Yıl: 2020 Cilt: 46 Sayı: 2 Sayfa Aralığı: 115 - 122 Metin Dili: İngilizce DOI: 10.5152/tud.2020.19203 İndeks Tarihi: 04-11-2020

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy

Öz:
Objective: It has been reported that the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and platelet-to-lympho-cyte ratio (PLR) are higher in men with prostate cancer. We compare their use with the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, and primary circulating prostate cells (CPCs) to predict clini-cally significant prostate cancer at first biopsy in men with a PSA of 4–10 ng/mL.Material and methods: Consecutive men with suspicion of prostate cancer underwent a 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy; total serum PSA, the percentage of free PSA, prostate ultrasound to cal-culate PSA density, and absolute neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts were used for risk assessment. CPCs were detected using differential gel centrifugation and immunocytochemistry with anti-PSA and anti-P504S. A malignant CPC was defined as a cell-expressing PSA and P504S and defined as positive or negative. Biopsies were classified as indicating cancer or no cancer. Areas under the curve for each param-eter were calculated and compared, and diagnostic yields were calculated.Results: A total of 1223 men participated, and 467 (38%) had a biopsy positive for cancer, whereas 353/467 (76%) had clinically significant prostate cancer. The PLR was significantly higher in men with prostate can-cer; there was no significant difference for the SII. The areas under the curves were CPC 0.84, the percentage of free PSA was 0.79, PLR 0.65, PSA density 0.62, and SII 0.46. Neither the PLR nor the SII discriminated between patients with clinically significant prostate cancer, indolent cancer, and benign prostatic disease.Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, neither the SII nor PLR could differentiate between clinically significant prostate cancer and indolent cancer/benign disease at initial biopsy.
Anahtar Kelime:

