Yıl: 2019 Cilt: 0 Sayı: 54 Sayfa Aralığı: 231 - 253 Metin Dili: Türkçe İndeks Tarihi: 29-10-2020

İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ

Öz:
İş ve ailenin her ikisi de çoğu yetişkin insanın yaşamında önemli bir role sahiptir. İş saatleri sonrası aşırı düzeyde iş amaçlı akıllı telefon kullanımı iki tarafın da taleplerini karşılayabilmeyi zorlaştırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, bireylerin iş amaçlı akıllı telefon kullanmasıyla işlerinin ev hayatlarını engellemesi sürecinde işkolik davranışların nasıl bir etkiye sahip olduğu araştırılmaktadır. Örneklem, kartopu örnekleme yöntemi kullanılarak, iş için akıllı telefon sağlayan şirketlerde çalışmakta olan 224 kişiden oluşmuştur. Araştırma modelini test etmek amacıyla yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (YEM) kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, işkolikliğin akıllı telefon kullanımının işin ev hayatına müdahalesine etkisinde aracılık rolü oynadığı ortaya çıkmıştır. Bu sonuca göre çalışanların iş saatleri sonrasında akıllı telefonlarını iş amaçlı kullanımlarının zararlı sonuçları olabileceği görülmüştür. Kurumlara iş saatleri sonrasında iş amaçlı iletişim kurma konusunda yeni düzenlemeler önerilmektedir.
Anahtar Kelime:

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK-RELATED SMART PHONE USING AND WORK-HOME BALANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORKAHOLISM

Öz:
Work and family have an important role in the life of most of the adults. Extensive use of work related smart phone makes it difficult to handle the demands that come from both sides. In this study, it is focused that how workaholic behaviors influenced the process of individual work related use of smartphones and their work’s interference on their private life. Through the snowball sampling method, the sample of the study consisted of 224 employees from various companies which provide a smartphone for work. To test the research model, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used. According to the results, it was found out that workaholism has a mediation effect between smart phone using and work – home interference. Accordingly, it can be deducted that work-related smartphone use after work hours has detrimental effects for individual employees. Therefore organizations are suggested to regulate their work-related after-work-hours communication procedures.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • Allen, D. K. ve Shoard, M. (2005). Spreading the load: Mobile information and communications technologies and their effect on information. Overload Information Research: An International Electronic Journal, 10(2), n2.
  • Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(3), 414-435.
  • Allen, T. D. ve Shockley, K. (2009). Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype. Handbook of Families and Work: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 265-284.
  • Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S. ve Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278.
  • Arbuckle, J. (2012). Amos 21 reference guide. Chicago: Small Waters Corporation.
  • Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E. ve Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day's work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 472-491.
  • Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E. ve Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887-906.
  • Barling, J. (1990). Employment, stress and family functioning. Chichester: Wiley.
  • Bianchi, A. ve Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51.
  • Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.
  • Bond, J. T., Galinsky, E. ve Swanberg, J. E. (1997). The national study of the changing workforce. ERIC, 2.
  • Bowling, N. A. (2010). Effects of job satisfaction and conscientiousness on extra-role behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), 119-130.
  • Brief, A. ve Nord, W. (1990). Work and meaning: Definitions and Interpretations. The Meaning of Occupational Work. (pp. 1-19). Lexington, MA: Lexington,. doi:10.1002/9780470988213.ch3
  • Brough, P., O'driscoll, M. P. ve Kalliath, T. J. (2005). The ability of ‘family friendly’ organizational resources to predict work–family conflict and job and family satisfaction. Stress and Health, 21(4), 223-234.
  • Burke, R. J. (2000). Workaholism in organizations: Psychological and physical well-being consequences. Stress and Health, 16(1), 11-16.
  • Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169-198.
  • Carmeli, A., Sternberg, A. ve Elizur, D. D. (2008). Organizational culture, creative behavior, and information and communication technology (ICT) usage: A facet analysis. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 175-180. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0037
  • Chesley, N., Moen, P. ve Shore, R. P. (2003). The new technology climate. It’s about time: Couples and Careers, 220-241.
  • Chin, W. W., Gopal, A. ve Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342-367.
  • Ching, J. H. S., ve Thurasamy, R. (2017). Cyberloafing: An emerging online counter-productive work behaviour. In Exploring the Influence of Personal Values and Cultures in the Workplace (pp. 364-377). IGI Global.
  • Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D. ve Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. Jama, 298(14), 1685-1687.
