Numan Melik OCAL
(Erenköy Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Hastanesi, Bölüm Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
NURAY ALACA
(Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi, Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Mehmet Kerem CANBORA
(Üsküdar Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye)
Yıl: 2020Cilt: 35Sayı: 2ISSN: 2149-2042 / 2149-4606Sayfa Aralığı: 91 - 98İngilizce

49 0
Does Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training Have an Impact on Functional Outcomes in Chronic Stroke Patients?
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effect of upper extremity proprioceptive training on spasticity and functional motor skills in patients with chronic hemiplegia occurring after stroke. Method: Thirty chronic hemiplegic patients (17 females, mean age: 66.47±12.55 years) admitted to the Research Center with a diagnosis of chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke were included in the study. Patients were divided into two groups. The first group received a conventional physiotherapy program (PTR) for 5 days a week and the second group additionally received a proprioceptive training program (PTR-PT) for 5 days a week. Before and 6 weeks after the treatment modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer upper extremity motor evaluation scale (FMA) and action-researcharm-test (ARAT) and motor activity log-28 scale (MAL-28) were applied. SSPS-22.0 program was used for statistical evaluation and p <0.05 was considered as the level of statistical significance Results: There was no difference in MAS scores before and after treatment in the groups (p>0.05). There was a statistically significant improvement in both PTR (p<0.05) and PTR-PT groups (p<0.001) for the FMA, ARAT and MAL-28. scale scores. Although the results obtained in the PTR, and PT groups were more improved, there was a significant result in favor of PTR-PT only regarding the MAL-28 scale scores (p<0.05). It was determined that adding proprioception-based exercises had the greatest effect on FMA, ARAT and MAL-28 in the evaluation of the effect size (>0.3). Conclusion: It was observed that upper extremity proprioceptive training yielded better results in patients with chronic hemiplegia developed after stroke than conventional therapy in increasing the frequency and quality of movement in upper extremity. This result shows that proprioceptive training programs should be added to stroke rehabilitation methods
DergiAraştırma MakalesiErişime Açık
  • 1. Yavuzer G, Atay MB, Bussmann JB, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:393-8. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Bonita R. Epidemiology of Stroke. Lancet. 1992;239:342-4. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Lovell LL, Harvey RL, Mcguire JR, Diaz S. Impairment and disability: their relation during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:329-35. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, Neill MR. Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14:11-27. [CrossRef]
  • 5. Dalyan AM, Cakcı A. İnme Rehabilitasyonu. In: Oguz H, Dursun E, Dursun N, editors. Tıbbi Rehabilitasyon. 2rd ed. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2004. p. 589-619.
  • 6. Ward NS, Cohen LG. Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:1844-8. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2011;7:76-85. [CrossRef]
  • 8. Otman S, Aksu S, Aras Ö, Karaduman A, Kerem M, Köse N, Meriç A, Livanelioğlu A, Hemipleji Rehabilitasyonunda Nörofizyolojik Yaklaşımlar. 1rd ed. Ankara: Hipokrat Kitapevi; 2001.
  • 9. Hsieh YW, Chang WH, Chen CC, et al. Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot- assisted stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):316-21. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Rand D. Proprioception deficits in chronic stroke upper extremity function and daily living. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0195043. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Kiper P, Agostini M, Baba A, Turolla A, Proprioceptive Based Training for stroke recovery. Proposal of new treatment modality for rehabilitation of upper limb in neurological diseases. Arch Phy Ther. 2015;5(1):6. [CrossRef]
  • 12. Stern PH, McDowell F, Miller SM, Robinson M. Factors influencing stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1971;3:213-8. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Wade DT, Wood VA, Langton-Hewer R. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(1):7-13. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Smith DL, Akhtar AJ, Garraway WM. Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. Age Ageing. 1983;12(1):63-9. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Gottlieb D, Kipnis M, Sister E, Medvedev V, Brill S, Vardi Y. Classification of stroke rehabilitation patients with a simple impairment scale. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1997;11(4):239-43. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, Skilbeck CE, Ismail HM. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: Measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1983;46:521-4. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Chalsen GG, Fitzpatrick KA, Navia RA, Bean SA, Reding MJ. Prevalence of shoulder-hand syndrome in an inpatient stroke rehabilitation population: A quantitative cross-sectional study. J Neurol Rehabil. 1987;1:137-41. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Rand D, Weiss PL, Gottlieb D. Does proprioceptive loss influence recovery of the upper extremity after stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 1999; 3:15-2. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Rand D, Gottlieb D, Patrice L. Weiss T. Recovery of Patients with a Combined Motor and Proprioception Deficit During the First Six Weeks of Post Stroke Rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;18(3):69-87. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Stone JA, Partın NB, Lueken JS, Tımm KE, Ryan EJ. Upper Extremity Proprioceptive Training. J Athl Training. 1994;29:1.
  • 21. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater Reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of Muscle Spasticity. Ardsley, NY: Geigy Pharmaceuticals, Div of CIBA-GEIGY Corp; 1987.
  • 22. Sullıvan KJ, Cen S, Correa A, Duncan PW, Gallıchıo J, Hershberg J, et al. Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Sensorimotor Function After Stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:427-32. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Lyle RC, A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehab Research. 1981;4(4):483-92. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu B, Razak Özdinçler A, Oğul E, Krespi Y. Reliability And Validity Of Turkish Version Of Motor Activity Log-28. Turk J Neurol. 2011;17(2):83-9.
  • 25. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
  • 26. Hsieh YW, Chang WH, Chen CC, Chen JL, Lin KC, Lien HY. Predicting clinically significant changes in motor and functional outcomes after robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(2):316-21. [CrossRef]
  • 27. Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijck F, Morris J, Langhorne P. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;14(4):CD006432. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Whitall J, Waller SM, Silver KH, Macko RF. Repetitive bilateral arm training with rhythmic auditory cueing improves motor function in chronic hemiparetic stroke. stroke. 2000;31(10):2390-5. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Wu CY, Yang CL, Chen MD, Lin KC, Wu LL. Unilateral versus bilateral robot assisted rehabilitation on arm-trunk control and functions post stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10(1):35. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Cho S, Ku J, Cho JC, et. al. Development of virtual reality proprioceptive rehabilitation system for stroke patients. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2014;113(1):258- 65. [CrossRef]

TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM Ulusal Akademik Ağ ve Bilgi Merkezi Cahit Arf Bilgi Merkezi © 2019 Tüm Hakları Saklıdır.