Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 4 Sayfa Aralığı: 277 - 281 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030 İndeks Tarihi: 25-11-2020

Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer

Öz:
Objective: Guidelines recommend 4 weeks of thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients who undergo major surgery for solid malignancies. However, there are limited head-to-head comparisons of risk of venous thromboembolic complications in patients with and without cancer undergoing similar surgical procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare risk of venous thromboembolic complications following major renal surgery and cystectomy between patients with and without cancer at the time of surgery. Material and methods: In the nationwide Danish National Patient Registry, which captures all hospital contacts, including surgical procedures, we identified 8,645 patients who underwent major renal surgery (4,273 without cancer and 4,372 with cancer) and 2,164 patients who underwent cystectomy (359 without cancer and 1,805 with cancer) in 2000–2009. The rate of venous thromboembolic events within 6 months from surgery was compared for patients with and without cancer after stratification on organ using Chisquared test. Results: There was no difference in the rate of venous thromboembolic complications within the first 6 months after major renal surgery (0.4% and 0.3% [p=0.91]) or cystectomy (1.3% and 0.8% [p=0.44]) for patients with and without cancer. The cost for 28 days of Tinzaparin 4.500 IE administered by the patient was €112, whereas the cost if administered by a community nurse was €1.988. Conclusions: Our study questions the different recommendations in thromboembolic prophylaxis between patients with and without cancer after major renal surgery and cystectomy.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Agnelli G, Bolis G, Capussotti L, Scarpa RM, Tonelli F, Bonizzoni E, et al. A clinical outcome-based prospective study on venous thromboembolism after cancer surgery: the @RISTOS project. Ann Surg 2006;243:89-95. [Crossref]
  • Geerts WH, Pineo GF, Heit JA, Bergqvist D, Lassen MR, Colwell CW, et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004;126(Suppl 3):338S-400S. [Crossref]
  • White RH, Zhou H, Romano PS. Incidence of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after different elective or urgent surgical procedures. Thromb Haemost 2003;90:446-55. [Crossref]
  • National Clinical Guideline Centre - Acute and Chronic Conditions. Venous Thromboembolism: Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism (Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism) in Patients Admitted to Hospital (2010).
  • Rasmussen MS, Jørgensen LN, Wille-Jørgensen P. Prolonged thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin for abdominal or pelvic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD004318. [Crossref]
  • Bergqvist D, Burmark US, Flordal PA, Frisell J, Hallböök T, Hedberg M, et al. Low molecular weight heparin started before surgery as prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis: 2500 versus 5000 XaI units in 2070 patients. Br J Surg 1995;82:496-501. [Crossref]
  • Danish Society of thrombose and haemostasis. Behandlingsvejledning: Cancer og venøstromboembolisme 2016.p. 1-30.
  • The Danish Health Registry; www.esundhed.dk/sundhedsregistre/ LPR/Sider/LPR
  • Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL,MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373-83. [Crossref]
  • 10. Fagarasanu A, Alotaibi GS, Hrimiuc R, Lee AYY, Wu C. Role of Extended Thromboprophylaxis After Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:1422-30. [Crossref]
  • 11. Sundbøll J, Adelborg K, Munch T, Frøslev T, Sørensen HT, Bøtker HE, et al. Positive predictive value of cardiovascular diagnoses in the Danish National Patient Registry: a validation study. BMJ Open 2016;6. [Crossref]
  • 12. Dyer J, Wyke S, Lynch C. Hospital episode Statistics data analysis of postoperative venous thromboembolus in patients undergoing urological surgery: A review of 126,891 cases. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:65-9. [Crossref]
  • 13. Tyson MD, Castle EP, Humphreys MR, Andrews PE. Supplementary Table. Incidence of DVT and PE by Urologic Procedure (n=82,808). J Urol 2014;33:81-7.
  • 14. Vandlac AA, Cowan NG, Chen Y, Anderson RE, Conlin MJ, La Rochelle JC, et al. Timing, incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for malignancy: A case for extended duration pharmacological prophylaxis. J Urol 2014;191:943-7. [Crossref]
  • 15. Wiborg MH, Toft A, Jahn H, Hansen LU, Lund L. Initial experience with hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a single-centre experience over 5 years. Scand J Urol 2017;51:73-7. [Crossref]
  • 16. Johansen LS, Christensen TH, Bendixen A, Nordling J, Jensen KME, Kehlet H. Cystektomi i Danmark 2000- 2005. Ugeskr Laeger 2008;10:215-7.
  • 17. Nuttall M, Cathcart P, van der Meulen J, Gillatt D, McIntosh G, Emberton M. A description of radical nephrectomy practice and outcomes in England: 1995-2002. BJU Int 2005;96:58-61. [Crossref]
  • 18. White MA, Autorino R, Spana G, Laydner H, Hillyer SP, Khanna R, et al. Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Radical Nephrectomy: Surgical Technique and Comparative Outcomes. Eur Urol 2011;59:815-22. [Crossref]
  • 19. Abraham JBA, Young JL, Box GN, Lee HJ, Deane LA, Ornstein DK. Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion. J Endourol 2007;21:1473-80. [Crossref]
  • 20. Khan MS, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Rimington P, Coker B, Murphy D, et al. A dual-centre, cohort comparison of open, laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Int J Clin Pract 2012;66:656-62. [Crossref]
APA Thomsen F, Pedersen T, Berg K, Clark P, Lund L (2020). Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. , 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
Chicago Thomsen Frederik,Pedersen Torben Brøchner,Berg Kasper Drimer,Clark Peter,Lund Lars Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. (2020): 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
MLA Thomsen Frederik,Pedersen Torben Brøchner,Berg Kasper Drimer,Clark Peter,Lund Lars Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. , 2020, ss.277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
AMA Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. . 2020; 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
Vancouver Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. . 2020; 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
IEEE Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L "Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer." , ss.277 - 281, 2020. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
ISNAD Thomsen, Frederik vd. "Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer". (2020), 277-281. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
APA Thomsen F, Pedersen T, Berg K, Clark P, Lund L (2020). Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(4), 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
Chicago Thomsen Frederik,Pedersen Torben Brøchner,Berg Kasper Drimer,Clark Peter,Lund Lars Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. Turkish Journal of Urology 46, no.4 (2020): 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
MLA Thomsen Frederik,Pedersen Torben Brøchner,Berg Kasper Drimer,Clark Peter,Lund Lars Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.46, no.4, 2020, ss.277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
AMA Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(4): 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
Vancouver Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(4): 277 - 281. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
IEEE Thomsen F,Pedersen T,Berg K,Clark P,Lund L "Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer." Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, ss.277 - 281, 2020. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030
ISNAD Thomsen, Frederik vd. "Comparison of venous thromboembolic complications following urological surgery between patients with or without cancer". Turkish Journal of Urology 46/4 (2020), 277-281. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.20030