  • Day, A., Paquet, S., Scott, N. ve Hambley, L. (2012). Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The moderating effect of organizational ICT support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(4), 473-491. doi:10.1037/a0029837
  • Del Líbano, M., Salanova, M. ve Schaufeli, W. (2010). Validity of a brief workaholism scale. Psicothema-Revista de Psicologia, 22(1), 143-150.
  • Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B. ve Bulters, A. J. (2004). The loss spiral of work pressure, work–home interference and exhaustion: Reciprocal relations in a three-wave study. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 131-149.
  • Demerouti, E., Taris, T. W. ve Bakker, A. B. (2007). Need for recovery, home–work interference and performance: Is lack of concentration the link? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 71(2), 204-220.
  • Derks, D. ve Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work–home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied Psychology, 63(3), 411-440.
  • Derks, D., van Duin, D., Tims, M. ve Bakker, A. B. (2015). Smartphone use and work–home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 155-177.
  • Duxbury, L. E. ve Higgins, C. A. (2001). Work-life balance in the new millennium: Where are we? Where do we need to go? (Vol. 4). Ottawa, ON: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
  • Ebelhar, J. (Jun 21, 2009). Mind your BlackBerry or mind your manners. The New York Times.
  • Edwards, J. R. ve Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
  • Ekonomik İşbirliği ve Kalkınma Teşkilatı. (2015). Average annual hours actually worked per worker. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=ANHRS, Erişim Tarihi: 01.09.2016.
  • Etzion, D., Eden, D. ve Lapidot, Y. (1998). Relief from job stressors and burnout: Reserve service as a respite. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(4), 577.
  • Falk R. F. ve Miller, N. B. (1992). A Primer for Soft Modeling. Akron, Ohio: The University of Akron Press.
  • Fassel, D. (1990). Working ourselves to death: The high cost of workaholism, the rewards of recovery. San Francisco: Harper.
  • Fenner, G. H. ve Renn, R. W. (2004). Technology-assisted supplemental work: construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management, 43, 179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20014
  • Fletcher, J. ve Bailyn, L. (1996). Challenging the last boundary: Reconnecting work and family. The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for A New Organizational Era, 256-267.
  • Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., ... Stoica, I. (2009). Above the clouds: A Berkeley view of cloud computing. Dept. Electrical Eng. and Comput. Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Rep. UCB/EECS, 28(13).
  • Galinsky, E., Kim, S. S. ve Bond, J. T. (2001). Feeling overworked: When work becomes too much. New York: Families and Work Institute.
  • Geurts, S. A. ve Demerouti, E. (2003). Work/non-work interface: A review of theories and findings. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology, 2, 279-312.
  • Geurts, S.A., Taris, T.W., Kompier, M.A.J., Dikkers, J.S.E., Van Hooff, M.L.M. ve Kinnunen, U.M. (2005). Work–home interaction from a work psychological perspective: Development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work ve Stress, 19(4), 319–339.
  • Gini, A. L. (1998). Working ourselves to death: Workaholism, stress, and fatigue. Business and Society Review, 100(1), 45-56.
  • Golden, A. G. ve Geisler, C. (2007). Work–life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations, 60(3), 519-551.
  • Goodhue, D. L. ve Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236.
  • Greenhaus, J. H. ve Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles. Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76-88.
  • Ha, J. H., Chin, B., Park, D. H., Ryu, S. H. ve Yu, J. (2008). Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(6), 783-784.
  • Hair Junior, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. ve Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Macmillan Publishing Co: New York.
  • Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N. ve Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17(3), 419-436.
  • Härmä, M. (2006). Workhours in relation to work stress, recovery and health. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(6), 502-514.
  • Harman, H. H. (1960). Modern factor analysis. (3rd Edition Revised). Chicago: University of Chicago Press Harpaz, I. ve Snir, R. (2003). Workaholism: Its definition and nature. Human Relations, 56(3), 291-319.
  • Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408-420.
  • Hill, E. J., Ferris, M. ve Märtinson, V. (2003). Does it matter where you work? A comparison of how three work venues (traditional office, virtual office, and home office) influence aspects of work and personal/family life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(2), 220-241.
  • Janssen, P. P., Peeters, M. C., de Jonge, J., Houkes, I. ve Tummers, G. E. (2004). Specific relationships between job demands, job resources and psychological outcomes and the mediating role of negative work–home interference. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(3), 411-429.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L. ve Lang, K. R. (2005). Managing the paradoxes of mobile technology. Information Systems Management, 22(4), 7-23.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. ve Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.
