PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 16 Sayı: 1 Sayfa Aralığı: 108 - 125 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 İndeks Tarihi: 14-11-2020
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS
Öz: Like in any other field, performance of a company in the insurance industry is the keyfactor of gaining competitive advantage and market share. In this study, insurance companiesare ranked according to their 2016 performance indicators using a two-step hybrid MCDMmethod including BWM and TOPSIS. Only the non-life insurance companies are used in thestudy. BWM is one of the relatively new MCDM methods, which has an advantage of using lesscomparison, measuring the consistency between the pair-wise comparisons and giving intervalanalysis for multi-optimal situations. In the proposed methodology, BWM is used to calculatethe criterion weights and TOPSIS to rank the alternatives. The solutions found are consistentwith the real life market shares of the insurance companies.
Anahtar Kelime: HAYAT-DIŞI SİGORTA ŞİRKETLERİNİN BEST-WORST YÖNTEMİ VE TOPSIS İLE PERFORMANSLARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Öz: Şirketlerin diğer herhangi bir alanda olduğu gibi, sigorta endüstrisinde de sergileyeceği performansı, rekabet avantajı ve pazar payı kazanmada anahtar faktördür. Bu çalışmada, sigorta şirketleri 2016 yılına ait performans göstergeleri doğrultusunda BWM (Best and Worst Method) ve TOPSIS yöntemlerini içeren iki aşamalı hibrit Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemi kullanılarak sıralanmaktadır. BWM, daha az karşılaştırma kullanan, çift yönlü karşılaştırmalar arasındaki tutarlılığı ölçme ve en uygun durumlar için aralık analizi yapma avantajına sahip olan nispeten yeni çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinden birisidir. Önerilen yöntemde BWM, kriterlerin ağırlıklarının hesaplanmasında TOPSIS ise alternatiflerin sıralanmasında kullanılmaktadır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, şirketlerin gerçek hayattaki sektör pazar payları ile tutarlılık göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelime: Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
- Ahmad, W. N., Wan, K., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017). Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242-252.
- Akhisar, I., & Tunay, N. (2015). Performance ranking of Turkish life insurance companies using AHP and TOPSIS. Management International Conference. Portoroz, Slovenia.
- Aktan, H. E., & Tosun, Ö. (2013). An integrated fuzzy AHP–fuzzy TOPSIS approach for AS/RS selection. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 11(2), 228-245.
- Altan, M. S. (2010). Türk sigortacılık sektöründe etkinlik: Veri zarflama analizi yöntemi ile bir uygulama. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(1), 185-204.
- Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589-609.
- Bawa, S. K., & Chattha, S. (2013). Financial performance of life insurers in Indian insurance industry. Pacific Business Review International, 6(5), 44-52.
- Chang, S. H., Wu, T. C., Tseng, H. E., Su, Y. J., & Ko, C. C. (2012). Media mix decision support for schools based on analytic network process. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 19(7), 297-304.
- Cummins, J. D., Weiss, M. A., Xie, X., & Zi, H. (2010). Economies of scope in financial services: A DEA efficiency analysis of the US insurance industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1525-1539.
- Cummins, J. D., & Weiss, M. A. (2014). Systemic risk and the US insurance sector. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(3), 489-528.
- Eling, M., & Luhnen, M. (2010). Efficiency in the international insurance industry: A cross-country comparison. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(7), 1497-1509.
- Ghaffari, S., Arab, A., Nafari, J., & Mangehti, M. (2017). Investigation and evaluation of key success factors in technological innovation development based on BWM. Decision Science Letters, 6, 295-306.
- Gupta, H., & Barua, M. K. (2016). Identifying enablers of technological innovation for Indian MSMEs using best–worst multi criteria decision making method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 107, 69-79.
- Gupta, P., Anand, S., & Gupta, H. (2017). Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 244-259.
- Klumpes, P. J. M. (2004). Performance benchmarking in financial services: Evidence from the UK life insurance industry. The Journal of Business, 77(2), 257-273.
- Mohaghar, A., Sahebi, I. G., & Arab, A. (2017). Appraisal of humanitarian supply chain risks using bestworst method. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 11(2), 259-264.
