EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING

Emin İBİLİ (Afyonkarahisar Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi, Afyonkarahisar, Türkiye)
IOJET
7 0
Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 3 Sayfa Aralığı: 1010 - 1030 Metin Dili: İngilizce İndeks Tarihi: 14-11-2020

EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING

Öz:
In this study, the e-readiness levels of university students studying in the field of healthsciences were examined in terms of different variables. In this context, whether the level of ereadiness differs according to gender, department, class level, type of education, deviceownership, working status and economic level has been examined. In addition, the relationshipbetween e-readiness level and academic success was investigated. The research sample consistsof 923 health science students studying in different departments. The results of the researchshow that gender, learning type, device type and income level are important factors on the ereadiness level. In addition, the e-readiness levels of the nursing department students, normal(daytime) teaching, 1st year students were found to be low in the study. As the difficulty levelof the courses increased, the level of e-readiness was found to be an important factor onacademic achievement. The results obtained from this research provide important clues foracademicians as well as institutions and organizations providing services in the field of healthsciences who want to switch to distance education. In addition, some suggestions were madein the light of this research results.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Adams, D., Sumintono, B., Mohamed, A., & Noor, N.S. (2018). M.E-Learning readiness among students of diverse backgrounds in a leading Malaysian Higher Education Institution. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(2). 227-256.
  • Adnan, M., & Boz, Y.B. (2017 Profile of engineering undergraduates on readiness and satisfaction for e-learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 218-243.
  • Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. (2017, June). Identifying success factors for e-learning in higher education. In International conference on e-learning (pp. 247-255). Academic Conferences International Limited).
  • Altun A. (2003). Ögretmen adaylarinin bilissel stilleri ile bilgisayara yönelik tutumlari arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2.1.
  • Benhamdi, S., Babouri, A., & Chiky, R. (2017). Personalized recommender system for elearning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1455-1477.
  • Brinkerhoff, J., & Koroghlanian, C. M. (2005). Student computer skills and attitudes toward internet-delivered instruction: An assessment of stability over time and place. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (1), 27-56.
  • Borotis, S., & Poulymenakou, A. (2004). e-Learning readiness components: Key issues to consider before adopting eLearning interventions. In J. Nall, & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of world conference on e-Learning in corporate, government, healthcare, and higher education (pp. 1622e1629). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
  • Changiz, T., Haghani, F., & Nowroozi, N. (2013). Are postgraduate students in distance medical education program ready for e-learning? A survey in Iran. Journal of education and health promotion, 2.2.
  • Coşkun, G., Kaymakoğlu, B., & Gök, E. (2007). The Internet Usage of Medical School Students and Their Attitudes Towards e-learning: An Application for Başkent University, IV. National Medical Informatics Congress,72-77.
  • Coşkun, Ö., Özeke, V., Budakoğlu, İ., & Kula, S. (2018). The levels of readiness of medical faculty members for e-learning: Gazi University Case. Ankara Medical Journal, 18(2), 175-185.
  • Duran, N., Önal, A., & Kurtuluş, C. (2006). E-Öğrenme Ve Kurumsal Eğitimde Yeni Yaklaşım Öğrenim Yönetim Sistemleri, Bilgi Teknolojileri Kongresi IV, 9-11 Şubat 2006, Bildiriler Kitabı, 97-101.
  • Grundman, J., Wigton, R., & Nickol, D. (2000). You Have Got Mail: Distance Education. Academic Medicine, 75(10): 47-49.
  • Guglielmino, L. M., & Guglielmino, P. J. (2003). Identifying learners who are ready for elearning and supporting their success. In G. Piskurich (Ed.), Preparing learners for elearning (pp. 18-33). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Gülbahar, Y. (2005). Learning Styles and Technology, Educalion and Science, 30(138). Gülbahar, Y., & Alper, A. (2014). Development of e-learning styles scale for electronic environments. Educalion and Science, 39(171).
  • Güngör, C., & Aşkar (2004), P. E-öğrenmenin ve bilişsel stilin başarı ve internet öz yeterlik algısı üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27.27.
  • Hakkari, F., İbili, E., Kantar, M., Boy, Y., Bayram, F., & Doğan, M. (2008). Uzaktan Eğitimde Ders Materyallerinin Hazırlanmasında Ders İçeriklerinin Tasarımı ve Senaryolaştırılması, 2. Uluslararası Gelecek İçin Öğrenme Alanında Yenilikler Konferansı, İstanbul.
  • Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 663). Houghton Mifflin College Division.
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H., & Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-1090.
