Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 68 - 72 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003 İndeks Tarihi: 02-11-2020

Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites

Öz:
Concrete has a significant place in construction structures, is a material that can beeasily damaged due to incorrect design, incorrect material selection. Concrete maybe damaged by physical and chemical factors. One of these factors is the alkali-silicareaction (ASR). ASTM C1260, is a short-term test method, and ASTM C227, is a longterm test method, are used to measure effect of alkali-silica reaction. In this study,the effect of fly ash additive use with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% replacement of cementwas investigated in short- and long-term ASR test methods. For this purpose, whilesamples prepared for ASTM C1260 were kept in NaOH solution 14-days, samples prepared for ASTM C227 were waited 360-days in normal water solution. As a result;mortar bars with 20% fly ash additive ratio were classified as harmless for ASR inboth test methods.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • ASTM C1260-14 (2014). Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • ASTM C227-10 (2010). Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • Bagel L (1998). Strength and pore structure of ternary blended cement mortars containing blast furnace slag and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 28(7), 1011–1022.
  • Capra B, Bournazel JP (1995). Perspectives nouvelles pour la prise en compte des alcali-réactions dans le calcul des structures. Materials and Structures, 28(2), 71–73.
  • Demir İ, Arslan M (2013). The mechanical and microstructural properties of Li2SO4, LiNO3, Li2CO3 and LiBr added mortars exposed to alkali–silica reaction. Construction and Building Materials, 42, 64– 77.
  • Demir İ, Sevim Ö (2017). Effect of sulfate on cement mortars containing Li2SO4, LiNO3, Li2CO3 and LiBr. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 46–55.
  • Demir İ, Sevim Ö, Kalkan İ (2018). Microstructural properties of lithium-added cement mortars subjected to alkali–silica reactions. Sādhanā, 43(7), 112.
  • Diamond S, Penko M (1992). Alkali–silica reaction processes: the conversion of cement alkalies to alkali hydroxide. Proceedings of the Symposium on Durability of Concrete, ACI SP-131, 131, 153–168.
  • Dongxue L, Xinhua F, Xuequan W, Mingshu T (1997). Durability study of steel slag cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(7), 983–987.
  • Frohnsdorff G, Clifton JR, Brown PW (1978). History and status of standards relating to alkalies in hydraulic cements. ASTM International, Cement Standards-Evolution and Trends, West Conshohocken, PA.
  • Helmuth R, Stark D, Diamond S, Moranville-Regourd M (1993). Alkali– Silica Reactivity: An Overview of Research. National Research Council, Washington, DC.
  • Hobbs DW (1988). Alkali–Silica Reaction in Concrete. Thomas Telford Publishing, Michigan.
  • Monteiro PJM, Wang K, Sposito G, Dos Santos MC, de Andrade WP (1997). Influence of mineral admixtures on the alkali–aggregate reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(12), 1899–1909.
  • Ramlochan T, Thomas M, Gruber KA (2000). The effect of metakaolin on alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(3), 339–344.
  • Stanton TE (1940). Influence of cement and aggregate on concrete expansion. Engineering News-Record, 59-61.
APA SİVRİKAYA B, Demir İ, Sevim O (2020). Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. , 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
Chicago SİVRİKAYA Burak,Demir İlhami,Sevim Ozer Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. (2020): 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
MLA SİVRİKAYA Burak,Demir İlhami,Sevim Ozer Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. , 2020, ss.68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
AMA SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. . 2020; 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
Vancouver SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. . 2020; 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
IEEE SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O "Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites." , ss.68 - 72, 2020. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
ISNAD SİVRİKAYA, Burak vd. "Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites". (2020), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
APA SİVRİKAYA B, Demir İ, Sevim O (2020). Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 6(2), 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
Chicago SİVRİKAYA Burak,Demir İlhami,Sevim Ozer Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 6, no.2 (2020): 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
MLA SİVRİKAYA Burak,Demir İlhami,Sevim Ozer Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, vol.6, no.2, 2020, ss.68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
AMA SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2020; 6(2): 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
Vancouver SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics. 2020; 6(2): 68 - 72. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
IEEE SİVRİKAYA B,Demir İ,Sevim O "Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites." Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 6, ss.68 - 72, 2020. 10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003
ISNAD SİVRİKAYA, Burak vd. "Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites". Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics 6/2 (2020), 68-72. https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003