- Özcan, A. İ. (2011). Türkiye’de hayat dışı sigorta sektörünün 2002-2009 dönemi itibariyle etkinlik analizi. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(1), 61-78.
- Özdemir, M. (2015). TOPSIS işletmeciler, mühendisler ve yöneticiler için operasyonel, yönetsel ve stratejik problemlerin çözümünde çok kriterli karar verme. B.F. Yıldırım, E. Önder (Eds.), Bursa:Dora Basım-Yayın.
- Ren, J., Liang, H., & Chan, F. T. S. (2017). Urban sewage sludge, sustainability, and transition for eco-city: Multi-criteria sustainability assessment of technologies based on best-worst method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 29-39.
- Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49-57.
- Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using best-worst method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42, 9152-9164.
- Rezaei, J., Nispeling, T., Sarkis, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2016). A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135, 577-588.
- Rezaei, J., Hemmes, A., & Tavasszy, L. (2017). Multi-criteria decision-making for complex bundling configurations in surface transportation of air freight. Journal of Air Transport Management, 61, 91-105.
- Rezaei, J. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126-130.
- Saeedpoor, M., Vafadarnikjoo, A., Mobin, M., & Rastegari, A. (2015). A servqual model approach integrated with fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies to rank life insurance firms. Proceedings of the International Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Management, American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM).
- Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2016). Measuring efficiency of university-industry Ph.D. projects using best worst method. Scientometrics, 109(3), 911-1938.
- Shen, K. Y., Hu, S. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2017). Financial modeling and improvement planning for the life insurance industry by using a rough knowledge-based hybrid MCDM model. Information Sciences, 375, 296-313.
- Taha, Z., Salaam, H. A., Phoon, S. Y., Tuan, Ya T. M. Y. S., & Mohamad, M. R. (2015). Application of integrated sustainability assessment: Case study of a screw design. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 22(1), 1-10.
- Tsai, T. N., & Tsai, C. W. (2014). Development of a closed-loop diagnosis system for reflow soldering using neural networks and support vector regression. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 21(1), 18-32.
- Turgutlu, E., Kök, R., & Kasman, A. (2007). Türk sigortacılık şirketlerinde etkinlik: Deterministik ve şans kısıtlı veri zarflama analizi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 22(251), 85-102.
- Tuş Işık, A. (2016). QUALIFLEX and ORESTE methods for the insurance company selection problem. Alphanumeric Journal, 4(2), 55-68.
- Vadlamannati, K. C. (2008). Do insurance sector growth and reforms affect economic development? Empirical evidence from India. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 2(1), 43-86.
- Venkateswarlu, R., & Rao, B. S. S. (2016). Profitability evaluation and ranking of Indian non-life insurance firms using GRA and TOPSIS. Journal of Insurance and Financial Management, 2(2), 59-89.
- Wu, D, Yang, Z., Vela, S., & Liang, L. (2007). Simultaneous analysis of production and investment performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies using data envelopment analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 34(1), 180-198.
| APA | Akyüz G, TOSUN Ö, Aka S (2020). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. , 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| Chicago | Akyüz Gökhan,TOSUN Ömür,Aka Salih PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. (2020): 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| MLA | Akyüz Gökhan,TOSUN Ömür,Aka Salih PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. , 2020, ss.108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| AMA | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. . 2020; 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| Vancouver | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. . 2020; 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| IEEE | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S "PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS." , ss.108 - 125, 2020. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| ISNAD | Akyüz, Gökhan vd. "PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS". (2020), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| APA | Akyüz G, TOSUN Ö, Aka S (2020). PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 16(1), 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| Chicago | Akyüz Gökhan,TOSUN Ömür,Aka Salih PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi 16, no.1 (2020): 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| MLA | Akyüz Gökhan,TOSUN Ömür,Aka Salih PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, vol.16, no.1, 2020, ss.108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| AMA | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 2020; 16(1): 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| Vancouver | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi. 2020; 16(1): 108 - 125. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| IEEE | Akyüz G,TOSUN Ö,Aka S "PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS." Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 16, ss.108 - 125, 2020. 10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
| ISNAD | Akyüz, Gökhan vd. "PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF NON-LIFE INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH BEST-WORST METHOD AND TOPSIS". Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi 16/1 (2020), 108-125. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.700907 |