  • Keown, L. A. (2007). Time escapes me: Workaholics and time perception. Canadian Social Trends, 83, 28-32.
  • Killinger, B. (1991). Workaholics: The respectable addicts. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
  • Kim, D. J. (2012). An investigation of the effect of online consumer trust on expectation, satisfaction, and postexpectation. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 10(2), 219-240.
  • Kinnunen, U., Geurts, S. ve Mauno, S. (2004). Work-to-family conflict and its relationship with satisfaction and well-being: A one-year longitudinal study on gender differences. Work & Stress, 18(1), 1-22.
  • Koçak, E., Günaydin, S. C., Soysal, A., Agun, H., Erebak, S. ve Karabakkal, H. (2016). Disconnect! If you want to be connected! Euroasian Academy of Sciences Euroasian Business & Economics Journal, 2S, 695-710.
  • Koçak, Ö.E., Gülcü, İ., Demir, H. ve Kahraman, İ. (2017). İşkolik davranışlar, algılanan katkı ve yaşam doyumu ilişkisinde işte kendini yetiştirmenin aracı etkisi. IV. Örgütsel Davranış Kongresi Bildiri Kitapçığı. Antalya. 3-5 Kasım.
  • Korn, E. R., Pratt, G. J. ve Lambrou, P. T. (1987). Hyper-Performance: The AIM Strategy for Releasing Your Business Potential. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Kotecha, K. (2013). The impact of technology on work-life conflict among academics. (Unpublished Master Thesis). University of Johannesburg.
  • Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I. ve Baumann, A. (2016, June). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among "generation y" users. In ECIS (p. ResearchPaper109).
  • Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E. ve Barnes, C. M. (2014). Beginning the workday yet already depleted? Consequences of late-night smartphone use and sleep. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 21(1), 11-23.
  • Law, W. K. (Ed.). (2006). Information Resources Management: Global Challenges: Global Challenges. IGI Global.
  • Limpaphayom, W. (2011). Multitasking behaviors as incivility in the workplace. Review Literature and Arts of the Americas.
  • Matuska, K. M. (2010). Workaholism, life balance, and well-being: A comparative analysis. Journal of Occupational Science, 17(2), 104-111.
  • Mazmanian, M., Yates, J. ve Orlikowski, W. (2006, August). Ubiquitous email: Individual experiences and organizational consequences of blackberry use. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2006, No. 1, pp. D1-D6). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  • Mcmillan, L. H., O Driscoll, M. P. ve Burke, R. J. (2003). Workaholism: A review of theory, research, and future directions. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 18, 167-190.
  • Mcshane, C. J. ve Quirk, F. (2009). Mediating and moderating effects of work–home interference upon farm stresses and psychological distress. Australian Journal of Rural Health, 17(5), 244-250.
  • Metin, U. B., Taris, T. W. ve Peeters, M. C. (2016). Measuring procrastination at work and its associated workplace aspects. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 254-263.
  • Montgomery, A. J., Peeters, M. C. W., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Ouden, M. D. (2003). Work‐home interference among newspaper managers: Its relationship with burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 16(2), 195-211.
  • Mosier, S. K. (1983), Workaholics: An analysis of their stress, success and priorities. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Texas at Austin.
  • Ng, T. W., Sorensen, K. L. ve Feldman, D. C. (2007). Dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of workaholism: A conceptual integration and extension. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(1), 111-136.
  • Nixon, A. E. ve Spector, P. E. (2014). The impact of technology on employee stress, health, and well-being. In M. D. Coovert, ve L. F. Thompson (Eds.), The psychology of workplace technology (pp. 238e260). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Npr.org. http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwoway/2016/12/31/507704720/french-law-giving-workers-the-right-to-disconnect-goes-into-effect (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2017).
  • Oates, W. E. (1971). Confessions of a workaholic: The facts about work addiction. World Publishing Company.
  • Olson-Buchanan, J. B. ve Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432-445.
  • Parasuraman, S. ve Greenhaus, J. H. (1997). The changing world of work and family. Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world, 3-14.
  • Piotrowski, C. ve Vodanovich, S. J. (2006). The interface between workaholism and work-family conflict: A review and conceptual framework. Organization Development Journal, 24(4), 84.
  • Piszczek, M. M. (2017). Boundary control and controlled boundaries: Organizational expectations for technology use at the work–family interface. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(4), 592-611.
  • Preacher, K. J. ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
  • Quintanilla, S. A. R. ve Wilpert, B. (1991). Are work meanings changing?. The European Work and Organizational Psychologist, 1(2-3), 91-109.
