.21031/epod.562586
ISNAD KUZU, OKAN - Arican, Muhammet. "Investigating Preservice Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Competencies in Statistics and Probability in Terms of Various Variables". Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi 11/1 (2020), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.562586