  • Işık, İ., Hakan, A., & Güler, İ., (2008), Using the 3D Web Technologies in Distance Education, International Journal of Informatics Technologies, 75-77
  • İlhan, M., & Çetin, B. (2013). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of an online learning readiness scale. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 3(2), 72- 101.
  • Karasar, N. (2015). Scientific Research Method (28th edition.). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Korkmaz, Ö., ÇAKIR, R., & Tan, S. S. (2015). Students E-learning Readiness and Satisfaction Levels and Effects on the Academic Achievement. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 16(3).
  • Lu, H. P., & Chiou, M. J. (2010). The impact of individual differences on e‐learning system satisfaction: A contingency approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 307-323.
  • Mafenya, P. N. (2013). An investigation of first-year students’ pedagogical readiness to elearning and assessment in open and distance learning: an University of South Africa context. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(13), 353.
  • Öner, S. Ç., Çelik, G., Bay, H., Yeşil, Y., & Turfan, E. Ç. (2018). Evaluation of midwifery distance education students e-learning readiness. Medical Sciences, 13(1), 10-18.
  • Panda, S., & Mishra, S. (2007). E‐Learning in a Mega Open University: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators. Educational Media International, 44(4), 323- 338.
  • Piskurich, G. M. (2003). Preparing learners for e-learning. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational psychology, 25(1), 3-12.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon. Needham Heights, MA.
  • Toplu, M., & Gökçearslan, Ş. (2012). Development of E-learning and Reflections of the Internet on the Process of Education: A Case Study at Gazi University. Turkish Librarianship, 26(3), 501-535.
  • Thorndike, R. L. (Ed.): 1971, Educational Measurement, American Council on Education, Washington. DC.
  • Tuncer, M., & Taşpınar, M., (2008). The future of education and training in virtual environments and possible problems, Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1) 124.
  • Venkatesh, V. & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decision Sciences, 27 (3), 451–481.
  • Wang, Y. S., Wu, M. C., & Wang, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British journal of educational technology, 40(1), 92-118.
  • Watkins, R., Leigh, D., & Triner, D. (2004). Assessing Readiness for E-Learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly,17(4), 66-79.
  • Wei, Y., & Johnes, J. (2005). Internet tools in teaching quantitative economics: why gaps between potential and reality? Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2005, 29(2):125–41.
  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies.
  • Yacob, A., Kadir, A. Z. A., Zainudin, O., & Zurairah, A. (2012). Student awareness towards e-learning in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67 (93-101).
  • Yılmaz, H., & Özkaynak, E. (2012). A Motivational Tool in Internet-Based Education: Ice Breakers, XIV. Academic Informatics Conference, 1 - 3 February, Uşak University, 155- 162.
  • Yurdugül, H., & Demir, Ö. (2017). An investigation of Pre-service Teachers' Readiness for Elearning at Undergraduate Level Teacher Training Programs: The Case of Hacettepe University. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(4), 896-915.
APA ibili e (2020). EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. , 1010 - 1030.
Chicago ibili emin EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. (2020): 1010 - 1030.
MLA ibili emin EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. , 2020, ss.1010 - 1030.
AMA ibili e EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. . 2020; 1010 - 1030.
Vancouver ibili e EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. . 2020; 1010 - 1030.
IEEE ibili e "EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING." , ss.1010 - 1030, 2020.
ISNAD ibili, emin. "EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING". (2020), 1010-1030.
APA ibili e (2020). EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. IOJET, 7(3), 1010 - 1030.
Chicago ibili emin EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. IOJET 7, no.3 (2020): 1010 - 1030.
MLA ibili emin EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. IOJET, vol.7, no.3, 2020, ss.1010 - 1030.
AMA ibili e EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. IOJET. 2020; 7(3): 1010 - 1030.
Vancouver ibili e EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING. IOJET. 2020; 7(3): 1010 - 1030.
IEEE ibili e "EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING." IOJET, 7, ss.1010 - 1030, 2020.
ISNAD ibili, emin. "EXAMINATION OF HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ LEVEL OF READINESS FOR E-LEARNING". IOJET 7/3 (2020), 1010-1030.
Sayfa Oluşturulma Tarihi
23-04-2024 15:5

İLETİŞİM

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM TR Dizin

Yüzüncüyıl, İşçi Blokları Mahallesi

Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi No:51/C

06530 Çankaya / ANKARA +90 (312) 298 92 00

trdizin@tubitak.gov.tr

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. Gizlilik Politikası Kullanım Şartları