  • Robinson, B. E., Carroll, J. J. ve Flowers, C. (2001). Marital estrangement, positive affect, and locus of control among spouses of workaholics and spouses of nonworkaholics: A national study. American Journal of Family Therapy, 29(5), 397-410.
  • Robinson, B. E., Flowers, C. ve Ng, K. M. (2006). The relationship between workaholism and marital disaffection: Husbands' perspective. The Family Journal, 14(3), 213-220.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Taris, T. W. ve Van Rhenen, W. (2008). Workaholism, burnout, and work engagement: Three of a kind or three different kinds of employee well-being? Applied Psychology, 57(2), 173-203.
  • Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B. ve Taris, T. W. (2010). How does workaholism affect worker health and performance? The Mediating Role of Coping. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), 154-160.
  • Sluiter, J. K., Frings-Dresen, M. H., van der Beek, A. J. ve Meijman, T. F. (2001). The relation between work-induced neuroendocrine reactivity and recovery, subjective need for recovery, and health status. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 50(1), 29-37.
  • Sonnentag, S. (Ed.). (2003). Psychological management of individual performance. John Wiley & Sons. doi:10.1002/0470013419
  • Sonnentag, S. ve Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204.
  • Sonnentag, S. ve Kruel, U. (2006). Psychological detachment from work during off-job time: The role of job stressors, job involvement, and recovery-related self-efficacy. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(2), 197-217.
  • Sonnentag, S. ve Zijlstra, F. R. (2006). Job characteristics and off-job activities as predictors of need for recovery, well-being, and fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 330.
  • Spence, J. T. ve Robbins, A. S. (1992). Workaholism: Definition, measurement, and preliminary results. Journal of Personality Assessment, 58(1), 160-178.
  • Taris, T. W., Geurts, S. A., Schaufeli, W. B., Blonk, R. W. ve Lagerveld, S. E. (2008). All day and all of the night: The relative contribution of two dimensions of workaholism to well-being in self-employed workers. Work & Stress, 22(2), 153-165.
  • Treadway, D. C., Duke, A. B., Perrewe, P. L., Breland, J. W. ve Goodman, J. M. (2011). Time may change me: The impact of future time perspective on the relationship between work–family demands and employee commitment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(7), 1659-1679.
  • Van Hooff, M. L., Geurts, S. A., Kompier, M. A. ve Taris, T. W. (2006). Work–home interference: How does it manifest itself from day to day?. Work & Stress, 20(2), 145-162.
  • Wajcman, J. (2008). Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. The British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 59-77.
  • Witt, L. A. ve Carlson, D. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343.
  • Yates, R. (1988), Japanese live and die for their work, Chicago Tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/1988-11-13/news/8802150740_1_karoshi-japanese-health-and-welfare, Erişim Tarihi: 07.09.2016.
  • Zheng, P. ve Ni, L. M. (2006). Spotlight: The Rise of the Smart Phone. IEEE Distributed Systems Online, 7(3), 3.
APA KOCAK Ö, EREBAK S (2019). İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. , 231 - 253.
Chicago KOCAK Ömer Erdem,EREBAK SERKAN İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. (2019): 231 - 253.
MLA KOCAK Ömer Erdem,EREBAK SERKAN İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. , 2019, ss.231 - 253.
AMA KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. . 2019; 231 - 253.
Vancouver KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. . 2019; 231 - 253.
IEEE KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S "İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ." , ss.231 - 253, 2019.
ISNAD KOCAK, Ömer Erdem - EREBAK, SERKAN. "İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ". (2019), 231-253.
APA KOCAK Ö, EREBAK S (2019). İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 0(54), 231 - 253.
Chicago KOCAK Ömer Erdem,EREBAK SERKAN İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 0, no.54 (2019): 231 - 253.
MLA KOCAK Ömer Erdem,EREBAK SERKAN İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol.0, no.54, 2019, ss.231 - 253.
AMA KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 0(54): 231 - 253.
Vancouver KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019; 0(54): 231 - 253.
IEEE KOCAK Ö,EREBAK S "İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ." Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 0, ss.231 - 253, 2019.
ISNAD KOCAK, Ömer Erdem - EREBAK, SERKAN. "İŞ AMAÇLI AKILLI TELEFON KULLANIMI VE İŞ - EV HAYATI DENGESİ İLİŞKİSİ: İŞKOLİKLEŞMENİN ARACI DEĞİŞKEN ETKİSİ". Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 54 (2019), 231-253.