Belge Türü: Makale Makale Türü: Araştırma Makalesi Erişim Türü: Erişime Açık
  • 1. Vickers AJ, Sjoberg DD, Ulmert D, Vertosick E, Roobol MJ, Thomp-son I, et al. Empirical estimates of prostate cancer overdiagnosis by age and prostate specific antigen. BMC Med 2014;12:26. [CrossRef]
  • 2. Finne P, Fallah M, Hakama M, Ciatto S, Hugosson J, de Koning H, et al. Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of screening for prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:3102-8. [CrossRef]
  • 3. Catalona WJ, Southwick PC, Slawin KM, Partin AW, Brawer MK, Flanigan RC, et al. Prospective evaluation of percent free PSA, PSA density and age specific PSA cut-offs for prostate cancer de-tection and staging. Urol 2000;56:255-260. [CrossRef]
  • 4. Feng L, Haibo H, Shuo G, Chen X, Qing S. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio plays an important role in prostate cancer ́s diagnosis and prognosis. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:11746-51.
  • 5. Yuksel OH, Urkmez A, Akan S, Yidirim C, Verit A. Predictive val-ue of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2015;16:6407-12. [CrossRef]
  • 6. Kawahara T, Fukui S, Sakamaki K, Ito Y, Ito H, Kobayashi N, et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts prostatic carcinoma in men undergoing needle biopsy. Oncotarget 2015;6:32169-76. [CrossRef]
  • 7. Oh JJ, Kwon O, Lee JL, Byun SS, Lee Se, Lee S, et al. Association of the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and prostate cancer detection rates in patients via contemporary multicore prostate biopsy. Asian J Androl 2016;18:937-41.
  • 8. Gokce MI, Hamidi N, Suer E, Tangal S, Huseynov A, Ibis A. Eval-uation of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio prior to prostate biopsy to predict biopsy histology: Results of 1836 patients. Can Urol Assoc J 2015;9:761-5. [CrossRef]
  • 9. Allensworth SK, Langstraat CL, Martin JR, Lemens MA, McGree ME, Weaver AL, et al. Evaluating the prognostic significance of preoperative thrombocytosis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013:130:499-504. [CrossRef]
  • 10. Josa V, Krzystanek M, Eklund AC, Salamon F, Zarand A, Szallasi Z, et al. Relationship of postoperative thrombocytosis and survival of patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Surg 2015;18:1-6. [CrossRef]
  • 11. Moreno JG, Croce CM, Fischer R, Monne M, Vikha P, Mulholland SG, et al. Detection of hematogenous micrometastasis in patients with prostate cancer. Cancer 1992;52:6110-2.
  • 12. Meyer CP, Pantel K, Tennstedt P, Stroelin P, Schlomm T, Heinzer H, et al. Limited prognostic value of preoperative circulating tu-mor cells for early biochemical recurrence in patients with local-ized prostate cancer. Urol Onc 2016;34:e11-6. [CrossRef]
  • 13. Fizazi K, Morat L, Chauveinc L, Prapotnich D, De Crevoisier R, Escudier B, et al. High detection rate of circulating tumor cells in blood of patients with prostate cancer using telomerase activity. Ann Oncol 2007;18:518-21. [CrossRef]
  • 14. Todenhofer T, Park ES, Duffy S, Deng X, Jin C, Abdi H, et al. Micro-fluidic enrichment of circulating tumor cells in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2016;34:483.e9-16. [CrossRef]
  • 15. Murray NP, Fuentealba C, Reyes E, Jacob O. A comparison of 3 on-line nomograms with the detection of primary circulating pros-tate cells to predict prostate cancer at initial biopsy. Actas Urol Esp 2017;41:234-41. [CrossRef]
  • 16. Murray NP, Reyes E, Badinez L, Orellana N, Fuentealba C, Oli-vares R, et al. Circulating prostate cells found in men with benign prostate disease are P504S negative: clinical impications. J Oncol 2013;2013:1650214. [CrossRef]
  • 17. Pantel K, Deneve E, Nocca D, Coffy A, Vendrell JP, Maudelonde T, et al. Circulating epithelial cells in patients with benign colon diseases. Clin Chem 2012;58:936-40. [CrossRef]
  • 18. Borgen E, Naume B, Nesland JM, Kvalheim G, Beiske K, Fods-tad O, et al. Standardization of the immunocytochemical detec-tion of cancer cells in BM and blood. I. Establishment of objective criteria for the evaluation of immunostained cells. Cytotherapy 1999;1:377-88. [CrossRef]
  • 19. Rubin MA, Zhou M, Dhanasekaran SM, Varambally S, Barrette TR, Sanda MG, et al. 𝛼-methylacyl Coenzyme-A racemase as a tissue biomarker for prostate cancer. JAMA 2002;287:1662-70. [CrossRef]
  • 20. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA 1994;271:368-74. [CrossRef]
  • 21. Bellardita L, Villa S, Valdagni R. Living with untreated prostate cancer: predictors of quality of life. Curr Opin Urol 2014;24:311-7. [CrossRef]
  • 22. Adhyatma KP, Warli SM. Diagnostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in prostate cancer. Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:1093-6. [CrossRef]
  • 23. Wei JT, Feng Z, Partin AW, Brown E, Thompson I, Sokoll L, et al. Can urinary PCA3 supplement PSA in the early detection of prostate cancer? J Clin Oncol 2014;32:4066-72. [CrossRef]
  • 24. Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Sanda MG, Wei JT, Klee GG, Bangma CH, et al. A multicenter study of [-2]pro-prostate specific antigen combined with prostate specific antigen and free prostate specific antigen for prostate cancer detection in the 2.0 to 10.0 ng/ml pros-tate specific antigen range. J Urol 2011;185:1650-5. [CrossRef]
  • 25. Parekh DJ, Punnen S, Sjoberg DD, Asroff SW, Bailen J, Cochran JS, et al. A multi-institutional prospective trial in the USA confirms that the 4K score accurately identifies men with high grade pros-tate cancer. Eur Urol 2015;68:464-70. [CrossRef]
  • 26. Lucarelli G, Loizzo D, Ferro M, Rutigliano M, Vartolomei D, Can-tiello F, et al. Metabolomic profiling for the identification of novel diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer: an update. Expert Rev Mol Dian 2019;19:377-87. [CrossRef]
  • 27. de Cobelli O, Terracciano D, Tagliabue E, Raimondi S, Galasso G, Cioffi A, et al. Body mass index was associated with upstaging and upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer who met the inclusión criteria for active surveillance. Urol Oncol 2015;33:201.e1-8. [CrossRef]
  • 28. Tangen CM, Schenk J, Till C, Goodman PJ, Barrington W, Lucia MS, et al. Variations in prostate biopsy recommendation and accep-tance confound evalution of risk factors for prostate cancer: examin-ing race and BMI. Cancer Epidemiol 2019;63:101619. [CrossRef]
  • 29. Murray NP, Reyes E, Fuentealba C, Aedo S, Jacob O. The presence of primary circulating prostate cells is associated with upgrading and upstaging in patients eligiable for active surveillance. Ecancer-medicalscience 2017;11:711. [CrossRef]
  • 30. Murray NP, Leighton G. Relation between body mass index and detection of circulating prostatic cells in healthy men: a pilot study. Rev Chil Nutr 2007;34:346-51.
  • 31. Ferro M, Musi G, Serino A, Cozzi G, Mistretta FA, Costa B, et al. Neutrophil, platelets and eosinophil to lymphocyte ratios pre-dict Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer. Urol Int 2019;102:43-50. [CrossRef]
APA Murray N, Fuentealba Sudy C, SALAZAR A, Reyes E (2020). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. , 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Chicago Murray Nigel P,Fuentealba Sudy Cynthia,SALAZAR ANIBAL,Reyes Eduardo Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. (2020): 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
MLA Murray Nigel P,Fuentealba Sudy Cynthia,SALAZAR ANIBAL,Reyes Eduardo Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. , 2020, ss.115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
AMA Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. . 2020; 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Vancouver Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. . 2020; 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
IEEE Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E "Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy." , ss.115 - 122, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
ISNAD Murray, Nigel P vd. "Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy". (2020), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.19203
APA Murray N, Fuentealba Sudy C, SALAZAR A, Reyes E (2020). Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology, 46(2), 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Chicago Murray Nigel P,Fuentealba Sudy Cynthia,SALAZAR ANIBAL,Reyes Eduardo Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology 46, no.2 (2020): 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
MLA Murray Nigel P,Fuentealba Sudy Cynthia,SALAZAR ANIBAL,Reyes Eduardo Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology, vol.46, no.2, 2020, ss.115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
AMA Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(2): 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
Vancouver Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2020; 46(2): 115 - 122. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
IEEE Murray N,Fuentealba Sudy C,SALAZAR A,Reyes E "Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy." Turkish Journal of Urology, 46, ss.115 - 122, 2020. 10.5152/tud.2020.19203
ISNAD Murray, Nigel P vd. "Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index versus circulating prostate cells to predict significant prostate cancer at first biopsy". Turkish Journal of Urology 46/2 (2020), 115-122. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.19203